There is DataSourceRequest class in KendoUI framework. It has Filters collection that allows to get filtering Expressions for each filter configured in grid. Is there alternative class to DataSourceRequest that contains all the grid data in "plain", not parsed format, without ability to build expressions but with all the form data "as is"?
There is no such class built-in. You can however easily get the raw data from the Request object.
It's probably a better idea to override Telerik's DataSourceRequest model binder to implement the functionality that you want.
Related
so many pages and links i found, but none of them have clear answer. Even spring docs doesn't say anything about it.
So which one to use on what context?
Model is an interface that defines methods for adding/removing attributes.
From the javadoc:
Primarily designed for adding attributes to the model. Allows for
accessing the overall model as a java.util.Map.
ModelMap is just a Map implementation used for storing values that will be used in the UI.
ModelAndView is an object that combines a Model object (for storing values that will be used in the UI) and a View (used for resolving UIs components like jsp or templates). It was designed to provide both model and view in a single return.
I usually add objects in my jsp requestScopes using Controllers.
For example, if I need to list categories in "localhost/products/viewall", I simply change my ProductsController adding something like
#RequestMapping("/products/viewall")
public void viewCategories(Model model) {
List<Category> categories = service.findAllCategories();
model.addAttribute("categories", categories);
}
so, this method adds a list of categories to my requestScope.
I need to do the same, but for all the pages of the website (since the variable I need will be used in the layout of the site).
How can I add something to all the pages requestScopes with Spring?
I think you have at least two possible options for this:
Using an MVC Interceptor. With an interceptor you can perform common operations for all requests. You can extend HandlerInterceptorAdapter and add common model data in postHandle
Using the #ModelAttribute annotation within an Controller. You can use this to add common data for all request mappings within a controller. You can also use an #ControllerAdvice (with #ModelAttribute annotated methods inside) if you want provide model data to all controllers. The section Using #ModelAttribute on a method should provide some additional information for this.
Already checked this question but didn't answer.
Background
I have a fully functional RESTful web service written using ASP.NET Web API and it currently supports CORS effectively for cross-origin access from browsers that support CORS. Problem is that current business needs require support of browsers that don't support CORS. I am adding JSON-P support to my web service in addition to supporting CORS and through the magic of action selectors and type formatters, my actual web service code hasn't changed....yet.
Currently I use nested POCO objects (objects that contain other objects) as parameters, for example, for my Post actions. Since I'm supporting XML and JSON incoming, the POST data gets deserialized nicely into the POCO objects, since both XML and JSON support nested deserialization. But to support JSON-P, I have to now emulate a POST through Query Parameters. Getting to the Post action method is successful via an httpMethod Query Parameter and a custom action selector.
Question(s)
First of all, and I ask this after reading responses to other questions, will the registered type formatters even access the Query Parameters for deserializing if I have no request body? The JSON-P request is going to be a simple GET request with no body, so I'm not even sure if it is possible to have a POCO in my action parameter and have it deserialized with a GET request and only Query Parameters.
EDIT: Looks like I may be able to do some MediaTypeFormatter magic with a custom formatter and using the QueryStringMapping. Not sure yet though.
Second, is it possible to deserialize Query Parameters into nested properties of the POCO object? And if so, what is the naming convention for Query Parameters to do this? For example XML of Bob would get deserialized into Message.User.FirstName if the action parameter was of type Message.
EDIT: FormUrlEncodedMediaTypeFormatter has some of the functionality that I want if I could just redirect it to use the Query String instead of the body. But I also don't want a JToken object -- I'd like my POCO, but I think I can deserialize a JToken with JSON.NET. So I'm probably going to steal the code from FormUrlEncodedMediaTypeFormatter and the relate internal class FormUrlEncodedJson to make a custom formatter. Just need to make sure question #1 is possible first.
Example POCOs
public class User
{
public string FirstName { get; set;}
}
public class Message
{
public User User { get; set; }
}
Example "standard" RESTful POST
POST /api/messages
Content-Type: text/xml
<Message><User><FirstName>Bob</FirstName></User></Message>
Example Hypothetical JSON-P Simulated POST
<script type="text/javascript"
src="https://api.mydomain.com/api/messages?callback=MyCallback&httpMethod=Post&User.FirstName=Bob">
</script>
EDIT: Overall Goal: I'm trying to leave the action methods alone right now if possible since they currently handle RESTful CORS-enabled requests. My goal is to add JSON-P support to the calls without changing the method signature. I've got that mostly accomplished; all I have left is being able to deserialize the Query Parameters into the action method parameters when it's a JSON-P request.
Try adding [FromUri] to your action definition, i.e.:
public HttpResponseMessage YourAction([FromUri] YourModel model)
{
...
}
At this point in time it seems that I must create two different paths in the API. Because of the way request parameter deserialization works, and model binding vs. media type formatters, and the lack of a hook in this particular area, I cannot have one single Web API method and have the parameters taken from either the query string or the content based upon various request factors.
I need to the ignore the serialization (JSon/Jackson and XML/XStream) of some attributes from my object response based on user input/or Spring security roles (like you don't have permission to see the content of this field, but all others are ok etc). How is the best approach to do this in Spring MVC Rest?
Other approach is show only the attributes that are relevant for the api user, like described here http://googlecode.blogspot.com.br/2010/03/making-apis-faster-introducing-partial.html
If you are using Jackson, here are some possible options to modify the Json serialization:
Use the #JsonIgnore annotation - However, this is static filtering, and will not allow you to implement rule-based filtering as you appear to need
Use #JsonFilter - This will allow you to implement an interface in which you can provide your serialization filtering logic. You may find this to be too heavyweight of a solution.
The way I often solve this is to return a Map from my Controller methods instead of the underlying object. You can write processing code that puts the relevant fields from the object into the Map, therefore giving you complete control over what is serialized. You could include a method on the Object to do the conversion. The method could look something like this:
// RequestObj is whatever 'input' object that indicates what should be filtered
public Map<String,Object> convertToMapForRequest(RequestObj request){
// Build return map based on 'this' and request
}
I have a scenario where I have a list of filters that inherit from the same base class (BaseFilter). This are rendered in a few with different templates in a certain order based on what the user chooses. What is the best way to grab that data via javascript and submit it via an ajax request to a strongly typed List<IBaseFilter> in the ActionResult. Should I use a model binder and if so how with a list of IFilters?
public ActionResult Save(List<IFilter> filters)
{
}
public FirstFilter : BaseFilter {
// Has Two Properties
}
public SecondFilter : BaseFilter {
// Has One Property
}
Casting from child to parent means that you loose all child properties, and you only get parent properties. If you model bind filters to IFilter then only properties existing in IFilter would be available to you. I recommend that you create two action methods, and save filters consecutively, if possible, and use strongly-typed model binding in those actions. Another options might be to send data to the action method, but extract information manually from HTTP request, rather than letting ASP.NET MVC bind incoming parameters to your List<IFilter> parameter.
Basically Binders get what's in the FormCollection, and convert them to nice model objects for you. You probably can create a customized binder (IModelBinder implementation) to do all that for you. See this post to get an idea on how they work.