I have dapper working correctly, but it is unsecure as in I haven't been using parameters, how can I best turn my dapper variables into parameters for instance this is the unparameterized code that I had that worked..
var getinfo = sqlConnection.Query<test>("Select name,location from tests where location="+ myplace).FirstOrDefault();
myplace is a textbox that users put information on, now when I tried to parameterized that code like
var getinfo = sqlConnection.Query<test>("Select name,location from tests where location='#location'", new {location = myplace}).FirstOrDefault();
I get absolutely no returns back, yet no error messages. What can I be missing here or whats the best way to parameterized variables.
You do not need to place the single quotes around the parameter. Hope this helps.
var getinfo = sqlConnection.Query<test>("Select name,location from tests where location=#location", new {location = myplace}).FirstOrDefault();
Related
I recently have had a problem when coding using NativeScript.
I tried using Map() object as a Collection, but its set() method seems not to work.
I use the following snippet :
var r = new Map();
r.set("one", "two");
console.dir(r);
It however outputs an empty Map(), and I do not know why...
For your convenience, here is a link to a NativeScript PlayGround: https://play.nativescript.org/?template=play-ng&id=evhIxX&v=2
I inserted the snippet inside home.components.ts
Thanks alot!
LMy
Actually it works, if you try r.get("one") then you will see two in console.
May be console.dir does not handle Map as expected. You may report that in the GitHub project.
I have a variable in my main javascript file e.g. var example = {};.
After webpack has finished its job, I find that example is now referenced as t. This presents me a problem as I am using the variable across the web project. I bind functions onto objects for example:
var example = {};
example.initialise = function () {};
Finally at the bottom of a page I may invoke this section of script e.g:
<script>example.initialise()</script>
This way of writing javascript functions is not unusual...
This is obviously a huge pain in the ass as I have no control over the minification. Moreover, it appears that webpack doesn't figure out that example.initialise = function () {}; relates to its newly minified var example (becoming)--> var t. I.e. it doesn't become t.initialise = function {}; either.
What am I supposed to do here?
I've tried using rollup as well. The same kind of variable minification happens.
The thing is, this kind of minification/obfuscation is great, particularly on the inner workings of functions where there's little cause for concern over the parameter names. But not on the top level. I do not understand why this is happening, or how to prevent it.
Any ideas?
I assume that there are ways to set the configuration of webpack. E.g. inside webpack.config.js, but my perusing of the webpack docs gives me no easy understanding of what options I can use to resolve this, like preventing property minification in some way.
In laravel-elixir-webpack-official code you can see minify() is being applied here, minify() uses UglifyJS2 and mangling is on by default.
Mangling is an optimisation that reduces names of local variables and functions usually to single-letters (this explains your example object being renamed to t). See the doc here.
I don't see any way you can customize minify() behaviour in laravel-elixir-webpack, so for now you might have to monkey patch WebpackTask.prototype.gulpTask method before using the module (not an ideal solution). See the lines I am commenting out.
const WebpackTask = require('laravel-elixir-webpack-official/dist/WebpackTask').default;
WebpackTask.prototype.gulpTask = function () {
return (
gulp
.src(this.src.path)
.pipe(this.webpack())
.on('error', this.onError())
// .pipe(jsFiles)
// .pipe(this.minify())
// .on('error', this.onError())
// .pipe(jsFiles.restore)
.pipe(this.saveAs(gulp))
.pipe(this.onSuccess())
);
};
Turns out I have been silly. I've discovered that you can prevent top level properties from being minified by binding it to window... which in hindsight is something I've always known and was stupid not to have realised sooner. D'oh!
So all that needed to be done was to change all top-level properties like var example = {}; to something like window.app.example = {}; in which app is helping to namespace and prevent and override anything set by the language itself.
I made a custom report in AX2012, to replace the WHS Shipping pick list. The custom report is RDP based. I have no trouble running it directly (with the parameters dialog), but when I try to use the controller (WHSPickListShippingController), I get an error saying "Pre-Processed RecId not found. Cannot process report. Indicates a development error."
The error is because in the class SrsReportProviderQueryBuilder (setArgs method), the map variable reportProviderParameters is empty. I have no idea why that is. The code in my Data provider runs okay. Here is my code for running the report :
WHSWorkId id = 'LAM-000052';
WHSPickListShippingController controller;
Args args;
WHSShipmentTable whsShipmentTable;
WHSWorkTable whsWorkTable;
clWHSPickListShippingContract contract; //My custom RDP Contract
whsShipmentTable = WHSShipmentTable::find(whsWorkTable.ShipmentId);
args = new Args(ssrsReportStr(WHSPickListShipping, Report));
args.record(whsShipmentTable);
args.parm(whsShipmentTable.LoadId);
contract = new clWHSPickListShippingContract();
controller = new WHSPickListShippingController();
controller.parmReportName(ssrsReportStr(WHSPickListShipping, Report));
controller.parmShowDialog(false);
controller.parmLoadFromSysLastValue(false);
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpContract(contract);
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpName(classStr(clWHSPickListShippingDP));
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdlContract().parmLanguageId(CompanyInfo::languageId());
controller.parmArgs(args);
controller.startOperation();
I don't know if I'm clear enough... But I've been looking for a fix for hours without success, so I thought I'd ask here. Is there a reason why this variable (which comes from the method parameter AifQueryBuilderArgs) would be empty?
I'm thinking your issue is with these lines (try removing):
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpContract(contract);
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpName(classStr(clWHSPickListShippingDP));
controller.parmReportContract().parmRdlContract().parmLanguageId(CompanyInfo::languageId());
The style I'd expect to see with your contract would be like this:
controller = new WHSPickListShippingController();
contract = controller.getDataContractObject();
contract.parmWhatever('ParametersHere');
controller.parmArgs(args);
And for the DataProvider clWHSPickListShippingDP, usually if a report is using a DataProvider, you don't manually set it, but the DP extends SRSReportDataProviderBase and has an attribute SRSReportParameterAttribute(...) decorating the class declaration in this style:
[SRSReportParameterAttribute(classstr(MyCustomContract))]
class MyCustomDP extends SRSReportDataProviderBase
{
// Vars
}
You are using controller.parmReportContract().parmRdpContract(contract); wrong, as this is more for run-time modifications. It's typically used for accessing the contract for preRunModifyContract overloads.
Build your CrossReference in a development environment then right click on \Classes\SrsReportDataContract\parmRdpContract and click Add-Ins>Cross-reference>Used By to see how that is generally used.
Ok, so now I feel very stupid for spending so much time on that error, when it's such a tiny thing...
The erronous line is that one :
controller.parmReportName(ssrsReportStr(WHSPickListShipping, Report));
Because WHSPickListShipping is the name of the AX report, but I renamed my custom report clWHSPickListShipping. What confused me was that my DataProvider class was executing as wanted.
For some reason that I don't understand, on my development machine can't call to function of a cfc component from a cfajaxproxy.
In my cfm document:
<cfajaxproxy cfc="#Application.CfcPath#.empleado"
jsclassname="ccEmpleado">
This works, and also I can instantiate an object to get all the functions of that cfc component:
var cfcEmpleado = new ccEmpleado();
But, when I try to call a function of that object:
var nb_Empleado = cfcEmpleado.RSEmpeladoNombreBIND(1,1);
Debug complains:
Error: The ID_EMPRESA parameter to the RSEmpeladoNombreBIND function is required but was not passed in.
I got this from Network tab on Chrome and figured out that something is generating an invalid parameter:
http://127.0.0.1/vpa/componentes/empleado.cfc?method=RSEmpeladoNombreBIND&_cf_ajaxproxytoken=[object%20Object]&returnFormat=json&_cf_nodebug=true&_cf_nocache=true&_cf_clientid=41C92098C98042112AE2B3AAF523F289&_cf_rc=0
As you can see, there's a parameter [object%20Object], that is messing around my request, and that's why it fails. I don't why is happening this. Other people has tested this, and it works, but in mine doesn't.
I have Coldfusion 9, Apache, Windows 8. Is is some configuration issue on Coldfusion, or a bug?
I can't tell if this is your error or not, but it might be. This was a problem that we had for awhile. You should consider using explicit names to avoid any confusion. Add the "js" in there.
<cfajaxproxy cfc="cfcEmpleado" jsclassname="proxyEmpleado">
var jsEmpleado = new proxyEmpleado();
I will try to find a link to an article about this very thing.
I'm trying to serialize objects as JSON with MVC4 WebAPI (RTM - just installed VS2012 RTM today but was having this problem yesterday in the RC) and I'd like for all nulls to be rendered in the JSON output.
Like this:
[{"Id": 1, "PropertyThatMightBeNull": null},{"Id":2, "PropertyThatMightBeNull": null}]
But what Im getting is
[{"Id":1},{"Id":2}]
I've found this Q/A WebApi doesnt serialize null fields but the answer either doesn't work for me or I'm failing to grasp where to put the answer.
Here's what I've tried:
In Global.asax.cs's Application_Start, I added:
var json = GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter;
json.SerializerSettings.NullValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.NullValueHandling.Include;
json.SerializerSettings.DefaultValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.DefaultValueHandling.Include;
This doesn't (seem to) error and seems to actually execute based on looking at the next thing I tried.
In a controller method (in a subclass of ApiController), added:
base.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.NullValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.NullValueHandling.Include;
base.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.DefaultValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.DefaultValueHandling.Include;
I say #1 executed because both values in #2 were already set before those lines ran as I stepped through.
In a desperation move (because I REALLY don't want to decorate every property of every object) I tried adding this attrib to a property that was null and absent:
[JsonProperty(DefaultValueHandling = DefaultValueHandling.Include,
NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Include)]
All three produce the same JSON with null properties omitted.
Additional notes:
Running locally in IIS (tried built in too), Windows 7, VS2012 RTM.
Controller methods return List -- tried IEnumerable too
The objects I'm trying to serialize are pocos.
This won't work:
var json = GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter;
json.SerializerSettings.NullValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.NullValueHandling.Include;
But this does:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SerializerSettings = new Newtonsoft.Json.JsonSerializerSettings()
{
NullValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.NullValueHandling.Include
};
For some odd reason the Newtonsoft.Json.JsonFormatter ignore assigments to the propreties os SerializerSettings.
In order to make your setting work create new instance of .SerializerSettings as shown below:
config.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SerializerSettings = new Newtonsoft.Json.JsonSerializerSettings
{
DefaultValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.DefaultValueHandling.Include,
NullValueHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.NullValueHandling.Include,
};
I finally came across this http://forums.asp.net/t/1824580.aspx/1?Serializing+to+JSON+Nullable+Date+gets+ommitted+using+Json+NET+and+Web+API+despite+specifying+NullValueHandling which describes what I was experiencing as a bug in the beta that was fixed for the RTM.
Though I had installed VS2012 RTM, my project was still using all the nuget packages that the beta came with. So I nugetted (nugot?) updates for everything and all is now well (using #1 from my question). Though I'm feeling silly for having burned half a day.
When I saw this answer I was upset because I was already doing this and yet my problem still existed. My problem rooted back to the fact that my object implemented an interface that included a nullable type, so, I had a contract stating if you want to implement me you have to have one of these, and a serializer saying if one of those is null don't include it. BOOM!