New to Dynamics AX,how to get all the item in particular wmslocation and what is the relation b/w wmslocation and inventTable?
The easiest way to do this would be to create an on-hand counting journal for that WMS location.
There is no direct relation between these two tables. The item id from the inventtable can be used to connect to the inventtrans table. The inventtrans table has the itemid, transaction type (inventory transaction, transfer, item counting, etc) and the InventDimID. The InventDim table has a link to the particular dimension group you are looking for (wmslocationid).
So the SQL would look something like:
select distinct (itemid) from inventTrans where inventdimid in
(select inventDimid from inventDim
where wmslocationid = 'WMSLocationID you care about here')
Related
I'm developing a functionality that fills a collection, using two select lists, with a shuttle . I'm not getting the correct way to display the name, and recover its correspondent id, on shuttle's select item at right side, when I change an specific list, after repeated interventions. I developed a procedure to update, insert or delete the selected items on shuttle, and I suppose its works well after several tests on sql commands.
My test case uses three tables : contracts, worksations and employees. I intend to insert the employees of any workstation of a given contract to another contract. That new contract, whose will receive the employees, must have its owns workstations, previously inserted. The general structure of the tables is:
contracts : pk_contract, number_contract, company_name etc...
workstations : pk_workstation, fk_contract, description etc...
employees: pk_employee, fk_workstation, employee_name, employee_sex etc...
I created an app to demonstrate it: https://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=43921
USER: test,
PASSWORD : TEST
Page 2- Migrate Employees - has three major regions, and 2 another to display information inserted :
Contracts with a select list, that must choice, preferrable the contract 070/2016, witch have workstation inserted, and a display field with static value, representing a contract, with workstations and employees attached.
workstations: with two select list, the gordian knot, I suppose : old workstations, related original contract's wokstations - related to display field, at contract's region; and new workstation, related to new contract selected above.
Employees: with a shuttle that represents, at left side, a bunch of employees, of a given original workstation and button witch do nothing.
Two more regions representing a classical report, only to inform the inserted, updated or deleted employees, from shuttles right size, using a collection. I made two report's regions because don't know make joins with collections and tables. This collection have the employee id, old_workstation id, new_workstation id, and new contract id, for further migration, not yet implemented.
I'm submiting almost all the fields, for recover its values on apex session's state.
Apparently, the collection works well, with a procedure, but when I choose again the original worksation the shuttle don't display, on right size, the previous inserted employee on that workstation. I configured on my list of values to not include extra values, when i change it, it shows the employee's ids, not their names, regards to source type listed here below:
SELECT e.pk_employee
FROM tb_employee e
INNER JOIN tb_workstation pt
ON pt.pk_workstation = e.fk_workstation
WHERE pt.typo IS NOT NULL
AND e.fk_workstation = p2_original_workstation
AND e.pk_employee IN (
SELECT to_number(c001) AS id_employee
FROM apex_collections
WHERE collection_name = 'WORKSTATION_EMPLOYEES');
My shutlle's lov has this rationale:
SELECT e.name, e.pk_employee
FROM tb_employee e
INNER JOIN tb_workstation pt
ON pt.pk_workstation = e.fk_workstation
WHERE pt.typo IS NOT NULL
AND e.fk_workstation = p2_original_workstation
AND e.pk_employee NOT IN (
SELECT to_number(c001) AS id_employee
FROM apex_collections
WHERE collection_name = 'WORKSTATION_EMPLOYEES');
Could anyone help me on this issue?
Regards!
I consider this a regular and fine solution. The shuttle permits recover entire registers on left side, changing it to another original workstation. After have removed the last "and" subclause, added at SHUTTLE an source sql query - return colon separated value, like this:
select e.pk_employee from employee e
inner join workstations w on w.pk_workstation = e.fk_workstation
where w.typo is not null and e.fk_workstation = :P2_ORIGINAL_WORKSTATION and e.pk_employee in (
SELECT TO_NUMBER(c001) as id_employee FROM APEX_collections WHERE collection_name = 'WORKSTATION_EMPLOYEES' and c002 = :P2_NEW_WORKSTATION);
But for purpose of goood usabilty, and my better interpretation that what shuttle obect does, I reinsert the 'and' clause with an 'and' more, reflecting that on lov has all employees of a given original workstation, except by the employees also inserted and that ones became from another new workstations. This particularité avoids the user thinks that a employee previously attached, on new workstation needed to be inserted:
select e.name, e.employee from employees e
inner join workstations w on w.pk_workstation = e.workstation
where w.typo is not null and e.worktation = :P2_ORIGINAL_WORKSTATION and e.pk_employee not in (
SELECT TO_NUMBER(c001) as id_employee FROM APEX_collections WHERE collection_name = 'WORKSTATION_EMPLOYEES' and c002 != :P2_NEW_WORKSTATION)
I could be consider use without these cited subclauses, using a disable jquery, in case of same original_wrkstion but at a diferent new, at left size, however its will be an improvement, and I need to understand the jqueries features. I consider this an basic and good, yet functional solution.
TablePatient.Patient_ID(PK)
TableProviders.Encounter (joins to PK)
TableProviders.Provider_Type
TableProviders.Provider_ID
TableNames.Full_Name
TableNames.Provider_ID (joins to Table Names)
I want a query that will give, for all the Patient_IDs, the Full_Name of the provider for every Provider ID.
There are about 30 provider_types.
I have made this already using a left join a ton of left joins. It takes a long time to run and I am thinking there is a trick I am missing.
Any help?
Ok, my previous answer didn't match at all what you meant. You want to pivot the table to have on each line one Patient_ID with every Full_name for every provider_type. I assume that each patient has only one provider for one type and not more ; if more, you will have more than one row for each patient, and anyway I don't think it's really possible.
Here is my solution with pivot. The first part is to make it more understandable, so I create a table named TABLE_PATIENT in a subquery.
WITH TABLE_PATIENT AS
(
SELECT TablePatient.Patient_ID,
TableProviders.Provider_Type,
TableNames.Full_Name
FROM TablePatient LEFT JOIN
TableProviders on TablePatient.Patient_ID = TableProviders.Encounter
LEFT JOIN
TableNames on TableNames.Provider_ID = TableProviders.Provider_ID
group by TablePatient.Patient_ID,
TableProviders.Provider_Type,
TableNames.Full_Name
)
SELECT *
FROM TABLE_PATIENT
PIVOT
(
min(Full_name)
for Provider_type in ([type1], [type2],[type3])
) AS PVT
So TABLE_PATIENT just has many rows for each patient, with one provider each row, and the pivot puts everything on a single row. Tell me if something doesn't work.
You need to write every type you want in the [type1],[type2] etc. Just put them inside [], no other character needed as ' or anything else.
If you put only some types, then the query will not show providers of other types.
Tell me if something doesn't work.
If I understand what you mean, you just want to group the answer by Patient Id and then Provider ID. A full name is unique on a provider id right ?
This should be something like
SELECT TablePatient.Patient_ID,
TableProviders.Provider_ID,
TableNames.Full_Name
FROM TablePatient LEFT JOIN
TableProviders on TablePatient.Patient_ID = TableProviders.Encounter
LEFT JOIN
TableNames on TableNames.Provider_ID = TablerProviders.Provider_ID
group by TablePatient.Patient_ID,
TableProviders.Provider_ID,
TableNames.Full_Name
You can either group by TableNames.Full_Name or select First(TableNames.Full_Name) for example if indeed a full name is unique to a provider ID.
Note : I used the SQL server Syntax, there can be différences with Oracle ..
I have these three tables :
RESEARCHER(Re_Id, Re_Name, Re_Address, Re_Phone, Re_HomePhoneNumber,
Re_OfficeNumber, Re_FirstScore, Re_Second_Score)
PUBLICATION(Pub_ID, Pub_Title, Pub_Type, Pub_Publisher, Pub_Year,Pub_Country, Pub_StartingPage, Pub_Number_of_Page, Score1, Score2)
WRITTEN_BY(Re_Id, Pub_ID)
I want to change the authors of the publication “Introduction to Database System” to “Henry Gordon” and “Sarah Parker”.
The problem is in WRITTEN_BY table,I just store the researcher's ID and publication's ID.
My idea is to change the Re_Id in WRITTEN_BY by those names are "Henry Gorgon" , "Sarah Parker" , which are already existed in RESEARCHER table
UPDATE WRITTEN_BY
SET Re_Id = ....( SELECT Re_Id
FROM RESEACHER
WHERE Re_Name = ‘Henry Gordon’ OR Re_Name = ‘Sarah Paker’ )
WHERE Pub_ID IN ( SELECT Pub_ID
FROM PUBLICATION
WHERE Pub_Name = ‘Introduciton to Database system’ );
I have problem in the SET part,so how to write the SQL statement for that requirement?
Here is the sqlfiddle link for my schema : http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/b9118/1
I'd use something like below query:
DELETE FROM WRITTEN_BY WHERE Pub_ID IN (
SELECT Pub_ID FROM PUBLICATION
WHERE Pub_Title = 'Introduciton to Database system' )
INSERT INTO WRITTEN_BY
SELECT Re_Id,Pub_Id
FROM RESEARCHER CROSS JOIN PUBLICATION
WHERE Re_Name = 'Henry Gordon' OR Re_Name = 'Sarah Paker'
AND Pub_Title like 'Introduciton to Database system'
SELECT * FROM WRITTEN_BY
The idea is to first drop the existing mapping- you should not update it- and the insert a new one.
The reason for delete/insert approach vs update in case of mapping table is justified in favor of delete/insert as most mapping tables contain many-many mapping and usually one-to-many mappings.
Initially we may have a book mapped to say n number of authors where n <>1 then we either add extra rows, or are left with extraneous rows.
See sample fiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!6/a0e72/13
The real deal however is CROSS JOIN. This does not take any ON like other JOINs and is used to produce cartesian product type map.
We are restricting it to get only limited number of rows as per our need by adding suitable WHERE clauses
I am trying to get all records from an entity that do not join to another entity.
This is what I am trying to do in SQL:
SELECT * from table1
LEFT join table2
ON table1.code = table2.code
WHERE table2.code IS NULL
It results in all table1 rows that did not join to table2.
I have it working with Linq when joining on one field, but I have contact records to join on firstname, dob, and number.
I have a "staging" entity that is imported to; a workflow processes the staging records and creates contacts if they are new.
The staging entity is pretty much a copy of the real entity.
var queryable = from staging in linq.mdo_staging_contactSet
join contact in linq.ContactSet
on staging.mdo_code equals contact.mdo_code
into contactGroup
from contact in contactGroup.DefaultIfEmpty()
// all staging records are selected, even if I put a where clause here
select new Contact
{
// import sequence number is set to null if the staging contact joined to the default contact, which has in id of null
ImportSequenceNumber = (contactContactId == null) ? new int?(subImportNo) : null,
/* other fields get populated */
};
return queryable // This is all staging Contacts, the below expressions product only the new Contacts
.AsEnumerable() // Cannot use the below query on IQuerable
.Where(contact => contact.ImportSequenceNumber != null); // ImportSequenceNumber is null for existing Contacts, and not null for new Contacts
Can I do the same thing using method syntax?
Can I do the above and join on multiple fields?
The alternatives I found were worse and involved using newRecords.Except(existingRecords), but with IEnumerables; is there a better way?
You can do the same thing with method calls, but some tend to find it harder to read since there are some LAMBDA expressions in the middle. Here is an example that shows how the two are basically the same.
I've seen others ask this same questions and it boils down to choice by the developer. I personally like the LINQ approach since I also write a bunch of SQL and I can read the code easier.
I have three of many tables in Oracle (10g) database as listed below. I'm using Hibernate Tools 3.2.1.GA with Spring version 3.0.2.
Product - parent table
Colour - parent table
ProductColour - join table - references colourId and prodId of Colour and Product tables respectively
Where the ProductColour is a join table between Product and Colour. As the table names imply, there is a many-to-many relationship between Product and ProductColour. I think, the relationship in the database can easily be imagined and is clear with only this much information. Therefore, I'm not going to explore this relationship at length.
One entity (row) in Product is associated with any number entities in Colour and one entity (row) in Colour can also be associated with any number of entities in Product.
Let's say as for an example, I need to count the number of rows available in the Product table (regarding Hibernate), it can be done something like the following.
Object rowCount = session.createCriteria(Product.class)
.setProjection(Projections.rowCount()).uniqueResult();
What if I need to count the number of rows available in the ProductColour table? Since, it is a many-to-many relationship, it is mapped in the Product and the Colour entity classes (POJOs) with there respective java.util.Set and no direct POJO class for the ProductColour table is available. So the preceding row-counting statement doesn't seem to work in this scenario.
Is there a precise way to count the number of rows of such a join entity in Hibernate?
I think you should be able to do a JPQL or HQL along the lines.
SELECT count(p.colors) FROM Product AS p WHERE p.name = :name ... other search criteria etc
or
SELECT count(c.products) FROM Color AS c WHERE c.name = :name .... other search criteria
From Comment below, this should work:
Long colours=(Long) session.createQuery("select count(*) as cnt from Colour colour where colour.colourId in(select colours.colourId from Product product inner join product.colours colours where product.prodId=:prodId)").setParameter("prodId", prodId).uniqueResult();