Related
x=$(find . -name "*.txt")
echo $x
if I run the above piece of code in Bash shell, what I get is a string containing several file names separated by blank, not a list.
Of course, I can further separate them by blank to get a list, but I'm sure there is a better way to do it.
So what is the best way to loop through the results of a find command?
TL;DR: If you're just here for the most correct answer, you probably want my personal preference (see the bottom of this post):
# execute `process` once for each file
find . -name '*.txt' -exec process {} \;
If you have time, read through the rest to see several different ways and the problems with most of them.
The full answer:
The best way depends on what you want to do, but here are a few options. As long as no file or folder in the subtree has whitespace in its name, you can just loop over the files:
for i in $x; do # Not recommended, will break on whitespace
process "$i"
done
Marginally better, cut out the temporary variable x:
for i in $(find -name \*.txt); do # Not recommended, will break on whitespace
process "$i"
done
It is much better to glob when you can. White-space safe, for files in the current directory:
for i in *.txt; do # Whitespace-safe but not recursive.
process "$i"
done
By enabling the globstar option, you can glob all matching files in this directory and all subdirectories:
# Make sure globstar is enabled
shopt -s globstar
for i in **/*.txt; do # Whitespace-safe and recursive
process "$i"
done
In some cases, e.g. if the file names are already in a file, you may need to use read:
# IFS= makes sure it doesn't trim leading and trailing whitespace
# -r prevents interpretation of \ escapes.
while IFS= read -r line; do # Whitespace-safe EXCEPT newlines
process "$line"
done < filename
read can be used safely in combination with find by setting the delimiter appropriately:
find . -name '*.txt' -print0 |
while IFS= read -r -d '' line; do
process "$line"
done
For more complex searches, you will probably want to use find, either with its -exec option or with -print0 | xargs -0:
# execute `process` once for each file
find . -name \*.txt -exec process {} \;
# execute `process` once with all the files as arguments*:
find . -name \*.txt -exec process {} +
# using xargs*
find . -name \*.txt -print0 | xargs -0 process
# using xargs with arguments after each filename (implies one run per filename)
find . -name \*.txt -print0 | xargs -0 -I{} process {} argument
find can also cd into each file's directory before running a command by using -execdir instead of -exec, and can be made interactive (prompt before running the command for each file) using -ok instead of -exec (or -okdir instead of -execdir).
*: Technically, both find and xargs (by default) will run the command with as many arguments as they can fit on the command line, as many times as it takes to get through all the files. In practice, unless you have a very large number of files it won't matter, and if you exceed the length but need them all on the same command line, you're SOL find a different way.
What ever you do, don't use a for loop:
# Don't do this
for file in $(find . -name "*.txt")
do
…code using "$file"
done
Three reasons:
For the for loop to even start, the find must run to completion.
If a file name has any whitespace (including space, tab or newline) in it, it will be treated as two separate names.
Although now unlikely, you can overrun your command line buffer. Imagine if your command line buffer holds 32KB, and your for loop returns 40KB of text. That last 8KB will be dropped right off your for loop and you'll never know it.
Always use a while read construct:
find . -name "*.txt" -print0 | while read -d $'\0' file
do
…code using "$file"
done
The loop will execute while the find command is executing. Plus, this command will work even if a file name is returned with whitespace in it. And, you won't overflow your command line buffer.
The -print0 will use the NULL as a file separator instead of a newline and the -d $'\0' will use NULL as the separator while reading.
find . -name "*.txt"|while read fname; do
echo "$fname"
done
Note: this method and the (second) method shown by bmargulies are safe to use with white space in the file/folder names.
In order to also have the - somewhat exotic - case of newlines in the file/folder names covered, you will have to resort to the -exec predicate of find like this:
find . -name '*.txt' -exec echo "{}" \;
The {} is the placeholder for the found item and the \; is used to terminate the -exec predicate.
And for the sake of completeness let me add another variant - you gotta love the *nix ways for their versatility:
find . -name '*.txt' -print0|xargs -0 -n 1 echo
This would separate the printed items with a \0 character that isn't allowed in any of the file systems in file or folder names, to my knowledge, and therefore should cover all bases. xargs picks them up one by one then ...
Filenames can include spaces and even control characters. Spaces are (default) delimiters for shell expansion in bash and as a result of that x=$(find . -name "*.txt") from the question is not recommended at all. If find gets a filename with spaces e.g. "the file.txt" you will get 2 separated strings for processing, if you process x in a loop. You can improve this by changing delimiter (bash IFS Variable) e.g. to \r\n, but filenames can include control characters - so this is not a (completely) safe method.
From my point of view, there are 2 recommended (and safe) patterns for processing files:
1. Use for loop & filename expansion:
for file in ./*.txt; do
[[ ! -e $file ]] && continue # continue, if file does not exist
# single filename is in $file
echo "$file"
# your code here
done
2. Use find-read-while & process substitution
while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
# single filename is in $file
echo "$file"
# your code here
done < <(find . -name "*.txt" -print0)
Remarks
on Pattern 1:
bash returns the search pattern ("*.txt") if no matching file is found - so the extra line "continue, if file does not exist" is needed. see Bash Manual, Filename Expansion
shell option nullglob can be used to avoid this extra line.
"If the failglob shell option is set, and no matches are found, an error message is printed and the command is not executed." (from Bash Manual above)
shell option globstar: "If set, the pattern ‘**’ used in a filename expansion context will match all files and zero or more directories and subdirectories. If the pattern is followed by a ‘/’, only directories and subdirectories match." see Bash Manual, Shopt Builtin
other options for filename expansion: extglob, nocaseglob, dotglob & shell variable GLOBIGNORE
on Pattern 2:
filenames can contain blanks, tabs, spaces, newlines, ... to process filenames in a safe way, find with -print0 is used: filename is printed with all control characters & terminated with NUL. see also Gnu Findutils Manpage, Unsafe File Name Handling, safe File Name Handling, unusual characters in filenames. See David A. Wheeler below for detailed discussion of this topic.
There are some possible patterns to process find results in a while loop. Others (kevin, David W.) have shown how to do this using pipes:
files_found=1
find . -name "*.txt" -print0 |
while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
# single filename in $file
echo "$file"
files_found=0 # not working example
# your code here
done
[[ $files_found -eq 0 ]] && echo "files found" || echo "no files found"
When you try this piece of code, you will see, that it does not work: files_found is always "true" & the code will always echo "no files found". Reason is: each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate subshell, so the changed variable inside the loop (separate subshell) does not change the variable in the main shell script. This is why I recommend using process substitution as the "better", more useful, more general pattern.See I set variables in a loop that's in a pipeline. Why do they disappear... (from Greg's Bash FAQ) for a detailed discussion on this topic.
Additional References & Sources:
Gnu Bash Manual, Pattern Matching
Filenames and Pathnames in Shell: How to do it Correctly, David A. Wheeler
Why you don't read lines with "for", Greg's Wiki
Why you shouldn't parse the output of ls(1), Greg's Wiki
Gnu Bash Manual, Process Substitution
(Updated to include #Socowi's execellent speed improvement)
With any $SHELL that supports it (dash/zsh/bash...):
find . -name "*.txt" -exec $SHELL -c '
for i in "$#" ; do
echo "$i"
done
' {} +
Done.
Original answer (shorter, but slower):
find . -name "*.txt" -exec $SHELL -c '
echo "$0"
' {} \;
If you can assume the file names don't contain newlines, you can read the output of find into a Bash array using the following command:
readarray -t x < <(find . -name '*.txt')
Note:
-t causes readarray to strip newlines.
It won't work if readarray is in a pipe, hence the process substitution.
readarray is available since Bash 4.
Bash 4.4 and up also supports the -d parameter for specifying the delimiter. Using the null character, instead of newline, to delimit the file names works also in the rare case that the file names contain newlines:
readarray -d '' x < <(find . -name '*.txt' -print0)
readarray can also be invoked as mapfile with the same options.
Reference: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/005#Loading_lines_from_a_file_or_stream
# Doesn't handle whitespace
for x in `find . -name "*.txt" -print`; do
process_one $x
done
or
# Handles whitespace and newlines
find . -name "*.txt" -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 process_one
I like to use find which is first assigned to variable and IFS switched to new line as follow:
FilesFound=$(find . -name "*.txt")
IFSbkp="$IFS"
IFS=$'\n'
counter=1;
for file in $FilesFound; do
echo "${counter}: ${file}"
let counter++;
done
IFS="$IFSbkp"
As commented by #Konrad Rudolph this will not work with "new lines" in file name. I still think it is handy as it covers most of the cases when you need to loop over command output.
As already posted on the top answer by Kevin, the best solution is to use a for loop with bash glob, but as bash glob is not recursive by default, this can be fixed by a bash recursive function:
#!/bin/bash
set -x
set -eu -o pipefail
all_files=();
function get_all_the_files()
{
directory="$1";
for item in "$directory"/* "$directory"/.[^.]*;
do
if [[ -d "$item" ]];
then
get_all_the_files "$item";
else
all_files+=("$item");
fi;
done;
}
get_all_the_files "/tmp";
for file_path in "${all_files[#]}"
do
printf 'My file is "%s"\n' "$file_path";
done;
Related questions:
Bash loop through directory including hidden file
Recursively list files from a given directory in Bash
ls command: how can I get a recursive full-path listing, one line per file?
List files recursively in Linux CLI with path relative to the current directory
Recursively List all directories and files
bash script, create array of all files in a directory
How can I creates array that contains the names of all the files in a folder?
How can I creates array that contains the names of all the files in a folder?
How to get the list of files in a directory in a shell script?
based on other answers and comment of #phk, using fd #3:
(which still allows to use stdin inside the loop)
while IFS= read -r f <&3; do
echo "$f"
done 3< <(find . -iname "*filename*")
You can put the filenames returned by find into an array like this:
array=()
while IFS= read -r -d ''; do
array+=("$REPLY")
done < <(find . -name '*.txt' -print0)
Now you can just loop through the array to access individual items and do whatever you want with them.
Note: It's white space safe.
You can store your find output in array if you wish to use the output later as:
array=($(find . -name "*.txt"))
Now to print the each element in new line, you can either use for loop iterating to all the elements of array, or you can use printf statement.
for i in ${array[#]};do echo $i; done
or
printf '%s\n' "${array[#]}"
You can also use:
for file in "`find . -name "*.txt"`"; do echo "$file"; done
This will print each filename in newline
To only print the find output in list form, you can use either of the following:
find . -name "*.txt" -print 2>/dev/null
or
find . -name "*.txt" -print | grep -v 'Permission denied'
This will remove error messages and only give the filename as output in new line.
If you wish to do something with the filenames, storing it in array is good, else there is no need to consume that space and you can directly print the output from find.
I think using this piece of code (piping the command after while done):
while read fname; do
echo "$fname"
done <<< "$(find . -name "*.txt")"
is better than this answer because while loop is executed in a subshell according to here, if you use this answer and variable changes cannot be seen after while loop if you want to modify variables inside the loop.
function loop_through(){
length_="$(find . -name '*.txt' | wc -l)"
length_="${length_#"${length_%%[![:space:]]*}"}"
length_="${length_%"${length_##*[![:space:]]}"}"
for i in {1..$length_}
do
x=$(find . -name '*.txt' | sort | head -$i | tail -1)
echo $x
done
}
To grab the length of the list of files for loop, I used the first command "wc -l".
That command is set to a variable.
Then, I need to remove the trailing white spaces from the variable so the for loop can read it.
find <path> -xdev -type f -name *.txt -exec ls -l {} \;
This will list the files and give details about attributes.
Another alternative is to not use bash, but call Python to do the heavy lifting. I recurred to this because bash solutions as my other answer were too slow.
With this solution, we build a bash array of files from inline Python script:
#!/bin/bash
set -eu -o pipefail
dsep=":" # directory_separator
base_directory=/tmp
all_files=()
all_files_string="$(python3 -c '#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os
import sys
dsep="'"$dsep"'"
base_directory="'"$base_directory"'"
def log(*args, **kwargs):
print(*args, file=sys.stderr, **kwargs)
def check_invalid_characther(file_path):
for thing in ("\\", "\n"):
if thing in file_path:
raise RuntimeError(f"It is not allowed {thing} on \"{file_path}\"!")
def absolute_path_to_relative(base_directory, file_path):
relative_path = os.path.commonprefix( [ base_directory, file_path ] )
relative_path = os.path.normpath( file_path.replace( relative_path, "" ) )
# if you use Windows Python, it accepts / instead of \\
# if you have \ on your files names, rename them or comment this
relative_path = relative_path.replace("\\", "/")
if relative_path.startswith( "/" ):
relative_path = relative_path[1:]
return relative_path
for directory, directories, files in os.walk(base_directory):
for file in files:
local_file_path = os.path.join(directory, file)
local_file_name = absolute_path_to_relative(base_directory, local_file_path)
log(f"local_file_name {local_file_name}.")
check_invalid_characther(local_file_name)
print(f"{base_directory}{dsep}{local_file_name}")
' | dos2unix)";
if [[ -n "$all_files_string" ]];
then
readarray -t temp <<< "$all_files_string";
all_files+=("${temp[#]}");
fi;
for item in "${all_files[#]}";
do
OLD_IFS="$IFS"; IFS="$dsep";
read -r base_directory local_file_name <<< "$item"; IFS="$OLD_IFS";
printf 'item "%s", base_directory "%s", local_file_name "%s".\n' \
"$item" \
"$base_directory" \
"$local_file_name";
done;
Related:
os.walk without hidden folders
How to do a recursive sub-folder search and return files in a list?
How to split a string into an array in Bash?
How about if you use grep instead of find?
ls | grep .txt$ > out.txt
Now you can read this file and the filenames are in the form of a list.
From the current directory I have multiple sub directories:
subdir1/
001myfile001A.txt
002myfile002A.txt
subdir2/
001myfile001B.txt
002myfile002B.txt
where I want to strip every character from the filenames before myfile so I end up with
subdir1/
myfile001A.txt
myfile002A.txt
subdir2/
myfile001B.txt
myfile002B.txt
I have some code to do this...
#!/bin/bash
for d in `find . -type d -maxdepth 1`; do
cd "$d"
for f in `find . "*.txt"`; do
mv "$f" "$(echo "$f" | sed -r 's/^.*myfile/myfile/')"
done
done
however the newly renamed files end up in the parent directory
i.e.
myfile001A.txt
myfile002A.txt
myfile001B.txt
myfile002B.txt
subdir1/
subdir2/
In which the sub-directories are now empty.
How do I alter my script to rename the files and keep them in their respective sub-directories? As you can see the first loop changes directory to the sub directory so not sure why the files end up getting sent up a directory...
Your script has multiple problems. In the first place, your outer find command doesn't do quite what you expect: it outputs not only each of the subdirectories, but also the search root, ., which is itself a directory. You could have discovered this by running the command manually, among other ways. You don't really need to use find for this, but supposing that you do use it, this would be better:
for d in $(find * -maxdepth 0 -type d); do
Moreover, . is the first result of your original find command, and your problems continue there. Your initial cd is without meaningful effect, because you're just changing to the same directory you're already in. The find command in the inner loop is rooted there, and descends into both subdirectories. The path information for each file you choose to rename is therefore stripped by sed, which is why the results end up in the initial working directory (./subdir1/001myfile001A.txt --> myfile001A.txt). By the time you process the subdirectories, there are no files left in them to rename.
But that's not all: the find command in your inner loop is incorrect. Because you do not specify an option before it, find interprets "*.txt" as designating a second search root, in addition to .. You presumably wanted to use -name "*.txt" to filter the find results; without it, find outputs the name of every file in the tree. Presumably you're suppressing or ignoring the error messages that result.
But supposing that your subdirectories have no subdirectories of their own, as shown, and that you aren't concerned with dotfiles, even this corrected version ...
for f in `find . -name "*.txt"`;
... is an awfully heavyweight way of saying this ...
for f in *.txt;
... or even this ...
for f in *?myfile*.txt;
... the latter of which will avoid attempts to rename any files whose names do not, in fact, change.
Furthermore, launching a sed process for each file name is pretty wasteful and expensive when you could just use bash's built-in substitution feature:
mv "$f" "${f/#*myfile/myfile}"
And you will find also that your working directory gets messed up. The working directory is a characteristic of the overall shell environment, so it does not automatically reset on each loop iteration. You'll need to handle that manually in some way. pushd / popd would do that, as would running the outer loop's body in a subshell.
Overall, this will do the trick:
#!/bin/bash
for d in $(find * -maxdepth 0 -type d); do
pushd "$d"
for f in *.txt; do
mv "$f" "${f/#*myfile/myfile}"
done
popd
done
You can do it without find and sed:
$ for f in */*.txt; do echo mv "$f" "${f/\/*myfile/\/myfile}"; done
mv subdir1/001myfile001A.txt subdir1/myfile001A.txt
mv subdir1/002myfile002A.txt subdir1/myfile002A.txt
mv subdir2/001myfile001B.txt subdir2/myfile001B.txt
mv subdir2/002myfile002B.txt subdir2/myfile002B.txt
If you remove the echo, it'll actually rename the files.
This uses shell parameter expansion to replace a slash and anything up to myfile with just a slash and myfile.
Notice that this breaks if there is more than one level of subdirectories. In that case, you could use extended pattern matching (enabled with shopt -s extglob) and the globstar shell option (shopt -s globstar):
$ for f in **/*.txt; do echo mv "$f" "${f/\/*([!\/])myfile/\/myfile}"; done
mv subdir1/001myfile001A.txt subdir1/myfile001A.txt
mv subdir1/002myfile002A.txt subdir1/myfile002A.txt
mv subdir1/subdir3/001myfile001A.txt subdir1/subdir3/myfile001A.txt
mv subdir1/subdir3/002myfile002A.txt subdir1/subdir3/myfile002A.txt
mv subdir2/001myfile001B.txt subdir2/myfile001B.txt
mv subdir2/002myfile002B.txt subdir2/myfile002B.txt
This uses the *([!\/]) pattern ("zero or more characters that are not a forward slash"). The slash has to be escaped in the bracket expression because we're still inside of the pattern part of the ${parameter/pattern/string} expansion.
Maybe you want to use the following command instead:
rename 's#(.*/).*(myfile.*)#$1$2#' subdir*/*
You can use rename -n ... to check the outcome without actually renaming anything.
Regarding your actual question:
The find command from the outer loop returns 3 (!) directories:
.
./subdir1
./subdir2
The unwanted . is the reason why all files end up in the parent directory (that is .). You can exclude . by using the option -mindepth 1.
Unfortunately, this was onyl the reason for the files landing in the wrong place, but not the only problem. Since you already accepted one of the answers, there is no need to list them all.
a slight modification should fix your problem:
#!/bin/bash
for f in `find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.txt"`; do
mv "$f" "$(echo "$f" | sed -r 's,[^/]+(myfile),\1,')"
done
note: this sed uses , instead of / as the delimiter.
however, there are much faster ways.
here is with the rename utility, available or easily installed wherever there is bash and perl:
find . -maxdepth 2 -name "*.txt" | rename 's,[^/]+(myfile),/$1,'
here are tests on 1000 files:
for `find`; do mv 9.176s
rename 0.099s
that's 100x as fast.
John Bollinger's accepted answer is twice as fast as the OPs, but 50x as slow as this rename solution:
for|for|mv "$f" "${f//}" 4.316s
also, it won't work if there is a directory with too many items for a shell glob. likewise any answers that use for f in *.txt or for f in */*.txt or find * or rename ... subdir*/*. answers that begin with find ., on the other hand, will also work on directories with any number of items.
I'm starting bash scripting and i can't handle spaced filename. I searched other questions about my problem here, like:
how to output file names surrounded with quotes in SINGLE line?
In my script i need to take all directorys, end for each one doing some work. So the skeleton of my script is:
for directory in `find "$DIR" -type d`
do
# ... some work ...
done
This script, doesn't work with spaced filename. So i tried using find in combination with exec, that seems an elegant and easy solution, but nothing changed. More precisely i tried:
(I) find "$DIR" -type d -exec echo -n '"{}" ' \;
(II) find "$DIR" -type d -exec echo -n '"{}" ' +
Before using the command -exec i read something about it, but something is still not clear to me, so:
What's and how works '"{}" ' \;
What's and how works '"{}" ' +
How can i fix my script also for spaced filename?
What's and how works '"{}" ' \;
For each filename, this will basically execute echo -n "\"filename\" ", producing a bunch of lines like "filename".
Adding literal quotes doesn't help though, because bash doesn't start interpretting data as shell script code.
If you read foo; ls $foo, you can't just type in $(rm /) to run a command, and you can't just type in "foo bar" to avoid splitting a filename. Data is data, not code, and shell syntax isn't respected.
What's and how works '"{}" ' +
+ runs the command once for groups of filenames (for efficiency, instead of one at a time). Due to the way substitution works, it's identical to {} +, since the argument is just removed and replaced with a bunch of filenames.
How can i fix my script also for spaced filename?
You can make it work in 95% of cases by simply changing which characters bash uses for splitting, through the use of the IFS variable:
IFS=$'\n'
for dir in $(find "$DIR" -type d)
do
echo "Directory: >> $dir <<"
done
This makes bash split on just line feeds rather than the default of all whitespace (this can have some interesting side effects in the rest of your code, so you might want to set the value of IFS back to its original afterwards).
Filenames can contain line feeds too though. The best approach is to use:
while IFS= read -d '' -r dir
do
echo "Directory: >> $dir <<"
done < <(find "$DIR" -type d -print0)
which makes find output files split by NUL bytes, which filenames can never contain.
I use this format & it works fine:
find '/path/to/directories' -type d |\
while read DIRNAME
do
echo "${DIRNAME}"
done
This may work better for you:
while IFS= read -r adir ; do
echo "Directory: $adir"
done < <(find "$DIR" -type d)
x=$(find . -name "*.txt")
echo $x
if I run the above piece of code in Bash shell, what I get is a string containing several file names separated by blank, not a list.
Of course, I can further separate them by blank to get a list, but I'm sure there is a better way to do it.
So what is the best way to loop through the results of a find command?
TL;DR: If you're just here for the most correct answer, you probably want my personal preference (see the bottom of this post):
# execute `process` once for each file
find . -name '*.txt' -exec process {} \;
If you have time, read through the rest to see several different ways and the problems with most of them.
The full answer:
The best way depends on what you want to do, but here are a few options. As long as no file or folder in the subtree has whitespace in its name, you can just loop over the files:
for i in $x; do # Not recommended, will break on whitespace
process "$i"
done
Marginally better, cut out the temporary variable x:
for i in $(find -name \*.txt); do # Not recommended, will break on whitespace
process "$i"
done
It is much better to glob when you can. White-space safe, for files in the current directory:
for i in *.txt; do # Whitespace-safe but not recursive.
process "$i"
done
By enabling the globstar option, you can glob all matching files in this directory and all subdirectories:
# Make sure globstar is enabled
shopt -s globstar
for i in **/*.txt; do # Whitespace-safe and recursive
process "$i"
done
In some cases, e.g. if the file names are already in a file, you may need to use read:
# IFS= makes sure it doesn't trim leading and trailing whitespace
# -r prevents interpretation of \ escapes.
while IFS= read -r line; do # Whitespace-safe EXCEPT newlines
process "$line"
done < filename
read can be used safely in combination with find by setting the delimiter appropriately:
find . -name '*.txt' -print0 |
while IFS= read -r -d '' line; do
process "$line"
done
For more complex searches, you will probably want to use find, either with its -exec option or with -print0 | xargs -0:
# execute `process` once for each file
find . -name \*.txt -exec process {} \;
# execute `process` once with all the files as arguments*:
find . -name \*.txt -exec process {} +
# using xargs*
find . -name \*.txt -print0 | xargs -0 process
# using xargs with arguments after each filename (implies one run per filename)
find . -name \*.txt -print0 | xargs -0 -I{} process {} argument
find can also cd into each file's directory before running a command by using -execdir instead of -exec, and can be made interactive (prompt before running the command for each file) using -ok instead of -exec (or -okdir instead of -execdir).
*: Technically, both find and xargs (by default) will run the command with as many arguments as they can fit on the command line, as many times as it takes to get through all the files. In practice, unless you have a very large number of files it won't matter, and if you exceed the length but need them all on the same command line, you're SOL find a different way.
What ever you do, don't use a for loop:
# Don't do this
for file in $(find . -name "*.txt")
do
…code using "$file"
done
Three reasons:
For the for loop to even start, the find must run to completion.
If a file name has any whitespace (including space, tab or newline) in it, it will be treated as two separate names.
Although now unlikely, you can overrun your command line buffer. Imagine if your command line buffer holds 32KB, and your for loop returns 40KB of text. That last 8KB will be dropped right off your for loop and you'll never know it.
Always use a while read construct:
find . -name "*.txt" -print0 | while read -d $'\0' file
do
…code using "$file"
done
The loop will execute while the find command is executing. Plus, this command will work even if a file name is returned with whitespace in it. And, you won't overflow your command line buffer.
The -print0 will use the NULL as a file separator instead of a newline and the -d $'\0' will use NULL as the separator while reading.
find . -name "*.txt"|while read fname; do
echo "$fname"
done
Note: this method and the (second) method shown by bmargulies are safe to use with white space in the file/folder names.
In order to also have the - somewhat exotic - case of newlines in the file/folder names covered, you will have to resort to the -exec predicate of find like this:
find . -name '*.txt' -exec echo "{}" \;
The {} is the placeholder for the found item and the \; is used to terminate the -exec predicate.
And for the sake of completeness let me add another variant - you gotta love the *nix ways for their versatility:
find . -name '*.txt' -print0|xargs -0 -n 1 echo
This would separate the printed items with a \0 character that isn't allowed in any of the file systems in file or folder names, to my knowledge, and therefore should cover all bases. xargs picks them up one by one then ...
Filenames can include spaces and even control characters. Spaces are (default) delimiters for shell expansion in bash and as a result of that x=$(find . -name "*.txt") from the question is not recommended at all. If find gets a filename with spaces e.g. "the file.txt" you will get 2 separated strings for processing, if you process x in a loop. You can improve this by changing delimiter (bash IFS Variable) e.g. to \r\n, but filenames can include control characters - so this is not a (completely) safe method.
From my point of view, there are 2 recommended (and safe) patterns for processing files:
1. Use for loop & filename expansion:
for file in ./*.txt; do
[[ ! -e $file ]] && continue # continue, if file does not exist
# single filename is in $file
echo "$file"
# your code here
done
2. Use find-read-while & process substitution
while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
# single filename is in $file
echo "$file"
# your code here
done < <(find . -name "*.txt" -print0)
Remarks
on Pattern 1:
bash returns the search pattern ("*.txt") if no matching file is found - so the extra line "continue, if file does not exist" is needed. see Bash Manual, Filename Expansion
shell option nullglob can be used to avoid this extra line.
"If the failglob shell option is set, and no matches are found, an error message is printed and the command is not executed." (from Bash Manual above)
shell option globstar: "If set, the pattern ‘**’ used in a filename expansion context will match all files and zero or more directories and subdirectories. If the pattern is followed by a ‘/’, only directories and subdirectories match." see Bash Manual, Shopt Builtin
other options for filename expansion: extglob, nocaseglob, dotglob & shell variable GLOBIGNORE
on Pattern 2:
filenames can contain blanks, tabs, spaces, newlines, ... to process filenames in a safe way, find with -print0 is used: filename is printed with all control characters & terminated with NUL. see also Gnu Findutils Manpage, Unsafe File Name Handling, safe File Name Handling, unusual characters in filenames. See David A. Wheeler below for detailed discussion of this topic.
There are some possible patterns to process find results in a while loop. Others (kevin, David W.) have shown how to do this using pipes:
files_found=1
find . -name "*.txt" -print0 |
while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
# single filename in $file
echo "$file"
files_found=0 # not working example
# your code here
done
[[ $files_found -eq 0 ]] && echo "files found" || echo "no files found"
When you try this piece of code, you will see, that it does not work: files_found is always "true" & the code will always echo "no files found". Reason is: each command of a pipeline is executed in a separate subshell, so the changed variable inside the loop (separate subshell) does not change the variable in the main shell script. This is why I recommend using process substitution as the "better", more useful, more general pattern.See I set variables in a loop that's in a pipeline. Why do they disappear... (from Greg's Bash FAQ) for a detailed discussion on this topic.
Additional References & Sources:
Gnu Bash Manual, Pattern Matching
Filenames and Pathnames in Shell: How to do it Correctly, David A. Wheeler
Why you don't read lines with "for", Greg's Wiki
Why you shouldn't parse the output of ls(1), Greg's Wiki
Gnu Bash Manual, Process Substitution
(Updated to include #Socowi's execellent speed improvement)
With any $SHELL that supports it (dash/zsh/bash...):
find . -name "*.txt" -exec $SHELL -c '
for i in "$#" ; do
echo "$i"
done
' {} +
Done.
Original answer (shorter, but slower):
find . -name "*.txt" -exec $SHELL -c '
echo "$0"
' {} \;
If you can assume the file names don't contain newlines, you can read the output of find into a Bash array using the following command:
readarray -t x < <(find . -name '*.txt')
Note:
-t causes readarray to strip newlines.
It won't work if readarray is in a pipe, hence the process substitution.
readarray is available since Bash 4.
Bash 4.4 and up also supports the -d parameter for specifying the delimiter. Using the null character, instead of newline, to delimit the file names works also in the rare case that the file names contain newlines:
readarray -d '' x < <(find . -name '*.txt' -print0)
readarray can also be invoked as mapfile with the same options.
Reference: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/005#Loading_lines_from_a_file_or_stream
# Doesn't handle whitespace
for x in `find . -name "*.txt" -print`; do
process_one $x
done
or
# Handles whitespace and newlines
find . -name "*.txt" -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 process_one
I like to use find which is first assigned to variable and IFS switched to new line as follow:
FilesFound=$(find . -name "*.txt")
IFSbkp="$IFS"
IFS=$'\n'
counter=1;
for file in $FilesFound; do
echo "${counter}: ${file}"
let counter++;
done
IFS="$IFSbkp"
As commented by #Konrad Rudolph this will not work with "new lines" in file name. I still think it is handy as it covers most of the cases when you need to loop over command output.
As already posted on the top answer by Kevin, the best solution is to use a for loop with bash glob, but as bash glob is not recursive by default, this can be fixed by a bash recursive function:
#!/bin/bash
set -x
set -eu -o pipefail
all_files=();
function get_all_the_files()
{
directory="$1";
for item in "$directory"/* "$directory"/.[^.]*;
do
if [[ -d "$item" ]];
then
get_all_the_files "$item";
else
all_files+=("$item");
fi;
done;
}
get_all_the_files "/tmp";
for file_path in "${all_files[#]}"
do
printf 'My file is "%s"\n' "$file_path";
done;
Related questions:
Bash loop through directory including hidden file
Recursively list files from a given directory in Bash
ls command: how can I get a recursive full-path listing, one line per file?
List files recursively in Linux CLI with path relative to the current directory
Recursively List all directories and files
bash script, create array of all files in a directory
How can I creates array that contains the names of all the files in a folder?
How can I creates array that contains the names of all the files in a folder?
How to get the list of files in a directory in a shell script?
based on other answers and comment of #phk, using fd #3:
(which still allows to use stdin inside the loop)
while IFS= read -r f <&3; do
echo "$f"
done 3< <(find . -iname "*filename*")
You can put the filenames returned by find into an array like this:
array=()
while IFS= read -r -d ''; do
array+=("$REPLY")
done < <(find . -name '*.txt' -print0)
Now you can just loop through the array to access individual items and do whatever you want with them.
Note: It's white space safe.
I think using this piece of code (piping the command after while done):
while read fname; do
echo "$fname"
done <<< "$(find . -name "*.txt")"
is better than this answer because while loop is executed in a subshell according to here, if you use this answer and variable changes cannot be seen after while loop if you want to modify variables inside the loop.
You can store your find output in array if you wish to use the output later as:
array=($(find . -name "*.txt"))
Now to print the each element in new line, you can either use for loop iterating to all the elements of array, or you can use printf statement.
for i in ${array[#]};do echo $i; done
or
printf '%s\n' "${array[#]}"
You can also use:
for file in "`find . -name "*.txt"`"; do echo "$file"; done
This will print each filename in newline
To only print the find output in list form, you can use either of the following:
find . -name "*.txt" -print 2>/dev/null
or
find . -name "*.txt" -print | grep -v 'Permission denied'
This will remove error messages and only give the filename as output in new line.
If you wish to do something with the filenames, storing it in array is good, else there is no need to consume that space and you can directly print the output from find.
function loop_through(){
length_="$(find . -name '*.txt' | wc -l)"
length_="${length_#"${length_%%[![:space:]]*}"}"
length_="${length_%"${length_##*[![:space:]]}"}"
for i in {1..$length_}
do
x=$(find . -name '*.txt' | sort | head -$i | tail -1)
echo $x
done
}
To grab the length of the list of files for loop, I used the first command "wc -l".
That command is set to a variable.
Then, I need to remove the trailing white spaces from the variable so the for loop can read it.
find <path> -xdev -type f -name *.txt -exec ls -l {} \;
This will list the files and give details about attributes.
Another alternative is to not use bash, but call Python to do the heavy lifting. I recurred to this because bash solutions as my other answer were too slow.
With this solution, we build a bash array of files from inline Python script:
#!/bin/bash
set -eu -o pipefail
dsep=":" # directory_separator
base_directory=/tmp
all_files=()
all_files_string="$(python3 -c '#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os
import sys
dsep="'"$dsep"'"
base_directory="'"$base_directory"'"
def log(*args, **kwargs):
print(*args, file=sys.stderr, **kwargs)
def check_invalid_characther(file_path):
for thing in ("\\", "\n"):
if thing in file_path:
raise RuntimeError(f"It is not allowed {thing} on \"{file_path}\"!")
def absolute_path_to_relative(base_directory, file_path):
relative_path = os.path.commonprefix( [ base_directory, file_path ] )
relative_path = os.path.normpath( file_path.replace( relative_path, "" ) )
# if you use Windows Python, it accepts / instead of \\
# if you have \ on your files names, rename them or comment this
relative_path = relative_path.replace("\\", "/")
if relative_path.startswith( "/" ):
relative_path = relative_path[1:]
return relative_path
for directory, directories, files in os.walk(base_directory):
for file in files:
local_file_path = os.path.join(directory, file)
local_file_name = absolute_path_to_relative(base_directory, local_file_path)
log(f"local_file_name {local_file_name}.")
check_invalid_characther(local_file_name)
print(f"{base_directory}{dsep}{local_file_name}")
' | dos2unix)";
if [[ -n "$all_files_string" ]];
then
readarray -t temp <<< "$all_files_string";
all_files+=("${temp[#]}");
fi;
for item in "${all_files[#]}";
do
OLD_IFS="$IFS"; IFS="$dsep";
read -r base_directory local_file_name <<< "$item"; IFS="$OLD_IFS";
printf 'item "%s", base_directory "%s", local_file_name "%s".\n' \
"$item" \
"$base_directory" \
"$local_file_name";
done;
Related:
os.walk without hidden folders
How to do a recursive sub-folder search and return files in a list?
How to split a string into an array in Bash?
How about if you use grep instead of find?
ls | grep .txt$ > out.txt
Now you can read this file and the filenames are in the form of a list.
I'm trying to do something like the following:
for file in `find . *.foo`
do
somecommand $file
done
But the command isn't working because $file is very odd. Because my directory tree has crappy file names (including spaces), I need to escape the find command. But none of the obvious escapes seem to work:
-ls gives me the space-delimited filename fragments
-fprint doesn't do any better.
I also tried: for file in "find . *.foo -ls"; do echo $file; done
- but that gives all of the responses from find in one long line.
Any hints? I'm happy for any workaround, but am frustrated that I can't figure this out.
Thanks,
Alex
(Hi Matt!)
You have plenty of answers that explain well how to do it; but for the sake of completion I'll repeat and add to it:
xargs is only ever useful for interactive use (when you know all your filenames are plain - no spaces or quotes) or when used with the -0 option. Otherwise, it'll break everything.
find is a very useful tool; put using it to pipe filenames into xargs (even with -0) is rather convoluted as find can do it all itself with either -exec command {} \; or -exec command {} + depending on what you want:
find /path -name 'pattern' -exec somecommand {} \;
find /path -name 'pattern' -exec somecommand {} +
The former runs somecommand with one argument for each file recursively in /path that matches pattern.
The latter runs somecommand with as many arguments as fit on the command line at once for files recursively in /path that match pattern.
Which one to use depends on somecommand. If it can take multiple filename arguments (like rm, grep, etc.) then the latter option is faster (since you run somecommand far less often). If somecommand takes only one argument then you need the former solution. So look at somecommand's man page.
More on find: http://mywiki.wooledge.org/UsingFind
In bash, for is a statement that iterates over arguments. If you do something like this:
for foo in "$bar"
you're giving for one argument to iterate over (note the quotes!). If you do something like this:
for foo in $bar
you're asking bash to take the contents of bar and tear it apart wherever there are spaces, tabs or newlines (technically, whatever characters are in IFS) and use the pieces of that operation as arguments to for. That is NOT filenames. Assuming that the result of a tearing long string that contains filenames apart wherever there is whitespace yields in a pile of filenames is just wrong. As you have just noticed.
The answer is: Don't use for, it's obviously the wrong tool. The above find commands all assume that somecommand is an executable in PATH. If it's a bash statement, you'll need this construct instead (iterates over find's output, like you tried, but safely):
while read -r -d ''; do
somebashstatement "$REPLY"
done < <(find /path -name 'pattern' -print0)
This uses a while-read loop that reads parts of the string find outputs until it reaches a NULL byte (which is what -print0 uses to separate the filenames). Since NULL bytes can't be part of filenames (unlike spaces, tabs and newlines) this is a safe operation.
If you don't need somebashstatement to be part of your script (eg. it doesn't change the script environment by keeping a counter or setting a variable or some such) then you can still use find's -exec to run your bash statement:
find /path -name 'pattern' -exec bash -c 'somebashstatement "$1"' -- {} \;
find /path -name 'pattern' -exec bash -c 'for file; do somebashstatement "$file"; done' -- {} +
Here, the -exec executes a bash command with three or more arguments.
The bash statement to execute.
A --. bash will put this in $0, you can put anything you like here, really.
Your filename or filenames (depending on whether you used {} \; or {} + respectively). The filename(s) end(s) up in $1 (and $2, $3, ... if there's more than one, of course).
The bash statement in the first find command here runs somebashstatement with the filename as argument.
The bash statement in the second find command here runs a for(!) loop that iterates over each positional parameter (that's what the reduced for syntax - for foo; do - does) and runs a somebashstatement with the filename as argument. The difference here between the very first find statement I showed with -exec {} + is that we run only one bash process for lots of filenames but still one somebashstatement for each of those filenames.
All this is also well explained in the UsingFind page linked above.
Instead of relying on the shell to do that work, rely on find to do it:
find . -name "*.foo" -exec somecommand "{}" \;
Then the file name will be properly escaped, and never interpreted by the shell.
find . -name '*.foo' -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 somecommand
It does get messy if you need to run a number of shell commands on each item, though.
xargs is your friend. You will also want to investigate the -0 (zero) option with it. find (with -print0) will help to produce the list. The Wikipedia page has some good examples.
Another useful reason to use xargs, is that if you have many files (dozens or more), xargs will split them up into individual calls to whatever xargs is then called upon to run (in the first wikipedia example, rm)
find . -name '*.foo' -print0 | xargs -0 sh -c 'for F in "${#}"; do ...; done' "${0}"
I had to do something similar some time ago, renaming files to allow them to live in Win32 environments:
#!/bin/bash
IFS=$'\n'
function RecurseDirs
{
for f in "$#"
do
newf=echo "${f}" | sed -e 's/[\\/:\*\?#"\|<>]/_/g'
if [ ${newf} != ${f} ]; then
echo "${f}" "${newf}"
mv "${f}" "${newf}"
f="${newf}"
fi
if [[ -d "${f}" ]]; then
cd "${f}"
RecurseDirs $(ls -1 ".")
fi
done
cd ..
}
RecurseDirs .
This is probably a little simplistic, doesn't avoid name collisions, and I'm sure it could be done better -- but this does remove the need to use basename on the find results (in my case) before performing my sed replacement.
I might ask, what are you doing to the found files, exactly?