we are getting mail from ms exchange on imap by using java mail
all is fine if no one touch nothing ...but if users in outlook move a mail fron another directory in the inbox directory,this become the new top mail insted of its real arrival date could be years ago
as a workaround we are tryng to get the emails already sorted by exchange (normally we get the email in their creation message id order but message id of a just moved old mail is newer than the message id of a just arrived email)
we are using this code to try
SortTerm std[]={SortTerm.DATE};
try {
messages = folder.getSortedMessages(std);
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error(e.toString());
}
but we get
javax.mail.MessagingException: SORT not supported;
nested exception is:
com.sun.mail.iap.BadCommandException: SORT not supported
any help will be appreciated thanks in advance
regards
stefano buttarelli
Looks like Exchange doesn't support the IMAP SORT extension. You may have to sort the messages in the client.
(Note that the natural order of the mailbox is the order in which messages were added to the mailbox, which is usually the arrival order, except in cases like you're seeing.)
Related
I have noticed that forwarded email from a different sender for an existing case if there a case already exists in the system, is getting associated with the same case instead of creating a new case in the queue.
Explaining the Scenario:
1. I have configured a mailbox and 'Dummy' Queue for email address say: dummy#mycompanydomain.com
2. Case Creation rule is configured for any email coming to this queue.
Sending Emails in 2 different scenarios:
Sent email from ABC#outlook.com
TO : DEF#outlook.com & XYZ#outlook.com
"Replied to All" from DEF#outlook.com to ABD#outlook.com, XYZ#outlook.com and Added dummy#mycompanydomain.com email address as well.
New Ticket got created in 'Dummy' queue. – Working as expected.
"Replied to All" from XYZ to ABD, DEF and Added dummy#mycompanydomain.com mailbox as well.
New Ticket got created in ‘'Dummy' queue. – Working as expected.
Sent email from ABC#outlook.com
TO : DEF#outlook.com & XYZ#outlook.com
Replied to All from DEF to ABD#outlook.com, XYZ#outlook.com and Added dummy#mycompanydomain.com email address as well.
New Ticket got created in "Dummy" queue. – Working as expected.
Forwarded from XYZ to dymmy#mycompanydomain.com mailbox.
Incoming Email got associated with existing Ticket in ‘Dummy’ queue. -- Is this an expected behavior or a product bug?
Incoming Email got associated with existing Ticket in ‘Dummy’ queue. -- Is this an expected behavior or a product bug?
Also be aware of the type of matching you are doing in you SSS. If the matching is via regular expression or token a forwarded email will result in a matching Subject.
I'm trying to figure out what happens if the clients emits to join the same room more then once, To test and find answer on this I wanted initially to find out how many clients room has after same clients send more then one emit for joining the room, but Rooms chapter in wiki https://github.com/Automattic/socket.io/wiki/Rooms is outdated. When I try to use "io.sockets.clients('room')" I get error "Object # has no method 'clients'".
So I got two questions:
1. what happens if client tries to join same room more then once? Will he get emits for that room for each time he has tried to join?
2. How can I find out which clients are in a room?
Im using socket.io v1.0.2
I got an answer on this question at socket.io github.
As per this line of code, the socket will receive emits only once. The socket is added to a room only once, and if another attempt is made for the same socket to join the room, this attempt will be ignored.
There is currently no public API for getting the clients, and there is some discussion ongoing in #1428. If you really need to get them, for some reason, you can fetch the actual clients from the adapter, assuming you are not using the redis adapter like so:
socket.join('test room');
var clients = io.sockets.adapter.rooms['test room'];
console.log(clients);
for (var clientId in clients) {
console.log(io.sockets.connected[clientId]);
}
Fixed getting clients in a room at socket.io ~1.4.5 like this:
socket.join('test room');
var room = io.sockets.adapter.rooms['test room'];
console.log(room);
for (var socketId in room.sockets) {
console.log(io.sockets.connected[socketId]);
}
Its working fine and does not gives any error,it ignores the second request for joining the room from that socket which is already in the room.
I have actually tried and implemented a solution where
when user click on message notification it joins that specific room from which the notification came and, and when he sends very first message he again join that specific room (It is because I have build a Chat-Directive in AngularJS).
Client Side
1) User Open Notification
Socket.emit('JoinRoomWithThsID', notification.ConversationID);
2) user Sends First Message in that room
Socket.emit('patientChatRoomMessage', adminmessage);
I'm working on a YRS 2013 project and would like to use Twilio. I already have a Twilio account set up with over $100 worth of funds on it. I am working on a project which uses an external API and finds events near a location and date. The project is written in Ruby using Sinatra (which is going to be deployed to Heroku).
I am wondering whether you guys could guide me on how to approach this scenario: a user texts to the number of my Twilio account (the message would contain the location and date data), we process the body of that sms, and send back the results to the number that asked for them. I'm not sure where to start; for example if Twilio would handle some of that task or I would just use Twilio's API and do checking for smss and returning the results. I thinking about not using a database.
Could you guide me on how to approach this task?
I need to present the project on Friday; so I'm on a tight deadline! Thanks for our help.
They have some great documentation on how to do most of this.
When you receive a text you should parse it into the format you need
Put it into your existing project and when it returns the event or events in the area you need to check how long the string is due to a constraint that twilio has of restricting messages to 160 characters or less.
Ensure that you split the message elegantly and not in the middle of an event. If you were returned "Boston Celtics Game", "The Nut Cracker Play". you want to make sure that if both events cannot be put in one message that the first message says "Boston Celtics Game, Another text coming in 1 second" Or something similar.
In order to receive a text message from a mobile device, you'll have to expose an endpoint that is reachable by Twilio. Here is an example
class ReceiveTextController < ActionController
def index
# let's pretend that we've mapped this action to
# http://localhost:3000/sms in the routes.rb file
message_body = params["Body"]
from_number = params["From"]
SMSLogger.log_text_message from_number, message_body
end
end
In this example, the index action receives a POST from Twilio. It grabs the message body, and the phone number of the sender and logs it. Retrieving the information from the Twilio POST is as simple as looking at the params hash
{
"AccountSid"=>"asdf876a87f87a6sdf876876asd8f76a8sdf595asdD",
"Body"=> body,
"ToZip"=>"94949",
"FromState"=>"MI",
"ToCity"=>"NOVATO",
"SmsSid"=>"asd8676585a78sd5f548a64sd4f64a467sg4g858",
"ToState"=>"CA",
"To"=>"5555992673",
"ToCountry"=>"US",
"FromCountry"=>"US",
"SmsMessageSid"=>"hjk87h9j8k79hj8k7h97j7k9hj8k7",
"ApiVersion"=>"2008-08-01",
"FromCity"=>"GRAND RAPIDS",
"SmsStatus"=>"received",
"From"=>"5555992673",
"FromZip"=>"49507"
}
Source
Here's what I'm attempting to do: Let's assume that you are in mail and create a New blank mail message, then enter some data into it, such as body copy, etc. (in my case, the message was created through scripting bridge using the "Mail Contents of this Page" from safari... the main purpose of this process for my application.)
From my application, I want to select that message and assign it to:
MailOutgoingMessage *myMessage;
so that I can programmatically add recipients. I've tried several ways of doing this which seemed logical, but so far I haven't found the right combination, and the header file doesn't seem to be very clear to me (I'm new to scripting bridge.)
My initial thought was to try this:
mailMessage = [[mail outgoingMessages] lastObject];
Which should grab the last outgoing message created. It seems to work in that I am able to add recipients to mailMessage (though there have been a few times that I received unexpected results when multiple outgoing messages exist, such as adding the recipients to the wrong message) but attempting to log the subject line of the message:
NSLog(#"Subject = %#",[mailMessage subject]);
always returns NULL even though there is a subject clearly viewable in the subject field of the message. NULL is returned for any other parameter as well.
I'm gathering it must be a problem with my assignment to mailMessage above, because the only time I receive a NULL for message properties (or receive unexpected results) is if I try to point mailMessage to an existing outgoing message. If I create the mail message with scripting bridge, then I can retrieve all of the properties correctly.
Does anyone understand the hierarchy of the Mail scripting enough to tell me why I am getting NULLs for the parameters using the above assignment for mailMessage? What would the simplest way be go grab my message so that I can add recipients and later call the:
[myMessage send];
method? Any insight would be helpful. I've spent a week going through the mail.h header file and am quite literally at a loss as to what else to try at this point.
There's no way to (send, get or set the properties of the outgoing message) that the user or Safari has created.
It's a bug (it stopped working since Mac OS X 10.4), or some privacy/security considerations.
I'm writing a multiplayer chess game, and using Pusher for the websocket server part.
Anyways, if I have a list of users, and I select any one of them and challenge them, how do I send challenge to just that one user? I know I would use the client event like:
channel.trigger("client-challenge_member1", {some : "data"});
But this event would have to have already been created I think. So do I create this event dynamically after each member subscribes? as possibly in:
channel.bind("pusher:subscribed_completed", function(member) // not sure of correct syntax but...
{
channel.bind("client-challenge_" + member.memberID, function(data)
{
alert(data.Name + " is challenging you.");
});
});
I would think there'd be a overloaded method for trigger, like:
channel.trigger(eventName, data, memberID)
But I cannot see anything like this. Any ideas? Thanks.
I ran into this problem on my application. At this time Pusher does not provide methods for sending events to a specific user. I think the approach that you mentioned would work for your situation. For my application I had each user subscribe to a channel with their user id as the channel id, then I could send messages to a single user through that channel.
client = new Pusher(PUSHER_API_KEY);
channel = client.subscribe(user_id);
channel.bind('my_event',function(data){
//Do stuff
});
I talked this approach over with the pusher team and they assured me there was no real overhead in having the extra channels. The new Pusher() command is the code that creates a new socket connection so you don't have to worry about extra sockets per channel or anything like that. Hope this helps.
I'm from Pusher. As Braden says, you can easily make a channel per user. This is more efficient than having the user id in the event name which means you spam everyone with useless messages.
This is an area we want to improve on further, so thanks for the feedback.
If you're able to consider another service, Beaconpush has the ability to send messages to a specific user.
From their site:
POST /1.0.0/[API key]/users/[user]