I have a function:
private void FindEmployees(object source, MyEventArgs e)
{
using (SqliteConnection conn = new SqliteConnection(connectionString))
{
conn.Open();
using (MyDataContext db = new MyDataContext(conn))
{
IQueryable<Employee> employees = from g in db.Employees
where g.Name == e.Name
orderby g.Name
select g;
if (employees.Count() == 0)
{
MessageBox.Show("Not found");
}
else
{
Employee employee = employees.First<Employee>();
txtAddress.Text = employee.Address;
}
}
}
}
My program calls this function every 3 second with random "e.Name" (real names from DB) for test memory leaks.
After 12 hours Linux killed my program, because it have eaten all free memory.
Please, anybody help me!
If I comment the rows below, there is no leaks!
Employee employee = employees.First<Employee>();
txtAddress.Text = employee.Address;
Related
I'm trying to get the daa from windows azure storage but I'm getting table not found. I've already saw the others answers but nothing works...
I did try this:
private void popula()
{
var account = CloudStorageAccount.Parse(RoleEnvironment.GetConfigurationSettingValue("Conn"));
account.CreateCloudTableClient().CreateTableIfNotExist("fiscal");
var context = new CRUDManifestacoesEntities(account.TableEndpoint.ToString(), account.Credentials);
Hashtable ht = (Hashtable)ViewState["filtro"];
var teste = ViewState["x"].ToString();
if (ht == null)
GridView1.DataSource = context.SelectConc(teste);
else
GridView1.DataSource = context.SelectConc(ht);
}
public List<ManifestacaoGrid> SelectConc(string conc)
{
conc = Crypto.DecryptString(conc);
IQueryable<ManifestacaoEntity> results = null;
if (!conc.Equals("dfg"))
results = from c in ManifestacaoEntities where c.concessionaria == conc select c;
else
results = from c in ManifestacaoEntities select c;
var query = results.AsTableServiceQuery<ManifestacaoEntity>();
var queryResults = query.Execute();
List<ManifestacaoGrid> al = new List<ManifestacaoGrid>();
foreach (ManifestacaoEntity mf in queryResults)
{
.......
}
I'm getting this error:
TableNotFoundThe table specified does not exist.
RequestId:285f6ef7-b1ce-4c21-9406-3e9f6a58755b
Time:2014-01-15T14:30:55.7989535Z
EDIT: I did print '_account' to see if the credentials are correct:
var credencial = "Connection string with sensitive data: " + account.ToString(true);
and the AccountName and AccountKey are correct ...but how can I know if the requested table is correct?
The secundary key is needed in storage account?
I did found the problem. I write
public IQueryable<UserEntity> UserEntities
{
get
{
return this.CreateQuery<UserEntity>("tableName");
}
}
Instead of:
public IQueryable<UserEntity> UserEntities
{
get
{
return this.CreateQuery<UserEntity>("UserEntities");
}
}
I want to display all records from table of current autorized user in my ASP.NET-MVC 3 + SQL Server 2008 app. But I have some problems:
this code with LINQ-request working good:
public ActionResult Index(todo obj)
{
string u = User.Identity.Name;
var th = (from tt in _db.todo select tt);
return View(th);
}
but this code not work:
public ActionResult Index(todo obj)
{
string u = User.Identity.Name;
var th = (from tt in _db.todo where obj.login == u select tt);
return View(th);
}
and this code is working good
if (u == obj.login) { ViewBag.res = "ok"; } else { ViewBag.res = "fail"; }
What I do wrong, please help me.
You probably want to run your where criteria against the table you're querying, instead of against the argument from the method, i.e.:
var th = (from tt in _db.todo where tt.login == u select tt);
instead of obj.login == u, try
obj.Contains(u)
I have converted the following SQL query to LINQ with the exception of the "NOT IN" subquery.
What would be the most effective way to implement this using LINQ? Should I use a join instead?
If anybody is able to provide an example or some guidance, I'd appreciate it.
New LINQ Query:
return from objOpenCalls in db.OpenItemss
from objTasks in db.Tasks
.Where(t => (t.Task_ID == objOpenCalls.Parent_Task_ID))
where ((objTasks.Item_ID > 0) && (objTasks.Type_ID > 0) && (objTasks.OwnerTypeItem_ID == user) && (objOpenCalls.CallEnd < DateTime.Now))
orderby objOpenCalls.CallStart descending
select new CallMiniViewModel
{
ID = objOpenCalls.ID,
CallStart = objOpenCalls.CallStart,
Name = objTasks.Task_Title
};
Old SQL Query:
SELECT TOP (100) ta.ID, t.Task_Title, ta.CallStart
FROM OpenItems AS ta INNER JOIN
Tasks AS t ON ta.Parent_Task_ID = t.Task_ID
WHERE
(t.Item_ID > 0) AND (t.[Type_ID] > 0) AND (ta.CallStart > DATEADD(m, -6, GETDATE()))
AND (ta.ID NOT IN (SELECT CallId FROM CallFeedback)) AND (t.OwnerTypeItem_ID = #Username) AND (ta.CallEnd < GETDATE())
ORDER BY ta.CallStart DESC
There are a couple of ways of doing the not in. Below is just a quick sample put in LinqPad as a test.
class MyClass {
public int Id {get;set;}
}
void Main()
{
int[] myItems = new[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
IEnumerable<MyClass> classes = new []{
new MyClass { Id = 3 },
new MyClass { Id = 6 },
new MyClass { Id = 8 }
};
var results = from cl in classes
where !myItems.Contains( cl.Id )
select cl;
foreach(var result in results) {
Console.WriteLine( "Class {0}", result.Id);
}
var results2 = from cl in classes
where (
from i in myItems
where i == cl.Id
select i ).Count( ) == 0
select cl;
foreach(var result in results2) {
Console.WriteLine( "Class {0}", result.Id);
}
}
I normally play with code first in LinqPad as it helps me understand any problems, and it will (if you're working with SQL) then show you what SQL the query will generate and you can fine tune a little. Sometimes it takes a little time to get your stuff able to be run in there, but it's worth it with the more complex queries.
I am having trouble to return an IEnumerable and IList, I cant do it!
I am using EF 4 with POCOs
Here's the whole method:
//public IList<Genre> GetGenresByGame(int gameId)
public IEnumerable<Genre> GetGenresByGame(int gameId)
{
using(var ctx = new XContext())
{
var results =
from t0 in ctx.GameGenres
join t1 in ctx.GenreCultureDetails on t0.GenreId equals t1.GenreId
where t0.GameId == gameId && t1.CultureId == _cultureId
select new Genre
{
GenreId = t0.GenreId,
GenreName = t1.GenreName
};
return results.ToList();
}
}
I have tried different ways that I have found on the net.. but can't make it work!
Question 2:
I saw a screencast with Julie something, saying that "You should always return an ICollection" when using EF4.
Any thoughts about that ?
BR
EDIT:
When I load the page in Debug-mode i get these errors: The ObjectContext instance has been disposed and can no longer be used for operations that require a connection. OR The entity or complex type 'XModel.Genre' cannot be constructed in a LINQ to Entities query.
Genre must not be a L2EF type. Try this:
public IEnumerable<Genre> GetGenresByGame(int gameId)
{
using(var ctx = new XContext())
{
var resultList =
from t0 in ctx.GameGenres
join t1 in ctx.GenreCultureDetails on t0.GenreId equals t1.GenreId
where t0.GameId == gameId && t1.CultureId == _cultureId
select new { t0.GenreId, t1.GenreName };
var genres = resultList.AsEnumerable().Select(o => new Genre
{
GenreId = o.GenreId,
GenreName = o.GenreName
});
return genres.ToList();
}
}
First an foremost if Genre is in the database you should select it? If you have FKs from Genre->GenreCultureDetails let me know and I can update the below, but from the looks of it you could do it like this:
using(var ctx = new XContext())
{
var results =
from g in ctx.Genre
join gcd in ctx.GenreCultureDetails on g.GenreId equals gcd.GenreId
where g.GameId == gameId && gcd.CultureId == _cultureId
select g;
return result.ToList();
}
Alternatively continue down your path select them into an annoynmous type, and then copy them. You can use select instead of convertall if you please.
IList<Genre> returnMe = Null;
using(var ctx = new XContext())
{
var results =
from t0 in ctx.GameGenres
join t1 in ctx.GenreCultureDetails on t0.GenreId equals t1.GenreId
where t0.GameId == gameId && t1.CultureId == _cultureId
select new
{
GenreId = t0.GenreId,
GenreName = t1.GenreName
};
returnMe = results.ToList().ConvertAll(x=>new Genre(){
GenreId = x.GenreId,
GenreName = x.GenreName
}
);
}
return returnMe;
this is the way i used to save record with linq: (my Q is below)
public void SaveEmployee(Employee employee)
{
using (BizNetDB db = new BizNetDB())
{
BizNet.SqlRep.Data.Employee oldEmployee = (from e in db.Employees
where e.EmployeeID == employee.EmployeeID
select e).SingleOrDefault();
if (oldEmployee == null)
{
oldEmployee = new BizNet.SqlRep.Data.Employee();
oldEmployee.BirthDate = employee.BirthDate;
oldEmployee.WorkRole = employee.WorkRole;
oldEmployee.CurrentFlag = employee.CurrentFlag;
oldEmployee.HireDate = employee.HireDate;
...
db.Employees.InsertOnSubmit(oldEmployee);
}
else
{
if (oldEmployee.BirthDate.Date != employee.BirthDate.Date)
oldEmployee.BirthDate = employee.BirthDate;
if (oldEmployee.CurrentFlag != employee.CurrentFlag)
oldEmployee.CurrentFlag = employee.CurrentFlag;
if (oldEmployee.HireDate.Date != employee.HireDate.Date)
oldEmployee.HireDate = employee.HireDate;
}
oldEmployee.ModifiedDate = DateTime.Now;
db.SubmitChanges();
employee.EmployeeID = oldEmployee.EmployeeID;
}
}
my questions are:
a. are the if statements nesccery? why not to make the assigning without the
check?
mybe the if block take more cpu..
b. why to spearate the new record block and the update block?
when the record is new it will do
db.Employees.InsertOnSubmit(oldEmployee);
and then proceed with the update routine...
The way you're doing it the only reason you need the if statement is to new it up and insert it, so I would use the if statement just for that.
I would do this instead:
public void SaveEmployee(Employee employee)
{
using (BizNetDB db = new BizNetDB())
{
BizNet.SqlRep.Data.Employee oldEmployee =
(from e in db.Employees
where e.EmployeeID == employee.EmployeeID
select e).SingleOrDefault();
if (oldEmployee == null)
{
oldEmployee = new BizNet.SqlRep.Data.Employee();
db.Employees.InsertOnSubmit(oldEmployee);
}
if (oldEmployee.BirthDate.Date != employee.BirthDate.Date)
oldEmployee.BirthDate = employee.BirthDate;
if (oldEmployee.CurrentFlag != employee.CurrentFlag)
oldEmployee.CurrentFlag = employee.CurrentFlag;
if (oldEmployee.HireDate.Date != employee.HireDate.Date)
oldEmployee.HireDate = employee.HireDate;
oldEmployee.ModifiedDate = DateTime.Now;
db.SubmitChanges();
employee.EmployeeID = oldEmployee.EmployeeID;
}
}
I also think there's a way to map one object's properties to the other, but it escapes me at the moment. It may not work for what you're trying to do anyway since it seems that you're doing some other things later anyway with the ModifiedDate and EmployeeID.