Need help.
I have a dashboard style report with eight different graphs on it. My goal is to let that report run for every instance separate.
Just for a better understanding a simple example.
A Supermarket offers the following articles: vegetables, fruits, drinks etc. <-- first parameter.
dependent on the first parameter you have selection range. f.e. vegetabels --> bananas, apples, oranges etc. <-- second parameter
I want to run the report via a data driven subscription. Means I want to create separate reports for the articles (which I define in the subscription) which include the graphs separated by the instances (apples, bananas, etc.). I would like to get separate graphs. I don't want that data in one graph.
I tried to force the tables in to a matrix but this didn't work.
Help would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance
I think what you need is to use sub reports. Using these you can create separate reports and using the sub reports function to tie them together. These work well for me.
Example see http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd220581.aspx
Related
I am trying to crawl different websites (e-commerce websites) and extract specific information from the pages of each website (i.e. product price, quantity, date of publication, etc.).
My question is: how to configure the parsing since each website has a different HTML layout which means I need different Xpaths for the same item depending on the website? Can we add multiple parser bolts in the topology for each website? If yes, how can we assign different parsefilters.json files to each parser bolt?
You need #586. At the moment there is no way to do it but to put all your XPATH expressions regardless of the site you want to use them on in the parsefilters.json.
You can't assign different parsefilters.json to the various instances of a bolt.
UPDATE however you could have multiple XpathFilters sections within the parseFilters.json. Each could cover a specific source, however, there is currently no way of constraining which source a parse filter gets applied to. You could extend XPathFilter so that it takes some extra config e.g. regular expression a URL must match in order to be applied. That would work quite nicely I think.
I've recently added JsoupFilters which will be in the next release. These should be useful for your use case but that still doesn't solve the issue that you need an implementation of the filter that organizes the resources per host. It shouldn't be too hard to implement taking the URL filter one as a example and would also make a very nice contribution to the project.
Super new to XPath so forgive me if I stumble through terms. I'm using IMPORTXML() in a google doc in order to pull info from a webpage. Basically what I'm shooting for is to turn this
into
What I can't figure out is how to pull info between the <br> nodes and pull the string from within the <a> node.
I've fumbled my way as far as =IMPORTXML($A$1, "//p/b[starts-with(text(), '"& $A4 &"')]/following-sibling::text()[1]") to get a return of 1 for Casting Time, but not any further.
The end goal is to do this for about a dozen different values across the page and cycle the checks through about 500 web pages, hence the cells in the formula. Any help would be appreciated.
Super in depth clarification section
Using XPath and a Google Sheet I am attempting to automatically make a roll20 formatted template macro for each spell on a spell casters list.
For example, the Shaman Spell List I used //tr/td[1]/a[#href] and //tr/td[1]/a/#href to create side by side columns of spell names and their associated URL's.
Then on another page I can copy and paste the entire class spell list and use Vlookup to get the associated URL's while keeping the organized level sectioned tables like so (Note the Hyperlinked spell names are rich text so the internal URL is invisible to IMPORTXML, hence the extra step).
With a single class having upwards of 500+ spells the ultimate goal is to create a series of IMPORTXML that look at the spell URL and pull relevant data from this particular section. For this example I'm using Arcane Mark.
The final goal is to use IMPORTXML to get each important category such as School, Casting Time, Target, Effect, Area, Range, etc. Put them in their respective columns and have a Concatenate I've written go through and pull all the various parts into one big formatted string compatible with the roll20 macro template to look like &{template:default} {{Name=Arcane mark}} {{School=Universal}} {{Casting Time=1 Standard Action}} {{Components=V,S}} {{Range=Touch}} {{Effect=One personal rune or mark, all of which must fit within 1 sq. ft.}} {{Duration=Permanent}} {{Saving Throw=None}} {{Spell Resistance=No}}
=ARRAYFORMULA(REGEXEXTRACT(TRANSPOSE(QUERY(TRANSPOSE(QUERY(ARRAY_CONSTRAIN(
IMPORTDATA("http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic/all-spells/a/arcane-mark"),1000,5),
"where Col1 contains 'School'", 0)),,999^99)), A10&"\</b>\ (.+)\;"))
When a batch gets created documents should get separated automatically without using separator sheet or Barcode separator.
How can I classify documents for Invoice and supporting document.
In our project we get many invoices with supporting document so the scanning person has to insert the separator sheets manually, so to avoid this we want to automatically classify the supporting documents.
In general the concept would be that you would enable separation in the project and then train your classes with examples to be used for the layout or content classifiers.
However, as I'm sure you've seen, the obstacle with invoices is that they are different enough between vendors that it would not reliably classify all to an Invoice class. Similarly with "Supporting Documents" which are likely to be very different from each other, so unfortunately there isn't a completely easy answer without separator sheets (or barcode stickers affixed to supporting docs).
What you might want to do is write code in the one of the separation events like Document_AfterSeparate event. Despite the name, the document has not yet been split at this point, but the classifiers have run. See Scripting Help topic "Server Script Events Sequence > Document Separation > Standard Document Separation" for more detail. Setting the SplitPage property on the CDocPage (pXDoc.CDoc.Pages.ItemByIndex(lPage).SplitPage) will allow you to use your own logic to determine which pages to separate.
For example if you know that you will always have single page invoices, you can split on the first page and classify accordingly. Or you can try to search for something that indicates the end of the invoice like "Total" or other characteristics. There is an example of how you can use locators to help separation in the Scripting Help topic "Script Samples > Use Locator Results for Standard Document Separation". The example uses a Barcode Locator, but the same concept works if you wanted to try it with a Format Locator or anything else.
Without Separator sheets you will need a smart classification software like Kofax Transformation Module (KTM). Its kind of expensive. you will need to verify the cost saving and ROI.
According to the docs I should be able to do this ...
$("#tree").data("kendoTreeView").expand(".k-item");
Great if i want to expand everything, but what if i only want to expand nodes where the property "expanded" in my model items is set to true?
Is there a way i can query the tree based on something in the model then perform an action on all results?
The real answer here is quite long, the short version being as with everything kendo, spend hours with support to be given half the solution and told to write the rest yourself.
I got round this problem by using another library (jslinq) to query the model data.
This is yet another frustrating issue with kendo that really should at the very least be offered as a core part of the heirarchy data source at some basic level (essentially an incomplete implementation).
We are using DevExpress XtraReports 2009v3.3 and although I can achieve what I want through various formatting objects in code, there must be a (better/less painless/maintainable/visual) way of achieving what I require...
I need to produce a report, designed to end-user 'look & feel'. We have many companies which use our software and they all require different design schema's/templates for their reports. For example - a single report, depending on who logs on (we know what company they belong to) apply the template the report should use.
As an example, some of the requirements (per end-user/company) include:
their own logo (positioned in the correct place),
Margins being of specific size
their own fonts (or font choice)
alternating colours schemes
Specific rows / columns being particular colours (both permanently and based on value)
Formatting of values, for example a european user would get euro, a uk user gets pounds on certain columns/cells/rows.
I know there is an End-User Report Designer, however this isn't what we require - I must create the schema/template design for a report then apply it at runtime.
Also using save/load layout for multiple repx files isn't the best solution as a change to the report would cause a lot of extra work as you would have to update each repx template file.
It is possible to create different reports and save it to the repx format via XtraReport.SaveLayout method and use these repx files as template.
Similar but different question
I asked dev express and they basically said there isn't any 'layout abstraction' that would do what I require.