Coming from ActionScript + Papervision I am familiar with "AS3DMod" a library that modifies 3D meshes to bend, twist,etc. Now I am working with THREE.js and found this:"#MOD3 As3dMod 3D Modifier Library port for Javascript and Three.js, Pre3d and J3D and Copperlicht" but the code is outmoded for any remotely current versions of THREE.js (and also is written for canvas rendering, NOT webGL). The creator has not been able to update. Does anyone know of any similar 3D libs that can "bend ,twist, bloat" 3D meshes in webGL? I am not sufficiently skilled to update this myself.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Not that I know of, but depending on what modifiers you are utilize, it may not be too difficult to write a modifier yourself. Typically you can reuse the logic in js for Canvas renderer, and as for WebGLRenderer, you can implement it in the Vertex shaders.
Related
Does Three.JS have a function or capability of AI( Artificial intelligence )? Specifically let's say a FPS game. I want enemies to look for me and try to kill me, is it possible in three.js? Do they have a functionality or a system of such?
Webgl
create buffer
bind buffer
allocate data
set up state
issue draw call
run GLSL shaders
three.js
create a 3d context using WebGL
create 3 dimensional objects
create a scene graph
create primitives like spheres, cubes, toruses
move objects around, rotate them scale them
test for intersections between rays, triangles, planes, spheres, etc.
create 'materials' (rather than shaders)
javascript
write algorithms
I want enemies to look for me and try to kill me
Yes, three.js is capable of doing this, you just have to write an algorithm using three's classes. Your enemies would be 3d objects, casting rays, intersecting with other objects, etc.
You would be building a game engine, and you could use three.js as your rendering framework within that engine. Rendering is just one part of it. Think of a 2d shooter, you could make it using a 2d context, but you could also enhance it and make it 2.5d, by working with a 3d context. Everything else can stay the same.
any webgl engine that might have it ? or is it just not a webgl thing
Unity probably has everything you can possibly think of. Unity is capable of outputting WebGL, so it could be considered a 'webgl engine'.
Bablyon.js is more engine like.
Three Js is the best and most powerfull WebGL 3d engine that has no equal on the market , and its missing out on such an ability
Three.js isn't exactly a 3d engine. Wikipedia says:
Three.js is a lightweight cross-browser JavaScript library/API used to
create and display animated 3D computer graphics on a Web browser.
Three.js uses WebGL.
so if i need to just draw a car, or a spinning logo, i don't need them to come looking for me, or try to shoot me. I just need them to stay in one place, and rotate.
For a graphics demo you don't even need this - with a few draw instructions, you could render a full screen quad with a very elaborate pixel shader. Three gives you a ton of options, especially if you consider all the featured examples.
It works both ways, while you can expand three.js anyway you want, you can strip it down for just a very specific purpose.
If you need to build an app that needs to do image processing, and feature no '3d' graphics, you could still leverage webgl with three.js.
You don't need any vector, matrix, ray , geometry classes.
If you don't have vector3, you probably cant keep planeGeometry, but you would use bufferGeometry, and manually construct a plane. No transformations need to happen, so no need for matrix classes. You'd use shaders, and textures, and perhaps something like the EffectsComposer.
I’m afraid not. Three.js is just a engine for displaying 3d content.
Using it to create games only is one possibility. However few websites raise with pre-coded stuff like AI (among other things) to attract game creators, but using them is more restrictive than writing the exact code you need
Three.js itself doesn't however https://mugen87.github.io/yuka/ is a great AI engine that can work in collaboration with three to create AI.
They do a line if sight and a shooting game logic, as well as car logic which I've been playing around with recently, a React Three Fiber example here: https://codesandbox.io/s/loving-tdd-u1fs9o
I create a THREE.PlaneGeometry with heights, in the highest point locate a THREE.PointLight, but this illuminates areas that are not seen from this point.
Why?
I want light from a point only the areas that are viewed from.
By default, the appearance of any given point on a surface is calculated using the lights, their properties and of course the material properties - it does not take the rest of the scene into account, as that would be very computationally expensive. Various ray tracing renderers do this, but they are really slow, and that's not how WebGL and Three.js work.
What you want is shadows. Three.js is capable of rendering shadows using Shadow Map method. There are various examples on using shadow maps both on the net and Three.js examples folder.
A word of warning though, getting shadows to work well can be hard if you don't have the basics down well - you may need to do some studying. Shadows can slow your application down (specially with many lighs) and look ugly if not properly configured and fine-tuned. Also I think shadow maps are only supported for SpotLight and DirectionalLight, PointLights are trickier.
I'm struggling with a visualization I'm working on that involves a stream of repeated images. I have it working with a single sprite with a ParticleSystem, but I can only apply a single material to the system. Since I want to choose between textures I tried creating a pool of Particle objects so that I could choose the materials individually, but I can't get an individual Particle to show up with the WebGL renderer.
This is my first foray into WebGL/Three.js, so I'm probably doing something bone-headed, but I thought it would be worth asking what the proper way to go about this is. I'm seeing three possibilities:
I'm using Particle wrong (initializing with a mapped material, adding to the scene, setting position) and I need to fix what I'm doing.
I need a ParticleSystem for each sprite I want to display.
What I'm doing doesn't fit into particles at all and I really should be using another object type.
All the examples I see using the canvas renderer use Particle directly, but I can't find an example using the WebGL renderer that doesn't use ParticleSystem. Any hints?
Ok, I am going from what I have read elsewhere on this github issues page. You should start by reading it. It seems that the Particle is simply for the Canvas Renderer, and it will become Sprite in a further edition of Three.JS. ParticleSystem, however is not going to fulfill your needs either it seems. I don't think these classes are going to help you accomplish this in WebGL in 3D. Depending on what you are doing you might be better off with the CanvasRenderer anyway. ParticleSystem will only allow you to apply a single material which will serve as the material for each particle in the system as you suggested.
Short answer:
You can render THREE.Particle using THREE.CanvasRenderer only.
I've read the "learning webgl" tutorial, but it does not explain everything. Something like google experiments with webgl are amazing, but I've been wondering... how do you move a 3D object along a custom path to swing into the scene or create a custom transition?
webgl -> opengl in web, so how do you do that in opengl?
what you're looking for is pretty common functionality, but it is hard to find concrete examples showing how to do it.
the easiest way i have found to do it is using Apple's J3DIMath.js webgl library.
you basically want to define a "camera" perspective matrix, then move the camera along a predefined path of vertices through your 3d space. as you move along the "track" of vertices, at each draw frame you can call the function J3DIMatrix4.lookat(), passing it the position vector along the path, the direction to look at, and the "up" direction, and it will create the appearance of a moving camera.
i hope this helps!
J3DIMath.js
I'm making a game and thought about using vector shapes for the UI. I want to know what the best renderer for this. I think Agg is faster than Cairo, but Cairo can use hardware acceleration if it's available. And how about opengl? Is a good idea I use gl textures for images and lines to do rectangles, rounded rectagles and circles? Or is better I render cairo surfaces in opengl?
Other alternatives I found are Google Skia and SFML. What do you think of Skia? The SFML also draws polygons. I can make rounded shapes using polygons. I'm even thinking of using SDL or SFML to control events. In both I can create an OpenGL context and I've gotten used to their roles in control of events, which are crossplatforms.
I want a cross-platform solution. It should work in linux, mac and windows.
If you are already using OpenGL to render your game, the one thing you should not do is use a software renderer of any kind to draw the game's UI. So either use Cairo's OpenGL backend (which I understand is not particularly good) or do the rendering yourself in OpenGL. Otherwise, you'll kill your performance with all of the pixel transfers from CPU memory to the GPU.