Using RVM, how can I copy gems between two different computers? The gem is compiled and I want to avoid a compilation on the target machine.
I tried to copy the .rvm/gems/ruby-x.x.x-pxxx#gemset/gems/gem_name directory, and also the /bin and /cache, but in the target computer I can't see the gem in the gem list output.
Is there anything else I need to do?
You have to copy also the gem specification file you find in .rvm/gems/ruby-x.x.x-pxxx#gemset/specifications/gem_name.gemspec.
Keep in mind that the binary code could not run on the destination platform.
You could use gem-compiler from Luis Lavena.
It should be as easy as (replace <gem-*> with actual gem information):
gem install gem-compiler
gem fetch <gem-name> --platform=ruby
gem compile <gem-name>-<gem-version>.gem
This commands will create the *.gem file for your platform which can be then moved to another machine and installed with gem install --local <gem-file>.
For more details check https://github.com/luislavena/gem-compiler#usage
Related
I'm developing a couple of private gems and I think I don't understand correctly the PATH/GEM_PATH and/or Bundler/RVM installation flow, would love if someone could chip in.
I have a repository with two gems (A & B for simplicity sake). I've developed the gems using the scaffolding + following the guidelines provided by this bundler tutorial.
Thanks to the Bundler project I have a few Rakefile tasks like rake build, rake install, rake install:local and rake release. Because of the private nature of these gems I can't release them to RubyGems (and we haven't looked into hosting our rubygems).
My machines are using RVM to manage ruby versions and Bundler version 1.15.1
What I want to do: Assuming a new machine/developer trying out the project, ideally we would cd into each of the subfolders (currently 2, gem A and gem B), run rake install and after that we should have the gems available system wide for the current user.
What is happening: The gems are built and work properly, but they are only available inside the subfolder of each gem i.e. gem A is only available inside the subfolder A and gem B is only available inside subfolder B.
What I've tried: So, after rake build/install/install:local a new .gem file is generated under pkg. I've tried to manually install the "compiled" file using gem install pkg/A.gem, gem install --local pkg/A.gem and gem install --local --user-install pkg/A.gem without success. (there are plenty of SO questions/answers about this)
I believe this has something to do with the PATH variables, but like I said before I don't fully understand the way they are managed. I get the following results from these commands:
# Our gem
> gem which A
/home/ubuntu/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.4.0/gems/A-0.1.8/lib/A.rb
# Pry, available globally
> gem which pry
/home/ubuntu/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.4.0/gems/pry-0.11.1/lib/pry.rb
I've been lost and frustrated for far too long now, any help is appreciated. Also open to hear suggestions of better private gem installation flows :)
Yes, it has something to do with your PATH variables. Your installation seems to be good.
I advise you to first affirm your gems installation path with:
echo $GEM_HOME
The double check your PATH to ensure its present and also confirm that the GEM home is also where the gem got installed into from the rake install
echo $PATH
If not, put it in your path and you should be fine with something like this:
echo PATH=$PATH:$GEM_HOME >> ~/.bashrc
source ~/.bashrc
Build your gem as per that guide you linked. You should end up with a gem file. Distribute this as you see fit (I use rsync/crontab to download newer gem versions but anything goes). User can install the gem as follows:
gem install --user-install /path/to/your/file.gem
This will install the gem in the user's ~/.gem/ruby/<version>/gems/<your-gem-name> directory.
Tried it with an empty gem (foodie, as in that example guide) and it works fine. But if you don't specify the --user-install parameter it will try to install in the system ruby dir (/usr/lib/ruby/gems...)
I have a Gemfile that looks something like this:
source 'http://rubygems.org'
gemspec
gem "parent_gem", "0.1.3", :path => "#{File.expand_path(__FILE__)}/../vendor/gems/parent_gem-0.1.3"
parent_gem depends on child_gem-1.4.1, which we have packaged in the /vender/gems folder in the package. If a user installs child_gem-1.6.0 on their host on Ubuntu, they will get a Gem::ConflictError because it will try to use 1.6 and log child_gem-1.6.0 conflicts with child_gem (~> 1.4.1). However, if a user runs it on Amazon Linux, it works fine and uses the packaged child gem.
If I run gem list child_gem, I get the following output on both systems:
*** LOCAL GEMS ***
child_gem (1.6.1)
gem list parent_gem returns nothing because it's not installed separated and only exists in the package's vendor directory.
In the files that initiates the script, there is this line:
Gem.use_paths(nil, Gem.path << "/opt/my-app/vendor")
And the /opt/my-app/vendor directory includes child_gem-1.4.1.
Ultimately, I know that setting up the package properly with Bundler should resolve the issue, but I'm trying to understand why this is an issue.
How does Ruby decide where to look for a gem on a system? And where do I look to understand why it works on Amazon Linux but not Ubuntu?
I am trying to contribute to a Ruby gem and I don't understand how to test a local gem without using a globally installed gem.
The gem I want to contribute to is a command line interface gem. I clone the gem into a directory then cd into that directory. However, when I run commands in the terminal when I'm in the cloned project directory it still uses the global gem. I've even run
gem uninstall gemname
then while inside the newly cloned gem directory I redo
gem install gemname.
No matter what changes I make to the gem, I can't see the results or what my contributions are doing because it's always running the global gem.
When I do try to type a command line command that is supposed to interact with the gem while in the cloned gem directory I get:
-bash: ~/.gem/ruby/2.1.0/bin/githubrepo: No such file or directory
I've done a ton of research but I'm just not getting it. Help?
gem install gemname will look for a .gem file in the current directory. If not found it will look for it on the web.
gem install --local /path/to/your/gemname.gem will allow you to target a particular directory. You may need to gem build gemname.gemspec first, so it has your changes.
Instead of doing this, I would write tests in the gem directory itself. It's likely that when running code in there, you can simply require 'gemname' in Ruby to get the gem functionality.
If it's a well-written gem, it should have tests already. They will most likely be in a directory called test or spec. Have a look at these tests and try to carry on in that style to test your changes. This will make your code changes far far more likely to be accepted as a pull request.
I am trying to install eventmachine Gem, however a line needs to be commented out in the source for this to work on Ruby 2.0 on Windows x64.
I have tried modifying the Gem source in the Ruby build folder but each time I run gem install eventmachine it overwrites my changes. From the command line help there does not appear to be a way to rebuild the gem without unpacking fresh source, however there may be a workaround.
Is there a way to build my slightly tweaked source for this Gem?
Don't install the gem like that. Instead, build your own version and install that instead by specifying the path to the .gem file that is produced as part of the build process.
I've found the easiest way to get this right is to create a fork, set the fork's git path in your Gemfile, and bundle install which will take care of compiling things and installing them correctly.
Ok figured it out thanks to help from #tadman.
Ended up just installing locally from source rather than tweaking the official source downloaded by gem and preventing it from being overwritten. These are the exact steps ...
Clone locally from Github (or wherever)
Make your changes to the source
If there is a .gemspec file in the root directory
Open terminal in the directory and enter gem build GEMNAME.gemspec
Finally enter gem install GEMNAME-VERSION.gem
If there is not .gemspec but there is a file called "gem" or "build" or something similar , then you may have to build using rake according to this reply
Ruby dabbler/newbie here who's not familiar with the ecosystem, so apologies if this is one of those super duh questions.
Is there a way to view all the files and/or source code installed by a gem? That is, I just ran
$ gem install sass
And the sass gem is now a part of my local system
$ gem list --local
...
sass (3.1.16, 3.1.2)
...
I want to know what the gem install command put on my system. Is there a command I can run to see all the files installed by the gem?
After some googling, man gem and gem help commands, I discovered the contents command.
$ gem contents sass
However, when I run this command with the aforementioned sass gem, I get the following results
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/engine_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/functions_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/extend_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/logger_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/css2sass_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/conversion_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/script_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/util/subset_map_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/util/multibyte_string_scanner_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/callbacks_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/importer_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/scss/css_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/scss/scss_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/scss/rx_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/util_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/script_conversion_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/less_conversion_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/cache_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/test/sass/plugin_test.rb
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/bin/sass
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/bin/sass-convert
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.16/bin/scss
However, this list seems incomplete as I know there are files in
.../.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180/gems/sass-3.1.2/lib/
Why does contents not show the files from lib?
Is it possible for a gem installer to install files outside of the gems folder?
Is there a command that can show everything installed by a gem?
gem has an unpack command: http://guides.rubygems.org/command-reference/#gem-unpack
gem unpack rake
ls rake-0.4.3/
There are two really good ways to do this. There is another gem which allows you to open the gem and edit. This gem is call gem-open
gem install gem-open
then
gem open sass
Another way is to generate your own rdocs.
gem rdoc sass
You can then look at your rdocs by
gem server
Also if you are using rvm, you can type rvm info and it will show GEM_HOME location.
This will be where all your gems source code is.
cd $GEM_HOME
cd gems/sass-3.1.2/
Update:
This is the way I mostly do this now, when using bundler.
cd $(bundle show sass)
This will be the version of sass in your Gemfile.
I usually open a gem by running this command from the console
EDITOR=<your editor> bundle open <name of gem>
The lib/ directory you mentioned is for version 3.1.2 of the gem; gem contents without --version will just list one version (it appears to pick the newest version, but I'm unable to verify this is always true). What output do you get for gem contents --version 3.1.2 sass?
You can also use just rename the .gem file to .tar and extract as a posix archive. The source code is inside it in the lib folder. See https://blog.srcclr.com/extracting-ruby-source-code-from-gem-packages/ for more details.
In addition to gem contents, another command you might find useful is gem environment. If you have multiple paths for your gem installations, they will all be listed under the "GEM PATHS" label.