I'm trying to use DotNetZipLib-DevKit-v1.9 in my MVC3 Project to extract the files to a specific folder.
What i want is -- How to add multiple entries in zip.SelectEntries method.
Here is my code in controller action:
public ActionResult ExtractZip(string fileName, HttpPostedFileBase fileData)
{
string zipToUnpack = #"C:\Users\Public\Pictures\Sample Pictures\images.zip";
string unpackDirectory = System.IO.Path.GetTempPath();
using (ZipFile zip1 = ZipFile.Read(zipToUnpack))
{
// here, we extract every entry, but we could extract conditionally
// based on entry name, size, date, checkbox status, etc.
var collections = zip1.SelectEntries("name=*.jpg;*.jpeg;*.png;*.gif;");//This shows `0` items in collections
foreach (var item in collections)
{
item.Extract(unpackDirectory, ExtractExistingFileAction.OverwriteSilently);
}
}
return Json(true);
}
In this line var collections = zip1.SelectEntries("name=*.jpg;*.jpeg;*.png;*.gif;"); if i specify only single extension ,it works fine
ex:
var collections = zip1.SelectEntries("name=*.gif"); this works good
I've also seen SelectEntries method here, but it doesn't help though
How to add multiple entries ?
Finally i could answer my own question.
Inorder to select multiple entries we need to use OR and to select multiple entries use the following code:
var collections = zip1.SelectEntries("(name=*.jpg) OR (name=*.jpeg) OR (name=*.png) OR (name=*.gif)");
foreach (var item in collections)
{
item.Extract(unpackDirectory, ExtractExistingFileAction.OverwriteSilently);
}
Related
I am trying to learn how to submit multiple selections from a list to the model created between two data models. I have tried the following:
var tag = context.TagInformation.Find(model.Tags[0]);
var newlyCreatedUser = context.Users.Find(user.Id);
newlyCreatedUser.TagInfo = new List<TagInformation>(0) { tag };
context.SaveChanges();
I have also tried the following:
var tags = new List<TagInformation>();
foreach (var tag in model.Tags)
{
var tag= context.TagInformation.Find(model.Tags[0]);
if (tag != null)
{
tags.Add(tag);
}
}
var newlyCreatedUser = context.Users.Find(user.Id);
newlyCreatedUser.TagInfo = tags;
context.SaveChanges();
I have searched on Google and tried to find what value I need to change here in order to save all selected values from model.Tags, but currently only the first selected value is saved. To my understanding, the [0] is causing it to only save the first selected tag. I need to automatically save any combination of selected tags from the List, regardless of how many tags are in the list.
I can see that all of the select tags are loaded during debugging, and the foreach statement gets passed through for each selected id, but still only saves the first tag selected in the list.
What must I change to obtain this result and where can I find documentation to help me understand? Thanks in advance.
var tag= context.TagInformation.Find(model.Tags[0]);
this line of code always select the first tag, you should do something like
var tag= context.TagInformation.Find(tag);
I am trying to find a way to pass in an optional string list to a query. What I am trying to do is filter a list of tags by the relationship between them. For example if c# was selected my program would suggest only tags that appear in documents with a c# tag and then on the selection of the next, say SQL, the tags that are linked to docs for those two tags together would be shown, whittling it down so that the user can get closer and closer to his goal.
At the moment all I have is:
List<Tag> _tags = (from t in Tags
where t.allocateTagDoc.Count > 0
select t).ToList();
This is in a method that would be called repeatedly with the optional args as tags were selected.
I think I have been coming at it arse-backwards. If I make two(or more) queries one for each supplied tag, find the docs where they all appear together and then bring out all the tags that go with them... Or would that be too many hits on the db? Can I do it entirely through an entity context variable and just query the model?
Thanks again for any help!
You can try this.
First collect tag to search in a list of strings .
List<string> tagStrings = new List<string>{"c#", "sql"};
pass this list in your query, check whether it is empty or not, if empty, it will return all the tags, else tags which matches the tagStrings.
var _tags = (from t in Tags
where t.allocateTagDoc.Count > 0
&& (tagStrings.Count ==0 || tagStrings.Contains(t.tagName))
select t).ToList();
You can also try this, Dictionary represents ID of a document with it's tags:
Dictionary<int, string[]> documents =
new Dictionary<int, string[]>();
documents.Add(1, new string[] { "C#", "SQL", "EF" });
documents.Add(2, new string[] { "C#", "Interop" });
documents.Add(3, new string[] { "Javascript", "ASP.NET" });
documents.Add(4, new string[] { });
// returns tags belonging to documents with IDs 1, 2
string[] filterTags = new string[] { "C#" };
var relatedTags = GetRelatedTags(documents, filterTags);
Debug.WriteLine(string.Join(",", relatedTags));
// returns tags belonging to document with ID 1
filterTags = new string[] { "C#", "SQL" };
relatedTags = GetRelatedTags(documents, filterTags);
Debug.WriteLine(string.Join(",", relatedTags));
// returns tags belonging to all documents
// since no filtering tags are specified
filterTags = new string[] { };
relatedTags = GetRelatedTags(documents, filterTags);
Debug.WriteLine(string.Join(",", relatedTags));
public static string[] GetRelatedTags(
Dictionary<int, string[]> documents,
string[] filterTags)
{
var documentsWithFilterTags = documents.Where(o =>
filterTags
.Intersect(o.Value).Count() == filterTags.Length);
string[] relatedTags = new string[0];
foreach (string[] tags in documentsWithFilterTags.Select(o => o.Value))
relatedTags = relatedTags
.Concat(tags)
.Distinct()
.ToArray();
return relatedTags;
}
Thought I would pop back and share my solution which was completely different to what I first had in mind.
First I altered the database a little getting rid of a useless field in the allocateDocumentTag table which enabled me to use the entity framework model much more efficiently by allowing me to leave that table out and access it purely through the relationship between Tag and Document.
When I fill my form the first time I just display all the tags that have a relationship with a document. Using my search filter after that, when a Tag is selected in a checkedListBox the Document id's that are associated with that Tag(s) are returned and are then fed back to fill the used tag listbox.
public static List<Tag> fillUsed(List<int> docIds = null)
{
List<Tag> used = new List<Tag>();
if (docIds == null || docIds.Count() < 1)
{
used = (from t in frmFocus._context.Tags
where t.Documents.Count >= 1
select t).ToList();
}
else
{
used = (from t in frmFocus._context.Tags
where t.Documents.Any(d => docIds.Contains(d.id))
select t).ToList();
}
return used;
}
From there the tags feed into the doc search and vice versa. Hope this can help someone else, if the answer is unclear or you need more code then just leave a comment and I'll try and sort it.
I'm working with the OOB blog sites in SP2010. I'm using SPMetal to generate entity classes for the Posts list (among others). I've used a parameters.xml file to get the other columns that I need that aren't included by default.
One of the things that I want to do is to get the users' My Site url. I am able to do this with CAML relatively easily. However I need to do it using Linq. I can't figure out how to get the login id (i.e. domain\id) for the Author Field. I've looked through the Contact content type and it doesn't appear to have anything to help.
Has anyone run across this or gotten the login id for a user with SPMetal?
if you create Entity of Posts list using SPMetel.exe and if in Posts list having Suppose Field Type is User than automatically return two methods of like LookupId and LookupValue.
In my case : I have take promoterid As a Field name in Posts list in in my Entity having two method
private System.Nullable<int> _promoterId;
private string _promoter;
[Microsoft.SharePoint.Linq.ColumnAttribute(Name="promoterid", Storage="_promoterId", FieldType="User", IsLookupId=true)]
public System.Nullable<int> PromoterId {
get {
return this._promoterId;
}
set {
if ((value != this._promoterId)) {
this.OnPropertyChanging("PromoterId", this._promoterId);
this._promoterId = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged("PromoterId");
}
}
}
[Microsoft.SharePoint.Linq.ColumnAttribute(Name="promoterid", Storage="_promoter", ReadOnly=true, FieldType="User", IsLookupValue=true)]
public string Promoter {
get {
return this._promoter;
}
set {
if ((value != this._promoter)) {
this.OnPropertyChanging("Promoter", this._promoter);
this._promoter = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged("Promoter");
}
}
}
than after i can able to use using linq query
i.e
SPWeb oWebsiteRoot = SPContext.Current.Web;
EntitiesDataContext objent = new EntitiesDataContext(oWebsiteRoot.Url);
EntityList<PostsItem> evnitems = objent.GetList<PostsItem>("Posts");
var i = from item in evnitems
where item.PromoterId == SPContext.Current.Web.CurrentUser.ID
select item;
I have a function inside a class that will run a Linq to Entities query (or any type of Linq query actually), and it's gonna return 2 columns in the resultset. I would like to return an object to whoever is calling my function that will allow Intellisense to know what I have returned.
Let me explain. If I have a function like this:
public static IQueryable GetInfo(MyEntityModel oEntityModel)
{
var query =
(from t in oEntityModel.Table1
from u in t.Table2
where t.Status == true &&
u.Status == true
select new
{
t.Column1,
u.Column2
})
return query;
}
What can (should) I put instead of IQueryable so that whoever calls my GetInfo function, will get Intellisense from the resultset, and show that it has a Column1 and Column2?
var linqresult = ClsLinqTeste.GetInfo(oEntityModel);
if (linqresult.Column1 == 1)
{
foreach (var oItem in linqresult)
{
.. do stuff...
}
}
Tks
You cannot return an anonymous type from a function, they are strictly "inline" classes. When you return it, the foreach loop will only be able to interpret the result as an plain object. I guess you could use reflection to query the property names and values, however it seems much more straight forward to define a data transfer type to hold the results.
See this question, and this blog post.
So you could create a simple struct or class:
public class MyDataResult
{
public object Column1 { get; set; }
public object Column2 { get; set; }
}
Then modify your query in the function:
public static IQueryable<MyDataResult> GetInfo(MyEntityModel oEntityModel)
{
var query =
(from t in oEntityModel.Table1
from u in t.Table2
where t.Status == true &&
u.Status == true
select new MyDataResult
{
Column1 = t.Column1,
Column2 = u.Column2
})
return query;
}
Something like that should work. Note that I used "object" for the properties in MyDataResult. I don't know the types of the columns you are returning, you should use the actual types in order to get full intellisense.
You are returning a collection of anonymous types, they will be casted to objects, so when you try to iterate over them, altough they will be your objects (and they will contain your properties) at compile time they will be casted to objects:
foreach (var x in ClsLinqTeste.GetInfo(oEntityModel))
{
//x is an Object
}
You can read more about it here.
If you want to have intellisense, I suggest you create a custom class they will hold your properties and return not an anonymous type (using new {}) but object of your class (new MyClass(prop1, prop2)). You also need to change signature of your method, so it returns IQueryable<YourClass> and not just plain non-generic IQueryable.
As others have said, creating a new type to hold the two columns is usually the best option.
But if, for some reason, you don't want to do that and you are using .Net 4.0, you can use Tuple:
public static IQueryable<Tuple<Column1Type, Column2Type>>
GetInfo(MyEntityModel oEntityModel)
{
return from …
select Tuple.Create(t.Column1, u.Column2);
}
var linqresult = ClsLinqTeste.GetInfo(oEntityModel);
foreach (var oItem in linqresult)
Console.WriteLIne(oItem.Item1, oItem.Item2);
When you return your resultset AsQueryable, the app is already able to give you intellisense, however in your example, you must specify either .FirstOrDefault if you know your collection will only have a single row, or iterate over your collection to get the items from it, like so:
This is what you're doing:
var linqresult = ClsLinqTeste.GetInfo(oEntityModel);
if (linqresult.Column1 == 1)
{
..do stuff...
}
This is how you should do it:
var linqresult = ClsLinqTeste.GetInfo(oEntityModel);
foreach(var item in linqresult)
{
if (item.Column1 == 1)
{
..do stuff...
}
}
You must iterate over linqresult because when you query with link, it returns a result set, even if it just has one column. As with any collection, your data columns aren't available on the whole result set, only with individual items.
If you want to strongly typed enumerate a non-generic IEnumerable (IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() instead of IEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator<T>()) you can use the Cast<>() extension, like so
var myquery = GetQueryable();
for (var item in myquery.Cast<MyDataType>())
{
// use item.Column1 directly and strongly typed with intellisense
}
I have two tables in my database connected by foreign keys: Page (PageId, other data) and PageTag (PageId, Tag). I've used LINQ to generate classes for these tables, with the page as the parent and the Tag as the child collection (one to many relationship). Is there any way to mark PageTag records for deletion from the database from within the Page class?
Quick Clearification:
I want the child objects to be deleted when the parent DataContext calls SubmitChanges(), not before. I want TagString to behave exactly like any of the other properties of the Page object.
I would like to enable code like the following:
Page page = mDataContext.Pages.Where(page => page.pageId = 1);
page.TagString = "new set of tags";
//Changes have not been written to the database at this point.
mDataContext.SubmitChanges();
//All changes should now be saved to the database.
Here is my situation in detail:
In order to make working with the collection of tags easier, I've added a property to the Page object that treats the Tag collection as a string:
public string TagString {
get {
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
foreach (PageTag tag in PageTags) {
output.Append(tag.Tag + " ");
}
if (output.Length > 0) {
output.Remove(output.Length - 1, 1);
}
return output.ToString();
}
set {
string[] tags = value.Split(' ');
PageTags.Clear();
foreach (string tag in tags) {
PageTag pageTag = new PageTag();
pageTag.Tag = tag;
PageTags.Add(pageTag);
}
}
}
Basically, the idea is that when a string of tags is sent to this property, the current tags of the object are deleted and a new set is generated in their place.
The problem I'm encountering is that this line:
PageTags.Clear();
Doesn't actually delete the old tags from the database when changes are submitted.
Looking around, the "proper" way to delete things seems to be to call the DeleteOnSubmit method of the data context class. But I don't appear to have access to the DataContext class from within the Page class.
Does anyone know of a way to mark the child elements for deletion from the database from within the Page class?
After some more research, I believe I've managed to find a solution. Marking an object for deletion when it's removed from a collection is controlled by the DeleteOnNull parameter of the Association attribute.
This parameter is set to true when the relationship between two tables is marked with OnDelete Cascade.
Unfortunately, there is no way to set this attribute from within the designer, and no way to set it from within the partial class in the *DataContext.cs file. The only way to set it without enabling cascading deletes is to manually edit the *DataContext.designer.cs file.
In my case, this meant finding the Page association, and adding the DeleteOnNull property:
[Association(Name="Page_PageTag", Storage="_Page", ThisKey="PageId", OtherKey="iPageId", IsForeignKey=true)]
public Page Page
{
...
}
And adding the DeleteOnNull attribute:
[Association(Name="Page_PageTag", Storage="_Page", ThisKey="PageId", OtherKey="iPageId", IsForeignKey=true, DeleteOnNull = true)]
public Page Page
{
...
}
Note that the attribute needed to be added to the Page property of the PageTag class, not the other way around.
See also:
Beth Massi -- LINQ to SQL and One-To-Many Relationships
Dave Brace -- LINQ to SQL: DeleteOnNull
Sorry, my bad. That won't work.
It really looks like you need to be doing this in your repository, rather than in your Page class. There, you have access to your original data context.
There is a way to "attach" the original data context, but by the time you do that, it has become quite the code smell.
Do you have a relationship, in your Linq to SQL entity diagram, linking the Page and PageTags tables? If you don't, that is why you can't see the PageTags class from the Page class.
If the foreign key in the PageTags database table is set to Allow Nulls, Linq to SQL will not create the link when you drag the tables into the designer, even if you created a relationship on the SQL Server.
This is one of those areas where OR mapping can get kind of hairy. Providing this TagString property makes things a bit more convenient, but in the long run it obfuscates what is really happening when someone utilizes the TagString property. By hiding the fact that your performing data modification, someone can very easily come along and set the TagString without using your Page entity within the scope of a DataContext, which could lead to some difficult to find bugs.
A better solution would be to add a Tags property on the Page class with the L2S model designer, and require that the PageTags be edited directly on the Tags property, within the scope of a DataContext. Make the TagString property read only, so it can be genreated (and still provide some convenience), but eliminate the confusion and difficulty around setting that property. This kind of change clarifies intent, and makes it obvious what is happening and what is required by consumers of the Page object to make it happen.
Since Tags is a property of your Page object, as long as it is attached to a DataContext, any changes to that collection will properly trigger deletions or insertions in the database in response to Remove or Add calls.
Aaron,
Apparently you have to loop thru your PageTag records, calling DeleteOnSubmit for each one. Linq to SQL should create an aggregate query to delete all of the records at once when you call SubmitChanges, so overhead should be minimal.
replace
PageTags.Clear();
with
foreach (PageTag tag in PageTags)
myDataContext.DeleteOnSubmit(tag);
Aaron:
Add a DataContext member to your PageTag partial class.
partial class PageTag
{
DataClassesDataContext myDataContext = new DataClassesDataContext();
public string TagString {
..etc.
Larger code sample posted at Robert Harvey's request:
DataContext.cs file:
namespace MyProject.Library.Model
{
using Tome.Library.Parsing;
using System.Text;
partial class Page
{
//Part of Robert Harvey's proposed solution.
MyDataContext mDataContext = new TomeDataContext();
public string TagString {
get {
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
foreach (PageTag tag in PageTags) {
output.Append(tag.Tag + " ");
}
if (output.Length > 0) {
output.Remove(output.Length - 1, 1);
}
return output.ToString();
}
set {
string[] tags = value.Split(' ');
//Original code, fails to mark for deletion.
//PageTags.Clear();
//Robert Harvey's suggestion, thorws exception "Cannot remove an entity that has not been attached."
foreach (PageTag tag in PageTags) {
mDataContext.PageTags.DeleteOnSubmit(tag);
}
foreach (string tag in tags) {
PageTag PageTag = new PageTag();
PageTag.Tag = tag;
PageTags.Add(PageTag);
}
}
}
private bool mIsNew;
public bool IsNew {
get {
return mIsNew;
}
}
partial void OnCreated() {
mIsNew = true;
}
partial void OnLoaded() {
mIsNew = false;
}
}
}
Repository Methods:
public void Save() {
mDataContext.SubmitChanges();
}
public Page GetPage(string pageName) {
Page page =
(from p in mDataContext.Pages
where p.FileName == pageName
select p).SingleOrDefault();
return page;
}
Usage:
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult Edit(string pageName, FormCollection formValues) {
Page updatedPage = mRepository.GetPage(pageName);
//TagString is a Form value, and is set via UpdateModel.
UpdateModel(updatedPage, formValues.ToValueProvider());
updatedPage.FileName = pageName;
//At this point NO changes should have been written to the database.
mRepository.Save();
//All changes should NOW be saved to the database.
return RedirectToAction("Index", "Pages", new { PageName = pageName });
}