Getting image of the player with Kinect in XNA performance issues - performance

I am developing an XNA game that is using Kinect. The player seen on the screen is the real image of the person who is playing in front of Kinect sensor. For eliminating the background and getting only the player's image I am doing these operations in kinect.AllFramesReady:
using (ColorImageFrame colorVideoFrame = imageFrames.OpenColorImageFrame())
{
if (colorVideoFrame != null)
{
//Getting the image of the colorVideoFrame to a Texture2D named colorVideo
}
//And setting its information on a Color array named colors with GetData
colorVideo.GetData(colors);
}
using (DepthImageFrame depthVideoFrame = imageFrames.OpenDepthImageFrame())
{
if (depthVideoFrame != null){
//Copying the the image to a DepthImagePixel array
//Using only the pixels with PlayerIndex > 0 to create a Color array
//And then setting the colors of this array from the 'colors' array by using MapDepthPointToColorPoint method, provided by Kinect SDK
//Finally I use SetData function in order to set the colors to a Texture2D I created before
}
}
But the performance is very low unsurprisingly. Because I have to use GetData for a color array with 640*480 = 307200 length (because of the ColorImageFormat) and SetData for another color array with 320*480 = 76800 length (because of the DepthImageFormat) in every frame!
I wonder if there is any other solutions for this problem, any alternatives for SetData and GetData maybe. Because I know that these functions moving data between the GPU and CPU and that is an expensive operation for big data. Thanks for any help.

The Kinect for Windows Toolbox comes with a "GreenScreen-WPF" example, which should provide some insight into processing the information. Because you are working in XNA there may be some differences, but the overall concepts should work between the two examples.
The example works by extracting multiple players. Here is the business end of the processing function:
private void SensorAllFramesReady(object sender, AllFramesReadyEventArgs e)
{
// in the middle of shutting down, so nothing to do
if (null == this.sensor)
{
return;
}
bool depthReceived = false;
bool colorReceived = false;
using (DepthImageFrame depthFrame = e.OpenDepthImageFrame())
{
if (null != depthFrame)
{
// Copy the pixel data from the image to a temporary array
depthFrame.CopyDepthImagePixelDataTo(this.depthPixels);
depthReceived = true;
}
}
using (ColorImageFrame colorFrame = e.OpenColorImageFrame())
{
if (null != colorFrame)
{
// Copy the pixel data from the image to a temporary array
colorFrame.CopyPixelDataTo(this.colorPixels);
colorReceived = true;
}
}
// do our processing outside of the using block
// so that we return resources to the kinect as soon as possible
if (true == depthReceived)
{
this.sensor.CoordinateMapper.MapDepthFrameToColorFrame(
DepthFormat,
this.depthPixels,
ColorFormat,
this.colorCoordinates);
Array.Clear(this.greenScreenPixelData, 0, this.greenScreenPixelData.Length);
// loop over each row and column of the depth
for (int y = 0; y < this.depthHeight; ++y)
{
for (int x = 0; x < this.depthWidth; ++x)
{
// calculate index into depth array
int depthIndex = x + (y * this.depthWidth);
DepthImagePixel depthPixel = this.depthPixels[depthIndex];
int player = depthPixel.PlayerIndex;
// if we're tracking a player for the current pixel, do green screen
if (player > 0)
{
// retrieve the depth to color mapping for the current depth pixel
ColorImagePoint colorImagePoint = this.colorCoordinates[depthIndex];
// scale color coordinates to depth resolution
int colorInDepthX = colorImagePoint.X / this.colorToDepthDivisor;
int colorInDepthY = colorImagePoint.Y / this.colorToDepthDivisor;
// make sure the depth pixel maps to a valid point in color space
// check y > 0 and y < depthHeight to make sure we don't write outside of the array
// check x > 0 instead of >= 0 since to fill gaps we set opaque current pixel plus the one to the left
// because of how the sensor works it is more correct to do it this way than to set to the right
if (colorInDepthX > 0 && colorInDepthX < this.depthWidth && colorInDepthY >= 0 && colorInDepthY < this.depthHeight)
{
// calculate index into the green screen pixel array
int greenScreenIndex = colorInDepthX + (colorInDepthY * this.depthWidth);
// set opaque
this.greenScreenPixelData[greenScreenIndex] = opaquePixelValue;
// compensate for depth/color not corresponding exactly by setting the pixel
// to the left to opaque as well
this.greenScreenPixelData[greenScreenIndex - 1] = opaquePixelValue;
}
}
}
}
}
// do our processing outside of the using block
// so that we return resources to the kinect as soon as possible
if (true == colorReceived)
{
// Write the pixel data into our bitmap
this.colorBitmap.WritePixels(
new Int32Rect(0, 0, this.colorBitmap.PixelWidth, this.colorBitmap.PixelHeight),
this.colorPixels,
this.colorBitmap.PixelWidth * sizeof(int),
0);
if (this.playerOpacityMaskImage == null)
{
this.playerOpacityMaskImage = new WriteableBitmap(
this.depthWidth,
this.depthHeight,
96,
96,
PixelFormats.Bgra32,
null);
MaskedColor.OpacityMask = new ImageBrush { ImageSource = this.playerOpacityMaskImage };
}
this.playerOpacityMaskImage.WritePixels(
new Int32Rect(0, 0, this.depthWidth, this.depthHeight),
this.greenScreenPixelData,
this.depthWidth * ((this.playerOpacityMaskImage.Format.BitsPerPixel + 7) / 8),
0);
}
}
If you are interested in only a single player, you could look into using the player mask to more quickly extract the appropriate pixel set. You'd fi
using (SkeletonFrame skeletonFrame = e.OpenSkeletonFrame())
{
if (skeletonFrame != null && skeletonFrame.SkeletonArrayLength > 0)
{
if (_skeletons == null || _skeletons.Length != skeletonFrame.SkeletonArrayLength)
{
_skeletons = new Skeleton[skeletonFrame.SkeletonArrayLength];
}
skeletonFrame.CopySkeletonDataTo(_skeletons);
// grab the tracked skeleton and set the playerIndex for use pulling
// the depth data out for the silhouette.
this.playerIndex = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < _skeletons.Length; i++)
{
if (_skeletons[i].TrackingState != SkeletonTrackingState.NotTracked)
{
this.playerIndex = i+1;
}
}
}
}
You can then step through the depth data to extract the appropriate bits:
depthFrame.CopyPixelDataTo(this.pixelData);
for (int i16 = 0, i32 = 0; i16 < pixelData.Length && i32 < depthFrame32.Length; i16++, i32 += 4)
{
int player = pixelData[i16] & DepthImageFrame.PlayerIndexBitmask;
if (player == this.playerIndex)
{
// the player we are tracking
}
else if (player > 0)
{
// a player, but not the one we want.
}
else
{
// background or something else we don't care about
}
}
I'm pulling this code from a control I use to produce a silhouette, so it does not deal with the color stream. However, making a call to MapDepthFrameToColorFrame at the appropriate time should allow you to deal with the color stream data and extract the corresponding pixels to the player's mask.

Related

Random blocks using JavaFX

How to get random blocks(black & white) in board using JavaFX?
using:
Random ran = new Random()
here is a method, you can adapt it to your need :
private void ColoreBlock(Pane p){
Random random = new Random();
int randomNum = random.nextInt((1 - 0) + 1) + 0; // range (1-0) white/black
switch (randomNum) {
case 0:
p.setStyle("-fx-background-color:white;"); // -fx-fill for shape
break;
case 1:
p.setStyle("-fx-background-color:black;"); // -fx-fill for shape
break;
}
}

How to set up if statements so that loop goes forward and then in reverse? Processing

int x = 31;
int y = 31;
int x_dir = 4;
int y_dir = 0;
void setup ()
{
size (800, 800);
}
void draw ()
{
background (150);
ellipse (x,y,60, 60);
if (x+30>=width)
{
x_dir =-4;
y_dir = 4;
}
if (y+30>=height)
{
x_dir=4;
y_dir = 0;
}
if (x+30>=width)
{
x_dir = -4;
}
x+=x_dir;
y+=y_dir;
println(x,y);
}
Hi,
I have to create this program in processing which produces an animation of a ball going in a Z pattern (top left to top right, diagonal top right to bottom left, and then straight from bottom left to bottom right) which then goes backwards along the same path it came.
While I have the code written out for the forward direction, I don't know what 2 if or else statements I need to write for the program so that based on one condition it goes forwards, and based on another condition it will go backwards, and it will continue doing so until it terminates.
If I am able to figure out which two if statements I need to write, all I need to do is copy and reverse the x_dir and y_dir signs on the forward loop.
There are a ton of different ways you can do this.
One approach is to keep track of which "mode" you're in. You could do this using an int variable that's 0 when you're on the first part of the path, 1 when you're on the second part of the path, etc. Then just use an if statement to decide what to do, how to move the ball, etc.
Here's an example:
int x = 31;
int y = 31;
int mode = 0;
void setup ()
{
size (800, 800);
}
void draw ()
{
background (150);
ellipse (x, y, 60, 60);
if (mode == 0) {
x = x + 4;
if (x+30>=width) {
mode = 1;
}
} else if (mode == 1) {
x = x - 4;
y = y + 4;
if (y+30>=height) {
mode = 2;
}
} else if (mode == 2) {
x = x + 4;
if (x+30>=width) {
mode = 3;
}
} else if (mode == 3) {
x = x - 4;
y = y - 4;
if (y-30 < 0) {
mode = 2;
}
}
}
Like I said, this is only one way to approach the problem, and there are some obvious improvements you could make. For example, you could store the movement speeds and the conditions that change the mode in an array (or better yet, in objects) and get rid of all of the if statements.

Generate several random numbers, one of which must be the correct answer to a sum?

I have created a Space Invaders game in which the player must shoot an asteroid which displays a random number. A sum will also be randomly generated at the start of the scene. Once the player shoots an asteroid the scene reloads, with points awarded for correct answers.
The problem I am having is that I need at least one asteroid to display the correct answer. I am currently achieving this by reloading the scene until an asteroids number matches the answer to the sum. This can take quite a few reloads and looks really bad. Is there a better way to achive this which will look better and be more efficient. I have included my effort below. I appreciate any comments. Thanks!
Script for checking the correct answer and reloading the scene.
#pragma strict
function Start ()
{
}
{
if (
Asteroid1_Script.asteroid1Value != (Sum_Script.sumA - Sum_Script.sumB) &&
Asteroid2_Script.asteroid2Value != (Sum_Script.sumA - Sum_Script.sumB) &&
Asteroid3_Script.asteroid3Value != (Sum_Script.sumA - Sum_Script.sumB) &&
Asteroid4_Script.asteroid4Value != (Sum_Script.sumA - Sum_Script.sumB) &&
Asteroid5_Script.asteroid5Value != (Sum_Script.sumA - Sum_Script.sumB)
)
{
Application.LoadLevel("L1");
}
}
Script for randomly generating the sum.
#pragma strict
static var sumA :int = 0;
static var sumB :int = 0;
function Start ()
{
var newSumA = Random.Range(6,10);
sumA = newSumA;
var newSumB = Random.Range(1,6);
sumB = newSumB;
}
function Update () {
//Question Output.
guiText.text = sumA.ToString() + " - " + sumB.ToString()+ " =";
}
Script for generating an asteroids random number.
#pragma strict
var mainCam: Camera;
static var asteroid1Value : int = 0;
var asteroid1 : Transform;
var Asteroid1Style : GUIStyle;
function Start ()
{
var newAsteroid1Value = Random.Range(0,10);
asteroid1Value = newAsteroid1Value;
asteroid1.position.x = mainCam.ScreenToWorldPoint (new Vector3 (160f, 0f, 0f)).x;
asteroid1.position.y = mainCam.ScreenToWorldPoint (new Vector3 (0f, 450f, 0f)).y;
}
function OnGUI()
{
var point = Camera.main.WorldToScreenPoint(transform.position);
GUI.Label(new Rect(point.x, Screen.currentResolution.height - point.y - 530, 110, 100), asteroid1Value.ToString(), Asteroid1Style);
}
function OnCollisionEnter(col : Collision)
{
if(asteroid1Value == (Sum_Script.sumA - Sum_Script.sumB))
{
Destroy(gameObject);
Score_Script.score ++;
}
if(asteroid1Value != (Sum_Script.sumA - Sum_Script.sumB))
{
Score_Script.score --;
}
}
Do as you are doing, generate 5 random numbers for your asteroids.
Then generate a random number between 1 and 5, this is your random asteroid, and then set its value to the answer. (sumA - sumB)
You just need to abstract your logic.
The best argument I can make is, simply put, build your random numbers before you build your asteroids.
That way, you always have a correct one.
I would simply code:
function start(){
var x = 5 //X being whatever number of asteroids you wish.
var a = new Array();
for(var i=0; i<x; i++){
a[i] = Random.Range(0,10);
}
for( i in a){ buildAsteroid(a[i]) }
}
And... if the number matches, success.

Algorithm for value range mapping

My question perhaps belongs to general ability test or something like that. It is not directly related to Embedded devices.
I have been given a variable resister which can rotate infinitely and is of 10Ω. ADC is set for value range 0 to 1023 sampling. By which I've to control light luminosity/intensity.
The ADC value range is divided into 32 steps for 1024/32 levels of brightness. The issue is the pot has to be rotated 16 times to get to extremities. Which is very harassing. Now its time when I can't change the pot hardware but the firmware.
I thought of doing as follows, please help me from here:
I'll choose a range window within the [0 1023], say of 32 steps. Lets ignore the ADC noise for now.
Then we have 32 steps in that 32 step windows.
If I start from 0, the intensity will be increasing till 32. The 32 is max intensity possible. Then if I rotate more, the intensity should remain maximum at 32 all the way till 1023.
And as soon as it is started to decrease from 1023, I will have decrease in intensity till ( 1023-32 ) and will remain at 0 intensity all the way till 0.
if I rotate back from any place it should follow the above explained moving window rule.
How to start with it?
Pseudo code:
void processADC_data()
{
ushort adc0 = (ushort)ADC_DATA;
adc0_Avg = adc0;
// If Noise
/*
ushort adc0_L = (ushort)(adc0 - 40);
ushort adc0_H = (ushort)(adc0 + 40);
adc0 = (ushort)read_ADC( adc0_L,adc0_H );
adc0_Avg = adc0 * 20 + adc0_Avg * 80;
adc0_Avg /= 100;
*/
IsInceasing = (adc0_last - adc0_Avg) < 0 ;
adc0_last = adc0_Avg;
if (IsInceasing)
{
// Extrimity has to be handled
if (!HasPerformedIncreased)
{
adc0_center = (ushort)(adc0_Avg - window);
HasPerformedIncreased = true;
HasPerformedDecrease = false;
}
else if (HasPerformedIncreased)
{
IsCrossingLimit = ( (adc0_Avg - adc0_center) > window );
if(IsCrossingLimit)
{
adc0_Avg = LIGHT_SENS_MAX;
IsCrossingLimit = false;
}
else
{
adc0_Avg = (ushort)(adc0_Avg / LIGHT_SENS_MAX);
}
}
//judge_brightness(adc0_Avg);
}
else
{
// Extrimity has to be handled
if (!HasPerformedDecrease)
{
adc0_center = (ushort)(adc0_Avg + window);
HasPerformedDecrease = true;
HasPerformedIncreased = false;
}
else if (HasPerformedDecrease)
{
IsCrossingLimit = ( (adc0_center - adc0_Avg) > window );
if(IsCrossingLimit)
{
adc0_Avg = LIGHT_SENS_MIN;
IsCrossingLimit = false;
}
else
{
adc0_Avg = (ushort)(adc0_Avg / LIGHT_SENS_MAX);
}
}
}
brightness(adc0_Avg);
}
Thanks

How can I improve Java2D performance of TextLayout.draw(..)

I'm using the Java2D TextLayout class together with a LineBreakMeasurer and an AttributedCharacterIterator to draw a piece of text into a box. The text is wrapped.
Profiling shows me that the code is very slow. Most of the time is lost in the method TextLayout.draw(..).
Does anyone have a suggestion for speed improvement?
// Get iterator for string
AttributedCharacterIterator iterator = attribText.getIterator();
// Create measurer
LineBreakMeasurer measurer = new LineBreakMeasurer(iterator, context);
// loop over the lines
int i = 1;
while (measurer.getPosition() < iterator.getEndIndex()) {
// Get line
TextLayout textLayout = measurer.nextLayout(w);
// get measurements
float ascent = textLayout.getAscent();
float descent = textLayout.getDescent();
float leading = textLayout.getLeading();
float size = ascent + descent;
// Move down to baseline
if( i == 1 ) {
if( coverType == CoverType.SPINE ) {
y = (box.height-size)/2;
y -= (size+leading)*(lines-1)/2;
} else if( vAlign == Alignment.Center ) {
y += (h-size)/2-(size+leading)*(lines-1)/2;
} else if( vAlign == Alignment.Bottom ) {
y += (h-size) - (size+leading)*(lines-1);
}
}
y += ascent;
// calculate starting point for alignment
float paintX = x;
switch( hAlign ) {
case Right: {
paintX = x + w - textLayout.getVisibleAdvance();
break;
}
case Center: {
paintX = x + (w - textLayout.getVisibleAdvance())/2;
break;
}
}
// Draw line
textLayout.draw(g2d, paintX, y);
// Move down to top of next line
y += descent + leading;
i++;
}
The relevant code snippet is shown above. attribText is an AttributtedString set before. context is the g2d.getFontRenderContext().
This post is rather old now so I hope you have found a solution that works for your needs. If you haven't here is something to think about. You only need to draw the text that is within the visible region. Since you know the y coordinate of each line it is easy to check to see if the y lies within the bounds of getVisibleRect(). Only painting the text that is necessary greatly improves performance (assuming of course that your text is longer than a single page).

Resources