How do you rewrite this in lambda?
int[] productList = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
var myProducts = from p in db.Products
where productList.Contains(p.ProductID)
select p;
Assuming that by "with lambda" you mean the "query syntax", you can rewrite your query like this:
var myProducts = db.Products.Where(p => productList.Contains(p.ProductID));
Same thing just move the logic within a Where call.
var myProducts = db.Products.Where(p => productList.Contains(p.ProductID));
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/bb397947.aspx
^ a quick read that compares query syntax to method syntax for a query to two.
Related
I have a linq query like this:
var accounts =
from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new AccountsReport
{
recordIndex = ?
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
}
I want to populate recordIndex with the value of current row number in collection returned by the LINQ. How can I get row number ?
Row number is not supported in linq-to-entities. You must first retrieve records from database without row number and then add row number by linq-to-objects. Something like:
var accounts =
(from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new
{
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
})
.AsEnumerable() // Moving to linq-to-objects
.Select((r, i) => new AccountReport
{
RecordIndex = i,
CreditRegistryId = r.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = r.AccountNo,
});
LINQ to objects has this builtin for any enumerator:
http://weblogs.asp.net/fmarguerie/archive/2008/11/10/using-the-select-linq-query-operator-with-indexes.aspx
Edit: Although IQueryable supports it too (here and here) it has been mentioned that this does unfortunately not work for LINQ to SQL/Entities.
new []{"aap", "noot", "mies"}
.Select( (element, index) => new { element, index });
Will result in:
{ { element = aap, index = 0 },
{ element = noot, index = 1 },
{ element = mies, index = 2 } }
There are other LINQ Extension methods (like .Where) with the extra index parameter overload
Try using let like this:
int[] ints = new[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
int counter = 0;
var result = from i in ints
where i % 2 == 0
let number = ++counter
select new { I = i, Number = number };
foreach (var r in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(r.Number + ": " + r.I);
}
I cannot test it with actual LINQ to SQL or Entity Framework right now. Note that the above code will retain the value of the counter between multiple executions of the query.
If this is not supported with your specific provider you can always foreach (thus forcing the execution of the query) and assign the number manually in code.
Because the query inside the question filters by a single id, I think the answers given wont help out. Ofcourse you can do it all in memory client side, but depending how large the dataset is, and whether network is involved, this could be an issue.
If you need a SQL ROW_NUMBER [..] OVER [..] equivalent, the only way I know is to create a view in your SQL server and query against that.
This Tested and Works:
Amend your code as follows:
int counter = 0;
var accounts =
from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new AccountsReport
{
recordIndex = counter++
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
}
Hope this helps.. Though its late:)
I'm trying to get the following SQL query to work in LINQ:
Select id from table1 where id in (1,2) or canceledId in (1,2)
I'm using BuildContainsExpression to achieve the "IN" condition, but I can't figure out how to implement the "or" condition.
My shot in the dark is as follows:
var identifiers = new List<int> {1,2};
var query = (from t in Context.Table1
select t);
var query =
query.Where(BuildContainsExpression<Table1, int>(t => t.Id, identifiers));
if (showCanceled)
{
var expression = query.Where(BuildContainsExpression<Table1, int>(t => t.CanceledId.Value, identifiers)).Expression;
Expression.Or(expression, transactionsQuery.Expression);
}
But I get the following exception:
The binary operator Or is not defined for the types 'System.Linq.IQueryable1[Table1]' and 'System.Linq.IQueryable1[Table1]'..
Any ideas? -Am I in the right direction?
Thanks,
Nir.
You are appending your OR in the wrong place. What you are doing now is effectively something like this:
(from t in Context.Table1
where identifiers.Contains(t.Id)
select t)
OR
(where identifiers.Contains(t.CanceledId))
The second problem is that the BuildContainsExpression method you use, returns a lambda expression, something that looks like this:
t => t.Id == 1 || t.Id == 2 || ...
You can't change this expression once it's generated. However, that's what you want because you'd like to have something like this:
t => t.Id == 1 || t.Id == 2 || ... || t.CanceledId == 1 || t.CanceledId == 2 || ...
You can't simply take the body of this lambda expression and or it together with another expression because it depends on the parameter t.
So what you can do is the following:
// Overload of BuildContainsExpression.
private static Expression<Func<T, bool>> BuildOtherContainsExpression<T>(
ParameterExpression p, Expression field1, Expression field2, int[] values)
{
var eq1 = values.Select(v => Expression.Equal(field1, Expression.Constant(v)));
var eq2 = values.Select(v => Expression.Equal(field2, Expression.Constant(v)));
var body = eq1.Aggregate((acc, equal) => Expression.Or(acc, equal));
body = eq2.Aggregate(body, (acc, equal) => Expression.Or(acc, equal));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(body, p);
}
// Create a parameter expression that represents something of type Table1.
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Table1), "t");
// Create two field expressions that refer to a field of the parameter.
var idField = Expression.Property(parameter, "Id");
var canceledIdField = Expression.Property(parameter, "CanceledId");
// And finally the call to this method.
query.Where(BuildContainsExpression<Table1>(
parameter, idField, canceledIdField, identifiers));
Your if statement would now look like this:
if (!showCanceled)
{
// Use original version of BuildContainsExpression.
}
else
{
// Create some expressions and use overloaded version of BuildContainsExpression.
}
I know I'm a bit late to the party here - but I think the original code in the original poster's question was 99% right.
The only wrong was that instead of
Expression.Or
it should have been
Expression.OrElse
If I get two result IQueryable from different linq Query and I want to merge them together and return one as result, how to to this?
For example, if:
var q1 = (IQueryable<Person>).....;
var q2 = (IQueryable<Person>).....;
how to merge q1 and q2 together and get result like
var q = (IQueryable<Person>)q1.Union(q2);
You have it, q1.Union(q2). The Union is in the System.Linq namespace with Queryable.
You can try the Concat Method
Something like this
int[] i1 = new int[] { 1, 2, 3 };
int[] i2 = new int[] { 3, 4 };
//returns 5 values
var i3 = i1.AsQueryable().Concat(i2.AsQueryable());
//returns 4 values
var i4 = i1.AsQueryable().Union(i2.AsQueryable());
Union will only give you the DISTINCT values, Concat will give you the UNION ALL.
(q1.Union(q2)).AsQuerable()
With NHibernate Union is not possible.
You have to process on the client side instead of DB processing the union.
I convert IQueryable to IENumerable with AsEnumerable and then use Concat extension.
var allItems = q1.AsEnumerable().Concat(q2)
Regards,
Sebastian
How can I join 2 lists of equal lengths (to produce a 3rd list of equal length) where I do not want to specify a condition but simply rely on the order of items in the 2 lists.
Eg how can I join:
{1,2,3,4} with {5,6,7,8}
to produce:
{{1,5}, {2,6}, {3,7}, {4,8}}
I have tried the following:
from i in new []{1,2,3,4}
from j in new []{5,6,7,8}
select new { i, j }
but this produces a cross join. When I use join, I always need to specify the "on".
You could use Select in the first list, use the item index and access the element on the second list:
var a = new [] {1,2,3,4};
var b = new [] {5,6,7,8};
var qry = a.Select((i, index) => new {i, j = b[index]});
If you are using .Net 4.0, you can use the Zip extension method and Tuples.
var a = new [] {1,2,3,4};
var b = new [] {5,6,7,8};
var result = a.Zip(b, (an, bn) => Tuple.Create(an, bn));
Alternatively, you can keep them as arrays:
var resultArr = a.Zip(b, (an, bn) => new []{an, bn});
There is a half way solution, if you want to use query syntax. Half way in the sense that you need to use the Select method on both lists in order to get the indexes that you will use in the where clause.
int[] list1 = {1,2,3,4};
int[] list2 = {5,6,7,8};
var result = from item1 in list1.Select((value, index) => new {value, index})
from item2 in list2.Select((value, index) => new {value, index})
where item1.index == item2.index
select new {Value1 = item1.value, Value2 = item2.value};
The benefit with this solution is that it wont fail if the lists have different lengths, as the solution using the indexer would do.
What do I put in my order by?? I want to order by Name. I have moved the orderby after the distinct because I read that it needs to be done last.
var result = (from r in db.RecordDocs
where r.RecordID == recordID
select new
{
DocTypeID = r.Document.DocType.DocTypeID,
Name = r.Document.DocType.Name,
Number = r.Document.DocType.Number
}
).Distinct().OrderBy( );
Just do
.OrderBy(doc => doc.Name)
Another option, if you really prefer the query expression syntax would be to chain your query construction across multiple statements:
var query = from r in db.RecordDocs
where r.RecordID == recordID
select new
{
DocTypeID = r.Document.DocType.DocTypeID,
Name = r.Document.DocType.Name,
Number = r.Document.DocType.Number
};
query = query.Disctinct();
query = from doc in query orderby doc.Name select doc;
Since all of these methods are deferred, this will result in the exact same execution performance.