Hi, i'm running 2 server in amazon ec2 under load balancing apps, both of them using the same script. If i send curl data with base64 encryption on it, the load balancing won't proceed the base64 encryption. But if send the curl data directly to server, the base64 can be proceed.
everytime i send curl data with base64 on it via load balancing, i always receive this error:
curl: (6) Could not resolve host: my.host.server; nodename nor servname provided, or not known
can anyone help me with this?
Related
Problem definition: I want to send a rest request to an API that blocks my real ip address. I used a VPN that can change the ip (I checked it by any browser) but the masked ip leaks when I try to send the rest request. It means although the browser shows masked ip, the rest request knows my real ip.
Here is a simple rest request using cURL that returns the ip:
curl https://api.ipify.org?format=json
Tried solution: I have tried to send a port that is used by VPN. for example in this situation, the rest request should be like this:
curl -x http://localhost:<PORT> https://api.ipify.org?format=json
but I don't know what the port is used by the vpn I use. Also, I don't know is it a true solution or not?
thanks for all the answers and help.
I am not able to successfully bind and secure the rethinkdb http client, either being exposed to the whole network or refusing connections behind the proxy.
I am thus left with no choice but to restart the rdb daemon with bind-http=all each
time I want to access it...
Rdb starts with systemctl under archlinux. Three configurations I tried:
# /etc/rethinkdb/instances.d/mydb.conf
bind-http=localhost #(1)
bind-http=127.0.0.1 #(2)
bind-http=1.2.3.4 #(3)
Resulting in:
Fails to parse 'localhost'
Refuses connections behind the proxy
Equivalent to bind-http=all
Firefox 59 uses a socks proxy, working ok
as the browser's ip address does become 1.2.3.4:
$ ssh -TND 8080 user#1.2.3.4
I am quite convinced that I had secured the http client as expected,
and problems started after I updated both FF and rdb
(FF59 fails to parse 'localhost' as well for example)
I don't know if this is a bug or a feature or if I am missing something,
any help is most welcome. Many thanks
Beware of the "localhost" string.
Configuring the rethinkdb server with:
#/etc/rethinkdb/instances.d/mydb.conf
bind-http=127.0.0.1
http-port=8084
and binding some local port with SSH:
[client]$ ssh -L 8080:127.0.0.1:8084 server
is enough to access the web interface at 127.0.0.1:8080, as suggested by #jishi.
Configuring the browser to use a SOCKS proxy as per the rdb docs is not at all necessary.
For some reason localhost:8080 is not understood by FF59 (gets invisibly prefixed by www or something).
Does anyone know how to cluster NiFi 1.5.0? I want to use dataflow.mydomain.com but... I get this error when I try to hit the loadbalancer that reads:
"The request contained an invalid host header [dataflow.mydomain.com] in the request [/nifi/]. Check for request manipulation or third-party intercept."
According to one post that I read, the problem was that the value of nifi.web.http.host had to match the value of the url.
If that's true, I don't understand how a cluster would be possible.
Thanks!
(I'm using a 3 host setup in AWS, the hosts will individually respond if I set the nifi.web.http.host to their private IP and I access it at http://[ip]/nifi/
but not if I use a loadbalancer in front of the cluster).
It is not really an issue of clustering NiFi, it is an issue of accessing it through a load balancer. A cluster does not imply a load balancer.
In the next version of NiFi there will be a new property (nifi.web.proxy.host) where you could put dataflow.mydomain.com and it would let it through.
For now I think you'd have to strip off the host header of each request at your load balancer so that it doesn't get passed on to the NiFi nodes, that it was is triggering the rejection. NiFi is inspecting the headers of the incoming request and seeing that the host header has a value that is not the host of NiFi.
We have a Parse server(Parse.com) in which we would like to write data to, from a hardware device,using rest API
The hardware device is using TCP connection to send data to the server .
Things we have to set when sending data is :
"TCP","184.xxx.xxx.xxx",80 (the ip of the server)
Now, how can i know what is the ip of our app in parse to connect to it and send data ?
I have tried :
"TCP","https://api.parse.com",80
got DNS failed ..
also tried with port 443 with same error .
Solved with :
"TCP","api.parse.com",443
I have googled and searched all over but I am still having trouble getting connected to a site using the ftpzilla
I am getting this read out when I try to connect to the server using the network connection wizard
Connecting to probe.filezilla-project.org
Response: 220 FZ router and firewall tester ready
USER FileZilla
Response: 331 Give any password.
PASS 3.9.0.6
Response: 230 logged on.
Checking for correct external IP address
Retrieving external IP address from
http://ip.filezilla-project.org/ip.php
Checking for correct external IP address IP 173.56.114.112
bhd-fg-bbe-bbc
Response: 200 OK
PREP 60010
Response: 200 Using port 60010, data token 1063172065
PORT 173,56,114,112,234,106
Response: 200 PORT command successful
LIST
Response: 150 opening data connection
Response: 503 Failure of data connection.
Server sent unexpected reply.
Connection closed
The weird thing is I only get this error for this particular server and the server I use for my personal site (namecheap.com) gives me no such error. Does anyone know why this may be happening? And please try not to point me to the network configuration wiki because I have read through that and I still am at this point.
PORT 173,56,114,112,234,106
....
Response: 503 Failure of data connection.
...
please try not to point me to the network configuration wiki
You are using active mode, that is the ftp client (FileZilla) waits for a connection from the server. Obviously the server can not connect to the client which indicates that something like a firewall restricts the connection.
Since according to your description this happens only with few servers, you either use only these servers with active mode or these servers are protected by firewalls which do not allow active mode. Have you tried with passive mode?
I had a similar issue connecting and made the following changes and had success.
Go to File>>>Site Manager>>>
For my site, I changed the Encryption to "Only use plain FTP(insecure)" and had success. May you find the same success.