Prevent terminal prompt from printing on exec() call - shell

SO,
There are many similar questions, however none that I have been able to use. My code snippet is as follows:
for(int j=0; j<N; j++) {
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid == -1) {
exit(-1); //err
} else if (pid == 0) {//kid
stringstream ss;
ss<<j;
execlp("./sub","sub",ss.str().c_str(),NULL);
exit(0);
} else {
/* parent */
}
}
my executing code in sub(.cpp) is:
int main( int argc, char **argv )
{
cout<<argv[i]<<endl;
exit(0);
}
my output is as such:
[terminal prompt '$'] 4
2
3
etc.
Is there a way I could prevent the prompt from displaying on the exec call? and why is it ONLY displaying on the first exec call, and not on every one?

What you see is the normal prompt of your shell, because the parent process terminates very quickly. It is not the output of the exec call. The forked processes print their output after the parent process has terminated.
You can use waitpid() in the parent process to "wait" until all forked process have terminated.

Related

IIS is terminating CGI process when client disconnect

The following C snippet is supposed to be run by Windows IIS, as a CGI .exe program.
It outputs three character "a, b, c" with a 10 second delay between them.
However, if I use a browser to access the program, and then reloads the browser page to access the program again - then I get two processes running in parallell on the IIS.
At the browser I will of course only see the output of process 2, as the TCP connection to process 1 has been closed after the first "a" was received.
On the Windows server process 2 happily runs to completion, but processes 1 runs only until it outputs the second character "b".
The WriteFile that outputs that "b" is successful, and also the following log write "Done" is also excuted (thus, there is no fatil exception in WriteFile).
But then, suddenly, process 1 is terminated.
My theory is that IIS detects that some output is received from process 1, and that IIS then forcibly terminates it (as the client is disconnected)
If I add a 10ms sleep (commented below) after the WriteFile, then process 1 does not even execute the log write "Done".
I suppose that this is due to the fact that IIS needs a little time to perform that Terminate call, and without the Sleep the process has time to execute at least the log write "Done" before IIS terminates.
Does anybody recognize this?
And how do I stop IIS from terminating the process (except by beginning by forking it into a new process, that is not owned by IIS)
I really would like to run process 1 all the way to the end, even if no client is "listening" to it...
#include <stdio.h>
#include <windows.h>
void out(char *text)
{
int i;
int written;
char buf[1000];
FILE *fp;
for(i = 0; text[i] != '\0'; i++)
buf[i] = (text[i] == '\n' ? '^' : text[i]);
buf[i] = '\0';
if((fp = fopen("/temp/testkill.txt", "a")) != NULL) {
fprintf(fp, "%d: Write %s\n", _getpid(), buf);
fclose(fp);
}
if(WriteFile(GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE), text, strlen(text), &written, NULL) == 0)
written = -1;
// Sleep(10);
if((fp = fopen("/temp/testkill.txt", "a")) != NULL) {
fprintf(fp, "%d: Done! %s (%d)\n", _getpid(), buf, written);
fclose(fp);
}
}
main()
{
out("Content-Type: text/html\n\n<html><body>\n");
out("a");
Sleep(10000);
out("b");
Sleep(10000);
out("c");
}

put pipe to stdin another process

I'm using pipe to send an array of numbers to another process to sort them. So far, I'm able to get the result from another process using fdopen. However, I can't figure out how to send data from the pipe as stdin for another process.
Here is my code:
int main ()
{
int fd[2], i, val;
pid_t child;
char file[10];
FILE *f;
pipe(fd);
child = fork();
if (child == 0)
{
close(fd[1]);
dup2(fd[0], STDIN_FILENO);
close(fd[0]);
execl("sort", "sort", NULL);
}
else
{
close(fd[0]);
printf ("BEFORE\n");
for (i = 100; i < 110; i++)
{
write(fd[1], &i, sizeof (int));
printf ("%d\n", i);
}
close(fd[1]);
wait(NULL);
}
}
By the way, how can the other process get input? scanf?
I think your pipe is set up correctly. The problems may start at execl(). For this call you should specify an absolute path, which is probably /bin/sort if you mean the Unix utility. There is also a version of the call execlp() which searches automatically on the PATH.
The next problem is that sort is text based, more specifically line based, and you're sending binary garbage to its STDIN.
In the parent process you should write formatted text into the pipe.
FILE *wpipe = fdopen(fd[1], "w");
for (i = 100; i < 110; i++) {
fprintf(wpipe, "%d\n", i);
...
}
fclose(wpipe);
A reverse loop from 110 down to 100 may test your sorting a bit better.

Sending child stdout to parent stdout

I am working on a simple application that takes the output from another one and writes it to a socket.
Below is the code for the application that I am execvp'ing
this code is called simple App
int main( int argc, char * argv[])
{
int count = 0;
while(count < 5)
//Attempt fork
if((pid2 = fork()) < 0) //Failed to fork
{
printf("\n Failed to fork in Dump \n");
exit(1);
}
else if (pid2 == 0) //Child Code
{
dup2(STDOUT_FILENO,pipefd[1]);
close(pipefd[0]);
close(STDOUT_FILENO);
if(execvp("../App/App", dumpParam) < 0) //execute the app; returns -1 if failed
{
printf("\nFailed to execute App\n");
exit(1);
}
}
else //Parent
{
close(pipefd[1]);
memset(buff,'0',sizeof(buff));
printf("here\n");
while( (r = read(pipefd[0],buff,sizeof(buff))) >= 0)
{
printf("\nSuccess in read r = %d\n",r);
printf("\nBuff = %s\n",buff);
memset(buff,'0',sizeof(buff));
}
printf("nowHere\n");
}
return pipefd[0];
so far when i run it, it prints out just a ton of 0's. if i set read > 0 then it doesn't run at all. Thoughts?
The read is returning 0 (end of file) because the child end of the pipe is closed.
You've got the dup2 the wrong way round, it should be
dup2(pipefd[1],STDOUT_FILENO)
also remove
close(STDOUT_FILENO)

dup2 blocking printf, but not fprintf?

so, I have an assignment for my Operating Systems class wherein i am to create a ring of processes connected with pipes in order to pass messages between them. i found some example code which i was looking to adapt (or at least understand) for my needs. the example code (slightly modified) is:
/* Program 4.1 */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
/* Sample C program for generating a unidirectional ring of processes.Invoke this program
with a command-line arg ument indicating the number of processes on the ring. Communication
is done via pipes that connect the standard output of a process to the standard input of
its successor on the ring. After the ring is created, each process identifies itself with
its process ID and the process ID of its parent. Each process then exits. */
void main(int argc, char *argv[ ])
{
int master_pid = getpid();
printf("master pid: %i\n", master_pid);
int i; /* number of this process (starting with 1) */
int childpid; /* indicates process should spawn another */
int nprocs; /* total number of processes in ring */
int fd[2]; /* file descriptors returned by pipe */
int error; /* return value from dup2 call */
/* check command line for a valid number of processes to generate */
if ( (argc != 2) || ((nprocs = atoi (argv[1])) <= 0) ) {
fprintf (stderr, "Usage: %s nprocs\n", argv[0]);
exit(1);
}
/* connect std input to std output via a pipe */
if (pipe (fd) == -1) {
perror("Could not create pipe");
exit(1);
}
printf("%s\n", "test");
//this section is blocking printf()?
if ((dup2(fd[0], STDIN_FILENO) == -1) ||
(dup2(fd[1], STDOUT_FILENO) == -1)) {
perror("Could not dup pipes");
exit(1);
}
printf("%s\n", "test");
if ((close(fd[0]) == -1) || (close(fd[1]) == -1)) {
perror("Could not close extra descriptors");
exit(1);
}
/* create the remaining processes with their connecting pipes */
for (i = 1; i < nprocs; i++) {
if (pipe (fd) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr,"Could not create pipe %d: %s\n",
i, strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if ((childpid = fork()) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Could not create child %d: %s\n",
i, strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if (childpid > 0) /* for parent process, reassign stdout */
error = dup2(fd[1], STDOUT_FILENO);
else
error = dup2(fd[0], STDIN_FILENO);
if (error == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Could not dup pipes for iteration %d: %s\n",
i, strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if ((close(fd[0]) == -1) || (close(fd[1]) == -1)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Could not close extra descriptors %d: %s\n",
i, strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if (childpid)
break;
}
/* say hello to the world */
fprintf(stderr,"This is process %d with ID %d and parent id %d\n",
i, (int)getpid(), (int)getppid());
wait(1);
exit (0);
} /* end of main program here */
which outputs:
master pid: 30593
test
This is process 1 with ID 30593 and parent id 30286
This is process 2 with ID 30594 and parent id 30593
when i give is 2 as argv[1]
so, I'm wondering, why would the dup2 section prevent the printf() from executing? if i cant even print something, i'm not sure if i could even pass the message correctly. also, why would the fprintf() already there work, but not one that i would put there?
edit: i would take this to my professor/TA, but theyre both out of town and will be unreachable between now and the deadline...
printf prints to stdout, which is file descriptor 1 (or equivalently STDOUT_FILENO). dup2(3) is duplicating the pipe's file descriptor on top of the current stdout, which has the side effect of closing the current stdout. So, when you try to printf after calling that particular dup2, you're really printing the data into the pipe you just created, which doesn't go to your terminal output.
fprintf(stderr, ...) still works because that prints to stderr, not stdout, and the stderr file descriptor (2, or equivalently STDERR_FILENO) does not change during the program, so it continues to print out to the terminal.
printf() does not send data to path 0, it sends buffered data using stdout. It would seem that when you disrupt path 0 by dup2'ing something to it, you're disrupting stdout in the process.
From the man page on dup2: dup2() makes newfd be the copy of oldfd, closing newfd first if necessary. Thus when you call dup2(fd[0], STDIN_FILENO) you are breaking stdout.
You state that fprintf() is working but printf() is not... what path are you using for fprintf()? If you're using stderr then it makes perfect sense that it would continue to work, since you haven't done anything with that path.

Debugging child processes- GDB/DDD

My project is to implement a simple shell program with background processing by way of ending an arglist with &, as in most UNIX shells. My problem is how to debug the shell in GDB when background processing requires child processes to be created.
My child processing code goes like
int id;
int child=-1;
int running=0;
if ((strcmp(args[0], "&")==0){
if ((id==fork())==-1)
perror("Couldn't start the background process");
else if (id==0){ //start the child process
running++;
printf("Job %d started, PID: %d\n", running, getpid());
signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL);
signal(SIGQUIT, SIG_DFL);
execvp(args[0], args);
perror("Can't execute command);
exit(1);
else {
int jobNum= running-(running-1);
if ( (waitpid(-1, &child, WNOHANG) == -1)
perror("Child Wait");
else
printf("[%d] exited with status %d\n", jobNum, child>>8);
}
When I try to run a command, like ps &, and set the breakpoint to the function parser, the command executes without hitting the breakpoint. This is confusing and renders the debugger useless in this instance. What can I do about it?
I think you want
set follow-fork-mode child
also note that the line
if ((id==fork())==-1)
is comparing an uninitialized value against the return value of fork().
I believe you wanted an assignment.

Resources