I'm working on an application library with a utility class called "Config" which is backed by the Spring Environment object and provides strongly typed getters for all the applications configuration values.
The property sources for the configuration can vary depending on environment (DEV/PROD) and usage (standalone/test/webapp), and can range from the default ones (system & env props) to custom database and JNDI sources.
What I'm struggling with is how to let the apps consuming this library easily configure the property source(s) used by Environment, such that the properties are available for use in our Config class and via the PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer.
We're still using XML configuration, so ideally this could be configured in XML something like.
<bean id="propertySources" class="...">
<property name="sources">
<list>
<ref local="jndiPropertySource"/>
<ref local="databasePropertySource"/>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
...and then injected somehow into the Environment's property sources collection.
I've read that something like this may not be possible due to the timing of the app context lifecycle, and that this may need to be done using an application initializer class.
Any ideas?
It depends on how you want to use the properties, if it is to inject the properties using ${propertyname} syntax, then yes just having PropertySourcesPlaceHolderConfigurer will work, which internally has access to the PropertySources registered in the environment.
If you plan to use Environment directly, using say env.getProperty(), then you are right - the properties using PropertySourcesPlaceHolderConfigurer are not visible here. The only way then is to inject it using Java code, there are two ways that I know of:
a. Using Java Config:
#Configuration
#PropertySource("classpath:/app.properties")
public class SpringConfig{
}
b. Using a custom ApplicationContextInitializer, the way it is described here
I came up with the following which seems to work, but I'm fairly new to Spring, so I'm not so sure how it will hold up under different use cases.
Basically, the approach is to extend PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer and add a setter to allow the user to easily configure a List of PropertySource objects in XML. After creation, the property sources are copied to the current Environment.
This basically allows the property sources to be configured in one place, but used by both placholder configuration and Environment.getProperty scenarios.
Extended PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer
public class ConfigSourcesConfigurer
extends PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer
implements EnvironmentAware, InitializingBean {
private Environment environment;
private List<PropertySource> sourceList;
// Allow setting property sources as a List for easier XML configuration
public void setPropertySources(List<PropertySource> propertySources) {
this.sourceList = propertySources;
MutablePropertySources sources = new MutablePropertySources();
copyListToPropertySources(this.sourceList, sources);
super.setPropertySources(sources);
}
#Override
public void setEnvironment(Environment environment) {
// save off Environment for later use
this.environment = environment;
super.setEnvironment(environment);
}
#Override
public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
// Copy property sources to Environment
MutablePropertySources envPropSources = ((ConfigurableEnvironment)environment).getPropertySources();
copyListToPropertySources(this.sourceList, envPropSources);
}
private void copyListToPropertySources(List<PropertySource> list, MutablePropertySources sources) {
// iterate in reverse order to insure ordering in property sources object
for(int i = list.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
sources.addFirst(list.get(i));
}
}
}
beans.xml file showing basic configuration
<beans>
<context:annotation-config/>
<context:component-scan base-package="com.mycompany" />
<bean class="com.mycompany.ConfigSourcesConfigurer">
<property name="propertySources">
<list>
<bean class="org.mycompany.CustomPropertySource" />
<bean class="org.springframework.core.io.support.ResourcePropertySource">
<constructor-arg value="classpath:default-config.properties" />
</bean>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
<bean class="com.mycompany.TestBean">
<property name="stringValue" value="${placeholder}" />
</bean>
</beans>
The following worked for me with Spring 3.2.4 .
PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer must be registered statically in order to process the placeholders.
The custom property source is registered in the init method and as the default property sources are already registered, it can itself be parameterized using placeholders.
JavaConfig class:
#Configuration
#PropertySource("classpath:propertiesTest2.properties")
public class TestConfig {
#Autowired
private ConfigurableEnvironment env;
#Value("${param:NOVALUE}")
private String param;
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
env.getPropertySources().addFirst(new CustomPropertySource(param));
}
#Bean
public static PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer placeHolderConfigurer() {
return new PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer();
}
#Bean
public TestBean1 testBean1() {
return new TestBean1();
}
}
Custom property source:
public class CustomPropertySource extends PropertySource<Object> {
public CustomPropertySource(String param) {
super("custom");
System.out.println("Custom property source initialized with param " + param + ".");
}
#Override
public Object getProperty(String name) {
return "IT WORKS";
}
}
Test bean (getValue() will output "IT WORKS"):
public class TestBean1 {
#Value("${value:NOVALUE}")
private String value;
public String getValue() {
return value;
}
}
I had a similar problem, in my case I'm using Spring in a standalone application, after load the default configurations I may need apply another properties file (lazy load configs) present in a config directory. My solution was inspired this Spring Boot documentation, but with no dependency of Spring Boot. See below the source code:
#PropertySources(#PropertySource(value = "classpath:myapp-default.properties"))
public class PersistenceConfiguration {
private final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass());
private ConfigurableEnvironment env;
#Bean
public static PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer placeholderConfigurerDev(ConfigurableEnvironment env) {
return new PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer();
}
#Autowired
public void setConfigurableEnvironment(ConfigurableEnvironment env) {
for(String profile: env.getActiveProfiles()) {
final String fileName = "myapp-" + profile + ".properties";
final Resource resource = new ClassPathResource(fileName);
if (resource.exists()) {
try {
MutablePropertySources sources = env.getPropertySources();
sources.addFirst(new PropertiesPropertySource(fileName,PropertiesLoaderUtils.loadProperties(resource)));
} catch (Exception ex) {
log.error(ex.getMessage(), ex);
throw new RuntimeException(ex.getMessage(), ex);
}
}
}
this.env = env;
}
...
}
I recently ran into the issue of how to register custom property sources in the environment. My specific problem is that I have a library with a Spring configuration that I want to be imported into the Spring application context, and it requires custom property sources. However, I don't necessarily have control over all of the places where the application context is created. Because of this, I do not want to use the recommended mechanisms of ApplicationContextInitializer or register-before-refresh in order to register the custom property sources.
What I found really frustrating is that using the old PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer, it was easy to subclass and customize the configurers completely within the Spring configuration. In contrast, to customize property sources, we are told that we have to do it not in the Spring configuration itself, but before the application context is initialized.
After some research and trial and error, I discovered that it is possible to register custom property sources from inside of the Spring configuration, but you have to be careful how you do it. The sources need to be registered before any PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurers execute in the context. You can do this by making the source registration a BeanFactoryPostProcessor with PriorityOrdered and an order that is higher precedence than the PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer that uses the sources.
I wrote this class, which does the job:
package example;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Properties;
import org.springframework.beans.BeansException;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanInitializationException;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanFactoryPostProcessor;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.ConfigurableListableBeanFactory;
import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext;
import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContextAware;
import org.springframework.core.Ordered;
import org.springframework.core.PriorityOrdered;
import org.springframework.core.env.ConfigurableEnvironment;
import org.springframework.core.env.Environment;
import org.springframework.core.env.MutablePropertySources;
import org.springframework.core.env.PropertiesPropertySource;
import org.springframework.core.env.PropertySource;
import org.springframework.core.io.support.PropertiesLoaderSupport;
/**
* This is an abstract base class that can be extended by any class that wishes
* to become a custom property source in the Spring context.
* <p>
* This extends from the standard Spring class PropertiesLoaderSupport, which
* contains properties that specify property resource locations, plus methods
* for loading properties from specified resources. These are all available to
* be used from the Spring configuration, and by subclasses of this class.
* <p>
* This also implements a number of Spring flag interfaces, all of which are
* required to maneuver instances of this class into a position where they can
* register their property sources BEFORE PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer
* executes to substitute variables in the Spring configuration:
* <ul>
* <li>BeanFactoryPostProcessor - Guarantees that this bean will be instantiated
* before other beans in the context. It also puts it in the same phase as
* PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer, which is also a BFPP. The
* postProcessBeanFactory method is used to register the property source.</li>
* <li>PriorityOrdered - Allows the bean priority to be specified relative to
* PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer so that this bean can be executed first.
* </li>
* <li>ApplicationContextAware - Provides access to the application context and
* its environment so that the created property source can be registered.</li>
* </ul>
* <p>
* The Spring configuration for subclasses should contain the following
* properties:
* <ul>
* <li>propertySourceName - The name of the property source this will register.</li>
* <li>location(s) - The location from which properties will be loaded.</li>
* <li>addBeforeSourceName (optional) - If specified, the resulting property
* source will be added before the given property source name, and will
* therefore take precedence.</li>
* <li>order (optional) - The order in which this source should be executed
* relative to other BeanFactoryPostProcessors. This should be used in
* conjunction with addBeforeName so that if property source factory "psfa"
* needs to register its property source before the one from "psfb", "psfa"
* executes AFTER "psfb".
* </ul>
*
* #author rjsmith2
*
*/
public abstract class AbstractPropertySourceFactory extends
PropertiesLoaderSupport implements ApplicationContextAware,
PriorityOrdered, BeanFactoryPostProcessor {
// Default order will be barely higher than the default for
// PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer.
private int order = Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE - 1;
private String propertySourceName;
private String addBeforeSourceName;
private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
private MutablePropertySources getPropertySources() {
final Environment env = applicationContext.getEnvironment();
if (!(env instanceof ConfigurableEnvironment)) {
throw new IllegalStateException(
"Cannot get environment for Spring application context");
}
return ((ConfigurableEnvironment) env).getPropertySources();
}
public int getOrder() {
return order;
}
public void setOrder(int order) {
this.order = order;
}
public String getPropertySourceName() {
return propertySourceName;
}
public void setPropertySourceName(String propertySourceName) {
this.propertySourceName = propertySourceName;
}
public String getAddBeforeSourceName() {
return addBeforeSourceName;
}
public void setAddBeforeSourceName(String addBeforeSourceName) {
this.addBeforeSourceName = addBeforeSourceName;
}
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) {
this.applicationContext = applicationContext;
}
/**
* Subclasses can override this method to perform adjustments on the
* properties after they are read.
* <p>
* This should be done by getting, adding, removing, and updating properties
* as needed.
*
* #param props
* properties to adjust
*/
protected void convertProperties(Properties props) {
// Override in subclass to perform conversions.
}
/**
* Creates a property source from the specified locations.
*
* #return PropertiesPropertySource instance containing the read properties
* #throws IOException
* if properties cannot be read
*/
protected PropertySource<?> createPropertySource() throws IOException {
if (propertySourceName == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("No property source name specified");
}
// Load the properties file (or files) from specified locations.
final Properties props = new Properties();
loadProperties(props);
// Convert properties as required.
convertProperties(props);
// Convert to property source.
final PropertiesPropertySource source = new PropertiesPropertySource(
propertySourceName, props);
return source;
}
#Override
public void postProcessBeanFactory(
ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
try {
// Create the property source, and get its desired position in
// the list of sources.
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Creating property source [" + propertySourceName
+ "]");
}
final PropertySource<?> source = createPropertySource();
// Register the property source.
final MutablePropertySources sources = getPropertySources();
if (addBeforeSourceName != null) {
if (sources.contains(addBeforeSourceName)) {
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Adding property source ["
+ propertySourceName + "] before ["
+ addBeforeSourceName + "]");
}
sources.addBefore(addBeforeSourceName, source);
} else {
logger.warn("Property source [" + propertySourceName
+ "] cannot be added before non-existent source ["
+ addBeforeSourceName + "] - adding at the end");
sources.addLast(source);
}
} else {
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Adding property source ["
+ propertySourceName + "] at the end");
}
sources.addLast(source);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new BeanInitializationException(
"Failed to register property source", e);
}
}
}
Of note here is that the default order of this property source factory class is higher precedence than the default order of PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer.
Also, the registration of the property source happens in postProcessBeanFactory, which means that it will execute in the correct order relative to the PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer. I discovered the hard way that InitializingBean and afterPropertiesSet do not respect the order parameter, and I gave up on that approach as being wrong and redundant.
Finally, because this is a BeanFactoryPostProcessor, it is a bad idea to try to wire much in the way of dependencies. Therefore, the class accesses the environment directly through the application context, which it obtains using ApplicationContextAware.
In my case, I needed the property source to decrypt password properties, which I implemented using the following subclass:
package example;
import java.util.Properties;
/**
* This is a property source factory that creates a property source that can
* process properties for substituting into a Spring configuration.
* <p>
* The only thing that distinguishes this from a normal Spring property source
* is that it decrypts encrypted passwords.
*
* #author rjsmith2
*
*/
public class PasswordPropertySourceFactory extends
AbstractPropertySourceFactory {
private static final PasswordHelper passwordHelper = new PasswordHelper();
private String[] passwordProperties;
public String[] getPasswordProperties() {
return passwordProperties;
}
public void setPasswordProperties(String[] passwordProperties) {
this.passwordProperties = passwordProperties;
}
public void setPasswordProperty(String passwordProperty) {
this.passwordProperties = new String[] { passwordProperty };
}
#Override
protected void convertProperties(Properties props) {
// Adjust password fields by decrypting them.
if (passwordProperties != null) {
for (String propName : passwordProperties) {
final String propValue = props.getProperty(propName);
if (propValue != null) {
final String plaintext = passwordHelper
.decryptString(propValue);
props.setProperty(propName, plaintext);
}
}
}
}
}
Finally, I specifed the property source factory in my Spring configuration:
<!-- Enable property resolution via PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer.
The order has to be larger than the ones used by custom property sources
so that those property sources are registered before any placeholders
are substituted. -->
<context:property-placeholder order="1000" ignore-unresolvable="true" />
<!-- Register a custom property source that reads DB properties, and
decrypts the database password. -->
<bean class="example.PasswordPropertySourceFactory">
<property name="propertySourceName" value="DBPropertySource" />
<property name="location" value="classpath:db.properties" />
<property name="passwordProperty" value="db.password" />
<property name="ignoreResourceNotFound" value="true" />
<!-- Order must be lower than on property-placeholder element. -->
<property name="order" value="100" />
</bean>
To be honest, with the defaults for order in PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer and AbstractPropertySourceFactory, it is probably not even necessary to specify order in the Spring configuration.
Nonetheless, this works, and it does not require any fiddling with the application context initialization.
Related
Map key codeofproduct contains dots but no replacement was configured! Make sure map keys don't contain dots in the first place or configure an appropriate replacement!
org.springframework.data.mapping.model.MappingException: Map key foo.bar.key contains dots but no replacement was configured! Make sure map keys don't contain dots in the first place or configure an appropriate replacement!
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.potentiallyEscapeMapKey(MappingMongoConverter.java:622)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writeMapInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:586)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.createMap(MappingMongoConverter.java:517)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writePropertyInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:424)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter$3.doWithPersistentProperty(MappingMongoConverter.java:386)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter$3.doWithPersistentProperty(MappingMongoConverter.java:373)
at org.springframework.data.mapping.model.BasicPersistentEntity.doWithProperties(BasicPersistentEntity.java:257)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writeInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:373)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writePropertyInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:451)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter$3.doWithPersistentProperty(MappingMongoConverter.java:386)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter$3.doWithPersistentProperty(MappingMongoConverter.java:373)
at org.springframework.data.mapping.model.BasicPersistentEntity.doWithProperties(BasicPersistentEntity.java:257)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writeInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:373)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writePropertyInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:451)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter$3.doWithPersistentProperty(MappingMongoConverter.java:386)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter$3.doWithPersistentProperty(MappingMongoConverter.java:373)
at org.springframework.data.mapping.model.BasicPersistentEntity.doWithProperties(BasicPersistentEntity.java:257)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writeInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:373)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.writeInternal(MappingMongoConverter.java:345)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.write(MappingMongoConverter.java:310)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter.write(MappingMongoConverter.java:77)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.doSave(MongoTemplate.java:859)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.save(MongoTemplate.java:806)
at org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate.save(MongoTemplate.java:794)
When we try to insert value, this happens. How can we solve this?
this is my class
#Configuration
#EnableMongoRepositories("net.ooo.hepsiburada.**.repository")
#Profile(Constants.SPRING_PROFILE_CLOUD)
public class CloudMongoDbConfiguration extends AbstractMongoConfiguration {
private final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(CloudDatabaseConfiguration.class);
#Inject
private MongoDbFactory mongoDbFactory;
#Bean
public ValidatingMongoEventListener validatingMongoEventListener() {
return new ValidatingMongoEventListener(validator());
}
#Bean
public LocalValidatorFactoryBean validator() {
return new LocalValidatorFactoryBean();
}
#Bean
public CustomConversions customConversions() {
List<Converter<?, ?>> converterList = new ArrayList<>();;
converterList.add(DateToZonedDateTimeConverter.INSTANCE);
converterList.add(ZonedDateTimeToDateConverter.INSTANCE);
converterList.add(DateToLocalDateConverter.INSTANCE);
converterList.add(LocalDateToDateConverter.INSTANCE);
converterList.add(DateToLocalDateTimeConverter.INSTANCE);
converterList.add(LocalDateTimeToDateConverter.INSTANCE);
return new CustomConversions(converterList);
}
#Override
protected String getDatabaseName() {
return mongoDbFactory.getDb().getName();
}
#Override
public Mongo mongo() throws Exception {
return mongoDbFactory().getDb().getMongo();
}
}
When using Spring Data MongoDB you get an instance of: org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter that has mapKeyDotReplacement set to null by default - that is why you are getting an exception.
You need to either create your own instance of org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter or just modify existing instance using its provider setter method:
/**
* Configure the characters dots potentially contained in a {#link Map} shall be replaced with. By default we don't do
* any translation but rather reject a {#link Map} with keys containing dots causing the conversion for the entire
* object to fail. If further customization of the translation is needed, have a look at
* {#link #potentiallyEscapeMapKey(String)} as well as {#link #potentiallyUnescapeMapKey(String)}.
*
* #param mapKeyDotReplacement the mapKeyDotReplacement to set
*/
public void setMapKeyDotReplacement(String mapKeyDotReplacement) {
this.mapKeyDotReplacement = mapKeyDotReplacement;
}
In MongoDB, dot is always treated as a special character so avoiding it will most likely save you some other headache in the future.
EDIT:
To override default MappingMongoConverter add the following bean declaration:
#Bean
public MappingMongoConverter mongoConverter(MongoDbFactory mongoFactory) throws Exception {
DbRefResolver dbRefResolver = new DefaultDbRefResolver(mongoFactory);
MappingMongoConverter mongoConverter = new MappingMongoConverter(dbRefResolver, mongoMappingContext);
mongoConverter.setMapKeyDotReplacement(".");
return mongoConverter;
}
My exception:
org.springframework.data.mapping.MappingException: Map key VAT Registration No. contains dots but no replacement was configured! Make sure map keys don't contain dots in the first place or configure an appropriate replacement!
Field with a dot at the end: VAT Registration No.
This didn't work for me:
mongoConverter.setMapKeyDotReplacement(".");
mongoConverter.setMapKeyDotReplacement("_"); //this broke enum values for example VALUE_1 -> VALUE.1
This works for me:
mongoConverter.setMapKeyDotReplacement("-DOT")
Complete class:
#Configuration
public class MongoConfiguration {
#Bean
public MappingMongoConverter mongoConverter(MongoDbFactory mongoFactory, MongoMappingContext mongoMappingContext) {
DbRefResolver dbRefResolver = new DefaultDbRefResolver(mongoFactory);
MappingMongoConverter mongoConverter = new MappingMongoConverter(dbRefResolver, mongoMappingContext);
mongoConverter.setMapKeyDotReplacement("-DOT");
return mongoConverter;
}
}
For XML configuration following will be useful.
Note : mongoConverter bean is used for this. It will replace "." in key with "_"
<bean id="mappingContext" class="org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.mapping.MongoMappingContext" />
<mongo:auditing mapping-context-ref="mappingContext"/>
<mongo:db-factory id="mongoDbFactory" mongo-ref="mongoClient" dbname="${mongo.dbname}"/>
<bean id ="mongoConverter" class="org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.convert.MappingMongoConverter">
<constructor-arg name="mongoDbFactory" ref="mongoDbFactory"/>
<constructor-arg name="mappingContext" ref="mappingContext"/>
<property name="mapKeyDotReplacement" value="_"></property>
</bean>
<mongo:mongo-client id="mongoClient" credentials="${mongo.credential}" >
<mongo:client-options connections-per-host="50" threads-allowed-to-block-for-connection-multiplier="5000" />
</mongo:mongo-client>
<!-- MongoDB Template -->
<bean id="mongoTemplate" class="org.springframework.data.mongodb.core.MongoTemplate">
<constructor-arg name="mongoDbFactory" ref="mongoDbFactory"/>
<constructor-arg name="mongoConverter" ref="mongoConverter"/>
</bean>
I want to be able to read the active profiles from a property file so that different environments (dev,prod etc) can be configured with different profiles in a Spring MVC based web application. I know that the active profiles can be set through JVM params or system properties. But I would like to do it through a property file instead. The point is that I dont know the active profile statically and instead want to read it from a properties file. It looks like this is not possible. For eg., if I had 'spring.profiles.active=dev' in application.properties, and allow it to be overridden in override.properties like so:
<bean id="propertyConfigurer" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
<property name="ignoreResourceNotFound" value="true" />
<property name="locations">
<list>
<value>classpath:/application.properties</value>
<value>file:/overrides.properties</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
the profile is not being picked up in the environment. I guess this is because the active profiles are being checked before bean initialization, and therefore do not honor the property being set in a properties file. The only other option I see is to implement an ApplicationContextInitializer that will load those property files in order of priority(override.properties first if it exists, else application.properties) and set the value in context.getEnvironment(). Is there a better way to do it from properties files?
One solution to do it is to read necessary property file with specified profile "manually" - without spring - and set profile at context initialization:
1) Write simple properties loader:
import java.io.FileReader;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.Reader;
import java.util.Properties;
public class PropertiesLoader
{
private static Properties props;
public static String getActiveProfile()
{
if (props == null)
{
props = initProperties();
}
return props.getProperty("profile");
}
private static Properties initProperties()
{
String propertiesFile = "app.properties";
try (Reader in = new FileReader(propertiesFile))
{
props = new Properties();
props.load(in);
}
catch (IOException e)
{
System.out.println("Error while reading properties file: " + e.getMessage());
return null;
}
return props;
}
}
2) Read profile from properties file and set it during Spring container initialization (example with Java-based configuration):
public static void main(String[] args)
{
AnnotationConfigApplicationContext ctx = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext();
ctx.getEnvironment().setActiveProfiles(PropertiesLoader.getActiveProfile());
ctx.register(AppConfig.class);
ctx.refresh();
// you application is running ...
ctx.close();
}
Has anyone had any luck constructing a PropertySource that uses a remote source (for example a database) from which to retrieve property values. The idea would be to construct a PropertySource (needs some connection information such as host/port) and plug that into a PropertySourcePlaceholderConfigurer.
The problem seems to be a chicken and egg problem. How can I get the connection information down to the PropertySource? I could first instantiate the PropertySourcePlaceholderConfigurer with configuration to load a property file with the remote host and port properties and then later instantiate the PropertySource and inject that back into the configurer. However, I can't seem to figure a way to ensure that the very first bean to be instantiated (and quickly injected into the configurer) is my property source. I need to have this because, of course, all my other beans depend on the remote properties.
Commons Configuration supports loading properties from a variety of sources (including JDBC Datasources) into a org.apache.commons.configuration.Configuration object via a org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfigurationBuilder.
Using the org.apache.commons.configuration.ConfiguratorConverter, you can convert the Configuration object into a java.util.Properties object which can be passed to the PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer.
As to the chicken and egg question of how to configure the ConfigurationBuilder, I recommend using the org.springframework.core.env.Environment to query for system properties, command-line properties or JNDI properties.
In this exampe:
#Configuration
public class RemotePropertyConfig {
#Bean
public static PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer propertyPlaceholderConfigurer(Environment environment)
throws Exception {
final PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer props = new PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer();
final ConfigurationBuilder configurationBuilder = new DefaultConfigurationBuilder(environment.getProperty("configuration.definition.file"));
props.setProperties(ConfigurationConverter.getProperties(configurationBuilder.getConfiguration()));
return props;
}
You will need to specify the environment property configuration.definition.file which points to a file needed to configure Commons Configuration:
Similar to Recardo's answer above, I used Spring's PropertiesLoaderUtils instead of Apache's, but it amounts to the same thing. It's not exactly ideal.. hard coded dependency injection, but hey, it works!
/**
* This method must remain static as it's part of spring's initialization effort.
* #return
**/
#Bean
public static PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer propertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer() {
PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer configurer = new PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer();
String dbHost = null;
Integer dbPort = null;
// check system / environment properties first
Environment environment = new StandardEnvironment();
if (environment.containsProperty(DB_HOST_KEY)) {
dbHost = environment.getProperty(DB_HOST_KEY);
}
if (environment.containsProperty(DB_PORT_KEY)) {
dbPort = Integer.valueOf(environment.getProperty(DB_PORT_KEY));
}
if (dbHost == null || dbPort == null) {
// ok one or (probably) both properties null, let's go find the database.properties file
Properties dbProperties;
try {
dbProperties = PropertiesLoaderUtils.loadProperties(new EncodedResource(new ClassPathResource("database.properties"), "UTF-8"));
}
catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Could not load database.properties. Please confirm the file is in the classpath");
}
if (dbHost == null) {
dbHost = dbProperties.getProperty(DB_HOST_KEY);
}
if (dbPort == null) {
dbPort = Integer.valueOf(dbProperties.getProperty(DB_PORT_KEY));
}
}
PropertySourceService propertySourceService = new DBPropertySourceService(dbHost, dbPort);
PropertySource<PropertySourceService> propertySource = new DBPropertySource(propertySourceService);
MutablePropertySources propertySources = new MutablePropertySources();
propertySources.addFirst(propertySource);
configurer.setPropertySources(propertySources);
return configurer;
}
per request, here is the source of the remote property source. It depends on a 'service' class that might do.. well.. anything.. remote access of a property over a socket, talk to a database, whatever.
/**
* Property source for use with spring's PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer where the source is a service
* that connects to remote server for property values.
**/
public class RemotePropertySource extends PropertySource<PropertySourceService> {
private final Environment environment;
/**
* Constructor...
* #param name
* #param source
**/
public RemotePropertySource(PropertySourceService source) {
super("RemotePropertySource", source);
environment = new StandardEnvironment();
}
/* (non-Javadoc)
* #see org.springframework.core.env.PropertySource#getProperty(java.lang.String)
*/
#Override
public Object getProperty(String name) {
// check system / environment properties first
String value;
if (environment.containsProperty(name)) {
value = environment.getProperty(name);
}
else {
value = source.getProperty(name);
}
return value;
}
}
I have this bean in my Spring Java config:
#Bean
#Scope( proxyMode=ScopedProxyMode.TARGET_CLASS, value=SpringScopes.DESKTOP )
public BirtSession birtSession() {
return new BirtSession();
}
For tests, I need a mock without a scope (there is no "Desktop" scope in the test). But when I create a configuration for my test which imports the above configuration and contains:
#Bean
public BirtSession birtSession() {
return new MockSession();
}
I get a "Desktop" scoped mocked bean :-(
How do I make Spring "forget" the #Scope annotation?
PS: It works when I don't use #Import and use copy&paste but I don't want to do that.
The problem seems to be in ConfigurationClassBeanDefinitionReader.loadBeanDefinitionsForBeanMethod() that uses ScopedProxyCreator.createScopedProxy() static method to create the scoped bean definition:
// replace the original bean definition with the target one, if necessary
BeanDefinition beanDefToRegister = beanDef;
if (proxyMode != ScopedProxyMode.NO) {
BeanDefinitionHolder proxyDef = ScopedProxyCreator.createScopedProxy(
new BeanDefinitionHolder(beanDef, beanName), this.registry, proxyMode == ScopedProxyMode.TARGET_CLASS);
beanDefToRegister = proxyDef.getBeanDefinition();
}
As the BeanDefinitionHolder returns a RootBeanDefinition instead of ConfiguratioClassBeanDenition the scoped proxy bean definition (ie, the ScopedProxyFactoryBean) cannot be overriden by another Java Configuration class.
A workaround could be declaring the scoped beans to override in a xml configuration file and importing it with #ImportResource.
The problem isn't Spring keeping the annotation, the problem is that Spring first tries to parse the "productive" config and in order to do that, it checks whether the scope is available. Spring checks scopes eagerly. So it never gets to the second/overriding bean definition.
Create a dummy scope:
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.ObjectFactory;
public class MockSpringScope implements org.springframework.beans.factory.config.Scope {
private Map<String, Object> objects = new HashMap<String, Object>();
#Override
public Object get( String name, ObjectFactory<?> objectFactory ) {
Object result = objects.get( name );
if( null == result ) {
result = objectFactory.getObject();
objects.put( name, result );
}
return result;
}
#Override
public Object remove( String name ) {
return objects.remove( name );
}
#Override
public void registerDestructionCallback( String name, Runnable callback ) {
// NOP
}
#Override
public Object resolveContextualObject( String key ) {
// NOP
return null;
}
#Override
public String getConversationId() {
// NOP
return null;
}
}
and register that under as "Desktop" scope. That will Spring allow to successfully parse the production config.
I am using a properties File to store some configuration properties, that are accessed this way:
#Value("#{configuration.path_file}")
private String pathFile;
Is it possible (with Spring 3) to use the same #Value annotation, but loading the properties from a database instead of a file ?
Assuming you have a table in your database stored key/value pairs:
Define a new bean "applicationProperties" - psuedo-code follows...
public class ApplicationProperties {
#AutoWired
private DataSource datasource;
public getPropertyValue(String key) {
// transact on your datasource here to fetch value for key
// SNIPPED
}
}
Inject this bean where required in your application. If you already have a dao/service layer then you would just make use of that.
Yes, you can keep your #Value annotation, and use the database source with the help of EnvironmentPostProcessor.
As of Spring Boot 1.3, we're able to use the EnvironmentPostProcessor to customize the application's Environment before application context is refreshed.
For example, create a class which implements EnvironmentPostProcessor:
public class ReadDbPropertiesPostProcessor implements EnvironmentPostProcessor {
private static final String PROPERTY_SOURCE_NAME = "databaseProperties";
private String[] CONFIGS = {
"app.version"
// list your properties here
};
#Override
public void postProcessEnvironment(ConfigurableEnvironment environment, SpringApplication application) {
Map<String, Object> propertySource = new HashMap<>();
try {
// the following db connections properties must be defined in application.properties
DataSource ds = DataSourceBuilder
.create()
.username(environment.getProperty("spring.datasource.username"))
.password(environment.getProperty("spring.datasource.password"))
.url(environment.getProperty("spring.datasource.url"))
.driverClassName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver")
.build();
try (Connection connection = ds.getConnection();
// suppose you have a config table storing the properties name/value pair
PreparedStatement preparedStatement = connection.prepareStatement("SELECT value FROM config WHERE name = ?")) {
for (int i = 0; i < CONFIGS.length; i++) {
String configName = CONFIGS[i];
preparedStatement.setString(1, configName);
ResultSet rs = preparedStatement.executeQuery();
while (rs.next()) {
propertySource.put(configName, rs.getString("value"));
}
// rs.close();
preparedStatement.clearParameters();
}
}
environment.getPropertySources().addFirst(new MapPropertySource(PROPERTY_SOURCE_NAME, propertySource));
} catch (Throwable e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
}
Finally, don't forget to put your spring.factories in META-INF. An example:
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.EnableAutoConfiguration=
com.baeldung.environmentpostprocessor.autoconfig.PriceCalculationAutoConfig
Although not having used spring 3, I'd assume you can, if you make a bean that reads the properties from the database and exposes them with getters.