Everytime I deploy my ClickOnce application it creates a bunch of directories with a single dll inside it.
It doesn't even use them and I'm not sure how to disable their creation.
Actual Directory http://imageshack.us/a/img818/6347/folderstructure.png
Each time I open it them it's just ONE dll in there.
Actual Directory http://imageshack.us/a/img15/6027/directoryb.png
This is the actual working directory. I can delete the other folders manually, but I'm not sure what I need to do to make sure the clickonce deployment doesn't create the other directories.
Actual Directory http://imageshack.us/a/img11/573/actualdirectory.png
Any idea on how to disable the Clickonce installer to not create the other directories?
Thanks,
Raff
I was able to clean the list out by going through each project and modifying the assembly information so that it was not com enabled and all the fields filled. out.
Hopefully this will help anyone else that might find a similar issue.
Related
The project setting Debugging / Working Directory in Visual Studio 20015 will be saved by default in the *.user file wich I don't check in in to my repo because it's user specific. Still, I would like to have something other than $(ProjectDir) standing there when I do a clean checkout of my project. Is there an other place to store the Working Directory besides the *.user file?
Edit 1: The original idea is that I have a solution with multiple projects and all the binaries (dlls and exes) created end up in a folder called bin. If I want to debug it, I don't want to always edit the working directory again after a clean checkout.
Edit 2: In a post build step of every project within my solution, I copy the binaries in to the bin folder. If I start one of the executables from within VS, it starts them from the $(ProjectDir) folder, and of course not from the bin folder. This is why it does not find the dlls and why I want to set the working directory. I could change the output directory of my projects but then I get a lot of files ending up in the bin folder I don't want there. I will try it anyway; maybe I missed something. To be continued...
Edit 3: As expected, if I change the output directory to the bin folder, everything works fine except for some extra files that end up there and I don't want that (e.g. *.pbo, which would be okay, *.iobj, *.ipdb, etc.) Maybe that is the price I have to pay, but I don't like it.
So, the question remains: How can I have more control over which file ends up where after a build and still be able to run it from VS without changing the working dir?
The working directory should not have to be the directory that contains your DLLs. In fact, you definitely don't want that to be a requirement for running your application. Not only is it a hugely unexpected failure mode, but it could also be a potential security risk.
Put the required DLLs in the same directory as your application's executable. That's the first place that the loader will look. If necessary, use a post-build event in your library projects to copy them there.
Well since no body can help me I decided that I will change the output directory to the bin folder so VS will start my applications from the correct folder.
And how I can get rid of all the extra files that don't belong there I will find a way later.
I am creating a WIX installer project. During one managed customized action, I need to create a file (other than the deployed files specified in the components of WIX) in the installation folder, which by default is the Program Files folder. I am experiencing the "Access denied" problem in Windows 7. After some searching, I found out that people say it is not advisable to create files into Program Files folder. Instead, try to create files into for example AppData folder. For example, see this link:
C# Access denied to path in a Windows Application
But my question is, the generated file is crucial to our SW, so it must reside in the installation folder. Isn't it the target of SW installation, I mean, to create file in most of the cases Program Files folder? Does it mean the only files should be added into installation folder, during the installation, are the deployed files (basically the targets of XCopy)?
My file can't be made deploy-able in the WIX, i.e, it can't be made ready before the installation. So what's the proper way or best practice to handle such situation: a file must be generated during the installation, into the installation folder. It is not some log file that I can put somewhere else. I tried to create a Permission element in WIX for the INSTALLADIR, although it seems to be against the rule mentioned in the link, but it still failed. Thanks!
UPDATE:
Based one MichaelUrman's commen, some more information. The generated file is needed after the SW is installed and necessary during normal launch of the SW. And I think it needs to be modified during normal use after the installation. And as I mentioned my a comment to #caveman_dick answer, my CA is actually in commit phase, I don't know whether there is any difference between it and normal deferred CA
Set the custom action to Execute="deferred", that will run the command elevated and should give it the required permissions to create the file.
Since you need to update that file from the main application, and I'm assuming your application does not require elevated privileges, you have three options.
The first is the worst: without a manifest, your executable's attempts to write to the Program Files folder will typically result in it being redirected to the Virtual Store (see File Virtualization). It sounds like this isn't happening in your case, so you can't use it.
The second option is to modify the application to store this in an appropriate location such as the ProgramData folder, or Common Documents, or (if appropriate) a per-user location under LocalAppData. This is typically the best approach, but has the highest development costs.
Finally the third option is to create the file and change its permissions (or in some cases to change the permissions on the folder containing the file), allowing limited users to modify this file. See LockPermissions or MsiLockPermissionsEx for the Windows Installer way to approach this. Change the permissions on as few files or folders, as restricted as possible, to keep the system as safe as possible if you go with this option.
In the main project of my VS Solution I have a Resources folder with some required external tools. When building and publishing the solution, I get a .\Resources* with all required files there.
So far so good.
However I have to move some files to the parent directory.
My first attempt was do so with the Post Build Events. It works and does move them the correct folder.
Nevertheless in the publish output they still appear in the Resources folder and I need them in the parent one :/
Is there any way to setup the target output path for resources in Visual Studio?
After some research and experimental, I solved my problem.
Still, here's what I learned in the process.
The first attempt was adding the file to the project root and mark it as a resource. After publishing it worked. But having those files in the project root its lame.
Since I needed some *.exe files compiled in another VS solution, added them as a project reference. Gave it a try and it passed the "Publish" test. But still.. not the best way to do it.
After that, with some scripting and a post-build event, I copied the required files to the correct folder. Works.. but after publishing, they don't appear in the package.
However, there is still a possibility with the Mage tool:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/acz3y3te.aspx
This lead to some promissing experiments, however they ended up helping me realize how limited the MS ClickOnce is, so I decided to try other tools.
Here's a good start to follow:
What alternatives are there to ClickOnce?
I had a similar situation once. I found it became more trouble than it was worth to customize output paths and such in Visual Studio, to the extent that I wanted.
I ended up letting Visual Studio do its own thing with regards to file/project structure, and wrote a post-build script to copy everything that was needed into a final, 'publish-ready' directory.
I then set the execution target in Visual Studio to the new location, so I could run/debug as normal, but with the new folder that was organized how I needed it. Careful, I think this is a user project setting; so other developers will need to do this on their machines too, if they so desire.
I do recall changing some output paths and such to make the post-build script more simple. But changing things like that can lead to annoyances when you add new projects to the solution; you might need to configure them to match. It's all a trade-off :)
Two ideas:
Maybe you could move your resources into another project - a project just for resources - and then set their Build Action to Content and Copy To Output to true. Then reference this new project and build the solution. (This may not work as you want, just an idea).
Why not make your resources embedded resources instead. Keep them all within the Resources\ directory and access them programatically?
I'm working through installing the N2 content management framework in an ASP.NET website project.
The instructions at http://n2cms.com/Documentation/Content-enabling%20an%20existing%20site/The%20first%20content%20class.aspx recommend I create a lib folder to hold the required dlls. The very next step asks me to reference those same dlls - which will presumably add them to the bin folder! Thus my project will contain duplication copies of the dlls.
Can anyone suggest why this recommendation has been made?
Thanks
David
The project will not contain duplicates. The bin folder is where the output goes, but it is not considered part of your actual project and is not checked into source control.
By placing the DLLs in a lib folder, it makes it easier to distribute them with the source of your application and ensures that anyone else who gets a copy of your code, whether you send it to them or they grab it from source control, has the necessary DLLs to run the application. It also ensures that they are use the same version of the components that you used to create the software. If the DLLs require licensing, it can be a different story because anyone who wants to compile the project would need the licensing component for the DLLs installed on their workstation.
Basically, the main benefit I see is that it keeps all components used by your code in the same place, making your project one whole unit.
If you add the DLLs to the bin folder, then one day decide to clean your project, they will disappear... So it's good practice to keep your reference DLLs out of the bin folder.
Actually there's quite a few ways the DLLs can be accidentally removed from the bin folder. Just think of the bin folder as a transient location, the contents of which can be refreshed at a moment's notice.
During the build process all relevant files will be copied to the bin folder, including config files, content files marked for copy to the output folder, and of course, any referenced DLLs marked for Copy Local.
If the duplicate locations bother you, you can keep the DLLs in another folder, and just add the containing folder path to the PrivateBinPath of the current AppDomain, which will ensure they get loaded without requiring the Copy Local property.
I am developing a package using Installshield 2008 Primer Edition and Project type is Installscript MSI project.
The problem I am facing is during installation I am installing some of the files to the following location C:\Program Files\Company\SystemFiles from this location I am copying and adding the set of files into System32 folder, it contains DLLs and OCX files, copying into the System32 folder has been done using Installscript.
Due to this during uninstallation, the installed file is getting removed from System32 due to this other dependent application which requires the same set of DLLs have stopped working.
I have approached Installscript to copy files from ProgramFiles to System32 Folder rather than using built-in options because we have an issue during the upgrade in order to avoid that I am using Installscript.
Even I have tried several workarounds like setting the file attributes after file copies to System32 using Installscript like FILE_ATTR_SYSTEM which sets the system attribute but still files are getting removed during uninstallation.
Any idea how to give file attributes as PERMANENT or SHARED; will this help, and if it will, then how can I set it using Installscript?
I have 2 ideas
1)I think you can use SHARED option as this wont remove the files while uninstallation.
2)Also when i was facing similar issue , what i did was putting all the required files in the installation directory itself so that while uninstalling only the installed files will be removed.(I know this is not a best solution)
(NOTE:I have worked on Install shield some 6 years back and so remember only certain things)
You can also disable logging from Install Script. This will make the installer "forget" that it installed specific files groups or features.
You should make sure to enable logging once again after you have copied the files that you want to permanently leave on the system.
If you don't remember to enable logging after you have disabled it, your uninstall process may not work correctly.
Syntax is as follows:
Disable(LOGGING);
//Add code to copy your permanent files here
Enable(LOGGING);
For InstallScript projects:
To prevent the files in a particular Component from being removed during uninstall:
1-Select the Components view from within the Organization folder.
2-Select the component that contains the files you do not wish to remove during uninstall.
3-Change the "Uninstall" property in the right pane to a value of "No."
For MSI Projects:
To prevent the files in a particular Component from being removed during uninstall:
1-Select the Components view from within the Organization folder.
2-Select the component that contains the files you do not wish to remove during uninstall.
3-Change the "Permanent" property in the right pane to a value of "Yes".
I see this is an old question but I just came across this. Seems to be a common problem. One good solution is to stage the files to a private directory mostly program files and then have a custom action do the copy and register (ocx etc). Installshield remembers what it copied so it tends to remove them. Do not disturb anything else like logging (my recommendation). Set conditions on the custom action so that it doesn't run during Uninstall.
Although sometime back I did another weird implementation which only programmers are used to doing.. Packed the files as resources and created my own code to extract and deploy (Something that Process Explorer kind of tool does). There were certain use cases that warranted this kind of implementation. But again this is complicated and obviously reinventing the wheel. Unless you are good with C/C++ and Windows API this would be difficult. I would still suggest you stay away from this kind of implementation because it is also considered a "virulent behavior". Yet, so far I never got warnings from the Anti-malware products.