I'm writing a script to automate some command line commands in Python. At the moment, I'm doing calls like this:
cmd = "some unix command"
retcode = subprocess.call(cmd,shell=True)
However, I need to run some commands on a remote machine. Manually, I would log in using ssh and then run the commands. How would I automate this in Python? I need to log in with a (known) password to the remote machine, so I can't just use cmd = ssh user#remotehost, I'm wondering if there's a module I should be using?
I will refer you to paramiko
see this question
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.connect(server, username=username, password=password)
ssh_stdin, ssh_stdout, ssh_stderr = ssh.exec_command(cmd_to_execute)
If you are using ssh keys, do:
k = paramiko.RSAKey.from_private_key_file(keyfilename)
# OR k = paramiko.DSSKey.from_private_key_file(keyfilename)
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
ssh.connect(hostname=host, username=user, pkey=k)
Keep it simple. No libraries required.
import subprocess
# Python 2
subprocess.Popen("ssh {user}#{host} {cmd}".format(user=user, host=host, cmd='ls -l'), shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()
# Python 3
subprocess.Popen(f"ssh {user}#{host} {cmd}", shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()
Or you can just use commands.getstatusoutput:
commands.getstatusoutput("ssh machine 1 'your script'")
I used it extensively and it works great.
In Python 2.6+, use subprocess.check_output.
I found paramiko to be a bit too low-level, and Fabric not especially well-suited to being used as a library, so I put together my own library called spur that uses paramiko to implement a slightly nicer interface:
import spur
shell = spur.SshShell(hostname="localhost", username="bob", password="password1")
result = shell.run(["echo", "-n", "hello"])
print result.output # prints hello
If you need to run inside a shell:
shell.run(["sh", "-c", "echo -n hello"])
All have already stated (recommended) using paramiko and I am just sharing a python code (API one may say) that will allow you to execute multiple commands in one go.
to execute commands on different node use : Commands().run_cmd(host_ip, list_of_commands)
You will see one TODO, which I have kept to stop the execution if any of the commands fails to execute, I don't know how to do it. please share your knowledge
#!/usr/bin/python
import os
import sys
import select
import paramiko
import time
class Commands:
def __init__(self, retry_time=0):
self.retry_time = retry_time
pass
def run_cmd(self, host_ip, cmd_list):
i = 0
while True:
# print("Trying to connect to %s (%i/%i)" % (self.host, i, self.retry_time))
try:
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
ssh.connect(host_ip)
break
except paramiko.AuthenticationException:
print("Authentication failed when connecting to %s" % host_ip)
sys.exit(1)
except:
print("Could not SSH to %s, waiting for it to start" % host_ip)
i += 1
time.sleep(2)
# If we could not connect within time limit
if i >= self.retry_time:
print("Could not connect to %s. Giving up" % host_ip)
sys.exit(1)
# After connection is successful
# Send the command
for command in cmd_list:
# print command
print "> " + command
# execute commands
stdin, stdout, stderr = ssh.exec_command(command)
# TODO() : if an error is thrown, stop further rules and revert back changes
# Wait for the command to terminate
while not stdout.channel.exit_status_ready():
# Only print data if there is data to read in the channel
if stdout.channel.recv_ready():
rl, wl, xl = select.select([ stdout.channel ], [ ], [ ], 0.0)
if len(rl) > 0:
tmp = stdout.channel.recv(1024)
output = tmp.decode()
print output
# Close SSH connection
ssh.close()
return
def main(args=None):
if args is None:
print "arguments expected"
else:
# args = {'<ip_address>', <list_of_commands>}
mytest = Commands()
mytest.run_cmd(host_ip=args[0], cmd_list=args[1])
return
if __name__ == "__main__":
main(sys.argv[1:])
paramiko finally worked for me after adding additional line, which is really important one (line 3):
import paramiko
p = paramiko.SSHClient()
p.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy()) # This script doesn't work for me unless this line is added!
p.connect("server", port=22, username="username", password="password")
stdin, stdout, stderr = p.exec_command("your command")
opt = stdout.readlines()
opt = "".join(opt)
print(opt)
Make sure that paramiko package is installed.
Original source of the solution: Source
The accepted answer didn't work for me, here's what I used instead:
import paramiko
import os
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
# ssh.load_system_host_keys()
ssh.load_host_keys(os.path.expanduser('~/.ssh/known_hosts'))
ssh.connect("d.d.d.d", username="user", password="pass", port=22222)
ssh_stdin, ssh_stdout, ssh_stderr = ssh.exec_command("ls -alrt")
exit_code = ssh_stdout.channel.recv_exit_status() # handles async exit error
for line in ssh_stdout:
print(line.strip())
total 44
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 129 Dec 28 2013 .tcshrc
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 100 Dec 28 2013 .cshrc
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 176 Dec 28 2013 .bashrc
...
Alternatively, you can use sshpass:
import subprocess
cmd = """ sshpass -p "myPas$" ssh user#d.d.d.d -p 22222 'my command; exit' """
print( subprocess.getoutput(cmd) )
References:
https://github.com/onyxfish/relay/issues/11
https://stackoverflow.com/a/61016663/797495
Notes:
Just make sure to connect manually at least one time to the remote system via ssh (ssh root#ip) and accept the public key, this is many times the reason from not being able connect using paramiko or other automated ssh scripts.
I have used paramiko a bunch (nice) and pxssh (also nice). I would recommend either. They work a little differently but have a relatively large overlap in usage.
First: I'm surprised that no one has mentioned fabric yet.
Second: For exactly those requirements you describe I've implemented an own python module named jk_simpleexec. It's purpose: Making running commands easy.
Let me explain a little bit about it for you.
The 'executing a command locally' problem
My python module jk_simpleexec provides a function named runCmd(..) that can execute a shell (!) command locally or remotely. This is very simple. Here is an example for local execution of a command:
import jk_simpleexec
cmdResult = jk_simpleexec.runCmd(None, "cd / ; ls -la")
NOTE: Be aware that the returned data is trimmed automatically by default to remove excessive empty lines from STDOUT and STDERR. (Of course this behavior can be deactivated, but for the purpose you've in mind exactly that behavior is what you will want.)
The 'processing the result' problem
What you will receive is an object that contains the return code, STDOUT and STDERR. Therefore it's very easy to process the result.
And this is what you want to do as the command you execute might exist and is launched but might fail in doing what it is intended to do. In the most simple case where you're not interested in STDOUT and STDERR your code will likely look something like this:
cmdResult.raiseExceptionOnError("Something went wrong!", bDumpStatusOnError=True)
For debugging purposes you want to output the result to STDOUT at some time, so for this you can do just this:
cmdResult.dump()
If you would want to process STDOUT it's simple as well. Example:
for line in cmdResult.stdOutLines:
print(line)
The 'executing a command remotely' problem
Now of course we might want to execute this command remotely on another system. For this we can use the same function runCmd(..) in exactly the same way but we need to specify a fabric connection object first. This can be done like this:
from fabric import Connection
REMOTE_HOST = "myhost"
REMOTE_PORT = 22
REMOTE_LOGIN = "mylogin"
REMOTE_PASSWORD = "mypwd"
c = Connection(host=REMOTE_HOST, user=REMOTE_LOGIN, port=REMOTE_PORT, connect_kwargs={"password": REMOTE_PASSWORD})
cmdResult = jk_simpleexec.runCmd(c, "cd / ; ls -la")
# ... process the result stored in cmdResult ...
c.close()
Everything remains exactly the same, but this time we run this command on another host. This is intended: I wanted to have a uniform API where there are no modifications required in the software if you at some time decide to move from the local host to another host.
The password input problem
Now of course there is the password problem. This has been mentioned above by some users: We might want to ask the user executing this python code for a password.
For this problem I have created an own module quite some time ago. jk_pwdinput. The difference to regular password input is that jk_pwdinput will output some stars instead of just printing nothing. So for every password character you type you will see a star. This way it's more easy for you to enter a password.
Here is the code:
import jk_pwdinput
# ... define other 'constants' such as REMOTE_LOGIN, REMOTE_HOST ...
REMOTE_PASSWORD = jk_pwdinput.readpwd("Password for " + REMOTE_LOGIN + "#" + REMOTE_HOST + ": ")
(For completeness: If readpwd(..) returned None the user canceled the password input with Ctrl+C. In a real world scenario you might want to act on this appropriately.)
Full example
Here is a full example:
import jk_simpleexec
import jk_pwdinput
from fabric import Connection
REMOTE_HOST = "myhost"
REMOTE_PORT = 22
REMOTE_LOGIN = "mylogin"
REMOTE_PASSWORD = jk_pwdinput.readpwd("Password for " + REMOTE_LOGIN + "#" + REMOTE_HOST + ": ")
c = Connection(host=REMOTE_HOST, user=REMOTE_LOGIN, port=REMOTE_PORT, connect_kwargs={"password": REMOTE_PASSWORD})
cmdResult = jk_simpleexec.runCmd(
c = c,
command = "cd / ; ls -la"
)
cmdResult.raiseExceptionOnError("Something went wrong!", bDumpStatusOnError=True)
c.close()
Final notes
So we have the full set:
Executing a command,
executing that command remotely via the same API,
creating the connection in an easy and secure way with password input.
The code above solves the problem quite well for me (and hopefully for you as well). And everything is open source: Fabric is BSD-2-Clause, and my own modules are provided under Apache-2.
Modules used:
fabric : http://www.fabfile.org/
jk_pwdinput : https://github.com/jkpubsrc/python-module-jk-pwdinput
jk_simplexec : https://github.com/jkpubsrc/python-module-jk-simpleexec
Happy coding! ;-)
Works Perfectly...
import paramiko
import time
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
#ssh.load_system_host_keys()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
ssh.connect('10.106.104.24', port=22, username='admin', password='')
time.sleep(5)
print('connected')
stdin, stdout, stderr = ssh.exec_command(" ")
def execute():
stdin.write('xcommand SystemUnit Boot Action: Restart\n')
print('success')
execute()
You can use any of these commands, this will help you to give a password also.
cmd = subprocess.run(["sshpass -p 'password' ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null root#domain.com ps | grep minicom"], shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
print(cmd.stdout)
OR
cmd = subprocess.getoutput("sshpass -p 'password' ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null root#domain.com ps | grep minicom")
print(cmd)
Have a look at spurplus, a wrapper we developed around spur that provides type annotations and some minor gimmicks (reconnecting SFTP, md5 etc.): https://pypi.org/project/spurplus/
Asking User to enter the command as per the device they are logging in.
The below code is validated by PEP8online.com.
import paramiko
import xlrd
import time
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
loc = ('/Users/harshgow/Documents/PYTHON_WORK/labcred.xlsx')
wo = xlrd.open_workbook(loc)
sheet = wo.sheet_by_index(0)
Host = sheet.cell_value(0, 1)
Port = int(sheet.cell_value(3, 1))
User = sheet.cell_value(1, 1)
Pass = sheet.cell_value(2, 1)
def details(Host, Port, User, Pass):
time.sleep(2)
ssh.connect(Host, Port, User, Pass)
print('connected to ip ', Host)
stdin, stdout, stderr = ssh.exec_command("")
x = input('Enter the command:')
stdin.write(x)
stdin.write('\n')
print('success')
details(Host, Port, User, Pass)
#Reading the Host,username,password,port from excel file
import paramiko
import xlrd
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
loc = ('/Users/harshgow/Documents/PYTHON_WORK/labcred.xlsx')
wo = xlrd.open_workbook(loc)
sheet = wo.sheet_by_index(0)
Host = sheet.cell_value(0,1)
Port = int(sheet.cell_value(3,1))
User = sheet.cell_value(1,1)
Pass = sheet.cell_value(2,1)
def details(Host,Port,User,Pass):
ssh.connect(Host, Port, User, Pass)
print('connected to ip ',Host)
stdin, stdout, stderr = ssh.exec_command("")
stdin.write('xcommand SystemUnit Boot Action: Restart\n')
print('success')
details(Host,Port,User,Pass)
The most modern approach is probably to use fabric. This module allows you to set up an SSH connection and then run commands and get their results over the connection object.
Here's a simple example:
from fabric import Connection
with Connection("your_hostname") as connection:
result = connection.run("uname -s", hide=True)
msg = "Ran {0.command!r} on {0.connection.host}, got stdout:\n{0.stdout}"
print(msg.format(result))
I wrote a simple class to run commands on remote over native ssh, using the subprocess module:
Usage
from ssh_utils import SshClient
client = SshClient(user='username', remote='remote_host', key='path/to/key.pem')
# run a list of commands
client.cmd(['mkdir ~/testdir', 'ls -la', 'echo done!'])
# copy files/dirs
client.scp('my_file.txt', '~/testdir')
Class source code
https://gist.github.com/mamaj/a7b378a5c969e3e32a9e4f9bceb0c5eb
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Union
class SshClient():
""" Perform commands and copy files on ssh using subprocess
and native ssh client (OpenSSH).
"""
def __init__(self,
user: str,
remote: str,
key_path: Union[str, Path]) -> None:
"""
Args:
user (str): username for the remote
remote (str): remote host IP/DNS
key_path (str or pathlib.Path): path to .pem file
"""
self.user = user
self.remote = remote
self.key_path = str(key_path)
def cmd(self,
cmds: list[str],
strict_host_key_checking=False) -> None:
"""runs commands consecutively, ensuring success of each
after calling the next command.
Args:
cmds (list[str]): list of commands to run.
strict_host_key_checking (bool, optional): Defaults to True.
"""
strict_host_key_checking = 'yes' if strict_host_key_checking \
else 'no'
cmd = ' && '.join(cmds)
subprocess.run(
[
'ssh',
'-i', self.key_path,
'-o', f'StrictHostKeyChecking={strict_host_key_checking}',
'-o', 'UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null',
f'{self.user}#{self.remote}',
cmd
]
)
def scp(self, source: Union[str, Path], destination: Union[str, Path]):
"""Copies `srouce` file to remote `destination` using the
native `scp` command.
Args:
source (Union[str, Path]): Source file path.
destination (Union[str, Path]): Destination path on remote.
"""
subprocess.run(
[
'scp',
'-i', self.key_path,
str(source),
f'{self.user}#{self.remote}:{str(destination)}',
]
)
Below example, incase if you want user inputs for hostname,username,password and port no.
import paramiko
ssh = paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
def details():
Host = input("Enter the Hostname: ")
Port = input("Enter the Port: ")
User = input("Enter the Username: ")
Pass = input("Enter the Password: ")
ssh.connect(Host, Port, User, Pass, timeout=2)
print('connected')
stdin, stdout, stderr = ssh.exec_command("")
stdin.write('xcommand SystemUnit Boot Action: Restart\n')
print('success')
details()
I need some hints/help, how can I read multiline response into variable.
My current command results me multiline response but after that I get timeout.
Here's how my connection is setup:
connection = Net::Telnet.new('Host' => host,'Port' => 4800, 'Telnetmode' => false, 'Timeout' => 1)
Here's my request and how I save it:
puts "Weather request\n"
connection.cmd("{weather}"){ |c| print c }
parsed = JSON.parse(str)
puts "#{parsed}\n\n"
And here's the error:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/telnet.rb:558:in `waitfor': timed out while waiting for more data (Timeout::Error)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/net/telnet.rb:695:in `cmd'
from ruby_check.rb:37:in `<main>'
My response is multiple JSON lines, like this:
{"City":"Tallinn", "Degrees":"23"}
{"City":"Berlin", "Degrees":"23"}
{"City":"Helsinki", "Degrees":"23"}
{"City":"Stockholm", "Degrees":"23"}
Why the timeout?
The Net::Telnet documentation says:
For some protocols, it will be possible to specify the Prompt option once when you create the Telnet object and use cmd() calls; for others, you will have to specify the response sequence to look for as the Match option to every cmd() call, or call puts() and waitfor() directly; for yet others, you will have to use sysread() instead of waitfor() and parse server responses yourself.
This makes more sense when combined with the Net::Telnet#cmd method's documentation, which says that the method:
sends a string to the host, and reads in all received data until is sees the prompt or other matched sequence.
You're not specifying a custom Prompt or Match option, so #cmd is waiting for something from the server that matches the default Net::Telnet prompt (/[$%#>] \z/n) to indicate the end of the message.
If the message doesn't end with that kind of prompt, then it'll be waiting forever.
Possible solutions
Match the server's prompt
If the server does send some kind of prompt to indicate it's finished sending data and you should type the next command, you can pass a regular expression that matches it to the Net::Telnet initialiser. For example, if the server prompted you with command:, you could use:
connection = Net::Telnet.new(
"Prompt" => /command: \z/,
# …
)
Match the end of the response
If there's no prompt, but the response you're waiting for ends with a specific character sequence, you could explicitly specify the Match option when you call #cmd. For example, if your response was a single JSON array it would end with ], so you might be able to use this:
connection.cmd("String" => "{weather}", "Match" => "]") { |c| print c }
Give up on Net::Telnet and use a TCPSocket
If there's no prompt and no known ending, you could try to use the Net::Telnet object's underlying TCPSocket to read the data without using #cmd:
connection.puts("{weather}")
connection.sock.readline
At this point, there might not be much benefit to using Net::Telnet over a plain TCPSocket.
You are setting the timeout to one second and do not specify what str is. You can try increasing the timeout value or even setting it to false. Believieng it is the result from .cmd, try this:
connection = Net::Telnet.new(
"Host" => host, "Port" => 4800,
"Telnetmode" => false, "Timeout" => false)
puts "Weather request...\n"
str = connection.cmd("{weather}"){ |c| print c }
parsed = JSON.parse(str)
puts "#{parsed}\n\n"
I'm trying to write a simple telnet client that just runs a single command on a remote box using telnet. This needs to run over asyncio as other tasks are monitored at the same time under that framework.
I got it almost working, with the code below, that I tweaked from telnet-client as part of the telnetlib3 library; except that it does not return. I've had a hard time trying to figure what this protocol.waiter_closed is all about.
In any case, how do I need to tweak this code so that it returns once the command has been dealt with on the remote end ?
Thanks
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import logging
import asyncio
import telnetlib3
# just to check that connection is thrown away
class MyClient(telnetlib3.TelnetClient):
def connection_lost(self, *args):
print("connection lost on client {} - args={}".format(self, args))
#asyncio.coroutine
def register_telnet_command(loop, Client, host, port, command):
transport, protocol = yield from loop.create_connection(Client, host, port)
print("{} async connection OK for command {}".format(host, command))
def send_command():
EOF = chr(4)
EOL = '\n'
# adding newline and end-of-file for this simple example
command_line = command + EOL + EOF
protocol.stream.write(protocol.shell.encode(command_line))
# one shot invokation of the command
loop.call_soon(send_command)
# what does this do exactly ?
yield from protocol.waiter_closed
port = 23
hostname = "fit01"
def main():
def ClientFactory():
return MyClient(encoding='utf-8', shell = telnetlib3.TerminalShell)
# create as many clients as we have hosts
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
loop.run_until_complete(
register_telnet_command(loop, log, ClientFactory,
host = hostname, port = port,
command = "id"))
return 0
main()
Sorry, my mistake, redefining close_connection without calling the code from telnetlib3.connection_lost is a bad idea, since this is the code that populates waiter_closed.
I should have done
class MyClient(telnetlib3.TelnetClient):
def connection_lost(self, *args):
print("connection lost on client {} - args={}".format(self, args))
super().connection_lost(*args)
I am trying to write a Ruby script that runs the mount command interactively behind the scenes. The problem is, if I redirect input and output of the mount command to pipes, it doesn't work. Somehow, mount seems to realise that it's not talking directly to stdin/stdout and falls over. Either that, or it's a more wide-ranging problem that would affect all interactive commands; I don't know.
I want to be able to parse the output of mount, line by line, and shove answers into its input pipe when it asks questions. This shouldn't be an unreasonable expectation. Can someone help, please?
Examples:
def read_until(pipe, stop_at, timeoutsec = 10, verbose = false)
lines = []; line = ""
while result = IO.select([pipe], nil, nil, timeoutsec)
next if result.empty?
begin
c = pipe.read(1) rescue c = nil
end
break if c.nil?
line << c
break if line =~ stop_at
# Start a new line?
if line[-1] == ?\n
puts line if verbose
lines << line.strip
line = ""
end
end
return lines, line.match(stop_at)
end
cmd = "mount.ecryptfs -f /tmp/1 /tmp/2"
status = Open3::popen2e(cmd) { |i,o,t|
o.fcntl(3, 4) # Set non-blocking (this doesn't make any difference)
i.fcntl(3, 4) # Set non-blocking (this doesn't make any difference)
puts read_until(o, /some pattern/, 1, true) # Outputs [[], nil]
}
I've also tried spawn:
a, b = IO.pipe
c, d = IO.pipe
pid = spawn(cmd, :in=>a, :out=>d)
puts read_until(c, /some pattern/, 1, true) # Outputs [[], nil]
I've tried subprocess, pty and a host of other solutions - basically, if it's on Google, I've tried it. It seems that mount just knows if I'm not passing it a real shell, and deliberately blocks. See:
pid = spawn(cmd, :in=>STDIN, :out=>STDOUT) # Works
pid = spawn(cmd, :in=>somepipe, :out=>STDOUT) # Blocks after first line of output, for no reason whatsoever. It's not expecting any input at this point.
I even tried spawning a real shell (e.g. bash) and sending the mount command to it via an input pipe. Same problem.
Please ignore any obvious errors in the above: I have tried several solutions tonight, so the actual code has been rewritten many times. I wrote the above from memory.
What I want is the following:
Run mount command with arguments, getting pipes for its input and output streams
Wait for first specific question on output pipe
Answer specific question by writing to input pipe
Wait for second specific question on output pipe
...etc...
And so on.
You may find Kernel#system useful. It opens a subshell, so if you are ok w/ the user just interacting with mount directly this will make everything much easier.