I'm using the part of a coding in a customer workflow assembly in CRM 2011:
[Input("Organization input")]
[Output("Organization output")]
[ReferenceTarget("organization")]
public InOutArgument<EntityReference> OrgReference { get; set; }
[...]
In the definition of the workflow this input property is not set, that means no value has been selected, it's just empty.
When running the workflow, however, the code inside the if condition gets executed.
if (OrgReference != null)
{ //codeblock gets excuted here }
I would expect that the lines inside the code block is ignored.
Hence, what is the proper way to check if any workflow input properties are set or not?
Thanks,
Michael
You have to call Contact.Get(executionContext) to get the actual value.
if (OrgReference.Get(executionContext) != null)
{ //codeblock gets excuted here }
Related
VS 2015 automatically generated the following code:
// GET: api/Companies/5
[HttpGet("{id}")]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetCompany([FromRoute] int id)
{
if (!ModelState.IsValid)
{
return BadRequest(ModelState);
}
Company company = await _context.Companies.SingleOrDefaultAsync(m => m.Id == id);
if (company == null)
{
return NotFound();
}
return Ok(company);
}
What is the point of ModelState validation here?
I'm assuming you used the Web Api template. Since you didn't start from the "Empty" template, VS generated code, that the Microsoft team deemed "good practice".
The point is, that if you want a certain field to contain an email, another to be required, and so on, you might have marked them with data annotations. Now, there's an additional check for those before your method is executed (unnecessary for a simple int, but it's implied that you're likely going to change the arguments). Check this article for more information.
If you find these additions unnecessary, you can always start your project from the Empty template.
Im working on a MVVM Windows phone app that displays weather info.
When the app loads up it opens MainPage.xaml. It makes a call the the service to get weather info and binds that data to the UI. Both Fahrenheit and Celcius info are returned but only one is displayed.
On the setting page, the user can select to view the temp in either Fahrenheit or Celcius.
The user can change this setting at any time and its stored in IsolatedStorageSettings.
The issue Im having is this:
when the user navigates to the Settings page and changes their preference for either Fahrenheit or Celcius, this change is not reflected on the main page.
This issue started me thinking about this in a broader context. I can see this being an issue in ANY MVVM app where the display depends on some setting in IsolatedStorage. Any time any setting in the IsoStore is updated, how does the ViewModels know this? When I navigate back in the NavigationStack from the settings page back to MainPage how can I force a rebind of the page?
The data in my model hasnt changed, only the data that I want to display has changed.
Am I missing something simple here?
Thanks in advance.
Alex
Probably you have code like this:
public double DisplayTemperature
{
get { return (IsCelsium) ? Celsium : Fahrenheit; }
}
And IsCelsium is:
public double IsCelsium
{
get { return (bool)settings["IsCelsium"]; }
set { settings["IsCelsium"] = value; }
}
So you need to add NotifyPropertyChanged event to notify UI to get new values from DisplayTemperature property:
public double IsCelsium
{
get { return (bool)settings["IsCelsium"]; }
set
{
settings["IsCelsium"] = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("DisplayTemperature");
}
}
Take a look at Caliburn Micro. You could implement something similar or use CM itself. When using CM I don't even think about this stuff, CM makes it so simple.
When your ViewModel inherits from Screen there are life-cycle events that fire that you can override. For example, OnInitialize fires the very first time the ViewModel is Activated and OnActivate fires every time the VM is activated. There's also OnViewAttached and OnViewLoaded.
These methods are the perfect place to put logic to populate or re-populate data.
CM also has some special built in features for allowing one to easily tombstone a single property or an entire object graph into Iso or phone state.
ok, so Ive come up with a solution. Before I get to it, let me provide some background. The app that Im working on uses both MVVM Light and WP7Contrib. That being the case, I am using Funq for DI and the MVVMLight Toolkit. After I posted my initial question, I gave the question a bit more thought. I remembered a video that I watched a while back from MIX2011 called Deep Dive MVVM with Laurent Bugnion
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/MIX/MIX11/OPN03
In it, he talks about just this problem (view models not living at the same time) on Windows Phone. The part in question starts around the 19 minute mark.
Anyway, after I remembered that and realized that the ViewModel locator is exposed in App.xaml, this became a trivial problem to solve. When the user changes the Fahrenheit/Celcius option on the setting page, I simply get a reference to the MainViewModel via the ViewModelLocator and reset the collection that is bound to the UI thus causing the bindings to update.
public bool AddOrUpdateValue(string Key, Object value)
{
bool valueChanged = false;
// If the key exists
if (settings.Contains(Key))
{
// If the value has changed
if (settings[Key] != value)
{
// Store the new value
settings[Key] = value;
valueChanged = true;
}
}
// Otherwise create the key.
else
{
settings.Add(Key, value);
valueChanged = true;
}
return valueChanged;
}
public bool ImperialSetting
{
get
{
return GetValueOrDefault<bool>(ImperialSettingKeyName, ImperialSettingDefault);
}
set
{
if (AddOrUpdateValue(ImperialSettingKeyName, value))
{
Save();
RaisePropertyChanged("ImperialSettingText");
var vml = new ViewModelLocator();
vml.MainViewModel.Cities = (App.Current as App).Cities;
}
}
}
It was a mistake on my part not to realize that I could get access to the viewModel via the ViewModelLocator. Hopefully this post saves someone else the time I burned on this issue.
I'm running into a "bad request" error when playing back a test. I've tracked it down to a comma and space in a button that has "Yes, Do" as its value. There is functionality in another page that runs based on this value. When I remove the comma and space in the both pages everything works perfectly. I've tried toggling the 'url encode' property for that field in the Web Perf Test to true, but it still fails. When I look at the details of the request it shows "Yes,+Do" as the querystring param. I can't change the control value in this situation. Any hints?
It seems odd that the value of a button is being passed as a query string parameter in the first place...
Is it set up where there is an extraction rule from a prior request and then that context parameter is used for a later request? If so, you can actually modify the value. You can either hard code the value in the later request, or if you still need to get it dynamically but just modify it, you can create a pretty simple plugin. Sample code for it would be:
public class StringCharsFromParam: WebTestRequestPlugin
{
public override void PreRequest(object sender, PreRequestEventArgs e)
{
string ExtractParam = ((string)e.WebTest.Context["NameOfContextParameter"]);
if (ExtractParam != null && ExtractParam.Contains(", ")
{
e.WebTest.Context["NameOfContextParameter"] = ExtractParam.Replace(", ", "");
}
}
}
You would then add this WebTestRequestPlugin to your WebTest.
VS2010 is driving me nuts: whenever I rebuild, the "Error List" warnings from the previous compilation are persisted and any new warnings are simply added to the end of the list. Over time, this list becomes ridiculously long and unwieldy.
I'm using the Chirpy 2.0 tools to run JSHint and JSLint on my JS files, and these tools generate a lot of false positives.
I've been looking for an easy way to clear the contents of this window, but the only manual mechanism that works 100% of the time is to close and re-open the solution. Not very elegant.
I'd like to write a small VS Plug-In or some code that gets called right before a compilation to clear out this list so I can focus only on new warnings for the currently loaded file(s).
I see a .Clear() method for the Output window but not for the Error List. Is this doable?
Once upon a time I was an Add-In/VSIX Package/MEF developer ...
The answer is shortly no, but I have to do it on the long way:
Add-Ins, packages (Managed or not) have access to the VS service level separatedly. Every error belongs to the reporter (If they are manage them as Chirpy do), so you can not handle the errors created by Chirpy 2.0
I take a several look to it's source code and it is persist it's erros gained by the tools in a Singleton collection called TaskList.
The deletion of the collection elements is happening in several point of code in the latest release through the RemoveAll method:
First: after the soulution is closed.
by this:
private static string[] buildCommands = new[] { "Build.BuildSelection", "Build.BuildSolution", "ClassViewContextMenus.ClassViewProject.Build" };
private void CommandEvents_BeforeExecute(string guid, int id, object customIn, object customOut, ref bool cancelDefault) {
EnvDTE.Command objCommand = default(EnvDTE.Command);
string commandName = null;
try {
objCommand = this.App.Commands.Item(guid, id);
} catch (System.ArgumentException) {
}
if (objCommand != null) {
commandName = objCommand.Name;
var settings = new Settings();
if (settings.T4RunAsBuild) {
if (buildCommands.Contains(commandName)) {
if (this.tasks != null) {
this.tasks.RemoveAll();
}
Engines.T4Engine.RunT4Template(this.App, settings.T4RunAsBuildTemplate);
}
}
}
}
As you may see, clear of results depends on many thigs.
First on a setting (which I don't know where to set on GUI or configs, but seems to get its value form a check box).
Second the array of names which are not contains every build commands name.
So I see a solution, but only on the way to modify and rebuild/redepeloy your own version from Chirpy (and make a Pull request):
The code souldn't depend on the commands, and their names. (rebuilds are missing for example)
You could change the method above something like this:
this.eventsOnBuild.OnBuildBegin += ( scope, action ) =>
{
if (action != vsBuildAction.vsBuildActionDeploy)
{
if (this.tasks != null)
{
this.tasks.RemoveAll();
}
if (settings.T4RunAsBuild && action != vsBuildAction.vsBuildActionClean)
{
Engines.T4Engine.RunT4Template(this.App, settings.T4RunAsBuildTemplate);
}
}
};
Or with something equivalent handler method instead of lambda expression.
You shold place it into the subscription OnStartupComplete method of Chirp class.
The unsubscription have to placed into OnDisconnection method in the same class. (As for all other subscribed handlers...)
Update:
When an Add-In disconneced, it isn't means the Studio will be closed immediately. The Add-In could be unloaded. So you should call the RemoveAll from OnDisconneconnection too. (Or Remove and Dispose the TaskList...)
Update2:
You can also make a custom command, and bind it to a hotkey.
I need to store and retrieve lists in PhoneApplicationService.Current.State[] but this is not a list of strings or integers:
public class searchResults
{
public string title { get; set; }
public string description { get; set; }
}
public List<searchResults> resultData = new List<searchResults>()
{
//
};
The values of the result are fetched from internet and when the application is switched this data needs to be saved in isolated storage for multitasking. How do I save this list and retrieve it again?
If the question really is about how to save the data then you just do
PhoneApplicationService.Current.State["SearchResultList"] = resultData;
and to retrieve again you do
List<searchResults> loadedResultData = (List<searchResults>)PhoneApplicationService.Current.State["SearchResultList"];
Here is a complete working sample:
// your list for results
List<searchResults> resultData = new List<searchResults>();
// add some example data to save
resultData.Add(new searchResults() { description = "A description", title = "A title" });
resultData.Add(new searchResults() { description = "Another description", title = "Another title" });
// save list of search results to app state
PhoneApplicationService.Current.State["SearchResultList"] = resultData;
// --------------------->
// your app could now be tombstoned
// <---------------------
// load from app state
List<searchResults> loadedResultData = (List<searchResults>)PhoneApplicationService.Current.State["SearchResultList"];
// check if loading from app state succeeded
foreach (searchResults result in loadedResultData)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(result.title);
}
(This might stop working when your data structure gets more complex or contains certain types.)
Sounds like you just want to employ standard serialisation for your list object, see here in the MSDN docs
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973893.aspx
Or also XML serialisation if you want something that can be edited outside of the application (you can also use the Isolated Storage exploter to grab the file off and edit later)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/182eeyhh(v=vs.71).aspx
Alternatively i would also suggest trying out the Tombstone Helper project by Matt Lacey which can simplify this for you greatly
http://tombstonehelper.codeplex.com/
The answer by Heinrich already summarizes the main idea here - you can use the PhoneApplicationService.State with Lists like with any objects. Check out the MSDN docs on preserving application state: How to: Preserve and Restore Application State for Windows Phone. There's one important point to notice there:
Any data that you store in the State dictionary must be serializable,
either directly or by using data contracts.
Directly here means that the classes are marked as [Serializable]. Regarding your List<searchResults>, it is serializable if searchResults is serializable. To do this, either searchResults and all types referenced by it must be marked with the [Serializable] OR it must be a suitable Data Contract, see Using Data Contracts and Serializable Types. In short, make sure the class is declared as public and that it has a public, parameterless constructor.