What I Need
I would like to sort my grid/store by the Parent field, but because the Parent field that is fetched is an object, it fails to fetch any records when I put a sorter based on the Parent property. Even if I add a sorter function, it is not called. I am using a rallygrid, not sure if that makes a difference
sorters: [{
property: 'Parent',
direction: 'DESC',
sorterFn: function(one, two) {
console.log('one',one);
console.log('two',two); // console never shows these
return -1;
}
}]
What I have tried
To get around displaying the object, I have added a renderer function to the Parent column. I tried adding a doSort to the column, and that function is called, but sorting the store does not call my sorterFn, it only uses the property and direction (similar to the console.log() that fails to run above)
Here is an example of a custom App that works properly. The key is setting the default storeConfig of remoteSort to false!
Ext.define('CustomApp', {
extend: 'Rally.app.App',
componentCls: 'app',
launch: function() {
App = this;
Rally.data.ModelFactory.getModel({
type: 'PortfolioItem/Feature',
success: function(model) {
App.add({
xtype: 'rallygrid',
id : 'grid',
model: model,
columnCfgs: [
'FormattedID',
'Name',
{dataIndex: 'Parent', name: 'Parent',
doSort: function(state) {
var ds = this.up('grid').getStore();
var field = this.getSortParam();
console.log('field',field);
ds.sort({
property: field,
direction: state,
sorterFn: function(v1, v2){
v1 = v1.get(field);
v2 = v2.get(field);
console.log('v1',v1);
console.log('v2',v2);
if (!v1 && !v2) {
return 0;
} else if (!v2) {
return 1;
} else if (!v1) {
return -1;
}
return v1.Name.localeCompare(v2.Name);
}
});
},
renderer: function(value, meta, record) {
var ret = record.raw.Parent;
if (ret) {
return ret.Name;
} else {
return record.data.Name;
}
}
}
],
storeConfig: {
remoteSort: false
}
});
}
});
}
});
Related
How can i force ui router to reload the resolves on my state without reloading the entire ui/controller since
I am using components and since the data is binded from the state resolve,
i would like to change some parameters (pagination for example) without forcing the entire ui to reload but just the resolves
resolve : {
data: ['MailingListService', '$transition$', function (MailingListService, $transition$) {
var params = $transition$.params();
var ml = params.id;
return MailingListService.getUsers(ml, params.start, params.count)
.then(function (result) {
return {
users: result.data,
totalCount: result.totalCount
}
})
}],
node: ['lists', '$transition$', function (lists, $transition$) {
return _.find(lists, {id: Number($transition$.params().id)})
}]
},
I would like to change $transition$.params.{start|count} and have the resolve updated without reloading the html.
What you requested is not possible out of the box. Resolves are only resolved, when the state is entered.
But: one way of refreshing data could be, to check for state parameter changes in $doCheck and bind them to the components by hand.
Solution 1
This could look something like this:
export class MyComponent {
constructor($stateParams, MailingListService) {
this.$stateParams = $stateParams;
this.MailingListService = MailingListService;
this.paramStart = null;
this.paramCount = null;
this.paramId = null;
this.data = {};
}
$doCheck() {
if(this.paramStart !== this.$stateParams.start ||
this.paramCount !== this.$stateParams.count ||
this.paramId !== this.$stateParams.id) {
this.paramStart = this.$stateParams.start;
this.paramCount = this.$stateParams.count;
this.paramId = this.$stateParams.id;
this.MailingListService.getUsers(this.paramId, this.paramStart, this.paramCount)
.then((result) => {
this.data = {
users: result.data,
totalCount: result.totalCount
}
})
}
}
}
Then you have no binding in the parent component anymore, because it "resolves" the data by itself, and you have to bind them to the child components by hand IF you insert them in the template of the parent component like:
<my-component>
<my-child data="$ctrl.data"></my-child>
</my-component>
If you load the children via views, you are obviously not be able to bind the data this way. There is a little trick, but it's kinda hacky.
Solution 2
At first, resolve an empty object:
resolve : {
data: () => {
return {
value: undefined
};
}
}
Now, assign a binding to all your components like:
bindings: {
data: '<'
}
Following the code example from above, where you resolve the data in $doCheck, the data assignment would look like this:
export class MyComponent {
[..]
$doCheck() {
if(this.paramStart !== this.$stateParams.start ||
this.paramCount !== this.$stateParams.count ||
this.paramId !== this.$stateParams.id) {
[..]
this.MailingListService.getUsers(this.paramId, this.paramStart, this.paramCount)
.then((result) => {
this.data.value = {
users: result.data,
totalCount: result.totalCount
}
})
}
}
}
And last, you check for changes in the child components like:
export class MyChild {
constructor() {
this.dataValue = undefined;
}
$doCheck() {
if(this.dataValue !== this.data.value) {
this.dataValue = this.data.value;
}
}
}
In your child template, you access the data with:
{{ $ctrl.dataValue | json }}
I hope, I made my self clear with this hack. Remember: this is a bit off the concept of UI-Router, but works.
NOTE: Remember to declare the parameters as dynamic, so changes do not trigger the state to reload:
params: {
start: {
dynamic: true
},
page: {
dynamic: true
},
id: {
dynamic: true
}
}
I have a jqGrid custom function as editrules: { custom: true, custom_func: checkforduplicates, required:true }
However, I want this function to be run only in add mode, not in edit mode. Is this possible ?
EDIT:- After answer below from Oleg, I changed code to below. However, the alert does not print. Not sure where I am going wrong.
colModel: [
{ key: true, name: 'id', editable: false, formatter: 'integer', viewable: false, hidden: true },
{
key: false,
name: 'name',
editable: true,
editrules: {
required: true,
custom: function (options) {
// options have the following properties
// cmName
// cm
// iCol
// iRow
// rowid
// mode - "editForm", "addForm", "edit", "add", "cell" and so on
// newValue - the value which need be validated
// oldValue - the old value
// some additional properties depends on the editing mode
alert("mode is " + options.mode);
if (options.mode === "add") { // "add" for inline editing
var grid = $("#grid");
var textsLength = grid.jqGrid("getRowData");
var textsLength2 = JSON.stringify(textsLength);
alert("i am here");
var myAttrib = $.map(textsLength,
function (item) { return item.name });
var count = 0;
for (var k in textsLength) {
if (textsLength.hasOwnProperty(k)) {
++count;
}
}
var text, i;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
text = myAttrib[i];
if (value === text) {
return [false, " - Duplicate category name."];
}
}
return [true, ""];
}
return true;
}
}
},
Free jqGrid supports old style custom_func with the options value, name and iCol and the new style validation. To use new style validation one don't need to specify any custom_func callback, but to define custom as the calback function with one parameter:
editrules: {
required: true,
custom: function (options) {
// options have the following properties
// cmName
// cm
// iCol
// iRow
// rowid
// mode - "editForm", "addForm", "edit", "add", "cell" and so on
// newValue - the value which need be validated
// oldValue - the old value
// some additional properties depends on the editing mode
if (options.mode === "addForm") { // "add" for inline editing
// do the validation
}
return true;
}
}
In case of validation of Add form the mode property is equal to "addForm", options.iRow === -1, options.oldValue === null, options.rowid === "_empty". It's recommended to use options.mode to detect the editing (or searching mode) in free jqGrid because the values of other properties (iRow, oldValue and rowid) depends on the editing mode.
For version 4.7 I use this method. Form for adding data class for the table. After that, special actions verified by the user are performed.
{
name : "LOGIN",
index : "LOGIN", editrules: {
required:true,
custom:true,
custom_func: dublicateUser
}
...
{
closeAfterAdd : true,
width : 500,
recreateForm : true,
afterShowForm : function () {
jQuery("#TblGrid_list_users").addClass('addMode');
}
...
function dublicateUser() {
var a;
var login = jQuery('#LOGIN').val();
var checkMode = jQuery('#TblGrid_list_users').hasClass('addMode');
jQuery.ajax({
type: 'POST',
data: {login:login, mode:checkMode},
url: 'code/validate_user.php',
async: false,
success: function(data) {
if (data == 'err') {
a = 1;
}
else {
a=0;
}
}
});
if (a==1) {
return[false,"error"];
}
else {
return[true];
}
}
I'm doing my own custom validations on certain fields, so that only certain values are accepted (depending on the field) and the rest rejected. I would like to write a "filter" function that checks what attribute called the validation and from there decide what words the attribute is allowed to use. So the model would look something like this:
module.exports = {
types: {
filter: function(attribute) {
if (attribute === 'number') {
switch(attribute.value) {
case 'one':
return true;
case 'two':
return true;
default:
return false;
}
} else if (attribute === 'color') {
switch(attribute.value) {
case 'red':
return true;
case 'blue':
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
},
},
attributes: {
number: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
filter: true
},
color: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
filter: true
}
}
};
Of course, in normal Sails.js behaviour, "attribute" would not be the attribute, but the value of the attribute. (And attribute.value was just an example, meaning, I want the attribute value in there).
So, I want attribute to be the actual attribute that called the validation rule. Is this possible with Sails? I mean, I could write a function for each field in the model, but it would be nice to have a function that fits them all (I have many of them).
Thanks.
Ok so I will answer your question, but this may not be exactly what you want. An attribute can have an "enum" which is how we'd achieve your end goal:
attributes: {
state: {
type: 'string',
enum: ['pending', 'approved', 'denied']
}
}
But I will assume that this code is just a contrived example. Here's a way that I think would work.
module.exports = {
types: {
filter: function(attribute) {
if (attribute === 'number') {
switch(attribute.value) {
case 'one':
return true;
case 'two':
return true;
default:
this.validationErrors.push(attribute);
return false;
}
} else if (attribute === 'color') {
switch(attribute.value) {
case 'red':
return true;
case 'blue':
return true;
default:
this.validationErrors.push(attribute);
return false;
}
}
},
},
attributes: {
validationErrors:(function(){
var errors = [];
return {
push:function(attr){
errors.push(attr);
},
get:function(){
return errors;
}
};
})(),
number: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
filter: true
},
color: {
type: 'string',
required: true,
filter: true
}
}
};
Edit:Used an attribute method instead of an attribute
There are potentially a couple problems with this answer. I'm not sure how waterline handles "this" within these custom type functions. Is "this" bound to the model? Or the instance of the model we're creating? There's a lot of questions to be asked here but maybe this can give you some ideas and create a discussion.
I found this working example of Inheritance Patterns that separates business logic and framework code. I'm tempted to use it as a boilerplate, but since it is an inheritance Pattern, then how can I extend the business logic (the methods in var Speaker)?
For instance, how can I extend a walk: method into it?
/**
* Object Speaker
* An object representing a person who speaks.
*/
var Speaker = {
init: function(options, elem) {
// Mix in the passed in options with the default options
this.options = $.extend({},this.options,options);
// Save the element reference, both as a jQuery
// reference and a normal reference
this.elem = elem;
this.$elem = $(elem);
// Build the dom initial structure
this._build();
// return this so we can chain/use the bridge with less code.
return this;
},
options: {
name: "No name"
},
_build: function(){
this.$elem.html('<h1>'+this.options.name+'</h1>');
},
speak: function(msg){
// You have direct access to the associated and cached jQuery element
this.$elem.append('<p>'+msg+'</p>');
}
};
// Make sure Object.create is available in the browser (for our prototypal inheritance)
// Courtesy of Papa Crockford
// Note this is not entirely equal to native Object.create, but compatible with our use-case
if (typeof Object.create !== 'function') {
Object.create = function (o) {
function F() {} // optionally move this outside the declaration and into a closure if you need more speed.
F.prototype = o;
return new F();
};
}
$.plugin = function(name, object) {
$.fn[name] = function(options) {
// optionally, you could test if options was a string
// and use it to call a method name on the plugin instance.
return this.each(function() {
if ( ! $.data(this, name) ) {
$.data(this, name, Object.create(object).init(options, this));
}
});
};
};
// With the Speaker object, we could essentially do this:
$.plugin('speaker', Speaker);
Any ideas?
How about simply using JavaScript's regular prototype inheritance?
Consider this:
function Speaker(options, elem) {
this.elem = $(elem)[0];
this.options = $.extend(this.defaults, options);
this.build();
}
Speaker.prototype = {
defaults: {
name: "No name"
},
build: function () {
$('<h1>', {text: this.options.name}).appendTo(this.elem);
return this;
},
speak: function(message) {
$('<p>', {text: message}).appendTo(this.elem);
return this;
}
};
Now you can do:
var pp = new Speaker({name: "Porky Pig"}, $("<div>").appendTo("body"));
pp.speak("That's all folks!");
Speaker.prototype.walk = function (destination) {
$('<p>', {
text: this.options.name + " walks " + destination + ".",
css: { color: "red" }
}).appendTo(this.elem);
return this;
}
pp.walk("off the stage");
Runnable version:
function Speaker(options, elem) {
this.elem = $(elem)[0];
this.options = $.extend(this.defaults, options);
this.build();
}
Speaker.prototype = {
defaults: {
name: "No name"
},
build: function () {
$('<h1>', {text: this.options.name}).appendTo(this.elem);
return this;
},
speak: function(message) {
$('<p>', {text: message}).appendTo(this.elem);
return this;
}
};
var pp = new Speaker({name: "Porky Pig"}, $("<div>").appendTo("body"));
pp.speak("That's all folks!");
Speaker.prototype.walk = function (destination) {
$('<p>', {
text: this.options.name + " walks " + destination + ".",
css: { color: "red" }
}).appendTo(this.elem);
return this;
}
pp.walk("off the stage");
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
Is there a way to query jsPlumb in order to retrieve all connections whose "source" and "target" properties have the same parent div? Currently, I am manually setting the "scope" property of each connection (based on the parent div's id), and this works. However, feels hacky. I feel as if there should be some way to query jsPlumb like
jsPlumb.select('#parentDiv').each(function(connection) {
/*do stuff here*/
});
At the time of connection creation itself you can check and store those connections separately instead of checking for it later. Code:
jsPlumb.bind("jsPlumbConnection", function(ci) {
var s=ci.sourceId,c=ci.targetId;
var f=$('#'+s).parent().attr("id");
var g=$('#'+c).parent().attr("id");
if( f===g ){
// store ci.connection
console.log("Connection:"+ ci.connection +" has same parent div");
}
});
This is how you can confined it to a specific parent div & use 'instance' for each jsPlumb operation :
jsPlumb.ready(function () {
instance = jsPlumb.getInstance({
DragOptions: { cursor: 'pointer', zIndex: 2000 },
ConnectionOverlays: [
["Arrow", { width: 12, length: 15, location: -3 }],
],
Container: "parent" //put parent div id here
});
});
function containsCycle() {
var return_content = false;
$('.item:visible').each(function() {
$(this).addClass("white");
});
$('.item:visible').each(function() {
$vertex = $(this);
if ($vertex.hasClass("white")) {
if (visit($vertex)) {
return_content = true;
return false;
}
}
});
return return_content;
}
function visit(vertex) {
vertex.removeClass("white")
.addClass("grey");
var vertex_connections = jsPlumb
.getConnections({
source: vertex
});
for (var i = 0; i < vertex_connections.length; i++) {
if ($('#' + vertex_connections[i].targetId)
.hasClass("grey")) {
return true;
} else if ($('#' + vertex_connections[i].targetId)
.hasClass("white")) {
if (visit($('#' + vertex_connections[i].targetId))) {
return true;
}
}
}
vertex.removeClass("grey")
.addClass("black");
return false;
}
Use this code to find the cycle connection