Setting properties in Adobe CQ5 - osgi

I'm working on CQ5 based app, which is a whole new area for me as I was mainly working on Spring based web-apps before.
The app is maven project based on Blue-prints archetype(http://www.cqblueprints.com/xwiki/bin/view/Blue+Prints/The+CQ+Project+Maven+Archetype).
Now I have a question, what is a standard approach to add some properties, that would normally go to config.properties (or alike) file in standard web-app. Properties that contain things like hostNames, accountNumbers and alike.
Cheers.

I'm not familiar with blueprints, but as I understand that's just a way to generate your CQ project structure, so I assume it doesn't have any real impact on how you manage configuration parameters.
CQ5 is based on Apache Sling, which uses the OSGi ConfigAdmin service for configurable parameters, and provides a few tools to make this easier.
You can see an example of that in the PathBasedDecorator Sling component, which uses the #Component annotation to declare itself as an OSGi component:
#Component(metatype=true, ...)
and later uses an #Property annotation to declare a multi-value configurable parameter, with default values:
#Property(value={"/content:2", "/sling-test-pbrt:2"}, unbounded=PropertyUnbounded.ARRAY)
private static final String PROP_PATH_MAPPING = "path.mapping";
That value is then read in the component's activate() method:
final Dictionary<?, ?> properties = componentContext.getProperties();
final String[] mappingList = (String[]) properties.get(PROP_PATH_MAPPING);
and the OSGi bundle that contains that component provides a metatype.properties file to define the name and label of the configurable parameter.
That's it - with this, Sling and the OSGi framework generate a basic config UI for the component, that you can access from /system/console/config, and manage your component's activation and reactivation automatically if configuration parameters change.
Those configurations can also come from the JCR repository, thanks to the Sling installer which picks them up there, you can find a number of those in folders named "config" under /libs and /apps in your CQ5 repository.
Another option is to use JCR content directly, depending on how your configurable parameters are used. You could tell your component that its config is under /apps/foo/myparameters in the repository (and make just that value configurable), and add JCR properties and child nodes under that node as needed, that your component can read. The disadvantage is that your #Component won't be restarted automatically when parameters change, as happens when using OSGi configurations directly.
Long explanation...hope this helps ;-)

Thanks a lot to Bertrand, your answer really pointed me in the right direction.
What I did was I created .ConfigService.xml for each of my ran modes, which looks like that:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jcr:root xmlns:sling="http://sling.apache.org/jcr/sling/1.0" xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0"
jcr:primaryType="sling:OsgiConfig"
myconfig.config="{String}My Value"/>
Then in my ConfigService looked like that:
#Component(immediate = true, metatype = true)
#Service(ConfigService.class)
public class ConfigService {
private Dictionary<String, String> properties;
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
protected void activate(ComponentContext context) {
properties = context.getProperties();
}
protected void deactivate(ComponentContext context) {
properties = null;
}
public String getProperty(String key) {
return properties.get(key);
}
}
Than I just use ConfigService if I need to get a config property accessing it using #Reference.
I hope that can help someone!

ConfigService example may not be the best approach since the ComponentContext should only be depended upon during component activation and deactivation.

Related

How to prevent controller endpoints only available for a certain lifecycle environment in spring boot

Delete an article using DELETE /articles/:id
Delete all articles using DELETE /articles/
How can I make deletion support available only in dev environment and prevent it for test, staging, production environments in spring boot
First thing that comes to my mind would be adding a DeletionController which is created either based on a property or, in your case, on the active profile.
Something like:
#Profile("dev")
#RestController
public class DeletionController {
#DeleteMapping("articles")
public void deleteAll() {
//delete all articles
}
#DeleteMapping("articles/{id}")
public void delete(#PathVariable Integer id) {
//delete article for given id
}
}
Doing so Spring will only instantiate the DeletionController when the dev profile is active making the related endpoints available only in that case. You also have the possibility to have it active/inactive with more complex conditions like #Profile("dev & staging") or #Profile("dev & !production"). You can control the active profiles in your property file with the property spring.profiles.active.
The property approach would be using, instead of #Profile, the annotation #ConditionalOnProperty properly configured.

spring boot app cannot load bundle properties files

I am building an app that mostly provide REST services, nothing fancy. since my data consumed by the app can have multiple languages I thought about using the bundle files.
I created 3 files, one with the default file name and another two with specific languages. The files created using intellij IDE I am using.
I followed this guide https://www.baeldung.com/java-resourcebundle however on each run I am getting:
MissingResourceException: Can't find bundle for base name tp_app_strings, locale en_US
I tried numerous articles but none of them seems to resolve the issue.
One fun fact is that if I am using the #Value("classpath:tp_app_strings.properties") on a 'Resource' field I am able to get a reference to that file, so it spring is able to find it.
Additional thing that I tried was to create a WEB-INF directory and place the files there (read it in some article) but still no positive affect
The project structure is quite straight forward:
Spring boot version 2.2 running tomcat.
Any suggeestions would be highly appriciated
You can load the .properties file to the application context using #PropertySource annotation instead using #Value to load the .properties file to a org.springframework.core.io.Resource instance.
The usage;
#Configuration
#PropertySource("classpath:tp_app_strings.properties")
public class DefaultProperties {
#Value("${property1.name}") // Access properties in the above file here using SpringEL.
private String prop1;
#Value("${property2.name}")
private String prop2;
}
You wouldn't need java.util.ResourceBundle access properties this way. Use different or same class to load other .properties files as well.
Update 1:
In order to have the functionality of java.util.ResourceBundle, you can't just use org.springframework.core.io.Resource class. This class or non of it sub-classes don't provide functions to access properties by its name java.util.ResourceBundle whatsoever.
However, if you want a functionality like java.util.ResourceBundle, you could implement something custom like this using org.springframework.core.io.Resource;
#Configuration
public class PropertyConfig {
#Value("classpath:tp_app_strings.properties")
private Resource defaultProperties;
#Bean("default-lang")
public java.util.Properties getDefaultProperties() throws IOException {
Properties props = new Properties();
props.load(defaultProperties.getInputStream());
return props;
}
}
Make sure to follow correct naming convention when define the property file as java.util.Properties#load(InputStream) expect that.
Now you can #Autowire and use this java.util.Properties bean wherever you want just like with java.util.ResourceBundle using java.util.Properties#getProperty(String) or its overloaded counterpart.
I think it's problem of you properties file naming convention. use underline "_" for specifying locale of file like
filename_[languageCode]_[regionCode]
[languageCode] and [regionCode] are two letters standard code that [regionCode] section is optional
about code abbrivation standard take a look on this question
in your case change file name to tp_app_strings_en_US.properties

Mule connector config needs dynamic attributes

I have develop a new Connector. This connector requires to be configured with two parameters, lets say:
default_trip_timeout_milis
default_trip_threshold
Challenge is, I want read ${myValue_a} and ${myValue_a} from an API, using an HTTP call, not from a file or inline values.
Since this is a connector, I need to make this API call somewhere before connectors are initialized.
FlowVars aren't an option, since they are initialized with the Flows, and this is happening before in the Mule app life Cycle.
My idea is to create an Spring Bean implementing Initialisable, so it will be called before Connectors are init, and here, using any java based libs (Spring RestTemplate?) , call API, get values, and store them somewhere (context? objectStore?) , so the connector can access them.
Make sense? Any other ideas?
Thanks!
mmm you could make a class that will create the properties in the startup and in this class obtain the API properties via http request. Example below:
public class PropertyInit implements InitializingBean,FactoryBean {
private Properties props = new Properties();
#Override
public Object getObject() throws Exception {
return props;
}
#Override
public Class getObjectType() {
return Properties.class;
}
}
Now you should be able to load this property class with:
<context:property-placeholder properties-ref="propertyInit"/>
Hope you like this idea. I used this approach in a previous project.
I want to give you first a strong warning on doing this. If you go down this path then you risk breaking your application in very strange ways because if any other components depend on this component you are having dynamic components on startup, you will break them, and you should think if there are other ways to achieve this behaviour instead of using properties.
That said the way to do this would be to use a proxy pattern, which is a proxy for the component you recreate whenever its properties are changed. So you will need to create a class which extends Circuit Breaker, which encapsulates and instance of Circuit Breaker which is recreated whenever its properties change. These properties must not be used outside of the proxy class as other components may read these properties at startup and then not refresh, you must keep this in mind that anything which might directly or indirectly access these properties cannot do so in their initialisation phase or your application will break.
It's worth taking a look at SpringCloudConfig which allows for you to have a properties server and then all your applications can hot-reload those properties at runtime when they change. Not sure if you can take that path in Mule if SpringCloud is supported yet but it's a nice thing to know exists.

how to manage spring-cloud bootstrap properties in a shared library?

I'm in the process of building a library which provides an opinionated configuration for applications which use our Spring Cloud Config/Eureka setup. The idea is to deliver this configuration as a custom starter with little or no spring cloud-related boilerplate in individual microservice apps.
At this point, the majority of the shared configuration that I want to put in this library consists of stuff in bootstrap.yml. I'd like to provide bootstrap.yml in my custom starter, but applications using the library still need to be able to provide their own bootstrap.yml, even if only so they can set their spring.application.name properly.
Due to the way bootstrap.yml is loaded from the classpath, Spring seems to ignore the one in the shared lib if the application has its own bootstrap.yml. I can't even use an ApplicationContextInitializer to customize the Environment because of the special way the bootstrap context treats ApplicationContextInitializers.
Does anyone have any recommendations for an approach that would work here? I want to provide a drop-in lib that makes our opinionated bootstrap config work without having to duplicate a boilerplate bootstrap.yml in all of our projects.
You can add a PropertySource in a shared library to the bootstrap properties by using the org.springframework.cloud.bootstrap.BootstrapConfiguration key in the META-INF/spring.factories file.
For example, you can create a library containing the following:
src/main/java/com/example/mylib/MyLibConfig.java
package com.example.mylib;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.PropertySource;
#Configuration
#PropertySource("classpath:mylib-config.properties")
public class MyLibConfig {
}
src/main/resources/mylib-config.properties
eureka.instance.public=true
# or whatever...
src/main/resources/META-INF/spring.factories
org.springframework.cloud.bootstrap.BootstrapConfiguration=com.example.mylib.MyLibConfig
More details: http://projects.spring.io/spring-cloud/spring-cloud.html#_customizing_the_bootstrap_configuration
I was able to find a solution to this. The goals of this solution are:
Load the values from a yaml file in a shared library.
Allow applications using the library to introduce their own bootstrap.yml that is also loaded into the Environment.
Values in the bootstrap.yml should override values in the shared yaml.
The main challenge is to inject some code at the appropriate point in the application lifecycle. Specifically, we need to do it after the bootstrap.yml PropertySource is added to the environment (so that we can inject our custom PropertySource in the correct order relative to it), but also before the application starts configuring beans (as our config values control behavior).
The solution I found was to use a custom EnvironmentPostProcessor
public class CloudyConfigEnvironmentPostProcessor implements EnvironmentPostProcessor, Ordered {
private YamlPropertySourceLoader loader;
public CloudyConfigEnvironmentPostProcessor() {
loader = new YamlPropertySourceLoader();
}
#Override
public void postProcessEnvironment(ConfigurableEnvironment env, SpringApplication application) {
//ensure that the bootstrap file is only loaded in the bootstrap context
if (env.getPropertySources().contains("bootstrap")) {
//Each document in the multi-document yaml must be loaded separately.
//Start by loading the no-profile configs...
loadProfile("cloudy-bootstrap", env, null);
//Then loop through the active profiles and load them.
for (String profile: env.getActiveProfiles()) {
loadProfile("cloudy-bootstrap", env, profile);
}
}
}
private void loadProfile(String prefix, ConfigurableEnvironment env, String profile) {
try {
PropertySource<?> propertySource = loader.load(prefix + (profile != null ? "-" + profile: ""), new ClassPathResource(prefix + ".yml"), profile);
//propertySource will be null if the profile isn't represented in the yml, so skip it if this is the case.
if (propertySource != null) {
//add PropertySource after the "applicationConfigurationProperties" source to allow the default yml to override these.
env.getPropertySources().addAfter("applicationConfigurationProperties", propertySource);
}
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
#Override
public int getOrder() {
//must go after ConfigFileApplicationListener
return Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE + 11;
}
}
This custom EnvironmentPostProcessor can be injected via META-INF/spring.factories:
#Environment PostProcessors
org.springframework.boot.env.EnvironmentPostProcessor=\
com.mycompany.cloudy.bootstrap.autoconfig.CloudyConfigEnvironmentPostProcessor
A couple things to note:
The YamlPropertySourceLoader loads yaml properties by profile, so if you are using a multi-document yaml file you need to actually load each profile from it separately, including the no-profile configs.
ConfigFileApplicationListener is the EnvironmentPostProcessor responsible for loading bootstrap.yml (or application.yml for the regular context) into the Environment, so in order to position the custom yaml properties correctly relative to the bootstrap.yml properties precedence-wise, you need to order your custom EnvironmentPostProcessor after ConfigFileApplicationListener.
Edit: My initial answer did not work. I'm replacing it with this one, which does.

OSGi bundle config without managed service or factory

Neil Bartlett's article http://njbartlett.name/2010/07/19/factory-components-in-ds.html shows the way to set config for bundles without using managed service or managed factory.
Search for examples of actually setting the config for this method either point to felix file install or to examples using managed service.
In answer to the question OSGi Declarative Services vs. ManagedService for configuring service? Neil Bartlett states "Note that DS never actually creates a ManagedService or ManagedServiceFactory for your component. It works by listening to Config Admin with a ConfigurationListener. However the internal details are unimportant... simply create configs with PID/factoryPID matching the component.name and it "just works"
I think the technique involves placing a pid entry in the config dictionary but I have no idea how this would be used with config admin.
A guide or simple example of how to set the configuration using this method would be very helpful.
I know it is some time since the question was asked, but I ran into the same problem when trying to create a ManagedServiceFactory-like Component with Declarative Services. So I want to share my solution. Maybe others find it useful. My problem was like this:
I have defined a component (annotated with #Component). On each configuration I add using felix file-install, I want an instance of that component created with the given configuration and activated immediately.
First I tried messing with the properties factory and configurationPid of #Component, but all that is not needed and even returns wrong results (felix annotation processor in the maven plugin seems to have a bug when handling configurationPid).
The solution I came up with:
package com.example.my;
#Component(
name = MyExampleComponent.FACTORY_PID,
configurationPolicy = ConfigurationPolicy.REQUIRE,
property = {"abc=", "exampleProp="}
)
public class MyExampleComponent {
public static final String FACTORY_PID = "com.example.my.component";
#Activate
protected void activate(BundleContext context, Map<String,Object> map) {
// ...
}
}
Then I created a config file for felix file-install named com.example.my.component-test1.cfg:
abc = Hello World
exampleProp = 123
When deployed this automatically creates a folder structure in the configuration folder like com/example/my/component containing the files:
factory.config
contents:
factory.pid="com.example.my.component"
factory.pidList=[ \
"com.example.my.component.525ca4fb-2d43-46f3-b912-8765f639c46f", \
]
.
525ca4fb-2d43-46f3-b912-8765f639c46f.config
contents:
abc="Hello World"
exampleProp="123"
felix.fileinstall.filename="file:/..._.cfg"
service.factoryPid="com.example.my.component"
service.pid="com.example.my.component.525ca4fb-2d43-46f3-b912-8765f639c46f"
The 525ca4fb-2d43-46f3-b912-8765f639c46f seems to be some randomly generated ID (possibly UUID).

Resources