I don't know whether this is actually an SDL issue or just me not knowing how to build packages from msys/mingw. What I have done thus far:
downloaded latest mingw-get-inst.exe from sourceforge and ran it. This installed a C:\MinGW\ directory with msys inside. This brought me to my first bit of confusion. When I opened the mingw shell, rather than bringing me to my /home/ directory as I expected ( I have used mingw before and remember this being weird ) it placed me in /c/Users/me/.
I figured that this must be my home directory and put the extracted SDL-1.2.15/ in this location.
I then ran:
cd SDL-1.2.15
./configure --help
but received sh: ./configure: No such file or directory.
I then created a /c/MinGW/msys/1.0/home/ directory, set that as the HOME environment variable, moved the SDL folder into it and tried to configure again with the same result.
There are a few things I really dont understand about installing packages that I hope someone can clear up. I have installed a few before and the ./configure; make; make install; seems to be a common procedure. I know msys provides the functionality for make, but is configure a file that is supposed to be included in each package? If so, why is it not in the SDL package/how do configure it?
I have been following instructions from here and they seem to have worked for others in the comments. The bottom-most comment tells that mingw-get-inst works, though I did try it both ways.
I have a feeling my lack of msys/mingw knowledge is my problem.
I am on windows 7.
I had the same problem as you describe and I got SDL, SDL_image and SDL_ttf working after some research.
It seems that the configure file exists only in the source code packages. I found that out after I downloaded the SDL_image source. So, the problem probably lies in that the configure file comes only in the source packages.
However, I'm having other problems so I'm not sure this has fixed it for me, but it seems like it should.
Related
I downloaded and unzipped the file to folder c:\make-4.2.
The install instructions I have seen suggest that I just type "make install" and the installation will start.
I don't see that "make" file there. I tried it from the directory and got an error that the command is not recognized.
Any tips?
I don't know what install instructions you are referring to, but certainly not the ones that come with GNU make itself. There's no platform where you can simply untar the source code and type "make install" with no other steps, and certainly not on Windows.
If you're trying to build GNU make from downloaded source on Windows, you should read the README.W32 file that comes with the source code and follow the instructions there.
I've been trying to install hmatrix on my (64-bit) Windows 10 computer; after searching through and trying many possible solutions (including the instructions under "Windows" and "Alternative Windows Build" given here), I decided to pursue the course of action given on this Reddit thread.
However, when I type in the command
cabal install hmatrix -fopenblas --extra-lib-dir=${c:\msys64\mingw64\bin} --extra-include-dir=${c:\msys64\mingw64\include}
into the MSYS2 shell, the following log is given:
Resolving dependencies...
Configuring hmatrix-0.17.0.2...
Failed to install hmatrix-0.17.0.2
Build log ( C:\Users\Christian\AppData\Roaming\cabal\logs\hmatrix-0.17.0.2.log ):
Configuring hmatrix-0.17.0.2...
cabal.exe: Missing dependency on a foreign library:
* Missing C library: libopenblas
This problem can usually be solved by installing the system package that
provides this library (you may need the "-dev" version). If the library is
already installed but in a non-standard location then you can use the flags
--extra-include-dirs= and --extra-lib-dirs= to specify where it is.
cabal: Leaving directory 'C:\msys64\tmp\cabal-tmp-4244\hmatrix-0.17.0.2'
cabal.exe: Error: some packages failed to install:
hmatrix-0.17.0.2 failed during the configure step. The exception was:
ExitFailure 1
However, when I check the directory c:\msys64\mingw64\bin, I see that libopenblas.dll is right there; I don't know why cabal can't seem to find it.
Any insight into why this is not working or what to do?
UPDATE:
The files libopenblas.dll.a and libopenblas.a are in the directory c:\msys64\mingw64\lib. Is it possible I need to somehow include this directory as well? (If I do, how would I do that?)
I also downloaded the files in Alex Vorobiev's comment below and put them in c:\msys64\mingw64\bin if they are .dlls or c:\msys64\mingw64\lib if they are .libs. The header files were already contained in c:\msys64\include\openblas.
I tried several variations on the command in the original post after making these changes, including switching \bin with \lib and switching \include with \include\openblas, but all of them still give the same error.
I'm a bit suspicious about the
if os(windows)
if flag(openblas)
extra-libraries: libopenblas
in the cabal file, could you unpack it and remove the "lib" part? If that doesn't work please post a log with -v3 output. I've seen quite a few people with troubles installing this package. So could you also open a ticket on the GHC bug tracker if this doesn't work (and CC me "Phyx-")?
Secondly, you never said which version of GHC you're using. 8.0.1 should have far less trouble (and won't need the hack to get it working in GHCi) since the runtime linker has been overhauled and should be much better on Windows. 8.0.2 will likely include the new import libraries support as well.
I have been using MinGW and the GNU Fortran compiler for a while in order to compile Fortran programs on Windows, which has always been a successful method. However, I have been getting the following error for the past 4 days:
The application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b). Click OK to close the application.
The error only happens when running applications that I wrote myself, and that I compiled using the MinGW/gfortran combo. When compiling using Visual Studio and iFort, I have no problem running the applications. The error seems retroactive: applications that were compiled using gfortran a long time ago and ran perfectly until now also break, even though I didn't recompile them. This leads me to think that it is a dynamic library problem. Online searches show that it probably is a compatibility problem between a 64-bit dll and a 32-bit application
I am using Windows 7. One of the latest things I remember doing before starting to get the problem was trying to update MinGW ; I used the mingw-get update and mingw-get upgrade command lines.
After looking around online, I have tried the following fixes:
- reinstalled the Visual C++ Runtime Environment
- reinstalled the .NET framework
- downloaded and replaced a bunch of .dlls like mscvr100.dll, mscvr100d.dll, etc...
- uninstalled and reinstalled MinGW in order to make sure I had the latest gcc version
- run Dependency Walker on a simple application ("Hello World!" type program)
Dependency Walker tells me that a number of .dlls cannot be found (full list: API-MS-WIN-APPMODEL-RUNTIME-L1-1-0.DLL, API-MS-WIN-CORE-WINRT-ERROR-L1-1-0.DLL, API-MS-WIN-CORE-WINRT-L1-1-0.DLL, API-MS-WIN-CORE-WINRT-ROBUFFER-L1-1-0.DLL, API-MS-WIN-CORE-WINRT-STRING-L1-1-0.DLL, API-MS-WIN-SHCORE-SCALING-L1-1-1.DLL, DCOMP.DLL, GPSVC.DLL, IESHIMS.DLL).
It also highlights in red the libquadmath-0.dll (on which libgfortran-3.dll seems to depend). Indeed, it seems that libquadmath-0.dll is a 64-bit DLL in the middle of a 32-bit program. When opening said .dll with Dependency Walker, I can see that all the modules in this library are x86 except the library itself which is x64 (CPU column of DW). I am not exactly sure how this is possible / how to fix it. The library is found in the Python/Anaconda folder (I installed Python and Anaconda a few weeks ago, the problem did NOT appear at that time).
If anybody has an idea of how to get my environment to work again without reinstalling Windows, I would greatly appreciate it! Thanks!!
I had a similar problem. Looking at Dependency Walker I wasn't loading API-MS-WIN-CORE entries. However, when I went to edit my path it turned out that by bin folder wasn't on the path. Adding, in my case the mingw64 bin folder to the path fixed this issue for me. I only mention the API-MS-WIN-CORE entries since I thought it might be the problem, but in reality it wasn't causing my issue.
I was getting this same error code, and used Dependency Walker to discover that, in my case, the 64-bit version of libwinpthread-1.dll was not being found. This helped me resolve my issue.
So, the solution is to determine the missing dll, track it down on your system and reference its location in your path variable, or find out how to install it if you don't have it.
That said, I also came across the following caveat that's important to know about when using Dependency Walker. It's currently out of date and will actually show false results for WIN-CORE dlls: https://stackoverflow.com/a/36244483/4438237
To work around this, there's a newer program called Dependencies by lucasg, that properly interprets these and won't mistakenly tell you about these falsely missing dlls.
I was getting same Error, as mentioned in above answers the problem is "path not being set" aside from setting path you can alternatively Do this; if u don't want to set the path for some reason:
Open CMD
cd C:\MinGW\bin to navigate to the bin directory of mingw
now u can compile the code as following Gcc (dir of ur .c file) -o (ur output dir) for ex : gcc I:\dir\Hello.c -o I:\dir\output.exe
alternatively if u want to automate the process u can make a batch file to automatically do it for you.
here's the batch file if anyone needs it
#echo off
C:
cd \MinGW\bin\
gcc I:\dir\*.c -o "I:\dir\Output.exe" Rem Replace "dir" with your own directory and * with ur own FileName!
pause
I had a similar error but over came it by editing my environment variables.
I had g77 as part of my path variables and by removing it and leaving gfortran alone, the error disappeared
I was on Windows 10 using cmake-gui to generate a MinGW-w64 project and meet same problem.
My solution: go to start windows, search and open MinGW-w64 terminal, then in terminal call cmake with specifiying cmake options.
Yes the old posts got it right. It is the environmental parameters messed up. I got the same error. It is solved by putting the msys64 path to the first:
Path=c:\msys64\mingw64\bin;%PATH%
The msys64 path was the last, now it is the first. Type it once at the command line after Windows started, or edit the Path environmental parameter if you have the admin right.
I am trying to build xmlsec on Windows... I am not an experienced C/C++ developer and not really familiar with the build process if something along the lines of "make ... make install" doesn't do the trick.
xmlsec comes with a Win32 subdirectory, a nice ECMAScript configure.js that takes an optional bunch of parameters and a readme which explains that after running the configure, "nmake ... nmake install" should do the trick. (Obviously it isn't quite that easy or I wouldn't be posting here!)
xmlsec also depends on a number of other libraries (see here for a graphic). I have downloaded the sources for those libraries.
My problem is that I don't know how to arrange those sources, or what to tell the configure.js script, in order to get a build to work.
For instance, the nmake process complains that it can't find "iconv.h" (iconv is one of the required libraries), which is not surprising because there isn't one. Instead there is an "iconv.h.in" and an "iconv.h.build.in"... which I don't know what to do with to produce the required 'iconv.h".
(I am using MS Visual Studio 2010 at the command prompt (which I think is the recommended approach.)
Does anybody out there know how to do this? Any help at all would be very much appreciated.
TIA
Mike Peat
You don't need to build xmlsec, you can directly download the wheel file from this link
https://github.com/mehcode/python-xmlsec/releases
It has all the dependencies installed with it.
have you tried the Msys with Mingw32 compiler? In Msys, you can do make and make install trick. I have successful with Msys in compile xmlsec. If you want to use Msys and have difficulties, I can help.
Anyway, in general, there must be a iconv.h file in the pre-compile folder provided by Zlatkovic (i.e C:\iconv\include\iconv.h). You may want to download again the folder. After figure out where all the dependencies are, put the path in environment path. For your information, I once tried with the configure.js but not successful. Hope that you are luckier than me :D
Hi Kristine (#Kristine T) - (and thanks for getting back to me!)
I had not been doing "make clean", but have now done so ("make clean", followed by "make" - no change in the result though).
The problem I get with the "make" is that it throws an error on compiling "dl.c" saying that "PACKAGE" is undefined (line 295).
I have also had problems using the compiled version of libxml2 - "configure" always says it can't find it (it is there, but...), so I have been using the --with-libxml-src=... parameter to configure, giving it the full source of libxml2 to work with, getting configure to at least finish OK.
I don't have the same problems with openssl or libxslt where I can either tell configure about the compiled version (using --with-XXX={path-to-dir}, or just omit ={path} bit, in which case it seems to find MinGW's own versions, but that doesn't work with libxml2.
Mike
I need to build ffmpeg for Mac for converting MOV to FLV in a Java application. I made and installed LAME and then FFMPEG, but I'm confused as to what file I should grab to include with the Java application. What is the binary file? The previous version that I grabbed from the source of ffmpegX was 10mb in size, but the file that's in my /usr/local/bin is only 0.1mb. Is that the right file, or what do I need to include?
I'm not too savvy with anything that needs to be typed into Terminal, so excuse the lack of technical jargon!
Short answer: that file in /usr/local/bin is either the real binary or a soft link to the real binary. If you run ls -l /usr/local/bin any links will be displayed with an arrow to their target location. But pszilard is probably right, that file might be the actual binary, which was dynamically linked to library code.
Long answer: If you compiled from source, then you ran the following three commands
./configure
make
make install
The first one creates a configuration file called config.mak. Near the top of that file, you'll see a lines similar to the following:
prefix=/usr/local
LIBDIR=$(DESTDIR)${prefix}/lib
SHLIBDIR=$(DESTDIR)${prefix}/lib
INCDIR=$(DESTDIR)${prefix}/include
BINDIR=$(DESTDIR)${prefix}/bin
DESTDIR is optional; it's irrelevant unless you ran make install with an additional argument. BINDIR is the actual install location. On my system (snow leopard) that was /usr/local/bin/.
If you're still having trouble, just don't install the build. If you run
make clean
make
The binary will be in your build folder.
Don't use MacPorts or Fink. You'll be happier in the long run if you compile from source yourself. If you insist on using a package manager, try Homebrew <Link>.
I'm not a Mac expert by far, but I've a few tips. If you build the lib with dynamic linkage and the the other one was statically linked that might explain the size difference.
As for the location, what did you use? MacPorts, Fink, or source? If you built from source depends what you used :) MacPorts and Fink have their specific location for binaries (I don't remember anymore, but the documentation should have the info, otherwise the big G has it ;)