The following code works for non-recurring events, changes to startDate and endDate are saved just fine.
BOOL success = [theEventStore saveEvent:event
span:EKSpanFutureEvents
commit:YES error:&error];
But whenever I try to edit an event that has recurranceRules, it returns with success == YES, but nothing is saved, and any changes to startDate/endDate or the recurranceRules are reverted back to the original values. (Using span:EKSpanThisEvent works, but this is of course not what I want to do. Also, the code works on iOS, but not on OSX.)
eventWithIdentifier returns the first occurrence of a recurring event. When you change something on this event with EKSpanFutureEvents, you will change all occurrences.
eventsMatchingPredicate returns every event occurrence that matches your predicate. EKSpanFutureEvents will change each occurrence from the certain occurrence you used.
If a event is detached it doesn't matter, if you take EKSpanThisEvent or EKSpanFutureEvents.
I don't get what your code is supposed to do.
I think I've found a solution, or at least a workaround. It seems that on Mac OS X when you modify recurrent events you should get them with eventWithIdentifier and not use the ones from eventsMatchingPredicate.
NSArray* events = [_eventStore eventsMatchingPredicate:predicate];
EKEvent* event = [events objectAtIndex:index];
EKEvent* original = [_eventStore eventWithIdentifier:event.eventIdentifier];
if (event.isDetached)
{
… // modify detached event
success = [_eventStore saveEvent:event
span:EKSpanThisEvent
commit:YES
error:&error];
}
else if (!original.hasRecurrenceRules)
{
… // modify non-recurrent event
success = [_eventStore saveEvent:event
span:EKSpanFutureEvents
commit:YES
error:&error];
}
else
{
… // modify the original in a series of recurring events
success = [_eventStore saveEvent:original
span:EKSpanFutureEvents
commit:YES
error:&error];
}
I haven't found any good documentation on this, maybe it's a "bug" or just one of those peculiar behaviors of EventKit. In any case it seems that you need to take great care when modifying recurring events.
Related
I'm going through a book on OS X programing as a refresher and have a document app set up with an array controller, tableView etc. The chapter calls for implementing undo support by hand using NSInvocation. In the chapter, they call for adding a create employee method and manually, adding outlets to the NSArrayController, and connecting my add button to the new method instead of the array controller.
Instead I did this with my method for inserting new objects:
-(void)insertObject:(Person *)object inEmployeesAtIndex:(NSUInteger)index {
NSUndoManager* undoManager = [self undoManager];
[[undoManager prepareWithInvocationTarget:self]removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex:index];
if (![undoManager isUndoing]) {
[undoManager setActionName:#"Add Person"];
}
[self startObservingPerson:object];
[[self employees]insertObject:object atIndex:index];
dispatch_after(dispatch_time(DISPATCH_TIME_NOW, (int64_t)(.1 * NSEC_PER_SEC)), dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
// Wait then start editing
[[self tableView]editColumn:0 row:index withEvent:nil select:YES];
});
}
This works ok (looks a bit silly), but I was wondering the what issues could arise from this. I've done this elsewhere in order to execute code after an animation finished (couldn't figure out a better way).
Thanks in advance.
Why are you delaying the invocation of -editColumn:row:withEvent:select:?
Anyway, the risks are that something else will be done between the end of this -insertObject:... method and when the dispatched task executes. Perhaps something that will change the contents of the table view such that index no longer refers to the just-added employee.
I ran the following code expecting to schedule three subsequent calls, at different time intervals (e.g. after 1 sec, after 2.6sec etc..) on the method "displayWarningMessage" but didn't work (it displayed the massage only the first time).
I don't find a method signature in the scheduler that would do the job of displaying it multiple times and with a specific delay. Anyone has some suggestion?
[self scheduleOnce:#selector(displayWarningMessage) delay:0.7f];
[self scheduleOnce:#selector(displayWarningMessage) delay:1.7f];
[self scheduleOnce:#selector(displayWarningMessage) delay:3.7f];
Problem here is, when you call first schedule it is scheduled successfully. But the next immediate call is throwing warning something
CCScheduler#scheduleSelector. Selector already scheduled. Updating interval from: X.2 to X.2
you can see this in the log.
What you can do is when the selector is called, at the end of the method you can schedule it again for the next time, until you are done. You may take a counter to keep track of how many times it has been called, put all of your intervals in an array and then schedule next selector for the interval at the specific index identified by counter. like this:
NSArray *intervals = [NSArray arrayWithObjects:[NSNumber numberWithFloat:0.7],[NSNumber numberWithFloat:1.7],[NSNumber numberWithFloat:3.7], nil];
int counter = 0;
//schedule it for the first time with object at index counter/index 0
[self scheduleOnce:#selector(displayWarningMessage) delay:[(NSNumber *)[intervals objectAtIndex:counter]] floatValue];
now in your selector, do something like this:
-(void)displayWarningMessage
{
//do all your stuff here
//increment counter
counter ++;
if(counter < [intervals count])
{
//schedule it for the next time with object at index counter/index
[self scheduleOnce:#selector(displayWarningMessage) delay:[(NSNumber *)[intervals objectAtIndex:counter]] floatValue];
}
}
intervals and counter should be class ivars of-course.
Try this:
- (void)displayWarningMessage {
//Stuff
}
- (void)callStuff {
CCCallFunc *call = [CCCallFunc actionWithTarget:self selector:#selector(displayWarningMessage)];
CCDelayTime *delay1 = [CCDelayTime actionWithDuration:0.7f];
CCDelayTime *delay2 = [CCDelayTime actionWithDuration:1.7f];
CCDelayTime *delay3 = [CCDelayTime actionWithDuration:3.7f];
CCSequence *actionToRun = [CCSequence actions:delay1, call, delay2, call, delay3, call, nil];
[self runAction:actionToRun];
}
That should work for what you're trying to do, at least that's how I'd imagine doing it. I'm fairly sure you can call that CCCallFunc multiple times in one CCSequence without having to create it three individual times. You could also make those delays variable based if need be, of course. Let me know how it goes.
Method is created.
[self schedule: #selector(displayWarningMessage:) interval:3.2f];
-(void) displayWarningMessage:(ccTime) delta
{
CCLOG(#"alert........!!!!!!");
}
Use the Calling method in not warning message detected.
I have an array controller and I have bound an entity to it, sort descriptor and predicate.
If I change the predicate format when the app runs, it works, so the binding is working.
My problem is when I want to change the predicate, f.ex. with a search term or some string that a user inputs, nothing happens, but when I add a record to the core data database, the tableview does update.
So my question is, how do I tell the array controller that the predicate has changed and it should update itself. Here is a code that runs when I enter search term, it also works, and I get all the NSLogs output correctly. Just my tableview is not updating itself.
- (IBAction)didChangeSearch:(id)sender {
if (sender == searchField) {
NSString *searchterm = [sender stringValue];
if (searchterm.length > 1) {
predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:#"name contains [c]%#", #"m"];
NSLog(#"Putting predicate to the job : %#", searchterm);
} else {
predicate = nil;
NSLog(#"There is nolonger any predicate");
}
}
NSLog(#"I just got %#", [sender stringValue]);
}
I would like to say in the start that I am very new to bindings, have never used them until tonight, got a good feeling for them, and liked it, saves me so much code and I finally understood it (as much as 1 day can).
You should use self.predicate = ..... This will ensure that the proper KVO notifications are sent out, which will make your tableview update immediately (this assumes that "predicate" is a property and is bound to your array controller's filter predicate binding).
I have an NSButton subclass that I would like to make work with right mouse button clicks. Just overloading -rightMouseDown: won't cut it, as I would like the same kind of behaviour as for regular clicks (e.g. the button is pushed down, the user can cancel by leaving the button, the action is sent when the mouse is released, etc.).
What I have tried so far is overloading -rightMouse{Down,Up,Dragged}, changing the events to indicate the left mouse button clicks and then sending it to -mouse{Down,Up,Dragged}. Now this would clearly be a hack at best, and as it turns out Mac OS X did not like it all. I can click the button, but upon release, the button remains pushed in.
I could mimic the behaviour myself, which shouldn't be too complicated. However, I don't know how to make the button look pushed in.
Before you say "Don't! It's an unconventional Mac OS X behaviour and should be avoided": I have considered this and a right click could vastly improve the workflow. Basically the button cycles through 4 states, and I would like a right click to make it cycle in reverse. It's not an essential feature, but it would be nice. If you still feel like saying "Don't!", then let me know your thoughts. I appreciate it!
Thanks!
EDIT: This was my attempt of changing the event (you can't change the type, so I made a new one, copying all information across. I mean, I know this is the framework clearly telling me Don't Do This, but I gave it a go, as you do):
// I've contracted all three for brevity
- (void)rightMouse{Down,Up,Dragging}:(NSEvent *)theEvent {
NSEvent *event = [NSEvent mouseEventWithType:NSLeftMouse{Down,Up,Dragging} location:[theEvent locationInWindow] modifierFlags:[theEvent modifierFlags] timestamp:[theEvent timestamp] windowNumber:[theEvent windowNumber] context:[theEvent context] eventNumber:[theEvent eventNumber] clickCount:[theEvent clickCount] pressure:[theEvent pressure]];
[self mouse{Down,Up,Dragging}:event];
}
UPDATE: I noticed that -mouseUp: was never sent to NSButton, and if I changed it to an NSControl, it was. I couldn't figure out why this was, until Francis McGrew pointed out that it contains its own event handling loop. Now, this also made sense to why before I could reroute the -rightMouseDown:, but the button wouldn't go up on release. This is because it was fetching new events on its own, that I couldn't intercept and convert from right to left mouse button events.
NSButton is entering a mouse tracking loop. To change this you will have to subclass NSButton and create your own custom tracking loop. Try this code:
- (void) rightMouseDown:(NSEvent *)theEvent
{
NSEvent *newEvent = theEvent;
BOOL mouseInBounds = NO;
while (YES)
{
mouseInBounds = NSPointInRect([newEvent locationInWindow], [self convertRect:[self frame] fromView:nil]);
[self highlight:mouseInBounds];
newEvent = [[self window] nextEventMatchingMask:NSRightMouseDraggedMask | NSRightMouseUpMask];
if (NSRightMouseUp == [newEvent type])
{
break;
}
}
if (mouseInBounds) [self performClick:nil];
}
This is how I do it; Hopefully it will work for you.
I've turned a left mouse click-and-hold into a fake right mouse down on a path control. I'm not sure this will solve all your problems, but I found that the key difference when I did this was changing the timestamp:
NSEvent *event = [NSEvent mouseEventWithType:NSLeftMouseDown
location:[theEvent locationInWindow]
modifierFlags:[theEvent modifierFlags]
timestamp:CFAbsoluteGetTimeCurrent()
windowNumber:[theEvent windowNumber]
context:[theEvent context]
// I was surprised to find eventNumber didn't seem to need to be faked
eventNumber:[theEvent eventNumber]
clickCount:[theEvent clickCount]
pressure:[theEvent pressure]];
The other thing is that depending on your button type, its state may be the value that is making it appear pushed or not, so you might trying poking at that.
UPDATE: I think I've figured out why rightMouseUp: never gets called. Per the -[NSControl mouseDown:] docs, the button starts tracking the mouse when it gets a mouseDown event, and it doesn't stop tracking until it gets mouseUp. While it's tracking, it can't do anything else. I just tried, for example, at the end of a custom mouseDown::
[self performSelector:#selector(mouseUp:) withObject:myFakeMouseUpEvent afterDelay:1.0];
but this gets put off until a normal mouseUp: gets triggered some other way. So, if you've clicked the right mouse button, you can't (with the mouse) send a leftMouseUp, thus the button is still tracking, and won't accept a rightMouseUp event. I still don't know what the solution is, but I figured that would be useful information.
Not much to add to the answers above, but for those working in Swift, you may have trouble finding the constants for the event mask, buried deep in the documentation, and still more trouble finding a way to combine (OR) them in a way that the compiler accepts, so this may save you some time. Is there a neater way? This goes in your subclass -
var rightAction: Selector = nil
// add a new property, by analogy with action property
override func rightMouseDown(var theEvent: NSEvent!) {
var newEvent: NSEvent!
let maskUp = NSEventMask.RightMouseUpMask.rawValue
let maskDragged = NSEventMask.RightMouseDraggedMask.rawValue
let mask = Int( maskUp | maskDragged ) // cast from UInt
do {
newEvent = window!.nextEventMatchingMask(mask)
}
while newEvent.type == .RightMouseDragged
My loop has become a do..while, as it always has to execute at least once, and I never liked writing while true, and I don't need to do anything with the dragging events.
I had endless trouble getting meaningful results from convertRect(), perhaps because my controls were embedded in a table view. Thanks to Gustav Larsson above for my ending up with this for the last part -
let whereUp = newEvent.locationInWindow
let p = convertPoint(whereUp, fromView: nil)
let mouseInBounds = NSMouseInRect(p, bounds, flipped) // bounds, not frame
if mouseInBounds {
sendAction(rightAction, to: target)
// assuming rightAction and target have been allocated
}
}
I have a question regarding using KVO-compliant methods to insert/remove objects from an array. I'm working through Aaron Hillegass' Cocoa Programming for Mac OS X and I saw the following line of code (in the insertObject:inEmployeesAtIndex: method:
[[undoManager prepareWithInvocationTarget:self] removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex:index];
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always thought it was better to call mutableArrayValueForKey: and then removeObjectAtIndex:...so I tried changing the above line to this:
[[undoManager prepareWithInvocationTarget:[self mutableArrayValueForKey:#"employees"]] removeObjectAtIndex:index];
And it didn't work. Can someone explain the difference and why the first line works but the second line doesn't?
UPDATE: My removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex:index method is implemented to make my collection class (an instance of NSMutableArray) KVC-compliant. So ultimately, calling [[self mutableArrayValueForKey:#"employees"] removeObjectAtIndex:index]; should end up calling [self removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex:index];
In your update you say:
calling [[self mutableArrayValueForKey:#"employees"] removeObjectAtIndex:index]; should end up calling [self removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex:index];
Unfortunately this is not correct not matter what is in your removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex: method as NSMutableArray will never call any methods in your class. Since you seem to be trying to get undo/redo functionality you have to use a method like removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex:. Otherwise when you hit undo for adding an employee you will have no way to 'redo' adding that employee. You also could have issues with undo/redo for edits to individual employees. If you wanted to you could change the line in the removeObjectFromEmployeesAtIndex: method that reads [employees removeObjectAtIndex:index]; to [[self valueForKey:#"employees"] removeObjectAtIndex:index]; or [self.employees removeObjectAtIndex:index]; but there is really no reason to go this route.
Yes. The first line (from the book) is basically equivalent to this:
id tmp = [undoManager prepareWithInvocationTarget:self];
[tmp removeObejctFromEmployeesAtIndex:index];
Your code, however, is basically equivalent to this:
id tmp1 = [self mutableArrayValueForKey:#"employees"];
id tmp2 = [undoManager prepareWithInvocationTarget:tmp1];
[tmp2 removeObjectAtIndex:index];
In other words, the target that you're preparing the invocation with is different in your code (unless self happens to be the same object as [self mutableArrayValueForKey:#"employees"], which is doubtful).