I'm retrieving 5 records from my db using nhibernate linq like this
private IList<News> GetNews()
{
List<News> data = new List<News>();
using (session..)
{
using (transaction...)
{
data = s.Query<News>().Take(5).ToList();
transaction.Commit();
}
}
return data;
}
If I'm displaying last record from GetNews() how can I select rest 4 except last one.
Something along the lines of
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Date).Skip(1).Take(4)
Related
I am new to Web API, Entity Framework and OData. I asked a similar question in another forum but haven't gotten a relevant response.
We have a OData compliant web api service for use in Salesforce. We have a custom complex query in Oracle that we need to expose.
I am not sure how to use a custom query like we want to also allow for odata parameter filtering to occur? ($filter, $top, $skip, etc) For example, when a $filter is used i want to apply that filter to the custom query and then send it back to the database to have it return the result set. How can i do this?
The issue i seem to have is that I can see the parameters as they come in but they are not translating to the query being passed to oracle. It seems that it will fire the query returning the full result set and then apply the parameters. This is very slow as the result set is very large.
I am hoping 2 figure out 2 things
1. How can i use custom sql and apply odata parameters to the underlying query?
2. When using EF or a custom query, how can i apply odata parameters to the query so that when the query is sent to the database that the $filter parameter, for example, is included in the query? I don't want the full result returned then apply the filter.
Can anyone give me some pointers on how to make this happen?
private static ODataValidationSettings _validationSettings = new ODataValidationSettings();
//public IHttpActionResult GetName()
//{ }
// GET: odata/ShareData
[ODataRoute("Orders")]
[EnableQuery(PageSize = 50)]
public IHttpActionResult GetOrders(ODataQueryOptions<Orders> queryOptions)
{
// validate the query.
try
{
queryOptions.Validate(_validationSettings);
}
catch (ODataException ex)
{
return BadRequest(ex.Message);
}
try
{
string connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["DNATestConnectionString"].ConnectionString;
var items = GetDataItems(connectionString);
return Ok<IEnumerable<Orders>>(items);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return StatusCode(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError);
}
}
#region Load Data Methods
private static List<Orders> GetDataItems(string connectionString)
{
List<Orders> items = new List<Orders>();
using (OracleConnection con = new OracleConnection(connectionString))
{
con.Open();
using (OracleCommand cmd = con.CreateCommand())
{
cmd.CommandText = "select po_header_id, segment1, vendor_id, vendor_site_id from po_headers_all where vendor_id=4993";
using (OracleDataReader rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
while (rdr.Read())
items.Add(ToOrders(rdr));
}
}
}
return items;
}
private static Orders ToOrders(OracleDataReader rdr)
{
Orders data = new Orders();
data.VENDOR_ID = ToInt32(rdr, "VENDOR_ID");
data.VENDOR_SITE_ID = ToInt32(rdr, "VENDOR_SITE_ID");
data.PO_HEADER_ID = ToInt32(rdr, "PO_HEADER_ID");
data.SEGMENT1 = Convert.ToString(rdr["SEGMENT1"]);
return data;
}
private static int ToInt32(OracleDataReader rdr, string name)
{
int index = rdr.GetOrdinal(name);
return rdr.IsDBNull(index) ? 0 : Convert.ToInt32(rdr[index]);
}
#endregion
I don't think this is possible.
How can i use custom sql and apply odata parameters to the underlying query?
As far as I'm aware, you can't. The whole point of the OData library is that it needs to work off an IQueryable. By using custom SQL in a string like you have in your example, you can't combine it with the OData parameters that are being passed in.
One approach would be to have your custom SQL in a SQL view, then add the SQL view to your EF model in the same way as you would add a table - it will be represented as a DbSet just like tables are.
You can then get an IQueryable to represent the dataset and then apply the OData parameters as follows:
public IHttpActionResult GetOrders(ODataQueryOptions<OrdersView> queryOptions)
{
IQueryable<OrdersView> allData = // ... get the DbSet from entity framework...
// this will apply the OData query to the data set and only pull the data you want from the database
var filteredResults = queryOptions.ApplyTo(allData) as IQueryable<OrdersView>;
return Ok<IQueryable<OrdersView>>(filteredResults);
}
Hi I have a query like this:
var queryGridData = from question in questions
select new {
i = question.Id,
cell = new List<string>() { question.Id.ToString(), question.Note, question.Topic }
};
The ToString() part needed to convert the int is causing:
LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.String.ToString()' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm. I need it as a string to go into the collection. Any ideas?
I would personally perform just enough of the query in the database to provide the values you want, and do the rest in .NET:
var queryGridData = questions.Select(q => new { q.Id, q.Note, q.Topic })
.AsEnumerable() // Do the rest locally
.Select(q => new { i = q.Id,
cell = new List<string> {
q.Id.ToString(),
q.Note,
q.Topic
} });
(This formatting is horrible, but hopefully it'll be easier to do nicely in an IDE where you've got more space :)
so here's the code with irrelevant bits left out:
public IEnumerable<T> GetByQuery(Expression<Func<T, bool>> filter
{
try
{
return Session.Linq<T>().Where(filter);
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
// custom exception handling here
}
finally
{
CloseSession();
}
return null;
}
and an example of it being called looks like this:
IEnumerabl<ClientReport> clientReports =
clientReportRepository.GetByQuery(item => item.ClientId = id);
So as you can see, nothing fancy and being called in this way, we're hitting one table in the database with no relationships to any other tables. But when I have show_sql = true in the configuration, It's displaying 2 of the same query.
Any ideas?
Thanks
clientReports will probably execute the query every time you enumerate it (or get the Count(), for example).
To avoid that, use .ToList() in the assignment.
I have a piece of code which combines an in-memory list with some data held in a database. This works just fine in my unit tests (using a mocked Linq2SqlRepository which uses List).
public IRepository<OrderItem> orderItems { get; set; }
private List<OrderHeld> _releasedOrders = null;
private List<OrderHeld> releasedOrders
{
get
{
if (_releasedOrders == null)
{
_releasedOrders = new List<nOrderHeld>();
}
return _releasedOrders;
}
}
.....
public int GetReleasedCount(OrderItem orderItem)
{
int? total =
(
from item in orderItems.All
join releasedOrder in releasedOrders
on item.OrderID equals releasedOrder.OrderID
where item.ProductID == orderItem.ProductID
select new
{
item.Quantity,
}
).Sum(x => (int?)x.Quantity);
return total.HasValue ? total.Value : 0;
}
I am getting an error I don't really understand when I run it against a database.
Exception information:
Exception type: System.NotSupportedException
Exception message: Local sequence cannot be used in LINQ to SQL
implementation of query operators
except the Contains() operator.
What am I doing wrong?
I'm guessing it's to do with the fact that orderItems is on the database and releasedItems is in memory.
EDIT
I have changed my code based on the answers given (thanks all)
public int GetReleasedCount(OrderItem orderItem)
{
var releasedOrderIDs = releasedOrders.Select(x => x.OrderID);
int? total =
(
from item in orderItems.All
where releasedOrderIDs.Contains(item.OrderID)
&& item.ProductID == orderItem.ProductID
select new
{
item.Quantity,
}
).Sum(x => (int?)x.Quantity);
return total.HasValue ? total.Value : 0;
}
I'm guessing it's to do with the fact
that orderItems is on the database
and releasedItems is in memory.
You are correct, you can't join a table to a List using LINQ.
Take a look at this link:
http://flatlinerdoa.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!17124D03A9A052B0!455.entry
He suggests using the Contains() method but you'll have to play around with it to see if it will work for your needs.
It looks like you need to formulate the db query first, because it can't create the correct SQL representation of the expression tree for objects that are in memory. It might be down to the join, so is it possible to get a value from the in-memory query that can be used as a simple primitive? For example using Contains() as the error suggests.
You unit tests work because your comparing a memory list to a memory list.
For memory list to database, you will either need to use the memoryVariable.Contains(...) or make the db call first and return a list(), so you can compare memory list to memory list as before. The 2nd option would return too much data, so your forced down the Contains() route.
public int GetReleasedCount(OrderItem orderItem)
{
int? total =
(
from item in orderItems.All
where item.ProductID == orderItem.ProductID
&& releasedOrders.Contains(item.OrderID)
select new
{
item.Quantity,
}
).Sum(x => (int?)x.Quantity);
return total.HasValue ? total.Value : 0;
}
I have a couple of tables with similar relationship structure to the standard Order, OrderLine tables.
When creating a data context, it gives the Order class an OrderLines property that should be populated with OrderLine objects for that particular Order object.
Sure, by default it will delay load the stuff in the OrderLine property but that should be fairly transparent right?
Ok, here is the problem I have: I'm getting an empty list when I go MyOrder.OrderLines but when I go myDataContext.OrderLines.Where(line => line.OrderId == 1) I get the right list.
public void B()
{
var dbContext = new Adis.CA.Repository.Database.CaDataContext(
"<connectionString>");
dbContext.Connection.Open();
dbContext.Transaction = dbContext.Connection.BeginTransaction();
try
{
//!!!Edit: Imortant to note that the order with orderID=1 already exists
//!!!in the database
//just add some new order lines to make sure there are some
var NewOrderLines = new List<OrderLines>()
{
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=300 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=301 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=302 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=303 }
};
dbContext.OrderLines.InsertAllOnSubmit(NewOrderLines);
dbContext.SubmitChanges();
//this will give me the 4 rows I just inserted
var orderLinesDirect = dbContext.OrderLines
.Where(orderLine => orderLine.OrderID == 1);
var order = dbContext.Orders.Where(order => order.OrderID == 1);
//this will be an empty list
var orderLinesThroughOrder = order.OrderLines;
}
catch (System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException e)
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
throw;
}
finally
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
dbContext.Dispose();
dbContext = null;
}
}
So as far as I can see, I'm not doing anything particularly strange but I would think that orderLinesDirect and orderLinesThroughOrder would give me the same result set.
Can anyone tell me why it doesn't?
You're just adding OrderLines; not any actual Orders. So the Where on dbContext.Orders returns an empty list.
How you can still find the property OrderLines on order I don't understand, so I may be goofing up here.
[Edit]
Could you update the example to show actual types, especially of the order variable? Imo, it shoud be an IQueryable<Order>, but it's strange that you can .OrderLines into that. Try adding a First() or FirstOrDefault() after the Where.