Before i must say this : Please, excuse me for my bad english...
I'm student.My teacher gave me problem in pascal for my course work...
I must write program that calculates 2^n for big values of n...I've wrote but there is a problem...My program returns 0 for values of n that bigger than 30...My code is below...Please help me:::Thanks beforehand...
function control(a: integer): boolean;
var
b: boolean;
begin
if (a >= 10) then b := true
else b := false;
control := b;
end;
const
n = 200000000;
var
a: array[1..n] of integer;
i, j, c, t, rsayi: longint; k: string;
begin
writeln('2^n');
write('n=');
read(k);
a[1] := 1;
rsayi := 1;
val(k, t, c);
for i := 1 to t do
for j := 1 to t div 2 do
begin
a[j] := a[j] * 2;
end;
for i := 1 to t div 2 do
begin
if control(a[j]) = true then
begin
a[j + 1] := a[j + 1] + (a[j] div 10);
a[j] := a[j] mod 10;
rsayi := rsayi + 1;
end;
end;
for j := rsayi downto 1 do write(a[j]);
end.
The first (nested) loop boils down to "t" multiplications by 2 on every single element of a.
30 multiplications by two is as far as you can go with a 32-bit integer (2^31-1 of positive values, so 2^31 is out of reach)
So the first loop doesn't work, and you probably have to rethink your strategy.
Here is a quick and dirty program to compute all 2^n up to some given, possibly large, n. The program repeatedly doubles the number in array a, which is stored in base 10; with lower digit in a[1]. Notice it's not particularly fast, so it would not be wise to use it for n = 200000000.
program powers;
const
n = 2000; { largest power to compute }
m = 700; { length of array, should be at least log(2)*n }
var
a: array[1 .. m] of integer;
carry, s, p, i, j: integer;
begin
p := 1;
a[1] := 1;
for i := 1 to n do
begin
carry := 0;
for j := 1 to p do
begin
s := 2*a[j] + carry;
if s >= 10 then
begin
carry := 1;
a[j] := s - 10
end
else
begin
carry := 0;
a[j] := s
end
end;
if carry > 0 then
begin
p := p + 1;
a[p] := 1
end;
write(i, ': ');
for j := p downto 1 do
write(a[j]);
writeln
end
end.
Related
I have a program that reads a N number of integers and push them into an array, then I need to multiply the odd numbers from the array.
Program p2;
type
tab = array[1..10] of integer;
var
a, c : tab;
n, i, prod : integer;
begin
writeln('n=');
readln(n);
prod := 1;
writeln('Enter array numbers:');
for i := 1 to n do
read(a[i]);
if (a[i] mod 2 = 1) then
prod := a[i] * prod;
writeln('The produs of the odd numbers is: ',prod);
end.
For example when you enter the n as 5, and the numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5;
The result of multiplication of odd numbers should be 15. Can someone help me to fix it working properly.
First off, whitespace and indentation are not terribly significant in Pascal, but they can be your ally in understanding what your program is doing, so let's make your code easier to read.
Program p2;
type
tab = array[1..10] of integer;
var
a, c : tab;
n, i, prod : integer;
begin
writeln('n=');
readln(n);
prod := 1;
writeln('Enter array numbers:');
for i := 1 to n do
read(a[i]);
if a[i] mod 2 = 1 then
prod := a[i] * prod;
writeln('The produs of the odd numbers is: ', prod);
end.
With indentation, it should be apparent what's happening. Your conditional only runs once, rather than each time through your loop. As suggested in the comments, begin and end neatly solve this problem by creating a block where the conditional is checked each time the loop runs.
program p2;
type
tab = array[1 .. 10] of integer;
var
a, c : tab;
n, i, prod : integer;
begin
writeln('n=');
readln(n);
prod := 1;
writeln('Enter array numbers:');
for i := 1 to n do
begin
read(a[i]);
if a[i] mod 2 = 1 then
prod := a[i] * prod;
end;
writeln('The produs of the odd numbers is: ', prod);
end.
So, I've been trying to implement an N length FFT in VHDL but I can't seem to get the right outputs. I believe it's because of the Twiddle Factor but I'm unsure, I've been troubleshooting this for a while but can't find the solution
I've tried changing the Twiddle factor to another formula described on a couple of websites ((k/2**Stage)/N), like this, from one twiddle factor calculation website but it does not work.
constant M : integer := 3;
constant N : integer := 8;
constant Nminus1 : integer := 7;
constant TwoPiN : real := 2.0*MATH_PI/real(N);
Butterfly code :
TempRe := xtmp(kNs).re *WCos - xtmp(kNs).re * WSin;
TempIm := xtmp(kNs).im*WCos + xtmp(kNs).im*Wsin;
xtmp(kNs).re := xtmp(k).re - TempRe;
xtmp(kNs).im := xtmp(k).im - TempIm;
xtmp(k).re := xtmp(k).re + TempRe;
xtmp(k).im := xtmp(k).im + TempIm;
Main:process(x_in)
variable Ns, count ,Stage, k, kNs, p ,p_int, M1: integer;
variable Wcos, Wsin : real;
variable x : complexArr;
begin
x := x_in; --copy insignal
Ns := N;
M1 := M;
count := 0;
for Stage in 1 to M loop
k := 0;
Ns := Ns/2; --index distance between a dual node pair
M1 := M1 - 1;
while(k< N) loop
for n in 1 to Ns loop
p := Digit_Reverse(k/2**(M-1));
Wcos := cos(TwoPiN*real(p));--W to the power of p
Wsin := - sin(TwoPiN*real(p)); --W = exp(\u2212 j2\u03c0/N)
kNs := k + Ns;
Butterfly(x,k,kNs,Wcos,Wsin);
k := k + 1;
count := count +1;
end loop;
k := k + Ns;
end loop;
end loop;
Unscramble(x); --output
x_ut <= x;
No errors but I expect the correct values, for 2048 length FFT, but at the moment I'm troubleshooting the 16 point FFT and 8 point FFT with [-1;i]-[1;i] etc.
Part of the program I have checks if an input number is a perfect number. We're supposed to find a solution that runs in O(sqrt(n)). The rest of my program runs in constant time, but this function is holding me back.
function Perfect(x: integer): boolean;
var
i: integer;
sum: integer=0;
begin
for i := 1 to x-1 do
if (x mod i = 0) then
sum := sum + i;
if sum = x then
exit(true)
else
exit(false);
end;
This runs in O(n) time, and I need to cut it down to O(sqrt(n)) time.
These are the options I've come up with:
(1) Find a way to make the for loop go from 1 to sqrt(x)...
(2) Find a way to check for a perfect number that doesn't use a for loop...
Any suggestions? I appreciate any hints, tips, instruction, etc. :)
You need to iterate the cycle not for i := 1 to x-1 but for i := 2 to trunc(sqrt(x)).
The highest integer divisor is x but we do not take it in into account when looking for perfect numbers. We increment sum by 1 instead (or initialize it with 1 - not 0).
The code if (x mod i = 0) then sum := sum + i; for this purpose can be converted to:
if (x mod i = 0) then
begin
sum := sum + i;
sum := sum + (x div i);
end;
And so we get the following code:
function Perfect(x: integer): boolean;
var
i: integer;
sum: integer = 1;
sqrtx: integer;
begin
sqrtx := trunc(sqrt(x));
i := 2;
while i <= sqrtx do
begin
if (x mod i = 0) then
begin
sum := sum + i;
sum := sum + (x div i) // you can also compare i and x div i
//to avoid adding the same number twice
//for example when x = 4 both 2 and 4 div 2 will be added
end;
inc(i);
end;
if sum = x then
exit(true)
else
exit(false);
end;
I need an algorithm to print all possible sums of a number (partitions).
For example: for 5 I want to print:
1+1+1+1+1
1+1+1+2
1+1+3
1+2+2
1+4
2+3
5
I am writing my code in Pascal. So far I have this:
Program Partition;
Var
pole :Array [0..100] of integer;
n :integer;
{functions and procedures}
function Minimum(a, b :integer): integer;
Begin
if (a > b) then Minimum := b
else Minimum := a;
End;
procedure Rozloz(cislo, i :integer);
Var
j, soucet :integer;
Begin
soucet := 0;
if (cislo = 0) then
begin
for j := i - 1 downto 1 do
begin
soucet := soucet + pole[j];
if (soucet <> n) then
Write(pole[j], '+')
else Write(pole[j]);
end;
soucet := 0;
Writeln()
end
else
begin
for j := 1 to Minimum(cislo, pole[i - 1]) do
begin
pole[i] := j;
Rozloz(cislo - j, i + 1);
end;
end;
End;
{functions and procedures}
{Main program}
Begin
Read(n);
pole[0] := 101;
Rozloz(n, 1);
Readln;
End.
It works good but instead of output I want I get this:
1+1+1+1+1
2+1+1+1
2+2+1
3+1+1
3+2
4+1
5
I can't figure out how to print it in right way. Thank you for help
EDIT: changing for j:=i-1 downto 1 to for j:=1 to i-1 solves one problem. But my output is still this: (1+1+1+1+1) (2+1+1+1) (2+2+1) (3+1+1) (3+2) (4+1) (5) but it should be: (1+1+1+1+1) (1+1+1+2) (1+1+3) (1+2+2) (1+4) (2+3) (5) Main problem is with the 5th and the 6th element. They should be in the opposite order.
I won't attempt Pascal, but here is pseudocode for a solution that prints things in the order that you want.
procedure print_partition(partition);
print "("
print partition.join("+")
print ") "
procedure finish_and_print_all_partitions(partition, i, n):
for j in (i..(n/2)):
partition.append(j)
finish_and_print_all_partitions(partition, j, n-j)
partition.pop()
partition.append(n)
print_partition(partition)
partition.pop()
procedure print_all_partitions(n):
finish_and_print_all_partitions([], 1, n)
I'm trying to implement A* path finding algorithm (now it's Dijkstra's algorithm i.e without heuristic) using this article Link. But I can't figure out what's wrong in my code (it finds incorrect path).
instead of the empty begin ... end; it should be this step:
If it is on the open list already, check to see if this path to that
square is better, using G cost as the measure. A lower G cost means
that this is a better path. If so, change the parent of the square to
the current square, and recalculate the G and F scores of the square.
but I think it is not important because there is no diagonal movement.
uses
crt;
const
MAXX = 20;
MAXY = 25;
type
TArr = array [0..MAXY, 0..MAXX] of integer;
TCell = record
x: integer;
y: integer;
end;
TListCell = record
x: integer;
y: integer;
G: integer;
parent: TCell;
end;
TListArr = array [1..10000] of TListCell;
TList = record
arr: TListArr;
len: integer;
end;
var
i, j, minind, ind, c: integer;
start, finish: TCell;
current: TListCell;
field: TArr;
opened, closed: TList;
procedure ShowField;
var
i, j: integer;
begin
textcolor(15);
for i := 0 to MAXX do
begin
for j := 0 to MAXY do
begin
case field[j, i] of
99: textcolor(8); // not walkable
71: textcolor(14); // walkable
11: textcolor(10); // start
21: textcolor(12); // finish
15: textcolor(2); // path
14: textcolor(5);
16: textcolor(6);
end;
write(field[j, i], ' ');
end;
writeln;
end;
textcolor(15);
end;
procedure AddClosed(a: TListCell);
begin
closed.arr[closed.len + 1] := a;
inc(closed.len);
end;
procedure AddOpened(x, y, G: integer);
begin
opened.arr[opened.len + 1].x := x;
opened.arr[opened.len + 1].y := y;
opened.arr[opened.len + 1].G := G;
inc(opened.len);
end;
procedure DelOpened(n: integer);
var
i: integer;
begin
AddClosed(opened.arr[n]);
for i := n to opened.len - 1 do
opened.arr[i] := opened.arr[i + 1];
dec(opened.len);
end;
procedure SetParent(var a: TListCell; parx, pary: integer);
begin
a.parent.x := parx;
a.parent.y := pary;
end;
function GetMin(var a: TList): integer;
var
i, min, mini: integer;
begin
min := MaxInt;
mini := 0;
for i := 1 to a.len do
if a.arr[i].G < min then
begin
min := a.arr[i].G;
mini := i;
end;
GetMin := mini;
end;
function FindCell(a: TList; x, y: integer): integer;
var
i: integer;
begin
FindCell := 0;
for i := 1 to a.len do
if (a.arr[i].x = x) and (a.arr[i].y = y) then
begin
FindCell := i;
break;
end;
end;
procedure ProcessNeighbourCell(x, y: integer);
begin
if (field[current.x + x, current.y + y] <> 99) then // if walkable
if (FindCell(closed, current.x + x, current.y + y) <= 0) then // and not visited before
if (FindCell(opened, current.x + x, current.y + y) <= 0) then // and not added to list already
begin
AddOpened(current.x + x, current.y + y, current.G + 10);
SetParent(opened.arr[opened.len], current.x, current.y);
// field[opened.arr[opened.len].x, opened.arr[opened.len].y]:=16;
end
else
begin
end;
end;
begin
randomize;
for i := 0 to MAXX do
for j := 0 to MAXY do
field[j, i] := 99;
for i := 1 to MAXX - 1 do
for j := 1 to MAXY - 1 do
if random(5) mod 5 = 0 then
field[j, i] := 99
else field[j, i] := 71;
// start and finish positions coordinates
start.x := 5;
start.y := 3;
finish.x := 19;
finish.y := 16;
field[start.x, start.y] := 11;
field[finish.x, finish.y] := 21;
ShowField;
writeln;
opened.len := 0;
closed.len := 0;
AddOpened(start.x, start.y, 0);
SetParent(opened.arr[opened.len], -1, -1);
current.x := start.x;
current.y := start.y;
repeat
minind := GetMin(opened);
current.x := opened.arr[minind].x;
current.y := opened.arr[minind].y;
current.G := opened.arr[minind].G;
DelOpened(minind);
ProcessNeighbourCell(1, 0); // look at the cell to the right
ProcessNeighbourCell(-1, 0); // look at the cell to the left
ProcessNeighbourCell(0, 1); // look at the cell above
ProcessNeighbourCell(0, -1); // look at the cell below
if (FindCell(opened, finish.x, finish.y) > 0) then
break;
until opened.len = 0;
// count and mark path
c := 0;
while ((current.x <> start.x) or (current.y <> start.y)) do
begin
field[current.x, current.y] := 15;
ind := FindCell(closed, current.x, current.y);
current.x := closed.arr[ind].parent.x;
current.y := closed.arr[ind].parent.y;
inc(c);
end;
ShowField;
writeln(c);
readln;
end.
Edit Feb 1 '12: updated code, also fixed path marking (there should be or instead and), looks like it works now :)
You should rewrite the program to use a loop instead of cut-and-paste to visit each neighbor. If you do that you will avoid bugs like the following:
if (field[current.x, current.y - 1] <> 99) then
if (FindCell(closed, current.x, current.y - 1) <= 0) then
if (FindCell(opened, current.x + 1, current.y) <= 0) then
(See the inconsistent current.x + 1, current.y in the last line.)
With respect to the loop, I was thinking of something like this (pseudo-Python):
neighbor_offsets = [(0, 1), (0, -1), (1, 0), (-1, 0)]
for offset in neighbor_offsets:
neighbor = current + offset
if is_walkable(neighbor) and not is_visited(neighbor):
# Open 'neighbor' with 'current' as parent:
open(neighbor, current)
# Perhaps check if the goal is reached:
if neighbor == finish:
goal_reached = True
break
If you don't write a loop but just refactor to
ProcessCell(x+1, y);
ProcessCell(x-1, y);
ProcessCell(x, y-1);
ProcessCell(x, y-1);
then that's a great improvement too.
Youre posting quite a lot of code, have you tried narrow it down where it fails?
Have you compared your code with the pseudocode on wikipedia?
Also remember that dijkstra is just A* with a heuristic of 0.
Edit:
The article you linked (which I now realize is the very same I used to learn the A*, funny) contains illustrated steps. I would suggest that you recreate that map/grid and run your implementation on it. Then step through the images:
Are the eight initial neighbors added to the open list? Do they have the correct parent?
Is the correct open node picked as next to be scanned according to the heuristic?
Is the list of closed nodes correct?
And so on...