GNU bash, version 1.14.7(1)
I have a script is called "abc.sh"
I have to check this from abc.sh script only...
inside it I have written following statement
status=`ps -efww | grep -w "abc.sh" | grep -v grep | grep -v $$ | awk '{ print $2 }'`
if [ ! -z "$status" ]; then
echo "[`date`] : abc.sh : Process is already running"
exit 1;
fi
I know it's wrong because every time it exits as it found its own process in 'ps'
how to solve it?
how can I check that script is already running or not from that script only ?
An easier way to check for a process already executing is the pidof command.
if pidof -x "abc.sh" >/dev/null; then
echo "Process already running"
fi
Alternatively, have your script create a PID file when it executes. It's then a simple exercise of checking for the presence of the PID file to determine if the process is already running.
#!/bin/bash
# abc.sh
mypidfile=/var/run/abc.sh.pid
# Could add check for existence of mypidfile here if interlock is
# needed in the shell script itself.
# Ensure PID file is removed on program exit.
trap "rm -f -- '$mypidfile'" EXIT
# Create a file with current PID to indicate that process is running.
echo $$ > "$mypidfile"
...
Update:
The question has now changed to check from the script itself. In this case, we would expect to always see at least one abc.sh running. If there is more than one abc.sh, then we know that process is still running. I'd still suggest use of the pidof command which would return 2 PIDs if the process was already running. You could use grep to filter out the current PID, loop in the shell or even revert to just counting PIDs with wc to detect multiple processes.
Here's an example:
#!/bin/bash
for pid in $(pidof -x abc.sh); do
if [ $pid != $$ ]; then
echo "[$(date)] : abc.sh : Process is already running with PID $pid"
exit 1
fi
done
I you want the "pidof" method, here is the trick:
if pidof -o %PPID -x "abc.sh">/dev/null; then
echo "Process already running"
fi
Where the -o %PPID parameter tells to omit the pid of the calling shell or shell script. More info in the pidof man page.
Here's one trick you'll see in various places:
status=`ps -efww | grep -w "[a]bc.sh" | awk -vpid=$$ '$2 != pid { print $2 }'`
if [ ! -z "$status" ]; then
echo "[`date`] : abc.sh : Process is already running"
exit 1;
fi
The brackets around the [a] (or pick a different letter) prevent grep from finding itself. This makes the grep -v grep bit unnecessary. I also removed the grep -v $$ and fixed the awk part to accomplish the same thing.
Working solution:
if [[ `pgrep -f $0` != "$$" ]]; then
echo "Another instance of shell already exist! Exiting"
exit
fi
Edit: I checked out some comments lately, so I tried attempting same with some debugging. I will also will explain it.
Explanation:
$0 gives filename of your running script.
$$ gives PID of your running script.
pgrep searches for process by name and returns PID.
pgrep -f $0 searches by filename, $0 being the current bash script filename and returns its PID.
So, pgrep checks if your script PID ($0) is equal to current running script ($$). If yes, then the script runs normally. If no, that means there's another PID with same filename running, so it exits. The reason I used pgrep -f $0 instead of pgrep bash is that you could have multiple instances of bash running and thus returns multiple PIDs. By filename, its returns only single PID.
Exceptions:
Use bash script.sh not ./script.sh as it doesn't work unless you have shebang.
Fix: Use #!/bin/bash shebang at beginning.
The reason sudo doesn't work is that it returns pgrep returns PID of both bash and sudo, instead of returning of of bash.
Fix:
#!/bin/bash
pseudopid="`pgrep -f $0 -l`"
actualpid="$(echo "$pseudopid" | grep -v 'sudo' | awk -F ' ' '{print $1}')"
if [[ `echo $actualpid` != "$$" ]]; then
echo "Another instance of shell already exist! Exiting"
exit
fi
while true
do
echo "Running"
sleep 100
done
The script exits even if the script isn't running. That is because there's another process having that same filename. Try doing vim script.sh then running bash script.sh, it'll fail because of vim being opened with same filename
Fix: Use unique filename.
Someone please shoot me down if I'm wrong here
I understand that the mkdir operation is atomic, so you could create a lock directory
#!/bin/sh
lockdir=/tmp/AXgqg0lsoeykp9L9NZjIuaqvu7ANILL4foeqzpJcTs3YkwtiJ0
mkdir $lockdir || {
echo "lock directory exists. exiting"
exit 1
}
# take pains to remove lock directory when script terminates
trap "rmdir $lockdir" EXIT INT KILL TERM
# rest of script here
Here's how I do it in a bash script:
if ps ax | grep $0 | grep -v $$ | grep bash | grep -v grep
then
echo "The script is already running."
exit 1
fi
This allows me to use this snippet for any bash script. I needed to grep bash because when using with cron, it creates another process that executes it using /bin/sh.
I find the answer from #Austin Phillips is spot on. One small improvement I'd do is to add -o (to ignore the pid of the script itself) and match for the script with basename (ie same code can be put into any script):
if pidof -x "`basename $0`" -o $$ >/dev/null; then
echo "Process already running"
fi
pidof wasn't working for me so I searched some more and came across pgrep
for pid in $(pgrep -f my_script.sh); do
if [ $pid != $$ ]; then
echo "[$(date)] : my_script.sh : Process is already running with PID $pid"
exit 1
else
echo "Running with PID $pid"
fi
done
Taken in part from answers above and https://askubuntu.com/a/803106/802276
Use the PS command in a little different way to ignore child process as well:
ps -eaf | grep -v grep | grep $PROCESS | grep -v $$
I create a temporary file during execution.
This is how I do it:
#!/bin/sh
# check if lock file exists
if [ -e /tmp/script.lock ]; then
echo "script is already running"
else
# create a lock file
touch /tmp/script.lock
echo "run script..."
#remove lock file
rm /tmp/script.lock
fi
I have found that using backticks to capture command output into a variable, adversly, yeilds one too many ps aux results, e.g. for a single running instance of abc.sh:
ps aux | grep -w "abc.sh" | grep -v grep | wc -l
returns "1". However,
count=`ps aux | grep -w "abc.sh" | grep -v grep | wc -l`
echo $count
returns "2"
Seems like using the backtick construction somehow temporarily creates another process. Could be the reason why the topicstarter could not make this work. Just need to decrement the $count var.
I didn't want to hardcode abc.sh in the check, so I used the following:
MY_SCRIPT_NAME=`basename "$0"`
if pidof -o %PPID -x $MY_SCRIPT_NAME > /dev/null; then
echo "$MY_SCRIPT_NAME already running; exiting"
exit 1
fi
This is compact and universal
# exit if another instance of this script is running
for pid in $(pidof -x `basename $0`); do
[ $pid != $$ ] && { exit 1; }
done
The cleanest fastest way:
processAlreadyRunning () {
process="$(basename "${0}")"
pidof -x "${process}" -o $$ &>/dev/null
}
For other variants (like AIX) that don't have pidof or pgrep. Reliability is greatly improved by getting a "static" view of the process table as opposed to piping it directly to grep. Setting IFS to null will preserve the carriage returns when the ps output is assigned to a variable.
#!/bin/ksh93
IFS=""
script_name=$(basename $0)
PSOUT="$(ps ax)"
ANY_TEXT=$(echo $PSOUT | grep $script_name | grep -vw $$ | grep $(basename $SHELL))
if [[ $ANY_TEXT ]]; then
echo "Process is already running"
echo "$ANY_TEXT"
exit
fi
[ "$(pidof -x $(basename $0))" != $$ ] && exit
https://github.com/x-zhao/exit-if-bash-script-already-running/blob/master/script.sh
Related
I'm trying to write a script that will check if a script is already running, and not run it on cron if its still going from the last run. I found another post on here where they suggested using:
echo `pgrep -f $0` . "!=" . "$$";
if [[ `pgrep -f $0` != "$$" ]];
While this seems to work when I run it manually in SSH, it gives weird results when run via cron:
14767 14770 . != . 14770
Is this because there are 2 processes running with 2 different pids?
I have come up with this as an alternative:
if [ -n "$(ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep 'run.sh' | wc -l)" > 2 ];
then
echo "already running"
else
# do some stuff here
fi
Running the command on its own seems to work as expected:
# ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep 'run.sh' | wc -l)
2
But when in the code, it always shows "already running" , even though my condition is not met:
bash run.sh
2
already running
Maybe I'm doing something wrong with the variable as an int?
UPDATE: As suggested, I am trying flock:
#!/bin/bash
[ "${FLOCKER}" != "$0" ] && exec env FLOCKER="$0" flock -en "$0" "$0" "$#" || :
#... rest of code here
But I get:
flock: failed to execute run.sh: No such file or directory
You could write your code like that but it will be complex and errorprone. Better to use file-locking. The flock command exists for this. Its man-page provides various examples you can cut and paste, including:
#!/bin/bash
[ "${FLOCKER}" != "$0" ] && exec env FLOCKER="$0" flock -en "$0" "$0" "$#" || :
# ... rest of code ...
This is useful boilerplate code for shell scripts. Put it at
the top of the shell script you want to lock and it'll automatically
lock itself on the first run. If the env var $FLOCKER is
not set to the shell script that is being run, then execute
flock and grab an exclusive non-blocking lock (using the script
itself as the lock file) before re-execing itself with the right
arguments. It also sets the FLOCKER env var to the right value
so it doesn't run again.
man flock for details.
So I've looked up other questions and answers for this and as you can imagine, there are lots of ways to find this. However, my situation is kind of different.
I'm able to check whether a bash script is already running or not and I want to kill the script if it's already running.
The problem is that with the below code, -since I'm running this within the same script- the script kills itself too because it sees a script already running.
result=`ps aux | grep -i "myscript.sh" | grep -v "grep" | wc -l`
if [ $result -ge 1 ]
then
echo "script is running"
else
echo "script is not running"
fi
So how can I check if a script is already running besides it's own self and kill itself if there's another instance of the same script is running, else, continue without killing itself.
I thought I could combine the above code with $$ command to find the script's own PID and differentiate them this way but I'm not sure how to do that.
Also a side note, my script can be run multiple times at the same time within the same machine but with different arguments and that's fine. I only need to identify if script is already running with the same arguments.
pid=$(pgrep myscript.sh | grep -x -v $$)
# filter non-existent pids
pid=$(<<<"$pid" xargs -n1 sh -c 'kill -0 "$1" 2>/dev/null && echo "$1"' --)
if [ -n "$pid" ]; then
echo "Other script is running with pid $pid"
echo "Killing him!"
kill $pid
fi
pgrep lists the pids that match the name myscript.sh. From the list we filter current $$ shell with grep -v. It the result is non-empty, then you could kill the other pid.
Without the xargs, it would work, but the pgrep myscript.sh will pick up the temporary pid created for command substitution or the pipe. So the pid will never be empty and the kill will always execute complaining about the non-existent process. To do that, for each pid in pids, I check if the pid exists with kill -0. If it does, then it is outputted, effectively filtering all nonexistent pids.
You could also use a normal for loop to filter the pids:
# filter non-existent pids
pid=$(
for i in $pid; do
if kill -0 "$i" 2>/dev/null; then
echo "$i"
fi
done
)
Alternatively, you could use flock to lock the file and use lsof to list current open files with filtering the current one. As it is now, I think it will kill also editors that are editing the file and such. I believe the lsof output could be better filtered to accommodate this.
if [ "${FLOCKER}" != "$0" ]; then
pids=$(lsof -p "^$$" -- ./myscript.sh | awk 'NR>1{print $2}')
if [ -n "$pids" ]; then
echo "Other processes with $(echo $pids) found. Killing them"
kill $pids
fi
exec env FLOCKER="$0" flock -en "$0" "$0" "$#"
fi
I would go with either of 2 ways to solve this problem.
1st solution: Create a watchdog file lets say a .lck file kind of on a location before starting the script's execution(Make sure we use trap etc commands in case script is aborted so that .lck file should be removed) AND remove it once execution of script is completed successfully.
Example script for 1st solution: This is just an example a test one. We need to take care of interruptions in the script, lets say script got interrupted by a command or etc then we could use trap in it too, since at that time it would have not been completed but you may need to kick it off again(since last time it was not completed).
cat file.ksh
#!/bin/bash
PWD=`pwd`
watchdog_file="$PWD/script.lck"
if [[ -f "$watchdog_file" ]]
then
echo "Please wait script is still running, exiting from script now.."
exit 1;
else
touch $watchdog_file
fi
while true
do
echo "singh" > test1
done
if [[ -f "$watchdog_file" ]]
then
rm "$watchdog_file"
fi
2nd solution: Take pid of current running shell using $$ save it in a file. Then check if that process is still running come out of script if NOT running then move on to run statements in script.
I want to stall the execution of my script until a process is closed (I have the PID stored in a variable).
#!/bin/bash
outputl=$( ps -ef | grep $var4 | awk '{print $2}' ) >> $logfile
while [ "ps -p $outputl" ] > /dev/null;
do
sleep 1;
done
echo "Stopped $instance" >> $logfile
//command...
It stays in the "while" and not continue whit script.
This line:
while [ "ps -p $output1" ]
does not execute the ps command. It simply tests whether the string "ps -p $output1" is not empty, and it obviously isn't. To test the output of a command, use $():
while [ "$(ps -p "$output1")" ]
But since ps produces a header, this will always be true. The best way to test if a PID exists is to use the kill command with signal 0; this doesn't actually send a signal, it just tests whether it's possible to send a signal. I'm assuming this code is being run either by root or the userid running the application being checked. So you can write:
while kill -0 "$output1" 2>/dev/null
Also, your code for getting the PID into $output1 is wrong. ps -ef will also include the grep command, which matches the name you're looking for, so you need to filter that out. Use:
output1=$(ps -ef | grep "$var4" | awk '!/grep/ { print $2 }')
Redirecting the output to $logfile is not necessary, since variable assignments don't print anything.
Many systems have a pgrep command, which can be used by itself to test if a process with a given name exists; if you have this, you can use it instead of reinventing the wheel (and if not, you should be able to install it).
If you have the PID then just wait for it to complete. Try:
outputl=$( ps -ef | awk -v v="$var4" '$0~v{print $2}' )
wait "$outputl"
echo "Stopped $instance" >> $logfile
then look for a better way to find the pid in the first line.
I want to build a small script (called check_process.sh) that checks if a certain process $PROC_NAME is running. If it does, it returns its PID or -1 otherwise.
My idea is to use pgrep -f <STRING> in a command substitution.
If I run this code directly in the command line:
export ARG1=foo_name
export RES=$(pgrep -f ${ARG1})
if [[ $RES == "" ]]; then echo "-1" ; else echo "$RES"; fi
everything goes fine: PID or -1 depending on the process status.
My script check_process.sh contains the same lines plus an extra variable to pass the process' name :
#!/bin/bash
export ARG1=$1
export RES=$(pgrep -f ${ARG1})
if [[ $RES == "" ]]; then echo "-1" ; else echo "$RES"; fi
But this code does not work!
If the process is currently running I get two PIDs (the process' PID and something else...), whereas when I check a process that is not running I get the something else !
I am puzzled. Any idea?
Thanks in advance!
If you add the -a flag to pgrep inside your script, you can see something like that (I ran ./check_process.sh vlc):
17295 /usr/bin/vlc --started-from-file ~/test.mkv
18252 /bin/bash ./check_process.sh vlc
So the "something else" is the pid of the running script itself.
The pgrep manual explains the -f flag:
The pattern is normally only matched against the process name. When -f is set, the full command line is used.
Obviously, the script command line contain the lookup process name ('vlc') as an argument, hence it appears at the pgrep -f result.
If you're looking just for the process name matches you can remove the -f flag and get your desired result.
If you wish to stay with the -f flag, you can filter out the current pid:
#!/bin/bash
ARG1=$1
TMP=$(pgrep -f ${ARG1})
RES=$(echo "${TMP}" | grep -v $$)
if [[ $RES == "" ]]; then echo "-1" ; else echo "${RES}"; fi
I need to develop a shell script that would not be started if another instance of them self is running.
If I build a test.sh that monitors itself I need to know if it is already running and then abort, otherwise (if it not previously running) I can run
#!/bin/bash
loop() {
while [ 1 ]; do
echo "run";
#-- (... omissis ...)
sleep 30
done
}
daemon="`/bin/basename $0`"
pidlist=`/usr/bin/pgrep $daemon | grep -v $$`
echo "1:[ $pidlist ]"
pidlist=$(/usr/bin/pgrep $daemon | grep -v $$)
echo "2:[ $pidlist ]"
echo "3:[ `/usr/bin/pgrep $daemon | grep -v $$` ]"
echo "4:["
/usr/bin/pgrep $daemon | grep -v $$
echo "]"
if [ -z "$pidlist" ]; then
loop &
else
echo "Process $daemon is already running with pid [ $pidlist ]"
fi
exit 0;
When I run the above script for the first time (no previous instances running) I get this output:
1:[ 20341 ]
2:[ 20344 ]
3:[ 20347 ]
4:[
]
I cannot understand why only 4th attempt does not return anything (as expected). What's wrong in my script?
Do I have to redirect output of 4th command on a temporary file and then query that file in order to decide if I can run (or not) the loop function?
Thanks anyone would help me!
Sub-shells...the first three are run in sub-shells and hence $$ has changed to the PID of the sub-shell.
Try using:
PID=$$
pidlist=`/usr/bin/pgrep $daemon | grep -v $PID`
echo "1:[ $pidlist ]"
Etc. Since the value of $PID is established before the sub-shell is run, it should be the same for all of the commands.
Is this process going to be popular enough that other people want to run the same daemon on the machine? Maybe you never have multiple users on the machine, but remember that someone else might be wanting to run the command too.