I have a simple Hibernate entity:
#Entity
#Table(name = "keyword",
uniqueConstraints = #UniqueConstraint(columnNames = { "keyword" }))
public class KeywordEntity implements Serializable {
private Long id;
private String keyword;
public KeywordEntity() {
}
#Id
#GeneratedValue
#Column(unique = true, updatable=false, nullable = false)
public Long getId() {
return this.id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
#Column(name="keyword")
public String getKeyword() {
return this.keyword;
}
public void setKeyword(String keyword) {
this.keyword = keyword;
}
}
DAO for it:
#Component
#Scope("prototype")
public class KeywordDao {
protected SessionFactory sessionFactory;
#Autowired
public void setSessionFactory(SessionFactory sessionFactory) {
this.sessionFactory = sessionFactory;
}
public KeywordEntity findByKeyword(String keyword) throws NotFoundException {
Criteria criteria = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession()
.createCriteria(KeywordEntity.class)
.add(Restrictions.eq("keyword", keyword));
KeywordEntity entity = (KeywordEntity) criteria.uniqueResult();
if (entity == null) {
throw new NotFoundException("Not found");
}
return entity;
}
public KeywordEntity createKeyword(String keyword) {
KeywordEntity entity = new KeywordEntity(keyword);
save(entity);
return entity;
}
}
and a service, which puts everything under #Transactional:
#Repository
#Scope("prototype")
public class KeywordService {
#Autowired
private KeywordDao dao;
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public KeywordEntity getKeyword(String keyword) throws NotFoundException {
return dao.findByKeyword(keyword);
}
#Transactional(readOnly = false)
public KeywordEntity createKeyword(String keyword) {
return dao.createKeyword(keyword);
}
#Transactional(readOnly = false)
public KeywordEntity getOrCreateKeyword(String keyword) {
try {
return getKeyword(keyword);
} catch (NotFoundException e) {
return createKeyword(keyword);
}
}
}
In a single-threaded environment this code runs just fine. The problems, when I use it in multi-threaded environment. When there are many parallel threads, working the same keywords, some of them are calling the getOrCreateKeyword with the same keyword at the same time and following scenario occurs:
2 threads at the same time call keyword service with the same keyword, both first tries to fetch the existing keyword, both are not finding, and both try to create new one. The first one succeeds, the second - causes ConstraintViolationException to be thrown.
So I did try to improve the getOrCreateKeyword method a little:
#Transactional(readOnly = false)
public KeywordEntity getOrCreateKeyword(String keyword) {
try {
return getKeyword(keyword);
} catch (NotFoundException e) {
try {
return createKeyword(keyword);
} catch (ConstraintViolationException ce) {
return getKeyword(keyword);
}
}
}
So theoretically it should solve the issues, but in practice, once ConstraintViolationException is thrown, calling the getKeyword(keyword) results in another Hibernate exception:
AssertionFailure - an assertion failure occured (this may indicate a bug in Hibernate,
but is more likely due to unsafe use of the session)org.hibernate.AssertionFailure:
null id in KeywordEntity entry (don't flush the Session after an exception occurs)
How to solve this problem?
You could use some sort of Pessimistic locking mechanism using the database/hibernate or you could make the service method getOrCreateKeyword() synchronized if you run on a single machine.
Here are some references.
Hibernates documentation http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/core/3.3/reference/en/html/transactions.html#transactions-locking
This article shows how to put a lock on a specific entity and all entities from a result of a query which may help you.
http://www.objectdb.com/java/jpa/persistence/lock#Locking_during_Retrieval_
The solution was to discard the current session once ConstraintViolationException occurs and retrieve the keyword one more time within the new session. Hibernate Documentation also point to this:
If the Session throws an exception, the transaction must be rolled back and the session discarded. The internal state of the Session might not be consistent with the database after the exception occurs.
Related
I am having below mappings as Company having 1:N relation with CompanyFunds
#Entity
public class Company{
#Id
private Integer companyId;
private String name;
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "company")
private List<CompanyFund> companyFunds;
}
#Entity
public class CompanyFunds{
#Id
private Integer fundId;
private String name;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
#JoinColumn(name = "company_id")
private Company company;
}
I am using Spring-data-Jpa for my persistence layer and below are the controller and service methods:
//controller
#GetMapping(value = "/{companyId}")
public Resource<Company> find(#PathVariable Integer companyId) {
Resource<Company> companyResource = companyService.find(companyId);
return companyResource;
}
//service
public Resource<CompanyTypeOther> find(Integer companyId) {
Company company = companyRepository.findById(companyId);
return restResourceAssembler.toResource(company);
}
#Component
public class RestResourceAssembler implements ResourceAssembler<T, Resource<T>> {
private EntityLinks entityLinks;
public RestResourceAssembler(EntityLinks entityLinks) {
this.entityLinks = entityLinks;
}
#Override
public Resource<T> toResource(T entity) {
Resource<T> resource = new Resource<>(entity);
resource.add(entityLinks.linkToSingleResource(entity.getClass(), entity.getId()).withSelfRel());
return resource;
}
}
Now the weird thing is, until the return companyResource;(in controller) doesn't get executed, the companyResource contains null for companyFunds i.e the LAZY loading is working fine till that point. But the moment the return companyResource; executes, something goes inside the Spring and the Select statement for CompanyFund gets fired. I debugged the steps and below is the code(try block) responsible for this:
public class ServletInvocableHandlerMethod extends InvocableHandlerMethod {
......
public void invokeAndHandle(ServletWebRequest webRequest, ModelAndViewContainer mavContainer,
........other code
try {
this.returnValueHandlers.handleReturnValue(
returnValue, getReturnValueType(returnValue), mavContainer, webRequest);
}
catch (Exception ex) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace(formatErrorForReturnValue(returnValue), ex);
}
throw ex;
}
}
.....
}
There are no toString() declared in entities, also no getCompanyFund() called. Can't understand what Spring is doing with returnValue above, so that some getters(or something) are getting called.
One more thing I noticed is, this problem only occurs when the Resource<Company> is returned. If I return Company from the controller, nothing unexpected happens. Lazy loading works fine.
Since I want to lazy load the entity, a little fix/hack solved the problem for me(as of now).
#JsonIgnore
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "company")
private List<CompanyFund> companyFunds;
#JsonIgnore prevents LAZY loaded entity from being serialized. So I guess the jackson is the culprit here.
This is not a fix is my view but just a hack to do the thing. Still waiting someone from Spring team to reply.
I am running a Spring Boot application with a PostConstruct method to populate a POJO before application initialization. This is to ensure that the database isn't hit by multiple requests to get the POJO content after it starts running.
I'm able to pull the data from Oracle database through Hibernate query and store it in my POJO. The problem arises when I try to access the stored data. The dataset contains a list of objects that contain strings and numbers. Just trying to print the description of the object at the top of the list raises a class cast exception. How should I mitigate this issue?
#Autowired
private TaskDescrBean taskBean;
#PostConstruct
public void loadDescriptions() {
TaskDataLoader taskData = new TaskDataLoader(taskBean.acquireDataSourceParams());
List<TaskDescription> taskList = tdf.getTaskDescription();
taskBean.setTaskDescriptionList(taskList);
System.out.println("Task description size: " + taskBean.getTaskDescriptionList().get(0).getTaskDescription());
}
My POJO class:
#Component
public class TaskDescrBean implements ApplicationContextAware {
#Resource
private Environment environment;
protected List<TaskDescription> taskDescriptionList;
public Properties acquireDataSourceParams() {
Properties dataSource = new Properties();
dataSource.setProperty("hibernate.connection.driver_class", environment.getProperty("spring.datasource.driver-class-name"));
dataSource.setProperty("hibernate.connection.url", environment.getProperty("spring.datasource.url"));
dataSource.setProperty("hibernate.connection.username", environment.getProperty("spring.datasource.username"));
dataSource.setProperty("hibernate.connection.password", environment.getProperty("spring.datasource.password"));
return dataSource;
}
public List<TaskDescription> getTaskDescriptionList() {
return taskDescriptionList;
}
public void setTaskDescriptionList(List<TaskDescription> taskDescriptionList) {
this.taskDescriptionList = taskDescriptionList;
}
public ApplicationContext getApplicationContext() {
return applicationContext;
}
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) {
this.applicationContext = applicationContext;
}
}
My DAO class:
public class TaskDataLoader {
private Session session;
private SessionFactory sessionFactory;
public TaskDataLoader(Properties connectionProperties) {
Configuration config = new Configuration().setProperties(connectionProperties);
config.addAnnotatedClass(TaskDescription.class);
sessionFactory = config.buildSessionFactory();
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public List<TaskDescription> getTaskDescription() {
List<TaskDescription> taskList = null;
session = sessionFactory.openSession();
try {
String description = "from TaskDescription des";
Query taskDescriptionQuery = session.createQuery(description);
taskList = taskDescriptionQuery.list();
System.out.println("Task description fetched. " + taskList.getClass());
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
session.close();
}
return taskList;
}
TaskDescription Entity:
#Entity
#Table(name="TASK_DESCRIPTION")
#JsonIgnoreProperties
public class TaskDescription implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Id
#Column(name="TASK_DESCRIPTION_ID")
private Long taskDescriptionId;
#Column(name="TASK_DESCRIPTION")
private String taskDescription;
public Long getTaskDescriptionId() {
return taskDescriptionId;
}
public void setTaskDescriptionId(Long taskDescriptionId) {
this.taskDescriptionId = taskDescriptionId;
}
public String getTaskDescription() {
return taskDescription;
}
public void setTaskDescription(String taskDescription) {
this.taskDescription = taskDescription;
}
}
StackTrace
Instead of sending the List in the return statement, I transformed it into a JSON object and sent its String representation which I mapped back to the Object after transforming it using mapper.readValue()
We have two tables that have a one to many relationship. When we insert multiple records into the child table across multiple threads (more specifically across multiple REST web requests) we are running into lost update issues due to a race condition.
What we need to be able to do is have JPA recognize that the entity has been updated elsewhere prior to inserting the child record. I've tried using the #Version annotation approach but that doesn't seem to do the trick as the update/insert (I guess...) is happening on another table. I tried adding a version timestamp column on the parent table that is updated on every update but that didn't seem to do the trick either.
I think what I actually need to do is get a reference to the EntityManager directly so that I can issue a lock() command on the record prior to calling save(). I'm just too new to Spring to know if
A) that is indeed the correct approach,
B) if there is a better/easier way to do what we are trying to accomplish, and
C) how to actually do that.
Also, I am aware of the #OneToMany annotation but that didn't seem to do anything.
I've truncated the code below for brevity and I also created a trimmed down version of the code that demonstrates the problem and will hopefully make it easier to see what I am trying to do. In the test if you change the thread pool number to 1 you can see the test pass.
Engagement class:
#Entity
public class Engagement implements Serializable {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name = "id")
private Long id;
#ElementCollection(fetch = EAGER)
private List<String> assignedUsers;
#Version
private Long version;
private LocalDateTime updatedOn;
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Long getVersion(){return version;}
public void setVersion(Long version){this.version = version;}
public LocalDateTime getUpdatedOn(){
return updatedOn;
}
public void setUpdatedOn(LocalDateTime updatedOn) {
this.updatedOn = updatedOn;
}
public List<String> getAssignedUsers() {
return assignedUsers;
}
public void setAssignedUsers(List<String> assignedUsers) {
this.assignedUsers = assignedUsers;
}
public Engagement() {
}
}
User class:
public final class User {
private final String name;
private final String email;
private final String userId;
private final List<Engagement> engagements;
#ConstructorProperties({"roles", "name", "email", "userId", "engagements"})
User(String name, String email, String userId, List<Engagement> engagements) {
this.name = name;
this.email = email;
this.userId = userId;
this.engagements = engagements;
}
public static User.UserBuilder builder() {
return new User.UserBuilder();
}
public String getName() {
return this.name;
}
public String getEmail() {
return this.email;
}
public String getUserId() {
return this.userId;
}
public List<Engagement> getEngagements() {
return this.engagements;
}
public static final class UserBuilder {
private String name;
private String email;
private String userId;
private List<Engagement> engagements;
UserBuilder() {
}
public User.UserBuilder name(String name) {
this.name = name;
return this;
}
public User.UserBuilder email(String email) {
this.email = email;
return this;
}
public User.UserBuilder userId(String userId) {
this.userId = userId;
return this;
}
public User.UserBuilder engagements(List<Engagement> engagements) {
this.engagements = engagements;
return this;
}
public User build() {
return new User(this.name, this.email, this.userId, this.engagements);
}
public String toString() {
return "User.UserBuilder(name=" + this.name + ", email=" + this.email + ", userId=" + this.userId + ", engagements=" + this.engagements + ")";
}
}
}
Thread test:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
public class EngagementTest {
#Mock
UsersAuthService usersService;
#Autowired
EngagementsRepository engagementsRepository;
UsersAuthService authService;
#Before
public void init() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
authService = new UsersAuthServiceImpl(usersService, engagementsRepository);
}
#Test
public void addingMultipleUsersAtOnceSucceeds() throws InterruptedException {
Long engagementId = 1L;
String userId1 = "user1";
String userId2 = "user2";
String userId3 = "user3";
String userId4 = "user4";
String userId5 = "user5";
String auth = "asdf";
User adminUser = User.builder()
.userId("adminUser")
.email("user#user.com")
.name("Admin User")
.build();
Engagement engagement = new Engagement();
engagement.setAssignedUsers(new ArrayList<>());
engagement.getAssignedUsers().add(adminUser.getUserId());
engagementsRepository.save(engagement);
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);//change this to 1 to see the test pass
List<Callable<Engagement>> callableList = Arrays.asList(
addUserThread(engagementId, userId1, auth, adminUser),
addUserThread(engagementId, userId2, auth, adminUser),
addUserThread(engagementId, userId3, auth, adminUser),
addUserThread(engagementId, userId4, auth, adminUser),
addUserThread(engagementId, userId5, auth, adminUser));
executorService.invokeAll(callableList);
Engagement after = engagementsRepository.findById(engagementId);
assertEquals(6, after.getAssignedUsers().size());
}
private Callable<Engagement> addUserThread(Long engagementId, String userId1, String auth, User adminUser) {
return () -> authService.addUserTo(engagementId, userId1, auth, adminUser);
}
}
What's happening here is that you submit the callbacks for execution but never actually wait for their completion before checking the result. You need to use the List<Future<Engagement>> to actually wait for the results to complete before proceeding.
Something like this would do the trick:
executorService.invokeAll(callableList).forEach(it -> {
try {
it.get(500, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException | ExecutionException | TimeoutException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
});
Note that this is not a proper way to deal with the exception case but it causes the code to wait for completion. If you have that in place you see the threads properly rejecting some of the updates with an ObjectOptimisticLockingFailureException:
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: org.springframework.orm.ObjectOptimisticLockingFailureException: Object of class [com.example.racecondition.engagement.Engagement] with identifier [1]: optimistic locking failed; nested exception is org.hibernate.StaleObjectStateException: Row was updated or deleted by another transaction (or unsaved-value mapping was incorrect) : [com.example.racecondition.engagement.Engagement#1]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:206)
at com.example.racecondition.EngagementTest.lambda$0(EngagementTest.java:68)
at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1257)
at com.example.racecondition.EngagementTest.addingMultipleUsersAtOnceSucceeds(EngagementTest.java:66)
What's weird about the test case beyond that is that UsersAuthServiceImpl carries an #Transactional but the test case manually instantiates that class, so that there's no transactional proxy in place already. This causes the calls to findById(…) and save(…) from within addToUser(…) to run in two transactions. Tweaking that doesn't change the output though.
I think what I actually need to do is get a reference to the EntityManager directly so that I can issue a lock() command on the record prior to calling save(). I'm just too new to Spring to know if
A) that is indeed the correct approach,
If I understand you correctly you want to basically force a version increment on an entity so that if multiple threads do that one fails.
You can indeed achieve that by locking the entity in question using LockModeType.PESSIMISTIC_FORCE_INCREMENT or LockModeType.OPTIMISTIC_FORCE_INCREMENT.
B) if there is a better/easier way to do what we are trying to accomplish, and
C) how to actually do that.
With Spring Data probably the best way to do that is using the #Lock annotation on the method you use to load the entity.
Versions used: spring-data-neo4j 4.2.0-BUILD-SNAPSHOT / neo4j-ogm 2.0.6-SNAPSHOT
I'm having problems to correctly fetch relationship entities.
The following fetch calls don't return consistent results (executed in the same transaction):
session.query("MATCH (:A)-[b:HAS_B]-(:C) RETURN count(b) as count") returns 1
session.query("MATCH (:A)-[b:HAS_B]-(:C) RETURN b") correctly returns the relationship entity as a RelationshipModel object
session.query(B.class, "MATCH (:A)-[b:HAS_B]-(:C) RETURN b") returns null !
Important remark: When all operations (create, fetch) are done in the same transaction, it seems to be fine.
I have been able to implement a workaround by using session.query(String, Map) to query the relationship entity and map it by myself into my POJO.
#NodeEntity
public class A {
public A () {}
public A (String name) {
this.name = name;
}
#GraphId
private Long graphId;
private String name;
#Relationship(type="HAS_B", direction=Relationship.OUTGOING)
private B b;
}
#RelationshipEntity(type="HAS_B")
public class B {
public B () {}
public B (String name, A a, C c) {
this.name = name;
this.a = a;
this.c = c;
}
#GraphId
private Long graphId;
#StartNode
private A a;
#EndNode
private C c;
private String name;
}
#NodeEntity
public class C {
public C () {}
public C (String name) {
this.name = name;
}
#GraphId
private Long graphId;
private String name;
}
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(loader=AnnotationConfigContextLoader.class, classes={MyTest.TestConfiguration.class})
public class MyTest {
#Autowired
private MyBean myBean;
#Configuration
#EnableAutoConfiguration
#EnableTransactionManagement
#EnableNeo4jRepositories("com.nagra.ml.sp.cpm.core.repositories")
public static class TestConfiguration {
#Bean
public org.neo4j.ogm.config.Configuration configuration() {
org.neo4j.ogm.config.Configuration config = new org.neo4j.ogm.config.Configuration();
config.driverConfiguration().setDriverClassName("org.neo4j.ogm.drivers.embedded.driver.EmbeddedDriver");
return config;
}
#Bean
public SessionFactory sessionFactory() {
return new SessionFactory(configuration(), "com.nagra.ml.sp.cpm.model");
}
#Bean
public Neo4jTransactionManager transactionManager() {
return new Neo4jTransactionManager(sessionFactory());
}
#Bean
public MyBean myBean() {
return new MyBean();
}
}
#Test
public void alwaysFails() {
myBean.delete();
myBean.create("1");
try { Thread.sleep(2000); } catch (InterruptedException e) {} //useless
myBean.check("1"); // FAILS HERE !
}
#Test
public void ok() {
myBean.delete();
myBean.createAndCheck("2");
}
}
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRED)
public class MyBean {
#Autowired
private Session neo4jSession;
public void delete() {
neo4jSession.query("MATCH (n) DETACH DELETE n", new HashMap<>());
}
public void create(String suffix) {
C c = new C("c"+suffix);
neo4jSession.save(c);
A a = new A("a"+suffix);
neo4jSession.save(a);
B bRel = new B("b"+suffix, a, c);
neo4jSession.save(bRel);
}
public void check(String suffix) {
//neo4jSession.clear(); //Not working even with this
Number countBRels = (Number) neo4jSession.query("MATCH (:A)-[b:HAS_B]-(:C) WHERE b.name = 'b"+suffix+"' RETURN count(b) as count", new HashMap<>()).iterator().next().get("count");
assertEquals(1, countBRels.intValue()); // OK
Iterable<B> bRels = neo4jSession.query(B.class, "MATCH (:A)-[b:HAS_B]-(:C) WHERE b.name = 'b"+suffix+"' RETURN b", new HashMap<>());
boolean relationshipFound = bRels.iterator().hasNext();
assertTrue(relationshipFound); // FAILS HERE !
}
public void createAndCheck(String suffix) {
create(suffix);
check(suffix);
}
}
This query session.query(B.class, "MATCH (:A)-[b:HAS_B]-(:C) RETURN b") returns only the relationship but not the start node or end node and so the OGM cannot hydrate this. You need to always return the start and end node along with the relationship like session.query(B.class, "MATCH (a:A)-[b:HAS_B]-(c:C) RETURN a,b,c")
The reason it appears to work when you both create and fetch data in the same transaction is that the session already has a cached copy of a and c and hence b can be hydrated with cached start and end nodes.
Firstly, please upgrade from OGM 2.0.6-SNAPSHOT to 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT. I have noticed some off behaviour in the former which might be one part of the issue.
Now on to your test. There are several things going on here which are worth investigating.
Use of #DirtiesContext: You don't seem to be touching the context and if you are using it to reset the context between tests so you get a new Session/Transaction then that's going about it the wrong way. Just use #Transactional instead. The Spring JUnit runner will treat this in a special manner (see next point).
Being aware that Transactional tests automatically roll back: Jasper is right. Spring Integration Tests will always roll back by default. If you want to make sure your JUnit test commits then you will have to #Commit it. A good example of how to set up your test can be seen here.
Knowing how Spring Transaction proxies work. On top of all this confusion you have to make sure you don't simply call transactional method to transactional method in the same class and expect Spring's Transactional behaviour to apply. A quick write up on why can be seen here.
If you address those issues everything should be fine.
Model structure:
#MappedSuperclass
public class BaseModel<K extends Comparable> implements Serializable, Comparable<Object> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Id
private K id;
#Version
private Integer version;
// getter/setter
}
#Entity
public class MyEntity extends BaseModel<String> {
// some fields and it's getter/setter
}
Record in my database for my_entity:
id: 1
version: 1
...
Below is my update method:
void update(String id, Integer currentVersion, ....) {
MyEntity myEntity = myRepository.findOne(id);
myEntity.setVersion(currentVersion);
// other assignments
myRepository.save(myEntity);
}
Below is the query being fired when this method is invoked.
update my_entity set version=?, x=?, y=?, ...
where id=? and version=?
I am expecting OptimisticLockException when currentVersion passed in above method is other than 1.
Can any body help me why I am not getting OptimisticLockException?
I am using spring-boot for my webmvc project.
Section 11.1.54 of the JPA specification notes that:
In general, fields or properties that are specified with the Version
annotation should not be updated by the application.
From experience, I can advise that some JPA providers (OpenJPA being one) actually throw an exception should you try to manually update the version field.
While not strictly an answer to your question, you can re-factor as below to ensure both portability between JPA providers and strict compliance with the JPA specification:
public void update(String id, Integer currentVersion) throws MyWrappedException {
MyEntity myEntity = myRepository.findOne(id);
if(currentVersion != myEntity.getVersion()){
throw new MyWrappedException();
}
myRepository.save(myEntity);
//still an issue here however: see below
}
Assuming your update(...) method is running in a transaction however you still have an issue with the above as section 3.4.5 of the JPA specification notes:
3.4.5 OptimisticLockException Provider implementations may defer writing to the database until the end of the transaction, when
consistent with the lock mode and flush mode settings in effect. In
this case, an optimistic lock check may not occur until commit time,
and the OptimisticLockException may be thrown in the "before
completion" phase of the commit. If the OptimisticLockException must
be caught or handled by the application, the flush method should be
used by the application to force the database writes to occur. This
will allow the application to catch and handle optimistic lock
exceptions.
Essentially then, 2 users can submit concurrent modifications for the same Entity. Both threads can pass the initial check however one will fail when the updates are flushed to the database which may be on transaction commit i.e. after your method has completed.
In order that you can catch and handle the OptimisticLock exception, your code should then look something like the below:
public void update(String id, Integer currentVersion) throws MyWrappedException {
MyEntity myEntity = myRepository.findOne(id);
if(currentVersion != myEntity.getVersion()){
throw new MyWrappedException();
}
myRepository.save(myEntity);
try{
myRepository.flush()
}
catch(OptimisticLockingFailureException ex){
throw new MyWrappedException();
}
}
Use EVICT before updating when using JPA. I did not get the #Version to work either. The property was increased but no exception was thrown when updating an object that had the wrong version-property.
The only thing I have got to work is to first EVICT the object and then save it. Then the HibernateOptimisticLockingException is thrown if the Version properties does not match.
Set the hibernates ShowSQL to 'true' to verify that the actual update sql ends with "where id=? and version=?". If the object is not evicted first, the update statement only has "where id=?", and that will (for obvious reasons) not work.
Optimistic hibernation lock works out of the box (You don't must put a version for Entity):
#Entity
#Table(name = "product")
public class Product {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private Long id;
private Long quantity;
private Long likes;
#Version
private Long version;
public Product() {
}
//setter and getter
//equals and hashcode
repository
public interface ProductRepository extends JpaRepository<Product, Long> {}
service
#Service
public class ProductOptimisticLockingService {
private final ProductRepository productRepository;
public ProductOptimisticLockingService(ProductRepository productRepository) {
this.productRepository = productRepository;
}
#Transactional(readOnly = true)
public Product findById(Long id, String nameThread){
Product product =
productRepository
.findById(id)
.get();
System.out.printf(
"\n Select (%s) .... " +
"(id:) %d | (likes:) %d | (quantity:) %d | (version:) %d \n",
nameThread,
product.getId(),
product.getLikes(),
product.getQuantity(),
product.getVersion()
);
return product;
}
#Transactional(isolation = Isolation.READ_COMMITTED)
public void updateWithOptimisticLocking(Product product, String nameThread) {
try {
productRepository.save(product);
} catch (ObjectOptimisticLockingFailureException ex) {
System.out.printf(
"\n (%s) Another transaction is already working with a string with an ID: %d \n",
nameThread,
product.getId()
);
}
System.out.printf("\n--- Update has been performed (%s)---\n", nameThread);
}
}
test
#SpringBootTest
class ProductOptimisticLockingServiceTest {
#Autowired
private ProductOptimisticLockingService productService;
#Autowired
private ProductRepository productRepository;
#Test
void saveWithOptimisticLocking() {
/*ID may be - 1 or another. You must put the ID to pass in your methods. You must think how to write right your tests*/
Product product = new Product();
product.setLikes(7L);
product.setQuantity(5L);
productRepository.save(product);
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2);
Lock lockService = new ReentrantLock();
Runnable taskForAlice = makeTaskForAlice(lockService);
Runnable taskForBob = makeTaskForBob(lockService);
executor.submit(taskForAlice);
executor.submit(taskForBob);
executorServiceMethod(executor);
}
/*------ Alice-----*/
private Runnable makeTaskForAlice(Lock lockService){
return () -> {
System.out.println("Thread-1 - Alice");
Product product;
lockService.lock();
try{
product = productService
.findById(1L, "Thread-1 - Alice");
}finally {
lockService.unlock();
}
setPause(1000L); /*a pause is needed in order for the 2nd transaction to attempt
read the line from which the 1st transaction started working*/
lockService.lock();
try{
product.setQuantity(6L);
product.setLikes(7L);
update(product,"Thread-1 - Alice");
}finally {
lockService.unlock();
}
System.out.println("Thread-1 - Alice - end");
};
}
/*------ Bob-----*/
private Runnable makeTaskForBob(Lock lockService){
return () -> {
/*the pause makes it possible to start the transaction first
from Alice*/
setPause(50L);
System.out.println("Thread-2 - Bob");
Product product;
lockService.lock();
try{
product = findProduct("Thread-2 - Bob");
}finally {
lockService.unlock();
}
setPause(3000L); /*a pause is needed in order for the 1st transaction to update
the string that the 2nd transaction is trying to work with*/
lockService.lock();
try{
product.setQuantity(5L);
product.setLikes(10L);
update(product,"Thread-2 - Bob");
}finally {
lockService.unlock();
}
System.out.println("Thread-2 - Bob - end");
};
}
private void update(Product product, String nameThread){
productService
.updateWithOptimisticLocking(product, nameThread);
}
private Product findProduct(String nameThread){
return productService
.findById(1L, nameThread);
}
private void setPause(long timeOut){
try {
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.sleep(timeOut);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private void executorServiceMethod(ExecutorService executor){
try {
executor.awaitTermination(10L, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
executor.shutdown();
}
}