Yammer has a feature that allows you to "praise" someone. However, looking at the data that is returned from a "praise" message, it does not appear there is any distinguishing flag or attribute that marks it as a "praise" message. Inside the message, there is an attachment with "type=praise" and then "praised-user-id".
What is the best way to pull this information out of Yammer?
Unfortunately there is no way to pull all praise messages from Yammer at this time. It's worth joining the Yammer Developer Network and tracking updates to the API, but this is not something that I'd expect to see in the near future.
Thinking slightly on a tangent, try using the 'search' API looking for the word 'praised' as this is always in the body. This should return only results containing praised.
Related
Is there a way to get historical call ID's from the Slack API?
I would like to use the slack calls.info API (https://api.slack.com/methods/calls.info) to get information on past Slack calls. But I cannot find a way to get the ID's of the calls. (The only way per the documentation is the data returned by the calls.add API
I can see evidence in Slack of my past calls with other users, but when I call conversations.history, I do not see any data for calls...just messages.
Unfortunately, there is no method that will return call ids retroactively.Something like calls.list would be helpful. Right now, I think your only option would be to store the ids when you call calls.addmoving forward so that you can then use them in future calls.info calls.
Is there a way to get the members to a certain response of poll without the need to create segments?
I am sending mails and have a poll included (basically participating at an event).
Now I would like to easily collect the respondents for an event from various mails (announcement, invitation, reminder 1, reminder 2,..)
Currently I need to create segments for each response where I need to reference the campaigns individually. So whenever I send a campaign (email) I need to update all segments as there need to be a segment per question, which I would like to avaoid.
Hope thats clear enough.
I had a similar question and after a review of the mailchimp API docs, in particular the reports section I realized there was not a way to retrieve poll results.
After my review, I followed-up with mailchimp and they mentioned access to poll results via API is not available - detailed comments with image attached below:
MailChimp Response - Start
"To be completely honest and transparent, there currently wouldn't be a way of accessing the campaign poll result data directly through the report... With that being said, it would be possible to use the API to create segments based on poll response, then call those segments to view the number of responses for each option, as well as the specific subscribers who chose each individual option.
More info here: https://developer.mailchimp.com/documentation/mailchimp/reference/lists/segments/
MailChimp Response - End
As you can see, although accessing poll results via the API is not available, there is a work around using a method.
Good luck!
I would like to use the Outlook REST API to display the messages in a mail folder and group messages by conversations, like you have in any modern webmail.
For example with inbox, I would request using a first query such as <mailuri>/inbox/messages?$select=ConversationId (by default it is reverse chronological order)
It is not sufficient to group this request results by ConversationId because some emails may not be in inbox (think of sentmails) or they may be paginated and not returned in the first page.
Consequently, for each distinct ConversationId I need to perform another REST request, for retrieving participants or simply counting the emails in the conversation. I may use the new batch request to do this.
There are a lot of requests involved. Is there a better solution ?
As you've probably realized the REST API doesn't directly provide a way to work with conversations as an entity. This is something that we have on our roadmap to improve.
With the current state of the API what you're describing is basically the right approach. You could possibly defer the second request to "fill in" a conversation until the user selects it.
You can actually use this endpoint to cover both inbox and sentitems
https://outlook.office.com/api/v2.0/me/messages/?$select=ConversationId & $filter=ConversationId eq '${params.conversationId}'
I request Google Places API once a week to see if my requests to add new places have passed the moderation queue (if the scope has changed to google).
The problem is that I don't know how to know if a request has been rejected by the moderation.
The only solution seems to ask for get-current-place (or other "search" request) and look for the place, since the place must not appear in the result once rejected by the moderation, but I'm not really convinced by that solution.
Thanks
Unfortunately there isn't a good or stable way to do this at the moment. Looking at search results gives an approximation, but there are other reasons that a valid place may not appear in the results, so it won't give a strong confirmation.
A web application sends an email on behalf of a UserA to UserB, using the new Gmail API (Users.messages: send).
The synchronous response contains threadId, messageId which are stored in the database.
We then query the history API for any changes in user's inbox (Users.history: list).
Is there an efficient way to get all the updates since last sync (new replies, read/unread changes)?
One implementation that we tried was to filter the history API results through a custom label. Unfortunately, we noticed that once a thread/message is tagged with a specific label any subsequent responses are not labeled automatically and new replies are not included in the history API response.
A second approach was to query threads using gmail advanced search for a particular label and date (e.g. after:2014/08/29 label:MY_LABEL). The problem was that gmail does not return threads that were created before 2014/08/29 but had a reply on that date.
Any scalable suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Not sure I understand here, users.history.list was made exactly for this. Given a previous historyId, you can then call history.list(previousHistoryid), iterate through the results to find all the message Ids that have been updated since the previous historyId. Then call messages.get() on all of those--for any messages you already knew about you can just call format=MINIMAL (to see label updates), and for new messages you can use a different format to get the message content if you need it.