Is it possible to have a common Shibboleth SP configured at a single place(like at any middleware) and all application which resides in different domain in different server can use it for sso authentication.And all the application can communicate among themselves via common SP. Do you see any fault in this design ?
To be most efficient, the SP needs to be installed on the same host as the web application. Multiple physical SPs can have identical entityIDs/configurations/metadata - effectively becoming a single logical SP for your organization, which exists on all of your webservers needing SSO authentication.
See the Shib doc explaining the difficulty involved with having web applications protected by a Service Provider operating on a separate physical server.
https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/NativeSPOneMany
Related
I'm trying to find out how I can know if my application that wants to use a restricted Google API scope is exempt from the security assesment.
The documentation for the Google API Services User Data Policy states that:
Local client applications that only allow user- configured transmissions of Restricted Scope data from the device may be exempt from this requirement.
How can I find out if my app qualifies for this exemption?
If you check the OAuth API verification article here:
These applications [local client applications] may be exempt from the secure handling policy because the security assessment (and successful securement of a Letter of Assessment) primarily addresses risks associated with developers obtaining and storing data on servers.
Developers should specify in the verification application whether they believe the application is a local client application, and we will work with the developer to verify that is the case.
Therefore, when sending the verification application you should mention that the application you have is a local client one and if this is indeed the situation, you will be notified about it.
Also, please bear mind, that the local client applications can be defined as, according to Google:
Local client applications are generally applications that only run, store, and process data on the user's device (like a computer, mobile phone, or tablet). While user actions may cause data to leave a device (such as sending an email), local client applications do not transmit restricted scope data to the developer's servers (or servers specified by the developer), unless the user explicitly configured the application to do so. This would include local email clients, file managers, and calendar and contact management applications that don't utilize cloud services or only transmit restricted scope data to user-configured destinations.
Applications that send restricted scope data to a developer's or third-party's servers without explicit user-initiated action, such as setting up a backup capability, will not be considered a local client.
Reference
OAuth API Verification FAQs.
I have a request to restrict the access (access control) to a small user community in GCP.
Let me explain the question.
This is the current set up:
A valid GCP Organization: MyOrganization.com (under which the GCP project is deployed / provisioned)
Cloud DNS (To configure domain names, A & TXT records, zones and subdomains to build the URL for the application).
Oauth client set up (tokens, authorized redirects URIs, etc.).
HTTPS load balancer (GKE -managed k8s service- with ingress service), SSL certificate and keys issued by a trusted CA.
The application was built using python + Django framework.
I have already deployed the application (GCP resources) and it is working smooth.
The thing is that, since we are working in GCP, all IAM users who has a valid userID#MyOrgnization.com can access the application (https://URL-for-my-Appl.com).
Now, I have a new request, which consists in restricting access (access control) to the application only for a small user community within that GCP organization.
For example, I need to ensure that only specific IAM users can access the application (https://URL-for-my-Appl.com), such as:
user1#MyOrganization.com
user2#MyOrganization.com
user3#MyOrganization.com
user4#MyOrganization.com
How could I do that, taking into account the info I sent earlier ?
thanks!
You can use Cloud IAP (Identity Aware Proxy) in order to do that.
Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) lets you manage access to applications
running in App Engine standard environment, App Engine flexible
environment, Compute Engine, and GKE. IAP establishes a central
authorization layer for applications accessed by HTTPS, so you can
adopt an application-level access control model instead of using
network-level firewalls. When you turn on IAP, you must also use
signed headers or the App Engine standard environment Users API to
secure your app.
Note: you can configure it on your load balancer.
It's not clear in your question if your application uses google auth (but considering that you talk about org-restricted login I think so) - if that's the case you should be able to enable it without virtually touching anything in your application if you are using the Users API.
The best and easiest solution is to deploy IAP (Identity Aware Proxy) on your HTTPS Loadbalancer
Then, grant only the user that you want (or create a gsuite user group and grant it, it's often easier to manage)
We have an application which is hosted on the on-premises Windows server (IIS) server
now I created a windows server on azure and building a web app for it.where the application needs to authenticate the user by windows server (DC) using kerbrose protocol but I couldn't find any documentation regarding this from Microsoft's side
Is the above query possible to be implemented in the azure web app?
No, it's not possible. Windows Authentication is something for on-premise deployments. For Azure Web Sites Azure Active Directory is clearly the best option. Sync from AD to Azure Active Directory is also quite easy to setup.
If you still want to absolutely use Windows Auth and host your website on Azure, you can create Windows VM and host your website there. You then need to join the VM to your AD. To this, both VMs must be in the same network. So if your VM is on-premise you will need to create an site-to-site VPN.
For more information, follow this SO which also discussed about this.
If your intention is to join the VM hosting the website to a domain then as others have mentioned, this isn't possible.
However, doing Kerberos authentication itself within an Azure website isn't particularly difficult, but it does require manual implementation. Windows natively handles all of this for you on domain joined machines and and IIS exposes that functionality. Since you can't domain join you have to manually do all that heavy lifting and request and validate the tickets yourself.
This involves creating a service account in Active Directory and keeping the account password in sync. Once you have that you need to indicate to the browser that it needs to negotiate auth, which is done with the WWW-Authenticate: negotiate header on a 401 response. The client, if configured to send tickets, will send a ticket in the Authorization: Negotiate YII... request header on a subsequent response. At this point you need to shove that negotiate header and that original service account password into something that can validate Kerberos tickets. Windows SSPI will do this for you, but it's a pain. I built a library that'll do this for you: Kerberos.NET. YMMV with what works best for you.
All of that said, it may be more beneficial to switch over to a more modern authentication mechanism like OAuth/OpenIDConnect/SAML.
There are several ways depending on if you have to allow access to users who are associated with a on-premise Active Directory or not.
You should have a look at this service: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-domain-services/
It will offer an Active Directory within Azure where you can domain join your VM to and then using Kerberos as authentication protocol (should work the same way like on prem).
The other option would be to create a new Active Directory within your Virtual Network (via 1 or 2 small Windows Server VMs where you create the AD).
The good thing if you are using Active Directory Domain Services would be that you could extend it to your on-prem Active Directory by synchronizing or federating your on-prem AD.
There are more informations regarding these scenarios here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/hybrid/whatis-hybrid-identity
For a Azure App Service - Web App you would connect it to your Azure Active Directory (AAD) and use the hybrid identity model to allow users who originate from an on-prem AD access to it:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/configure-authentication-provider-aad
Hope this helps a bit, it is a rather complicated topic you are digging into.
I have written a web application that is, typically, installed internally by customers (based on IIS/MSSQL server).
When a customer wants to provide external access to the application, we offer the following supported scenarios:
Publish the application in their DMZ (pretty standard deployment).
Use our own platform where we host the application in our own cloud infrastructure for them.
However, because I have more and more customers who misunderstand the requirements for publishing an internal application, I would like to add a "one click" way of providing that service.
My idea is to have a reverse proxy installed on the customer's web server that will connect to a cloud server we control. When the application starts, it will connect to our server, authenticate and maintain the connection. When a user wants to use the application, she will use an URL that directs it to our server (say https://myapp.mycompany.org/CustomerID or https://CustomerID.myapp.mycompany.org). The server will then lookup the list of connections from reverse proxy to find the one matching the customer ID and, if found, use that connection to relay the end user connection.
In essence, that is the same thing as what Azure Application proxy or TeamViewer do, only without the need for using Azure AD or TeamViewer.
Is there an existing framework I can use for building such a service ? I know I can write it on my own but that is quite a large development.
Real application how can i use this app fabric ??
How can i put my business logic in this and this logic use in my windows azure application??
Thanks
The Azure AppFabric is a collection of services that allow to you leverage functionality traditionally provided on premise by infrasture components common to most networks. Currently, it consists of the following:
Azure AppFabric Service Bus - allows for connection of applications by providing a centralized relay point in the cloud. Applications create outbound connections to the rendezvous location, thus helping mitigate the challenges posed by security measures like firewall restrictions on in-bound connections and IP masking via NAT layers. This feature includes both 'real time' options as well a 'message buffer' dynamic to allow for more disconnected style communication.
Azure AppFabric Access Control Service - the "ACS" allows WIF applications to quickly access various identity providers and consume a single format of claims token. Used in conjunction with products like ADFS, it allows cloud hosted applications to authenticate against on-premise identity stores.
Azure AppFabric Cache Service - currently in public testing, this service brings the "Velocity" style functionality to applications. This provides them with a distributed cache system as well as a new session provider.
There's more features/services coming in 2011, but these are the hot ones currently. Regarding hosting your business logic, this is not something that is currently available in the Azure AppFabric. There's been mentions that we may eventually see the potential for placing applications "on the edge", meaning the servers that front the Azure AppFabric connections, but no ETA or even firm commitment that this will happen.
You can implement your business logic in Windows Azure, in a web or worker role depending if you need it to be synchronous or asynchronous.
You can surface the business logic using the service bus, though you could also implement your logic on premise and surface them via the service bus.
AppFabric is not a business logic layer. Think of AppFabric as cross-cuts, or glue between different parts of your application.
For now Business logic goes in components like a web or worker role, or an on premise app which you could expose on the internet using AppFabric Service Bus.
In a future release, AppFabric will release "Composite Apps" which in a nutshell seem to allow you to deploy managed WCF/WF workflow services, which makes for a better "business engine". But for now I think you could probably just use Workflow services in a web role.