I'm using Selenium Webdriver Ruby to create a function in order to wait for an element displayed within a Time that I set in this function
My function will have two parameters (one Optional parameter & one parameter is locator name of an object)
So, I have my function with two parameters like below:
def wait_for_element_displayed(locator, options={})
if options[:time]
settime = options[:time]
else
settime= 60
end
#driver.find_element(locator).click
end
So, I will call this function like: wait_for_element_displayed(:id=>"unique1", :time => "20")
However, I got the error when trying to calling this function with this way, the error is: "TypeError: can't convert String into an exact number".
Anybody please help me how to pass two parameters like my scenario to a function? Any help appreciated.
A few suggestions:
You can use hash#fetch to set a default value if the key you are looking up is not present:
time = options.fetch(:time) { 60 }
Ruby will have a hard time parsing your input when both arguments are hashes and you don't differentiate between them. Also, your error makes me think you should provide 20 as an integer instead of a string. Try calling the method like this:
wait_for_element_displayed({:id => "unique1"}, { :time => 20 })
Lastly, I don't know much about Selenium, so maybe someone can fill me in on the last point. Is setting a settime variable sufficient to configure timeouts?
Related
I've seen the JSON array questions here and I'm still a little lost, so could use some extra help.
Here's the setup:
My Flow calls a sproc on my DB and that sproc returns this JSON:
{
"ResultSets": {
"Table1": [
{
"OrderID": 9518338,
"BasketID": 9518338,
"RefID": 65178176,
"SiteConfigID": 237
}
]
},
"OutputParameters": {}
}
Then I use a PARSE JSON action to get what looks like the same result, but now I'm told it's parsed and I can call variables.
Issue is when I try to call just, say, SiteConfigID, I get "The output you selected is inside a collection and needs to be looped over to be accessed. This action cannot be inside a foreach."
After some research, I know what's going on here. Table1 is an Array, and I need to tell PowerAutomate to just grab the first record of that array so it knows it's working with just a record instead of a full array. Fair enough. So I spin up a "Return Values to Virtual Power Agents" action just to see my output. I know I'm supposed to use a 'first' expression or a 'get [0] from array expression here, but I can't seem to make them work. Below are what I've tried and the errors I get:
Tried:
first(body('Parse-Sproc')?['Table1/SiteConfigID'])
Got: InvalidTemplate. Unable to process template language expressions in action 'Return_value(s)_to_Power_Virtual_Agents' inputs at line '0' and column '0': 'The template language function 'first' expects its parameter be an array or a string. The provided value is of type 'Null'. Please see https://aka.ms/logicexpressions#first for usage details.'.
Also Tried:
body('Parse-Sproc')?['Table1/SiteconfigID']
which just returns a null valued variable
Finally I tried
outputs('Parse-Sproc')?['Table1']?['value'][0]?['SiteConfigID']
Which STILL gives me a null-valued variable. It's the worst.
In that last expression, I also switched the variable type in the return to pva action to a string instead of a number, no dice.
Also, changed 'outputs' in that expression for 'body' .. also no dice
Here is a screenie of the setup:
To be clear: the end result i'm looking for is for the system to just return "SiteConfigID" as a string or an int so that I can pipe that into a virtual agent.
I believe this is what you need as an expression ...
body('Parse-Sproc')?['ResultSets']['Table1'][0]?['SiteConfigID']
You can see I'm just traversing down to the object and through the array to get the value.
Naturally, I don't have your exact flow but if I use your JSON and load it up into Parse JSON step to get the schema, I am able to get the result. I do get a different schema to you though so will be interesting to see if it directly translates.
I want to mock this function:
def self.set_segment_info(segment_info, history_record)
history_record.segment_info = segment_info
end
In my test, I want a mock that only confirms that I called set_segment_info with an expected value. I don't care about what I pass in for history_record.
How would I do this? I tried
SegmentHistoryRecord.expects(:set_segment_info).with(:segment_info => expected_segment_info, :history_record => anything)
But that doesn't work.
I ran into this today and ended up doing something like:
SegmentHistoryRecord.expects(:set_segment_info).with(
expected_segment_info,
anything
)
I find it more readable that the do version and it helped me avoid a rubocop issue with too many parameters.
Here's an implementation where, if your function takes a lot of parameters, it's more convenient to specify a value for just the one you care about, instead of for all of them:
expected_segment_info = # ...
SegmentHistoryRecord.expects(:set_segment_info).with() { |actual_parameters| actual_parameters[:segment_info] == expected_segment_info }
(Where, as in the original question, set_segment_info is the function being mocked, and segment_info is the parameter whose value you want to match. Note that the history_record parameter -- and any others that might be present -- don't need to be included.)
SegmentHistoryRecord.expects(:set_segment_info).with() do |param1, param2|
# change below to your verification for :segment_info
# and leave param2 doing nothing, the expectation will ignore param2
param1 == expected_segment_info
end
I am new to Ruby, so let me describe the context of my problem first:
I have a json as input which has the following key / value pair:
{
"service": "update"
}
The value has many different values for example: insert,delete etc.
Next there is a method x which handles the different requests:
def x(input)
case input[:service]
services = GenericService.new
when "update"
result = services.service(UpdateService.new,input)
when "insert"
result = services.service(InsertService.new,input)
when "delete"
result = services.service(DeleteService.new,input)
....
....
else
raise "Unknown service"
end
puts JSON.pretty_generate(result)
end
What is bothering me is that I still need to use a switch statement to check the String values (reminds me of 'instance of' ugh..). Is there a cleaner way (not need to use a switch)?
Finally I tried to search for an answer to my question and did not succeed, if however I missed it feel free to comment the related question.
Update: I was thinking to maybe cast the string to the related class name as follows: How do I create a class instance from a string name in ruby? and then call result = services.services(x.constantize.new,input) , then the class names ofcourse needs to match the input of the json.
You can try something like:
def x(input)
service_class_name = "#{input[:service].capitalize}Service"
service_class = Kernel.const_get(service_class_name)
service_class.new(input).process
end
In addition you might want to check if this is a valid Service class name at all.
I don't understand why you want to pass the service to GenericService this seems strange. let the service do it's job.
If you're trying to instatiate a class by it's name you're actually speaking about Reflection rather than Polymorphism.
In Ruby you can achieve this in this way:
byName = Object.const_get('YourClassName')
or if you are in a Rails app
byName= 'YourClassName'.constantize
Hope this helps
Just first thoughts, but you can do:
eval(services.service("#{input[:service].capitalize}Service.new, #{input})") if valid_service? input[:service]
def valid_service?
w%(delete update insert).include? input[:service]
end
As folks will no doubt shout, eval needs to be used with alot of care
I have a method which I'm trying to stub out in my unit test. The real method gets called with one argument (a string) and then sends out a text message. I need to stub out the method but return the string that gets passed in as an argument.
The code I have in my RSpec test is this:
allow(taxi_driver).to receive(:send_text).with(:string).and_return(string)
This returns:
NameError: undefined local variable or method 'string'
If I change the return argument to :string, I get the following error:
Please stub a default value first if message might be received with other args as well
I've tried googling and checking the relishapp.com site, but can't find the answer to something which appears quite simple and straightforward.
You can pass a block:
allow(taxi_driver).to receive(:send_text).with(kind_of(String)){|string| string }
expect(taxi_driver.send_text("123")).to eq("123")
My method is being called like this: send_text("the time now is #{Time.now}"). The string varies according to the time, thats why I need the mock to return the varying string. Perhaps its not within the scope of a mock to do this?
In such a case, I usually use Timecop gem in order to freeze system time. Here is a sample use case:
describe "#send_text" do
let(:taxi_driver) { TaxiDriver.new }
before do
Timecop.freeze(Time.local(2016, 1, 30, 12, 0, 0))
end
after do
Timecop.return
end
example do
expect(taxi_driver.send_text("the time now is #{Time.now}")).to eq \
"the time now is 2016-01-30 12:00:00 +0900"
end
end
My question involves the use of QTP / VBScript.
Goal: From the qtp main starting file, initialize an array of classes, and pass that array as a parameter to a re-usable action via a parameter.
Problem: I am not able to pass an array of classes to my re-usable action.
Details:
I have two files: “application_main” and “personal_action”.
application_main is the entry point into qtp/vbscript.
personal_action is a re-usable action
Inside application_main, we have a call to InvokeApplication, proceeded by a few other declarations.
I am able to initialize an array and proceed to pass it as a parameter from my application_main to my personal_action:
From application_main:
Dim myArray
myArray = new Array(object1, object2, object3)
RunAction “personal_action”, oneIteration, myInteger, myBoolean, myArray
On the personal_action page, I edit the parameter properties via:
Edit->Action->ActionProperties. I select the Parameters tab.
In it, I have the option to define the amount of incoming parameters and each individual type. These available types seem to be restricted to:
String, Boolean, Date, Number, Password, Any
I set my 1st parameter as: Number
I set my 2nd parameter as: Boolean
I set my 3rd parameter as: Any
Upon running, I am prompted with this:
The type you specified for the ‘myArray’ parameter in your RunAction
statement does not match the type defined in the action.
Question: I am able to pass the Number and Boolean fine, but when an array is involved, qtp/vbscript doesn't seem to handle it well. Why am I not able to pass an array to an action via parameters from the main startup file? This seems like a common and simple task. Could I be so wrong?
Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
As per my knowledge, QTP will NOT allow this. There is no parameter type that can be used to represent an Array. This might be a limitation of QuickTest Professional.
Rather than passing array you can pass the Array elements as a string separated with delimiters.
Example:
"Item1^Item2^............" where "^" is the delimiter
then you can use split function of vb script, to get your array back.
Again doing the same thing with object,we have to give try for this
use lib file in your action ...
Create array public in lib
but in end for any case test or interation vararray=null
rodrigonw.
Sugestion... use function for include your lib in your actions (lib path)
Lib soluction
''######################################LIB"
'lib Passsagem de valores entre array
Dim arrayyy()
Sub setArrayyy(strvalores,redimencionaArray)
On error resume next
tamanho=UBound(arrayyy,1)
If Err.Number=9 then
ReDim arrayyy(0)
redimencionaArray=false
end if
err.Clear
On error goto 0
If redimencionaArray Then
tamanho=tamanho+1
ReDim preserve arrayyy(tamanho)
end if
arrayyy(tamanho)=strvalores
'arrayyy=arrayyy
End Sub
function getArrayyy() getArrayyy=arrayyy End function
''######################################"'Action X
call setArrayyy("X",false)
call setArrayyy("A",true)
call setArrayyy("D",true)
call setArrayyy("B",true)
''######################################'Action y
x=getArrayyy()
for countx=0 to ubound(x)
msgbox x(countx)
next