Upgrading to Ruby 2.0, overwrite executables without prompt - ruby

When upgrading from ruby 1.9.3 to ruby 2.0 on linux (at least 12.04) you get an unexpected prompt.
rdoc's executable "rdoc" conflicts with /path/bin/rdoc
Overwrite the executable? [yN]
It works fine to overwrite it manually but I'm looking for a way that my scripts will auto reply yes without halting.
Just found this issue on rubygems from a year ago. I'm using gem install in a script so I think I can somewhat easily add yes | gem install
Edit:
Tried yes | gem install rdoc but it fails with:
ERROR: Error installing rdoc:
"rdoc" from rdoc conflicts with /usr/local/rubies/2.0.0-p0/bin/rdoc

You can prepend
yes |
yes just enters y over and over again, which gets piped to to standard input.
(thanks #adamdunson)

--force worked for me:
gem install --force rdoc
Disclaimer: this is not what --force is for, and I don't know why yes | doesn't work.

For me with Ubuntu and Ruby 2.0 the yes | prepend solution as described above did NOT work as described in my automated build script (using sprinkle gem).
I therefore added a step to the build script to rename (in my case) /usr/local/bin/rdoc and /usr/local/bin/ri before the install is executed.
Consequently the install recreates these files without the pesky prompt which I just couldnt somehow seem to avoid. Personally I think the suggestion at https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/280 is a good one although this doesnt seem to have been embraced by the community with open arms.
My solution is a somewhat crude workaround but may help others until there is a more elegant fix.

actually, you shouldn't say yes. This is currently a bug right now for Ruby 2.0. My own fix (which I do go with, anyway, even if this is not a problem!) is to use a gemset handler (I'm using rbenv-gemset, with rbenv right now).

Prefixing yes | did not work in my case (rubygems verifies that input is tty). What works for me:
expect <<-DONE
set timeout -1
spawn gem update
expect {
"Overwrite the executable?" { send -- "y\r"; exp_continue }
eof
}
DONE

Related

rbenv install fails because of ruby-lang.org layout change (or permanent failure?)

Of all the days I chose today to switch from rvm to rbenv. All went well far enough, there are good tutorials on this, but the fun stopped when I tried to install ruby 1.9.3.
rbenv install 1.9.3
proposed to install 1.9.3-p448 as the current version which seems ok to me, so I tried
rbenv install 1.9.3-p448
and went down from there on. It will look up something on ...cloudfront.net and then tried to fetch ruby-1.9.3-p448.tar.gz from the "usual location" which it considers to be
http://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.3-p448.tar.gz
which fails with
/usr/local/bin/ruby-build: line 144: pushd: ruby-1.9.3-p448: No such file or directory
plus a final 404-error and a host of followup error messages.
As it turns out the link above is identical to the one published on http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/ which I would consider as "official" a link as you might find for Ruby. So if you go to ruby-lang.org manually (or using the link above) you will also find a broken download (as of 2013-08-06 17:06)!
I guess this is a temporary issue and the downloads will return (2.0.0 link is also broken by the way). Not to much of a problem for me at the moment as 1.9.2 can still be installed (and I am stuck with that at my current hosting provider ...), but anyways: Are there any other options I would have to install a ruby with rbenv without these "official" distributions?
Looks like ruby-lang.org has been going on and off line for a couple of hours now.
ruby-lang status: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/08/06/status-issue/
GitHub Issue: https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/issues/259
just tested overriding the mirror for ruby-build in cap...
rbenv uses ruby-build. You can override the mirror in ruby-build url in 2 ways:
Specifying a custom ruby version (requires you to write out a config in ruby-build/share/ruby-build/my-custom-ruby
Overriding the mirror url (requires the checksum to be the same), i.e., RUBY_BUILD_MIRROR_URL= http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/ruby/2.0/ruby-2.0.0-p247.tar.gz
env RUBY_BUILD_MIRROR_URL=http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/ruby/2.0/ruby-2.0.0-p247.tar.gz ~/.rbenv/bin/rbenv install 2.0.0-p247
I had this same problem, and I was able to work around it by editing the ruby-build recipe for the particular version of Ruby I needed to download.
I installed ruby-build as an rbenv plugin, so the recipe lives here:
~/.rbenv/plugins/ruby-build/share/ruby-build
Here's the edited version of the recipe:
install_package "yaml-0.1.4" "http://pyyaml.org/download/libyaml/yaml-0.1.4.tar.gz#36c852831d02cf90508c29852361d01b"
install_package "ruby-1.9.3-p448" "http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.3-p448.tar.gz#a893cff26bcf351b8975ebf2a63b1023"
#install_package "ruby-1.9.3-p448" "ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.3-p448.tar.gz#a893cff26bcf351b8975ebf2a63b1023"
I did not try this, but you might be able to achieve a similar result by following the instructions for specifying package download mirrors.

Installing Ruby 1.9 on OS X Leopard using /usr/local - RVM issues

I have to run a Rails (3.0.6) app locally that requires Ruby 1.9.2 (plus Mongo). I'd like to install Ruby 1.9.2 alongside my existing 1.8.7 and be able to swap between them as necessary. I prefer installing to usr/local over Macports etc. Any recommendations? I've tried installing RVM but this has proved such a pain on OS X I'd rather avoid that too.
Is there another way of running multiple Ruby versions (maybe with a prefix like this)? I only need to switch to 1.9 for this project. Or has anyone a good solution to the known OS X/RVM install issues? Specifically, on Tiger/10.4 bash doesn't support errtrace.
Update: solved with a new RVM install script: see RVM on OS X 10.4 - possible?.
RVM really is the easiest solution, and I would highly recommend you try and work that issue out first.
The only bit of advice is to make sure you configure your PATH variable to include /usr/local/bin before everything else. In your .profile or .login (depending on your shell), you should have it towards the bottom, in case there is any other lines configuring PATH as well, and then for the Bourne shell family:
export PATH="/usr/local/bin:$PATH
or for the C shell family:
set path = (/usr/local/bin $PATH)
Running ./configure alone should make it install into /usr/local, but you can explicitly state so with
./configure --prefix=/usr/local
Install Ruby from source and it will default to /usr/local/bin. Adjust your path, the #! line, or your /usr/local/bin/ruby source.rb as necessary to switch between Apple's installation of Ruby, and the one you add.
You can force a new base directory using ./configure --prefix=/... where '...' is whatever path you want. Again, once the files are installed, you can adjust the executing Ruby with one of the above methods.
Do not attempt to remove Apple's installed Ruby. It's there for their use, not for our convenience, and Apple uses it to provide some functionality. Messing with it or removing it could break things, and you probably wouldn't notice for a while.
RE: RVM, It really is the preferred way to install a user Ruby. I have it on two Macs, and a handful of different Linux boxes and the only time I had trouble was with a secured machine behind firewalls, but I can't blame RVM for those problems when it couldn't see the internet at all. And, yes, I got it working nicely, I just had to insert the manually downloaded Ruby archives into the ~/.rvm/archives directory.
If you are having problems and want to use it, it might help to temporarily strip your startup scripts, or create a temporary user, and see what happens. Additionally, the author has been very responsive and helpful the few times I've asked him questions. Contact him at:
If you still cannot find what an answer to your question, find me 'wayneeseguin' in #rvm on irc.freenode.net:
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=rvm
If you download the source and compile it, it should install into /usr/local by default, or you can
./configure --prefix=/usr/local
just to be sure.
Actually, compiling and installing ruby from source is an easy way to be sure you have the latest version, especially if you use git and github:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby

How to tell Terminal which version of Ruby to use?

I have two related questions that I was hoping someone could help out with.
I recently installed Ruby 1.9.2 on my Mac (running Snow Leopard 10.6.4) and I haven’t been able to figure out how to get Terminal to use the new Ruby as a default, rather than the factory-installed Ruby 1.8.7. The old Ruby 1.8.7 is located in my ~/usr/bin/ruby directory while the new Ruby 1.9.2 is in ~/usr/local/bin/ruby. Someone said that I need to put the new version of Ruby's directory in the PATH prior to the old version's directory so that the system looks there first - is this correct? If so, can anyone provide step by step instructions on how to do this?
I’ve created a new directory but can’t seem to figure out the correct way to add that directory to my PATH using the Terminal bash shell. I tried using the instructions that I found here (http://www.macgasm.net/2008/04/10/ad...thin-terminal/) twice but they didn't work for me. The directory containing my program ("Ruby_Programs") shows up in the PATH but when I try to run "ruby newprogram.rb" from the command line it results in ":ruby: No such file or directory -- newprogram.rb (LoadError)". The file definitely exists and is a functional Ruby program. I did change the name of the directory to "Ruby Programs" and then back to "Ruby_Programs" - could that have somehow caused this problem?
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Here is my current PATH:
$ echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/Users/sbrriffe/src:/usr/X11/bin:/Users/sbriffe/Ruby_Programs/:
You might want to check out rvm. You can install multiple versions of ruby side by side and easily switch between them. If you follow the rvm installation notes you won't have any more path problems.
Your Ruby Programs directory shouldn't be in your path: the location of your ruby interpreter should be. Then, you cd to the location of your ruby program, and run it from there: ruby program.rb.
Since you are on a Mac, check out homebrew for something that will make installing software easier. I have my homebrew set up in /usr/local, and it works great.
Once you have installed stuff where you need it, then you'll want to adjust your $PATH. The items in $PATH are searched in the order they appear, so in your ~/.bashrc, you'll want to add:
export PATH=/usr/local/bin:$PATH
To make sure /usr/local/bin gets searched before /usr/bin.
I would use RVM to get everything installed, and then once you have RVM installed it is easy to set your default Ruby version.
Check out https://rvm.io/ -- once you have that installed you can change your default by using : $ rvm use 1.9.2 --default
hope that helps- you can do this with any version, not only 1.9.2

Rubygems auto install from source code

I was wondering if there was a solution to automatically - from my ruby source code - ask Gem to install various librairies my code my require to work?
From what i read on the internet, it seems we are obliged to either use an install script that directly runs "gem install ..." commands or do it manually or some people have posted a ruby script that simply iterate over a list of dependencies and use the system command to install them.
Any other better options?
Thanks for your time.
You could use internal RubyGems commands, but that's a pain and error-prone process, especially for dependencies.
I would setup a Gemfile and use Bundler instead. http://github.com/carlhuda/bundler

cannot install ruby gems - zlib error

I'm trying to install some Ruby Gems so I can use Ruby to notify me when I get twitter messages. However, after doing a gem update --system, I now get a zlib error every time I try and do a gem install of anything. below is the console output I get when trying to install ruby gems. (along with the output from gem environment).
C:\data\ruby>gem install twitter
ERROR: While executing gem ... (Zlib::BufError)
buffer error
C:\data\ruby>gem update --system
Updating RubyGems
ERROR: While executing gem ... (Zlib::BufError)
buffer error
C:\data\ruby>gem environment
RubyGems Environment:
- RUBYGEMS VERSION: 1.2.0
- RUBY VERSION: 1.8.6 (2007-03-13 patchlevel 0) [i386-mswin32]
- INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
- RUBY EXECUTABLE: c:/ruby/bin/ruby.exe
- EXECUTABLE DIRECTORY: c:/ruby/bin
- RUBYGEMS PLATFORMS:
- ruby
- x86-mswin32-60
- GEM PATHS:
- c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
- GEM CONFIGURATION:
- :update_sources => true
- :verbose => true
- :benchmark => false
- :backtrace => false
- :bulk_threshold => 1000
- REMOTE SOURCES:
- http://gems.rubyforge.org/
Found it! I had the same problem on windows (it appeared suddenly without me doing an update, but whatever):
It has something to do with multiple conflicting zlib versions (I think).
In ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-msvcrt, make sure that there exists a zlib.so file. In my case, it was already there. If not, you may try to install ruby-zlib.
Then go to ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8./i386-msvcrt and delete the zlib.so file there.
In ruby/bin, there should be a zlib1.dll. For some reason my Ruby version did not use this dll. I downloaded the most recent version (1.2.3) and installed it there. I had to rename it to zlib.dll for it to be used.
And tada! Rubygems worked again.
Hope this helps.
Firstly, I thank the person, who came up with the solution to the missing zlib problem. (It wasn't me. :-)
Unfortunately I lost the link to the original posting, but the essence of the solution on Linux is to compile the Ruby while zlib header files are available to the Ruby configure script. On Debian it means that zlib development packages have to be installed before one starts to compile the Ruby.
The rest of my text here does not contain anything new and it is encouraged to omit it, if You feel comfortable at customizing Your execution environment at UNIX-like operating systems. The following is a combination of a brief intro to some basics and step by step instructions.
------The-start-of-the-HOW-TO-------------------------
If one wants to execute a program, let's say, irb, from a console, then the file named irb is searched from folders in an order that is described by an environment variable called PATH. It's possible to see the value of the PATH by typing to a bash shell (and pressing Enter key):
echo $PATH
For example, if there are 2 versions of irb in the system, one installed by the "official" package management system, let's say, yum or apt-get, to /usr/bin/irb and the other one that is compiled by the user named scoobydoo and resides in /home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin then the question arises, which one of the two irb-s gets executed.
If one writes to the
/home/scoobydoo/.bashrc
a line like:
export PATH="/home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin:/usr/bin"
and restarts the bash shell by closing the terminal window and opening a new one, then by typing irb to the console, the
/home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin/irb gets executed. If one wrote
export PATH="/usr/bin:/home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin"
to the
/home/scoobydoo/.bashrc
,then the /usr/bin/irb would get executed.
In practice one wants to write
export PATH="/home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin:$PATH"
because this prepends all of the values that the PATH had prior to this assignment to the /home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin. Otherwise there will be problems, because not all common tools reside in the /usr/bin and one probably wants to have multiple custom-built applications in use.
The same logic applies to libraries, except that the name of the environment variable is LD_LIBRARY_PATH
The use of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PATH allow ordinary users, who do not have root access or who want to experiment with not-that-trusted software, to build them and use them without needing any root privileges.
The rest of this mini-how-to assumes that we'll be building our own version of ruby and use our own version of it almost regardless of what is installed on the system by the distribution's official package management software.
1)=============================
First, one creates a few folders and set the environment variables, so that the folders are "useful".
mkdir /home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby
mkdir -p /home/scoobydoo/lib/our_gems
One adds the following 2 lines to the
/home/scoobydoo/.bashrc
export PATH="/home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin:$PATH"
export GEM_HOME="/home/scoobydoo/lib/our_gems"
Restart the bash shell by closing the current terminal window and opening a new one or by typing
bash
on the command line of the currently open window.
The changes to the /home/scoobydoo/.bashrc do not have any effect on terminal windows/sessions that were started prior to the saving of the modified version of the /home/scoobydoo/.bashrc
The idea is that the /home/scoobydoo/.bashrc is executed automatically at the start of a session, even if one logs on over ssh.
2)=============================
Now one makes sure that the zlib development packages are available on the system. As of April 2011 I haven't sorted the details of it out, but
apt-get install zlibc zlib1g-dev zlib1g
seems to be sufficient on a Debian system. The idea is that both, the library file and header files, are available in the system's "official" search path. Usually apt-get and alike place the header files to the /usr/include and library files to the /usr/lib
3)=============================
Download and unpack the source tar.gz from the http://www.ruby-lang.org
./configure --prefix=/home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby
make
make install
4)=============================
If a console command like
which ruby
prints to the console
/home/scoobydoo/ourcompiledruby/bin/ruby
then the newly compiled version is the one that gets executed on the command
ruby --help
5)=============================
The rest of the programs, gem, irb, etc., can be properly executed by using commands like:
ruby `which gem` install rake
ruby `which irb`
It shouldn't be like that but as of April 2011 I haven't figured out any more elegant ways of doing it. If the
ruby `which gem` install rake
gives the zlib missing error again, then one should just try to figure out, how to make the zlib include files and library available to the Ruby configure script and recompile. (Sorry, currently I don't have a better solution to offer.)
May be a dirty solution might be to add the following lines to the
/home/scoobydoo/.bashrc
alias gem="`which ruby` `which gem` "
alias irb="`which ruby` `which irb` "
Actually, I usually use
alias irb="`which ruby` -KU "
but the gem should be executed without giving the ruby the "-KU" args, because otherwise there will be errors.
------The-end-of-the-HOW-TO------------------------
I just started getting this tonight as well. Googling turned up a bunch of suggestions that didn't deliver results
gem update --system
and some paste in code from jamis that is supposed to replace a function in package.rb but the original it is supposed to replace is nowhere to be found.
Reinstalling rubygems didn't help. I'm reinstalling ruby right now.........and it is fixed. Pain though.
How about cd into rubysrc/ext/zlib, then ruby extendconf.rb, then make, make install.
After do that, reinstall ruby.
I did this on ubuntu 10.04 and was successful.
A reinstall of Ruby sorted this issue out. It's not what I wanted; I wanted to know why I was getting the issue, but it's all sorted out.
It most often shows up when your download failed -- i.e. you have a corrupt gem, due to network timeout, faulty manual download, or whatever. Just try again, or download gems manually and point gem at the files.
if gem update --system not works and rename ruby/bin/zlib1.dll to zlib.dll not helps try:
Open file RUBY_DIR\lib\ruby\site_ruby\1.8\rubygems.rb
And replace existed def self.gunzip(data) by this:
def self.gunzip(data)
require 'stringio'
require 'zlib'
data = StringIO.new data
# Zlib::GzipReader.new(data).read
data.read(10) # skip the gzip header
zis = Zlib::Inflate.new(-Zlib::MAX_WBITS)
is = StringIO.new(zis.inflate(data.read))
end
Try updating ZLib before you do anything else. I had a similar problem on OS X and updating Compress::Zlib (a Perl interface to ZLib) cured it - so I think an old version of ZLib (is now 1.2.3) may be where your problem lies...
install pure ruby zlib if all else fails

Resources