Single script to run in both Windows batch and Linux Bash? - bash

Question

Is it possible to write a single script file which executes in both Windows (treated as .bat) and Linux (via Bash)?
I know the basic syntax of both, but didn't figure out. It could probably exploit some Bash's obscure syntax or some Windows batch processor glitch.
The command to execute may be just a single line to execute other script.
The motivation is to have just a single application boot command for both Windows and Linux.
Update: The need for system's "native" shell script is that it needs to pick the right interpreter version, conform to certain well-known environment variables etc. Installing additional environments like CygWin is not preferable - I'd like to keep the concept "download & run".
The only other language to consider for Windows is Windows Scripting Host - WSH, which is preset by default since 98.

Answer 1

What I have done is use cmd’s label syntax as comment marker. The label character, a colon (:), is equivalent to true in most POSIXish shells. If you immediately follow the label character by another character which can’t be used in a GOTO, then commenting your cmd script should not affect your cmd code.
The hack is to put lines of code after the character sequence “:;”. If you’re writing mostly one-liner scripts or, as may be the case, can write one line of sh for many lines of cmd, the following might be fine. Don’t forget that any use of $? must be before your next colon : because : resets $? to 0.
:; echo "Hi, I’m ${SHELL}."; exit $?
#ECHO OFF
ECHO I'm %COMSPEC%
A very contrived example of guarding $?:
:; false; ret=$?
:; [ ${ret} = 0 ] || { echo "Program failed with code ${ret}." >&2; exit 1; }
:; exit
ECHO CMD code.
Another idea for skipping over cmd code is to use heredocs so that sh treats the cmd code as an unused string and cmd interprets it. In this case, we make sure that our heredoc’s delimiter is both quoted (to stop sh from doing any sort of interpretation on its contents when running with sh) and starts with : so that cmd skips over it like any other line starting with :.
:; echo "I am ${SHELL}"
:<<"::CMDLITERAL"
ECHO I am %COMSPEC%
::CMDLITERAL
:; echo "And ${SHELL} is back!"
:; exit
ECHO And back to %COMSPEC%
Depending on your needs or coding style, interlacing cmd and sh code may or may not make sense. Using heredocs is one method to perform such interlacing. This could, however, be extended with the GOTO technique:
:<<"::CMDLITERAL"
#ECHO OFF
GOTO :CMDSCRIPT
::CMDLITERAL
echo "I can write free-form ${SHELL} now!"
if :; then
echo "This makes conditional constructs so much easier because"
echo "they can now span multiple lines."
fi
exit $?
:CMDSCRIPT
ECHO Welcome to %COMSPEC%
Universal comments, of course, can be done with the character sequence : # or :;#. The space or semicolon are necessary because sh considers # to be part of a command name if it is not the first character of an identifier. For example, you might want to write universal comments in the first lines of your file before using the GOTO method to split your code. Then you can inform your reader of why your script is written so oddly:
: # This is a special script which intermixes both sh
: # and cmd code. It is written this way because it is
: # used in system() shell-outs directly in otherwise
: # portable code. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17510688
: # for details.
:; echo "This is ${SHELL}"; exit
#ECHO OFF
ECHO This is %COMSPEC%
Thus, some ideas and ways to accomplish sh and cmd-compatible scripts without serious side effects as far as I know (and without having cmd output '#' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.).

Answer 2

EDIT
The binki's answer is almost perfect but still can be improved:
:<<BATCH
#echo off
echo %PATH%
exit /b
BATCH
echo $PATH
It uses again the : trick and the multi line comment. Looks like cmd.exe (at least on windows10) works without problems with the unix style EOLs so be sure that your script is converted into linux format. (same approach has been seen used before here and here ) . Though using shebang still will produce redundant output...
you can try this:
#|| goto :batch_part
echo $PATH
#exiting the bash part
exit
:batch_part
echo %PATH%
Probably you'll need to use /r/n as a new line instead of a unix style.If I remember correct the unix new line is not interpreted as a new line by .bat scripts.Another way is to create an #.exe file in the path that does do nothing in similar manner as my answer here: Is it possible to embed and execute VBScript within a batch file without using a temporary file?

Answer 3

I wanted to comment, but can only add an answer at the moment.
The techniques given are excellent and I use them also.
It is hard to retain a file which has two kinds of line breaks contained within it, that being /n for the bash part and /r/n for the windows part. Most editors try and enforce a common line break scheme by guessing what kind of file you are editing. Also most methods of transferring the file across the internet (particularly as a text or script file) will launder the line breaks, so you could start with one kind of line break and end up with the other. If you made assumptions about line breaks and then gave your script to someone else to use they might find it doesn't work for them.
The other problem is network mounted file systems (or CDs) that are shared between different system types (particularly where you can't control the software available to the user).
One should therefore use the DOS line break of /r/n and also protect the bash script from the DOS /r by putting a comment at the end of each line (#). You also cannot use line continuations in bash because the /r will cause them to break.
In this way whoever uses the script, and in whatever environment, it will then work.
I use this method in conjunction with making portable Makefiles!

Answer 4

The following works for me without any errors or error messages with Bash 4 and Windows 10, unlike the answers above. I name the file "whatever.cmd", do chmod +x to make it executable in linux, and make it have unix line endings (dos2unix) to keep bash quiet.
:; if [ -z 0 ]; then
#echo off
goto :WINDOWS
fi
if [ -z "$2" ]; then
echo "usage: $0 <firstArg> <secondArg>"
exit 1
fi
# bash stuff
exit
:WINDOWS
if [%2]==[] (
SETLOCAL enabledelayedexpansion
set usage="usage: %0 <firstArg> <secondArg>"
#echo !usage:"=!
exit /b 1
)
:: windows stuff

Answer 5

You can share variables:
:;SET() { eval $1; }
SET var=value
:;echo $var
:;exit
ECHO %var%

Answer 6

The previous answers seem to cover pretty much all the options and helped me a lot. I'm including this answer here just to demonstrate the mechanism I used to include both a Bash script and a Windows CMD script in the same file.
LinuxWindowsScript.bat
echo >/dev/null # >nul & GOTO WINDOWS & rem ^
echo 'Processing for Linux'
# ***********************************************************
# * NOTE: If you modify this content, be sure to remove carriage returns (\r)
# * from the Linux part and leave them in together with the line feeds
# * (\n) for the Windows part. In summary:
# * New lines in Linux: \n
# * New lines in Windows: \r\n
# ***********************************************************
# Do Linux Bash commands here... for example:
StartDir="$(pwd)"
# Then, when all Linux commands are complete, end the script with 'exit'...
exit 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
:WINDOWS
echo "Processing for Windows"
REM Do Windows CMD commands here... for example:
SET StartDir=%cd%
REM Then, when all Windows commands are complete... the script is done.
Summary
In Linux
The first line (echo >/dev/null # >nul & GOTO WINDOWS & rem ^) will be ignored and the script will flow through each line immediately following it until the exit 0 command is executed. Once exit 0 is reached, the script execution will end, ignoring the Windows commands below it.
In Windows
The first line will execute the GOTO WINDOWS command, skipping the Linux commands immediately following it and continuing execution at the :WINDOWS line.
Removing Carriage Returns in Windows
Since I was editing this file in Windows, I had to systematically remove the carriage returns (\r) from the Linux commands or else I got abnormal results when running the Bash portion. To do this, I opened the file in Notepad++ and did the following:
Turn on the option for viewing end of line characters (View> Show Symbol > Show End of Line). Carriage returns will then show as CR characters.
Do a Find & Replace (Search > Replace...) and check the Extended (\n, \r, \t, \0, \x...) option.
Type \r in the Find what : field and blank out the Replace with : field so there's nothing in it.
Starting at the top of the file, click the Replace button until all of the carriage return (CR) characters have been removed from the top Linux portion. Be sure to leave the carriage return (CR) characters for the Windows portion.
The result should be that each Linux command ends in just a line feed (LF) and each Windows command ends in a carriage return and line feed (CR LF).

Answer 7

There are several ways of executing different commands on bash and cmd with the same script.
cmd will ignore lines that start with :;, as mentioned in other answers. It will also ignore the next line if the current line ends with the command rem ^, as the ^ character will escape the line break and the next line will be treated as a comment by rem.
As for making bash ignore the cmd lines, there are multiple ways. I have enumerated some ways to do that without breaking the cmd commands:
Non-existent # command (not recommended)
If there is no # command available on cmd when the script is run, we can do this:
# 2>nul & echo Hello cmd! & rem ^
echo 'Hello bash!' #
The # character at the beginning of the cmd line makes bash treat that line as a comment.
The # character at the end of the bash line is used to comment out the \r character, as Brian Tompsett pointed out in his answer. Without this, bash will throw an error if the file has \r\n line endings, required by cmd.
By doing # 2>nul, we're tricking cmd to ignore the error of some non-existent # command, while still executing the command that follows.
Don't use this solution if there is a # command available on the PATH or if you have no control over the commands available to cmd.
Using echo to ignore the # character on cmd
We can use echo with it's output redirected to insert cmd commands on bash's commented out area:
echo >/dev/null # >nul & echo Hello cmd! & rem ^
echo 'Hello bash!' #
Since the # character has no special meaning on cmd, it is treated as a part of the text to echo. All we had to do is redirect the output of the echo command and insert other commands after it.
Empty #.bat file
echo >/dev/null # 1>nul 2> #.bat
# & echo Hello cmd! & del #.bat & rem ^
echo 'Hello bash!' #
The echo >/dev/null # 1>nul 2> #.bat line creates an empty #.bat file while on cmd (or replaces existing #.bat, if any), and does nothing while on bash.
This file will be used by the cmd line(s) that follows even if there is some other # command on the PATH.
The del #.bat command on the cmd-specific code deletes the file that was created. You only have to do this on the last cmd line.
Don't use this solution if a #.bat file could be on your current working directory, as that file will be erased.
Recomended: using here-document to ignore cmd commands on bash
:; echo 'Hello bash!';<<:
echo Hello cmd! & ^
:
By placing the ^ character at the end of the cmd line we're escaping the line break, and by using : as the here-document delimiter, the delimiter line contents will have no effect on cmd. That way, cmd will only execute its line after the : line is over, having the same behaviour as bash.
If you want to have multiple lines on both platforms and only execute them at the end of the block, you can do this:
:;( #
:; echo 'Hello' #
:; echo 'bash!' #
:; );<<'here-document delimiter'
(
echo Hello
echo cmd!
) & rem ^
here-document delimiter
As long as there is no cmd line with exactly here-document delimiter, this solution should work. You can change here-document delimiter to any other text.
In all of the presented solutions, the commands will only be executed after the last line, making their behaviour consistent if they do the same thing on both platforms.
Those solutions must be saved to files with \r\n as line breaks, otherwise they won't work on cmd.

Answer 8

I use this technique to create runnable jar files. Since the jar/zip file starts at the zip header, I can put a universal script to run this file at the top:
#!/usr/bin/env sh\n
# 2>/dev/null # 2>nul & echo off & goto BOF\r\n
:\n
<shell commands go here with \n line endings>
exit\n
\r\n
:BOF\r\n
<cmd commands go here with \r\n line endings>\r\n
exit /B %errorlevel%\r\n
}
It is important to set the line endings as outlined above because they can cause issues on the different platforms. Also the goto statement will not work correctly in some cases if the proper line endings are missing around the jump label.
The technique above is what I use currently.
Below is an outdated version with an in-depth explaination:
#!/usr/bin/env sh
# 2>/dev/null # 2>nul & echo off
:; alias ::=''
:: exec java -jar $JAVA_OPTS "$0" "$#"
:: exit
java -jar %JAVA_OPTS% "%~dpnx0" %*
exit /B
The first line does echo off in cmd and doesn't print anything on sh. This is because the # in sh throws an error that is piped to /dev/null and after that a comment starts. On cmd the pipe to /dev/null fails because the file is not recognized on windows but since windows doesn't detect # as a comment the error is piped to nul. Then it does an echo off. Because the whole line is preceded by an # it doesn't get printet on cmd.
The second one defines ::, which starts a comment in cmd, to noop in sh. This has the benefit that :: does not reset $? to 0. It uses the ":; is a label" trick.
Now I can prepend sh commands with :: and they are ignored in cmd
On :: exit the sh script ends and I can write cmd commands
Only the first line (shebang) is problematic in cmd since it will print command not found.
You have to decide yourself if you need it or not.

Answer 9

I needed this for some of my Python package install scripts. Most things between sh and bat file are same but few things like error handling are different. One way to do this is as follows:
common.inc
----------
common statement1
common statement2
Then you call this from bash script:
linux.sh
--------
# do linux specific stuff
...
# call common code
source common.inc
Windows batch file looks like this:
windows.bat
-----------
REM do windows specific things
...
# call common code
call common.inc

Answer 10

Try my BashWin project at https://github.com/skanga/bashwin which uses BusyBox for most Unix commands

Answer 11

There is a platform independent build tools like Ant or Maven with xml syntax (based on Java).
So, you could rewrite all your scripts in Ant or Maven an run them despite os type.
Or you could just create Ant wrapper script, which will analyze os type and run appropriate bat or bash script.