Why the account password is passed without encryption - https

By a sniffer (Fiddler), I can check out the stream sent through my PC to network. Surprisingly, I found when I log in google's account (https), the password is sent in a clear text, e.g.
POST https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLoginAuth HTTP/1.1
...
Email=abc#gmail.com&**Passwd=12345678**
My question is: why the password is passed without encryption even with a https protocol?

HTTPS encrypts the entire request and response.
However, you're telling Fiddler to decrypt using an untrusted root certificate.
In other words, you're MITMing yourself, and telling the browser to ignore the untrusted certificate.

No, the password is not sent without encryption to Google as clear text. Google is using SSL, don't worry. But you installed Fiddler on your PC. When you did so, Fiddler registered a specific root level certificate on your computer and is able to decrypt the traffic between your web browser and the internet. By installing Fiddler, you explicitly granted this application the possibility to decrypt the traffic. So, yeah, anyone able to get administrator access to a PC is able to install a root level certificate to this PC and consequently is able to decrypt all traffic between this PC and the internet. What did you expect? How do you think trojans work?
But any man-in-the-middle attacks won't work because they won't be able to decrypt the SSL traffic between your web browser and the internet.

Related

Guzzle disabling certificate verification to false, how insecure is it?

Recently I found myself working with Guzzle while making requests to another server to post and fetch some data, in some cases, tokens. But I was getting certificate invalid error and I even tried to get a new .pem certificate, but Guzzle was still not accepting and kept throwing that error. So finally, I did what the "Internet" said:
$guzzleClient = new Client([
'verify' => false
]);
Now although this solution works, I am not sure how insecure it can get. Do I need to worry? If yes, in what scenarios?
well this is a big problem if you are for example
having login system on the request you are sending using guzzle
having payment/checkout on the request
basically any sensitive data being passed to the other server
because when you pass data without SSL certificate then your requests might get caught by malicious programs like
BurbSuite / WireShark , cain and abel / EtterCap
as these programs are Sniffing programs and anyone can get a version from the internet as they are open sourced and every thing going without SSL can be intercepted by the hacker using the tools mentioned above and the hacker can look to the entire request in plaintext! so its highly recommended to use SSL connection when passing sensitive data
Worth Mentioning : now a days even SSL isn't very secure because hackers can remove it using SSLStrip tool but believe me SSL will make it much harder for them to get to your request because if they used it your website sometimes will make non-completed requests and it will notify the user that the network isn't secure this will make it very hard for the hacker to get the user's data,
TLS/SSL in common configurations is meant to give you three things:
confidentiality - no third party is able to read the messages sent and received,
integrity - no third party is able to modify the messages sent and received,
server authentication - you know who are you talking to.
What you do with setting verify to false is disabling the certificate verification. It immediately disables the server authentication feature and enables loosing confidentiality and integrity too when facing an active attacker that has access to your data stream.
How is that?
First of all TLS/SSL relieas on Public Key Infrastructure. Without going into too much details: you hold on your machine a set of certificates of so called Certification Authorities (CA) whom you trust. When you open a new communication to a service, you get the services certificates and in the process of verification you validate amongst other things if the certificate belongs to a CA you trust. If yes, then the communication may proceed. If no, then the communication channel is closed.
Attack patterns
Disabling certificate verification allows for Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks than can easily be performed in your local network (e.g. via ARP poisoning attacks), in the local network of the service you are calling or in the network between. As we usually do not trust the network completely, we tend to verify.
Imagine me performing an attack on you. I have performed ARP poisoning, now I can see all your traffic. It's encrypted, isn't it? Well, not obviously. The TCP handshake and TLS handshake you believe you have performed with the target service - you have performed with me. I have presented you not the certificate of the target service, as I am unable to fake it, but my own. But you did not validate it to reject it. I have opened a connection between me and the target service on your behalf too so I can look into the decrypted traffic, modify if necessary and reply to you to make you believe everything is ok.
First of all - all your secrets are belong to me. Second of all - I am able to perform attacks on both you and the target service (which might have been secured by authentication mechanisms, but now is not).
How to fix this?
In XXI century there should be little reason to disable TLS verification anywhere. Configuring it to work properly might be a pain though, even more when you are doing it for the first time. From my experience the most common issues in the micro service world are:
the target certificate is self-signed,
you are missing a CA root certificate in your trust store,
the microservice does provide his certificate, but does not provide an intermediate CA certificate.
It's hard to guess what your issue is. We would need to dig deeper.
While the other answers points out some really good point about how important SSL/TLS is, your connection is still encrypted and the remote endpoint you're using has https:// in it as well. So you're not entirely disabling SSL when you set verify to false if I'm not mistken. It's just less secure since that you're not verifying the certificate of the remote server if they are signed by a Certificate Authority (CA) using the CA bundle.
Do you need to worry?
If this is something on your production, ideally you'd want things to be secure and configured correctly, so yes.
By not verifying the certificate, like Marek Puchalski mentioned, there's possibility of the server might not be the one you think it is and allows mitm (man in the middle) attack as well. More about mitm here, and peer verification here.
Why is it happening & how do you fix it?
Most common issue is misconfigured server, especially PHP configuration. You can fix your PHP configuration following this guide, where you'll be using adding the CA root certificates bundle to your configuration. Alternatively you can add this to Guzzle.
Another common issue is, the remote server is using a self-signed certificate. Even if you configured your CA bundle in your trustedstore, this certificate can't be trusted since it's not signed by a trusted CA. So the server needs to configure a SSL certificated signed by a CA. If that's not possible, you can manually trust this CA root, however this comes with some security concerns as well.
Hope this helped :)

Identifying which certificate is needed in order to perform https post using Oracle utl_http

Short story
I'm trying to send a POST request from a PL/SQL script using the utl_http utility in Oracle. I've been able to send the request using http, but not https. I've added what I thought was the necessary certificates to a Oracle Wallet, and I believe they are being imported and used (but in all honesty, this is a little hard to verify). My current assumption is that calls from our DB server are passing through a proxy server, and that that is somehow messing up some part of the https / certificate functionality.
Supporting evidence (possibly?): I tried to make calls (POST requests) to a dummy service at webhook.site. Again, I got this working with http, but not https - the latter results in a cert validation error.
I then tried to replicate the behavior using postman, and that basically produces the same result, unless I fiddle around with the settings:
Initial Postman result:
Could not get any response
There was an error connecting to https://webhook.site/950...
Disabling SSL verification
Under the Post man settings, I turned off SSL Certificate Verification, and tried again. This time, I got a 200 OK response, and confirmed that the webhook received the post request fine.
It seems clear that the error is due to a missing cert, but I can't figure out which, or how to configure it. My assumption is that if I can get this to work for a webhook-url from Postman (without disabling cert verification), then I should also be able to get it to work from PL/SQL later.
When I look at the webhook site in a browser and inspect the certs, the webhook cert is the lowest cert (leaf node?). Above it there is one intermediate cert related to the company I'm working for, and then a root cert also related to the company. The root node is named something like "Company Proxy Server CA" - So I'm assuming the proxy somehow manipulates my requests and inserts it's own cert here.
I've tried downloading all of these certs and importing them into my cert store, as well as importing them under the Postman settings (under Certificates) in various combinations, but nothing seems to make any difference; all attempts at posting with HTTPS produces the following error in my Postman Console:
POST https://webhook.site/9505...
Error: unable to verify the first certificate
Any ideas about how to resolve this, or at least obtain more information about what to do would be greatly appreciated.
Switching OFF "SSL Certificate Verification" in Postman only means that it (i.e. Postman) will not check the validity of SSL certificates while making a request. Meaning that it will just send the certificates as they are. Because your connection fails if the setting in ON, this means Postman cannot verify the validity of your certificates.
This is most likely the case with the actual service you're trying to POST to, they cannot verify the certificates. Is that service outside your company network? And is it a public one or one owned by your company? Where is that service hosted? What certificate do they need?
BTW, TLS client certificates are sent as part of establishing the SSL connection, not as part of the HTTP request. The TLS handshake (and exchange/validation of client and server certificates) happens before any HTTP message is sent.
I'm thinking this might be a blocked port issue.
You said... ""Company Proxy Server CA" - So I'm assuming the proxy somehow manipulates my requests and inserts it's own cert here."
That means your client software needs your Company Proxy Server CA in its trusted certificates list. If that client's list is that of the oracle wallet...
https://knowledge.digicert.com/solution/SO979.html
This talks about how to do that.
Also, if your system running postman has a non-oracle based wallet trusted certificate (probably the operating system?) you'll have to execute something like adding the trust to your account on the workstation
https://www.thewindowsclub.com/manage-trusted-root-certificates-windows
in order to have the proxy server certificate trusted.
Once the certificate you're making the connection with has a root of trust per the effective configuration of the client being used, then you'll be able to verify the certificate.
A couple of possible issues:
The server doesn't actually support HTTPS. Connect a browser to the URL that you POST to, and see if you receive a response. (It looks like you already did this, but I'm documenting it for completeness.)
The server uses the Server Name Indication (SNI) extension to determine what certificate chain to send back, but your POSTing client doesn't send that extension. You can identify this case by looking up the IP for the host you're POSTing to, then going to https://nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn/ (obviously use the IP here, instead of the literal string 'nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn') in your browser, and checking the certificate chain it returns. If it is not the same as you get from step 1, this is your problem, and you need to figure out how to either get SNI support in your Oracle PL/SQL client or get the POST endpoint exposed on that hostname. (alternatively, you might be able to use these certificates to prime your Oracle Wallet, but they might have an issue with the hostname in the certificate not matching the hostname you connect to.)
You have a proxy in the way. I don't think this is what's going on, since that would basically only cause problems if you were doing client-side certificate authentication. (If this is the problem or is a condition, you need to import those certificates into your trusted wallet; you also need to ensure that the server you're posting from is going through the same proxy. Otherwise, you need to ensure that the certificate authority for the proxy that the machine actually running the code sees is in the wallet. This may require the assistance of the system/network administrators who run that machine and its connection to the network.)
HTTPS is a finicky beast. Many, many things must work exactly correctly for TLS connections to work and the certificates to correctly verify (the TLS port must respond, the client and server must agree to speak the same version of TLS, the client and server must agree to use the same cipher combination, the certificate chain presented by the server must be issued by a CA the client recognizes, and the leaf certificate in that chain must certify the name client requested).
SNI is needed to support multiple names on a single host without messing with the certifications of other names on the same host. Unfortunately, SNI is one of those things that has been standardized for over a decade (RFC 3546), but many enterprise-grade softwares haven't implemented.

Why make use of HTTPS when Fiddler can decrypt it [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
What is point of SSL if fiddler 2 can decrypt all calls over HTTPS?
(3 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I have just discovered that Fiddler can decrypt HTTPS traffic.
For instance, I deployed a website on localhost using HTTPS. When inspecting the data packets in Fiddler, I was able to view all the information since it has an option to decrypt it.
My question is, why make use of HTTPS when Fiddler can easily decrypt it?
Fiddler performs a MITM technique.
To make it work, you need to trust its Certificate:
http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler/help/httpsdecryption.asp
If you don't, it won't decrypt anything...
how can Fiddler2 debug HTTPS traffic?
A: Fiddler2 relies on a "man-in-the-middle" approach to HTTPS
interception. To your web browser, Fiddler2 claims to be the secure
web server, and to the web server, Fiddler2 mimics the web browser.
In order to pretend to be the web server, Fiddler2 dynamically
generates a HTTPS certificate.
Fiddler's certificate is not trusted by your web browser (since
Fiddler is not a Trusted Root Certification authority), and hence
while Fiddler2 is intercepting your traffic, you'll see a HTTPS error
message in your browser [...]
In order to decrypt HTTPS traffic you must first install the Fiddler's root certificate in to your "trusted/root certificates" list. Fiddler's root certificate is NOT a Root certificate which by default comes with your Operating System. The OS will usually warn you when you're trying to install this.
In doing so, you explicitly begin to trust any certificate signed by Fiddler's root certificate. When you now make a https request, Fiddler will perform a Man in the middle attack with you.
Suppose you make a request in the form https://google.com. Fiddler will now act as the actual Google server and will create a dummy certificate for Google.com and sign it using Fiddler's Root certificate. You will receive this dummy certificate which has been signed by Fiddler. This certificate will pass your device's validation since Fiddler's Root certificate is now in your trusted certificates. Now, your device will start communicating with Fiddler through a secure HTTPS connection. Fiddler will relay your messages to Google.com and back to you. Of course Fiddler will able to decrypt them.
It is to note that the traffic from Fiddler to Google will occur through a second Secure https channel.
Therefore, not to worry about the security provided by https.

Can someone view the data going over https using fiddler?

Someone please please tell me this is not correct. Reading this link, seem like one can de-crypted https traffic via fiddler. Does it mean if I am doing online banking via https, someone who can intercept this traffic can read my account and pin key information?
Fiddler requires you to install a special SSL root certificate for it to be able to listen to HTTPS traffic. Once you install it, Fiddler can install itself as a proxy (middleman), faking that it's every HTTPS site on the Internet. In short, yes, it can listen to everything over HTTPS, but you need to manually install the certificate on your machine first to allow it.
In theory, any root certificate you install on your machine - Fiddler or not - will allow the person generating it to impersonate any Internet site, so never do it without considering the ramifications.
In SSL terms, what Fiddler does is that it installs itself as a certificate authority on your machine. When you access a HTTPS site for which it is acting as middleman, it quickly generates a certificate claiming to be the site in question. Since the root certificate is on your machine, it will trust Fiddler's certificate and happily let it decrypt everything.
Fiddler will act as a Man in the Middle, using its own SSL certificate, and thus triggering browser warnings. If you are suitably deterred by those warnings, nobody will snoop on your online banking sessions.
For more on how this works, you can read about public-key cryptography.
You have to accept the ssl certificate issued by fiddler but yes you can monitor ssl traffic with fiddler. If you dig a bit deeper there are more sophisticated tools for MITM attacks like: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_WebScarab_Project

Are valid digital certificates required on the clients (Java, C++ etc) to make successful https connections?

I am planning to implement a small standalone program that will make a https request to a server. Does that require a valid ssl certificate in the client? How does the SSL handshake work in that case? Are there any security issues in the client not have an SSL certificate?
Apart from encrypting the network traffic, HTTPS is normally used to authenticate the server. That is, to give clients reassuring information about who owns the server, etc. For that to work, the client needs to inspect the trust chain in the certificate published by the server. For that to happen automatically, the client machine should have a certificate installed that describes a Certification Authority that issued the server's certificate. Normally such certificates are found on your machine in a store called "Trusted Root Certification Authorities" and most OS come with a set of common CAs already installed.
In addition, many web servers offer a feature where the client can authenticate itself to the server by supplying a client certificate. The web server is able to inspect the certificate coming from the client and map it onto a set of permissions on the server. This "client authentication" is not necessary for a working HTTPS session however, it's just an option.
In short, you don't actually need any certificate on the client, but you will probably want to have a root CA certificate in order to validate the server's identity. If you don't have that certificate it will be impossible for you to trust the server (unless you have another good reason to do so), but you might choose to exchange data with it anyway.
If you wish to learn more about the HTTPS handshake and what is negotiated, i fully recommend you look at this excellent write up at moserware
http://www.moserware.com/2009/06/first-few-milliseconds-of-https.html
A client certificate is required only if the server requires one. A client certificate allows the server to authenticate the client, but this is only useful if the server has a list of all authorized clients. That's generally not the case with a web server, so it's quite rare for them to require client certificates.
When present, the client-side certificate does not affect establishment of the secure channel. (Only the server's certificate is required for that and adding a client certificate into the mix doesn't change the process.) Once a secure channel is established, the server will use the client's certificate the authenticate the client (generally by comparing the client's public key or name with a list of authorized clients).
You dont need a certificate to make a HTTPS connection, but you do need to if you want to know with whom you are communicating.

Resources