Integration test: test the Autowired annotation - spring

I want to test injection dependencies in spring.
I have a Class:
public SomeClass {
#Autowired
SomeBean bean ;
public SomeBean getBean(){
return this.bean ;
}
}
I want a test like this:
public SomeClassTest {
SomeClass someClass ;
#Before
public void setUp(){
someClass = new SomeClass() ;
}
#Test public testBeanWired(){
assertNotNull(someClass.getBean()) ;
}
}
I have tried with the ContextConfiguration with a test configuration file, but the test fails, i don't want to use #Autowired in the test, i want to create an instance of my class and the bean is autowired automatically.

That is only possible if the bean is annotated with #Configuration and if the byte-code is instrumented. Otherwise, only beans created by Spring are autowired. Not beans created using new. Because Spring has no way to know that you created an object and that it must inject a dependency in it.
That's a fundamental principle of dependency injection: the objects are instantiated and injected by the container, not by you.

Related

How to avoid a second Instantiation of a spring bean in child test context

I created an Embedded Sftp server bean for my integration tests, i hooked the startup and the shutdown of the server respectively with the afterPropertiesSet and destroy life cycles
public class EmbeddedSftpServer implements InitializingBean, DisposableBean {
//other class content
#Override
public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
//Code for starting server here
}
#Override
public void destroy() throws Exception {
//Code for stopping server here
}
}
here my config class
#TestConfiguration
public class SftpTestConfig {
#Bean
public EmbeddedSftpServer embeddedSftpServer() {
return new EmbeddedSftpServer();
}
//Other bean definitions
}
Now when i inject the bean in my test classes like the following :
#ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = SftpTestConfig .class)
class ExampleOneIT {
#Autowired
private EmbeddedSftpServer embeddedSftpServer;
}
#ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = SftpTestConfig .class)
class ExampleTwoIT {
#Autowired
private EmbeddedSftpServer embeddedSftpServer;
}
#SpringBatchTest
#ContextConfiguration(classes = SftpTestConfig .class)
class ExampleThreeIT {
#Autowired
private EmbeddedSftpServer embeddedSftpServer;
}
And i run all the test classes simultaneously, i found out that for the test classes annotated with #ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class), it's the same context that is used (which is understandable since i guess spring cache it) and therefore the bean lifecycle methods are not executed again, but to my surprise, for the class annotated with #SpringBatchTest i noticed that the life cycle hooks of the bean are executed again! Which is a behavior that is not convenient since i want the application context to start the server one time for all tests and close it at the end of those tests (which is the case if i use only #ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class) for all my test classes).
N.B. : I need to use #SpringBachTest for my ExampleThreeIT test class.
I think you are hitting this issue: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-batch/issues/3940 which has been fixed in v4.3.4/4.2.8. Upgrading to one of these versions should fix your issue.

Mockito mock does not work as expected in Spring MockMvc test

In an Spring mockmvc test I want to replace a bean by a mock implementation which is configured using Mockito.when() definitions. The definitions are indeed respected at the time the mock is configured, as well as at the time the mock is injected into a depending bean (a controller advice in my case) during application context startup. However, when the mock is used during a certain test, all when definitions are gone.
Why?
Some remarks:
The mock is completely new code, so it is impossible that I am not aware of any call to Mockito.reset().
the mock at the time of usage is the same as at the time of creation.
a bypassing solution to the problem is to configure the mock in a #BeforeEach method in AbstractTest. However, I want to understand why it does not work without.
Here a simplified and anonymized example
#Component
public class MyBean {
private String property;
...
public String getProperty() {
return property;
}
}
#ControllerAdvice
public class MyControllerAdvice() {
private MyBean myBean;
#Autowired
public MyControllerAdvice(MyBean myBean) {
this.myBean = myBean;
System.out.println(this.myBean.getProperty()); // --> outputs "FOOBAR"
}
#ModelAttribute
public String getMyBeanProperty() {
return myBean.getProperty(); // --> returns null
}
}
public class AbstractTest {
#Configuration
static class Config {
#Bean
public MyBean () {
MyBean myBean = Mockito.mock(MyBean.class, "I am a mock of MyBean");
when(myBean.getProperty()).thenReturn("FOOBAR");
}
}
}
That's not a problem of Mockito. I think you simplified the example a lot and we don't see the full picture, but I can say that main cause - 2 different beans MyBean: one is initialized with Spring's #Component, second is in configuration class with #Bean.
Why do you use #Component for POJO/DO?
#Bean in the configuration class is being initialized lazy so better way to use #PostConstruct
If you want to leave both beans mark MyBean in the configuration class as #Primary

How to have bean of repository interface of spring data jpa during run of test cases

We have written below 2 classes
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = {TestConfig.class})
public class AbcFilterTest {
#Autowired
private AbcUtils abcUtils;
#Autowired
private AbcRepository abcRepository;
#Test
public void testFilter() {
MockHttpServletRequest httpServletRequest = new MockHttpServletRequest();
MockHttpServletResponse httpServletResponse = new MockHttpServletResponse();
MockFilterChain mockChain = new MockFilterChain();
}
}
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackageClasses = {AbcUtils.class, AbcRepository.class,})
public class TestConfig {
}
For running a test class, i need instance of both AbcUtilsclass and AbcRepository interface(extending CurdRepository) which are autowired in the class i am testing.1st one has #Component while 2nd has #Repositry on top of it.As you can see,in my test class I have autowired both util and repository class with component scan as above code.In real time spring framework creates implementaion class for the repository interface but On running test case,I am getting below error
Caused by: org.springframework.beans.BeanInstantiationException:
Failed to instantiate [com.a.b.c.persistence.AbcRepository]: Specified
class is an interface.
Kindly suggest how to make this test class work. Please note that we are not using Spring Boot and Mockito.We are doing integration testing.
We are using Spring rest and Spring Data JPA with hibernate.
Scanning AbcUtils.class and AbcRepository.class is not enough if you want to write something in the database. You need to scan the configuration that contains your DataSource definition and related config. Since the tests will be instantiated like a Spring bean too, the test class need to implement the ApplicationContextAware interface:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(locations = {"/config.xml"})
public class TestClass implements ApplicationContextAware{
#Autowired
Repository repository;
//....
}

Spring annotation to initialize a bean during Autowire

Do we have a spring annotation that provides an option to initialize a bean (not a component) if not available through default constructor while autowiring?
If yes, that will be awesome. I am tired of initializing beans in some configuration class using default constructor and it occupies space.
I am doing this currently
#Bean
public Test test() {
return new Test();
}
Expecting:
Sometime like:
#Autowire(initMethodType=constructor)
private Test test:
If no, was there no real need of such annotation or any technical limitation?
You have to use #Bean annotation inside an #Configuration class.
Check the following link
https://docs.spring.io/spring-javaconfig/docs/1.0.0.M4/reference/html/ch02s02.html
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public TransferService transferService() {
return new TransferServiceImpl();
}
}
You could annotate your class with #Component, like this:
#Component
public class Test {
...
}
Whereever you need that class, you could then simply autowire it:
#Autowired
private Test test;
You would just have to make sure, that you use #ComponentScan to pick up that bean. You can find more information on that here.

Is #Autowired taking care of the nested autowiring?

I have the following components, in two different files:
#Component
public class Chauffeur {
Car car;
public Chauffeur(Car car){
this.car = car;
}
public void go(){
System.out.println("Chauffeur");
car.drive();
}
}
#Component
public class Car{
public void drive() {
System.out.println("Drive car");
}
}
the following configuration file:
#Configuration
#ComponentScan
public class DriveableConfiguration {
}
and the following test:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes=DriveableConfiguration.class)
public class DriveableTest {
#Autowired
Chauffeur chauffeur;
#Test
public void chauffeurTest(){
chauffeur.go();
}
}
All the classes above are in the same package and the test is passing.
In the test I annotated chauffer with #Autowired, which should mean that the Spring container looks after the creation of the instance of Chauffeur without the developer needing to explicitly instantiate it.
Now, the constructor for Chauffer needs an instance of Car, so there is no default constructor for that class. Nonetheless the container creates it, injecting the required instance in the constructor.
Is the #Autowired saying to the container to instantiate the element with whatever (Components, Beans) it can provide, included parameters in the constructor? If so, in what case is it needed to use #Autowired to annotate a constructor?
Only if you use Spring 4.3+. In such a case #Autowired on constructor is optional if you have one non default constructor.
You can check the example here.
So as of 4.3, you no longer need to specify an explicit injection annotation in such a single-constructor scenario. This is particularly elegant for classes which otherwise do not carry any container annotations at all, for example when programmatically registered
For versions lower than 4.3 you will an exception will be thrown:
the container will throw an exception looking for a default
constructor, unless you explicitly indicate autowire mode
‘constructor’ in your bean definition setup (e.g. in an XML )

Resources