Specifically, I'm trying to change the register_redirect in the system/cms/modules/users/config/ion_auth.php config file.
Is there some place to put my application specific configs?
Potentially.
Config files like this are not meant to be entirely untouchable, but I understand that it feels like "hacking the core". If you're tracking your site with Git then its a non-issue, because you can pull updates without overriding the changes.
Alternatives solutions are a little tricky as the "post_user_register" event is running before it sends out activation emails and the like. That would be a good place to put your own redirect, but that would mean no users get their welcome emails so this is not a good idea.
Really you'll need to use Git for this as described above. Ion Auth is not a very flexible solution these days, compared to the awesome "Sentry" auth system being implemented for 2.3.
Related
This question has been bugging me for quite some time now, I want to create a cms, a School Mnagement System to be more specific, and what matters to me the most, is making this system plugin based, in a way that administrators can download and install plugins right through their admin panel, just like wordpress.
Now I've read about wordpress Hooks, Actions and Filters, and in all honesty i can say i'm just a little familiar with their functionality, but to apply same functionality to a Laravel App... , It's a bit hard to figure out, at least for me.
I've also searched about this question and found out that almost everyone is suggesting packages, But while packages can work great for other developers wanting to get use of the package's functionality, they can't be easily installed by a user not familiar with any programming language, And that's exactly what i want in my application.
Now what i have in my mind so far, as in Wordpress Actions and Filters, almost everything one would want to use in Wordpress theme files ( to make that piece of code flexible for adding plugin functionality ) should be called as functions, and calling that function by Wordpress do_action() is kind of a must-take path, which of course makes sense.
This way plugin developers can just call add_action() / add_filter() in their files and put their plugins into the flow of the application.
So...
Basically what I'm asking here is:
How to apply such functionality to a laravel app?
Is there an easier way than calling everything by a function like do_action()?
Should i write some kind of a file management module for downloading and updating plugins?
Again I must say that I am not very familiar with wordpress ways to achieve this kind of functionality, So I may be wrong about some of the description I mentioned above, But please, I appreciate any clarification around this subject if you can.
Thanks in advance for any insight.
*P.S. I've tried to be as clear as I possibly can about the problem, And I'm not looking for any specific method for the system I`m developing.
What i want is to know Common / Best methods ( If there is a best method ) for achieving such functionality, preferably in Laravel, but a general algorithm would still be very appreciated.
I know lots of people have the same question and are tackling with the same issue, so if you even only provide a link to a useful article it would be great.*
I have been working as a Wordpress Developer for a very long time and I also have sufficient experience in Laravel... and to be honest, making this kind of functionality is not that difficult at all.
How?
First of all, you must understand that the web app that you will be making will have all the functionalities, but they can only be enabled/disabled from the front-end (Admin Panel/Dashboard). In other words, your School Management System app is actually having all the features/functionalities pre-installed, but you are just allowing the users to enable/disable it. This is much simpler.
So, if for eg. you want to provide someone attendance management functionality, you will have to give the admin of the site, the access to enable/disable it.
Why?
Wordpress has a built-in UI for adding/updating plugins. But in Laravel, everything is code based and therefore this I believe is the simplest way to go (especially for making things in your app pluggable).
Steps
Make a site with UI etc...
Create a config and migration file which will have the names of all the plugins you are going to allow the user to enable/disable.
Make a sync command that will sync all the plugins in your app.
Use it render a page from the front-end and manage their status from the back-end (is_active etc etc...)
Now once, these plugins are active, make sure the user (say moderator, editor) has access to manage them, for which you will obviously have to create roles/permissions and use Laravel Policies for such stuff.
Lastly, only the admin will have the enabling/disabling writes and no one else.
For the other part where you want the people to perform their own functions with filters/actions. I'd say this is completely contradictory to the part where you say Installing Laravel Packages isn't easy. Well, if you would really want a developer a way into this, why not straight away ask them to make a package for your app alone? Hmmmm.... Think about it :)
But, even then, if you would like to create such a functionality, create a simple class which the user can call and user its functions to call their own functions... Something like -> SMSPlugin::do_action(). But then again, making things like updating/deleting the plugin will require you to build your own Plugin Store and ask users to upload to it. Then you'll have to make an API to constantly check for updates for all the installed plugins and blah blah.... It's a really long procedure... And I don't believe that feasible too!
Hope I answered everything. Let me know in the comments if you have any doubts :)
I know it was 2 years ago, but for now you can achieve this with laravel with some packages:
So i think the steps will be:
Create new Laravel App and add some packages for BASIC admin UI and things you will need like:
Authentication (https://laravel.com/docs/5.7/authentication)
Roles and Permissions (https://github.com/spatie/laravel-permission)
Users managment
Modules (https://nwidart.com/laravel-modules/v4/introduction)
At this point you must configure and write a UI for manage every thing from every package mentioned.
So i think this is the way or at least some try to do it in 2019 :D
Happy new year to all!
There's a package for this, it supports version 5, didn't test yet with 6:
https://github.com/oneso/laravel-plugins
I have three different domains all on the same server and I want to run the code on all three domains from one source on the same server, but not sure the best way.
Here's what I have:
domain01.com
domain02.com
domain03.com
domain04.com/sourcecode
I want domain01-03 to run the code inside domain04.com/sourcecode so the user can go to their domain and not have to go to domain04.com to see their site. I want to keep all the code inside domain04.com because I don't want to have to put the code inside each domain every time I make a code change.
For whatever reason I can't get my head around the best way to do this -- and want to do it right.
Any advice?
Thanks!
All you need to do is create a mapping on the first three sites to the appropriate directory in the fourth site, eg map /domain04 to /full/path/to/domain04/sourcecode, then refererence its CFML resources via /domain04 in CFC and include paths. The inference here is the code does need to be accessible via the file system for all sites concerned.
Note that if you also want to server non-CFML files via HTTP (eg: images, css, js), then you will also need a web server virtual directory along the same lines.
None of this requires a framework, it's standard CF / web server functionality.
Are you using a framework? One like ColdBox could make this trivial if your code is written modularly. (Disclaimer, I am affiliated with ColdBox)
If not, it really depends on what the code is. CFCs can be mapped anywhere via ColdFusion mappings. Even .cfm files can be included as long as the file systems are visible. If you're wanting to basically have complete copy of a site in another web root without duplication, I would first consider using a shared source control repo and a build process that checks it out in the appropriate places, and secondly a good old, symlink will also work .
Using the jQuery wrapped version of Fineuploader v3.3.
Is it possible to populate the file list with files already in the upload folder?
I think "_addToList(id, name)" should do the trick, but I can't get it to work. Any ideas?
Seems that they are currently working on this feature:
https://github.com/Widen/fine-uploader/issues/784
So, this will be available soon.
This is not a behavior that Fine Uploader currently supports. Fine Uploader only displays files that users have submitted to the uploader since the current uploader instance was created. It doesn't try to be an all-in-one web application. You could probably add your own item to the list/UI via javascript. That probably wouldn't be terribly difficult, but seems like an odd thing to do.
If you'd like to discuss your specific use case more, please open up a feature request in the Github issue tracker.
Generally, client side code cannot add stored or hard-coded path based file names for use in any type of POST or upload operation. Obviously this is a security measure, you can imagine if a malicious web page could add to a generic POST operation some type of baked in file name. So from what I understand, only the user can specify path based file names, via a file browser for the session that it is included in. This applies to HTML/JavaScript/jQuery but am unsure if Flash/Silverlight based solutions would also be limited. I think a Java based uploader would be free of this. But you are just moving closer and closer to installed software.
I have a very-simple php-based website.
I would like to add "subsribe for information" box and send it to some list-management tool.
I found that phplist is quite a good one. However, I don't find any api which allows me to subscribe users using ajax.
(I would like to avoid the pages of phplist in order to avoid confusion due to different design, and also I want the interface to be multi-language).
Of-course I can touch the code, but I doubt that it misses this feature, so I assunme I simply missed it.
Thanks!
Hopefully you have managed how to achieve this already. I have a different use case not requiring AJAX.
Anyway, I've found a script that tries to ease the addition of subscribers to your list. Maybe you could use it as the backend to support your AJAX request.
This is the thread in which the script is shared, as others have found it useful, also for unsuscribing users, even handling massive subscriptions/unsuscriptions:
http://forums.phplist.com/viewtopic.php?t=5009
Finally, be aware this code is using PEAR DB abstraction layer, probably I'm going to use this but without the PEAR package.
I look forward for what you could do through AJAX and this functions.
I'm just getting started with ImageResizer and I'm stuck on what seem like totally basic questions:
I have an uploader that I use to put images into a directory that's not directly accessible over HTTP. (If I just put a image at, say, /images/myimage.jpg, then anyone could access it by just asking for it, whereas I want to limit access via thumbnails, watermarks, etc.). So I want to put it at /offlimits/myimage.jpg, but be able to serve it up at /public/images/myimage.jpg.
I don't really want to dump all the images in the same offlimits folder, because putting lots of files in one folder makes Windows unhappy. But I don't want to expose the details of that subdirectory structure either, so where do I put the mapping between the public facing url and the actual image location?
Most generally, I don't necessarily want an image extension at all, so I'd like to say /public/image_id?width=100... and have this map to /offlimits/sub1/sub2/sub3/image_id.jpg.
Can anyone advise about how to set this up?
Three part questions are generally frowned upon here at SO, but I'll bite anyhow :)
If you're allowing access to images based on authentication, then you need to use ASP.NET's URL Authorization feature. ImageResizer supports URL Authorization rules. If you just don't want the source files available, and want to force them resized or watermarked, read the docs on how to implement arbitrary rules like this.
You can rewrite image paths to your heart's content with Config.Current.Rewrite, which works just like the PostRewrite event mentioned earlier. Just remember you'll have to keep it all straight in your head later.
Image extensions are good things. Don't fight them. They let the server figure out the right mime-type to send and help errant browsers recover from related bugs. They prevent issues on several platforms and make the Save As dialog work. They significantly improve server efficiency as well, since handling logic doesn't have wait as long. This is particularly relevant because of the design of the IIS/ASP.NET modules system.