I'm trying to compile a simple ruby script to an executable with MacRuby. The issue I'm having is that the executable compiled on Mac OS 10.8.3 doesn't work on 10.7.x (I get an Illegal instruction: 4 error). It seems that I have to pass an option to gcc, -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 in order for the executable to be compatible with older systems, but I can't figure out how to do so. Any help is appreciated.
macrubyc doesn't have a good way to pass options through to gcc. But, you can see the commands that macrubyc is using, modify them, and run them yourself. If you want to pass -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 to gcc, here is a manual method to do it.
$ macrubyc script.rb -V
macrubyc will AOT compile "script.rb". The -V option will print every command executed by macrubyc. This printed output basically shows generating the bit code, then compiling, assembling, and linking.
The 3rd command (in my experience) is where gcc compiles the native assembly file generated from the bit code. In this command is where you would inject the -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 option.
Related
I was trying to run c program but this problem arise.. I don't know what it's trying to convey.. need help here
It looks like a pop up from some application rather than GCC. It says that it couldn't find the GCC on your computer, or may be GCC is installed but isn't included in your PATH environment variable.
You can find and install GCC here
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC
I'm trying to compile CMake using a non-default GCC installed in /usr/local/gcc530, on Solaris 2.11.
I have LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/gcc530/lib/sparcv9
Bootstrap proceeds fine, bootstrapped cmake successfully compiles various object files, but when it tries to link the real cmake (and other executables), I get pages of "undefined reference" errors to various standard library functions, because, as running the link command manually with -Wl,-verbose shows, the linker links with /usr/lib/64/libstdc++.so of the system default, much older GCC.
This is because apparently CMake tries to find curses/ncurses libraries (even if I tell it BUILD_CursesDialog:BOOL=OFF), finds them in /usr/lib/64, and adds -L/usr/lib/64 to build/Source/CMakeFiles/cmake.dir/link.txt, which causes the linker to use libstdc++.so from there, and not my actual GCC's own.
I found a workaround: I can get the path to proper libraries from $CC -m64 -print-file-name=libstdc++.so then put it with -L into LDFLAGS when running ./configure, and all works well then.
Is there a less hacky way? It's really weird that I can't tell GCC to prioritize its own libraries.
Also, is there some way to have CMake explain where different parts of a resulting command line came from?
I have downloaded Bellhop, which is an underwater acoustic simulator written in Fortran. It can be found here with the Makefile.
Question 1: I would like to know if it is possible to compile Fortran code, including everything needed, so a user without gfortran installed, can run it.
I have read here the following:
static linking
This section does not apply to Windows users, except for Cygwin users with gcc4-4.3.2-2 or later.
gfortran is composed of two main parts: the compiler, which creates the executable program from your code, and the library, which is used when you run your program afterwards. That explains why, if gfortran is installed in a non-standard directory, it may compile your code fine but the executable may fail with an error message like library not found. One way to avoid this (more ideas can be found on the binaries page) is to use the so-called "static linking", available with option -static gfortran then put the library code inside the program created, thus enabling it to run without the library present (like, on a computer where gfortran is not installed). Complete example is:
gfortran -static myfile.f -o program.exe
Reading this, I suppose that it is possible to do what I'm asking but I'm not very familiarized with fortran and makefiles. I don't understand this:
put the library code inside the program created
Question 2: How can I put the library code inside the program? Where can I find the library? What does "inside the program" means?
I'm running OSX 10.9.4 and gfortran
I solved my problem about compiling Fortran code with gfortran using static libraries.
As #M.S.B. said, using static-libgfortran worked for me under MacOS.
If somebody is having issues with linking the libquadmath.0.dylb library, remove libquadmath.0.dylib and libquadmath.dylib from /usr/local/gfortran/lib/
This doest the trick. Further information can be found here
I think the meaning of the bold part is actually
gfortran then puts the library code inside the
program created
That means using -static should be enough, there is no additional step. Just be advised you will need a static version of all the libraries that you link with.
I know this is very old tracker, but maybe somebody will be still interested in the solution that works.
Let's say we have code:
! fort_sample.f90
program main
write (*,*) 'Hello'
stop
end
First, compile the stuff:
gfortran -c -o fort_sample.o fort_sample.f90
Then, link stuff
ld -o ./fort_sample -no_compact_unwind \
-arch x86_64 -macosx_version_min 10.12.0 \
-lSystem \
/usr/local/gfortran/lib/libgfortran.a \
/usr/local/gfortran/lib/libquadmath.a \
/usr/local/gfortran/lib/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin16/6.3.0/libgcc.a \
fort_sample.o
You can execute it
./fort_sample
Hello
You can notice that quadmath is no longer there
> otool -L fort_sample
fort_sample:
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1238.51.1)
I guess this is what you were looking for in a first place. No removing dylibs, no symbolic links, etc.
The current version of the option is -static-libgfortran. This means that the Fortran specific libraries of gfortran will be included into the executable. These are libraries are automatically found for a good installation of gfortran. This should produce an executable that should run on other computers with the same OS, even if that computer doesn't have gfortran installed. This option likely doesn't statically link all libraries, so there is some risk that some other shared library used on your computer won't be available on the other computer.
So after searching the web for a while, Ive decided to try here as it seems to be a good forum for discussion. Im trying to create a simple gcc plugin. The program code is attached in the end of this mail, but in plain english it registers the plugin and makes sure that the pragma_init function is called when pragmas are registered. It is here that I use c_register_pragma to intercept some of the pragmas.
I compile it using the example in http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Plugins-building.html#Plugins-building. The compilation and linking works fine. However, when I load the plug-in I get:
gcc -c -fplugin=plugin.so test.c -o test.o
cc1: error: cannot load plugin plugin.so
plugin.so: undefined symbol: warning
What am I doing wrong? In addition, when including some header files (that will be required later), I get a lot of errors. For example, including "tree.h" yields (amongst 50 other errors):
/machmode.h:262:1: error: unknown type name 'class'
class bit_field_mode_iterator
^
/machmode.h:263:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
{
^
/plugin/include/tree.h:27:0,
from conftest.c:63:
/vec.h:220:8: error: field 'register_overhead' declared as a function
Anyone have a clue on what I am doing wrong?
Thank you
There are two problems here :
The error : "cannot load plugin plugin.so" means that you should add to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH the directory where you store your new shared library plugin.
The hundreds of errors you got with all the files in the include are resolved in my computer if you compile with g++ instead of gcc (not sure to understand why thought)
Which version of GCC are you using, both to compile your plugin, and to use the plugin? Run simply
gcc -v
without any other program argument to find out!
Did you install the appropriate package for GCC plugin development (on Debian or Ubuntu, it might be gcc-4.7-plugin-dev, but adapt the 4.7 version to your particular version of GCC)?
Did you install all the dependencies needed to build your GCC (on Debian or Ubuntu, apt-get build-dep gcc-4.7 gcc-4.7-plugin-dev)?
Recent versions of GCC (notably many GCC 4.7 shipped by distributions, and all GCC 4.8) are compiled by a C++ compiler, not a C compiler.
You may check how was your GCC built (in C or in C++) by running
nm -D -C $(gcc -print-file-name=cc1)
If that command shows typed C++ manged names, e.g. execute_ipa_pass_list(opt_pass*) instead of just execute_ipa_pass_list your GCC has been compiled with a C++ compiler (probably g++)
So you may need to use g++ (not gcc) to compile your GCC plugin.
As I commented, did you consider using MELT (a domain specific language to extend GCC) to extend or customize your gcc compiler?
I suggest downloading the very latest http://gcc-melt.org/melt-plugin-snapshot.tar.bz2 since I will release the next MELT in a few weeks for GCC 4.7 and 4.8
And don't expect to change the parsing behavior of your GCC with a plugin. That is not really possible (GCC provides only plugin hooks to add your builtins and pragmas, not to extend the parsed syntax).
Is there an option to GCC that changes the path of the assembler it uses? I'm getting errors from Solaris /usr/ccs/bin/as when using GCC to attempt to compile Haskell, but I've got a copy of GNU as in my path so when I type which as and as --version they use the GNU version, not the Solaris version. Unfortunately it seems GCC ignores the GNU version in the path and goes to the Solaris version. I'm trying to build Haskell on Solaris and I don't think it sits well with the Solaris assembler. I hope I can change this behaviour with a simple wrapper script so I don't have to recompile GCC.
Specifying the assembler to be used is not possible at run time. It has to be done when configuring gcc:
--with-gnu-as
Specify that the compiler should assume that the assembler it finds is the GNU
assembler. However, this does not modify the rules to find an assembler and will
result in confusion if the assembler found is not actually the GNU assembler.
(Confusion may also result if the compiler finds the GNU assembler but has not
been configured with --with-gnu-as.)
Note the part I've put in italics. Of course you could temporarily change /usr/ccs/bin/as to call the gnu assembler (provided you have the necessary permissions), but the above seems to suggest that you'll very likely run into problems. The gcc build process actually checks the features the assembler supports and generates code for exactly that assembler.
I suggest you build a new version of gcc first (configured to use the gnu tools), and then use that to build ghc.