The AdventureWorksDW has the construct of the Financial Reporting Fact table. I have a similar fact table where the fact contains only the FK to the dimension tables and a value. The measure gets it's context from an DimAccount dimension. Are there any code samples that show how to do a simple ratio in a calculated member between two measures of the AdventureWorks Financial Reporting sample?
So basically I would like to see say Total Long term Debt / Total Assets from AdventureWorksDW? What I need is the expression or MDX.
Thanks in advance.
Use a query like this:
with member [Account].[Accounts].[Balance Sheet].[Dept by Assets] as
IIf([Account].[Accounts].[Assets] <> 0,
[Account].[Accounts].[Long Term Liabilities] / [Account].[Accounts].[Assets],
null
)
,format_string = "0.00%"
select {
[Account].[Accounts].[Assets],
[Account].[Accounts].[Long Term Liabilities],
[Account].[Accounts].[Dept by Assets]
}
on columns,
{ [Measures].[Amount] }
on rows
from [Adventure Works]
You can define members in any hierarchy, not only in the measures. In the definition, you should use the parent member before the name of the new member, to tell AS the position in the hierarchy. This is more important for CREATE MEMBER in the cube calculation script than for WITH MEMBER, as it influences the position where the client tool will display it.
Related
I have following simple relationship:
I have created following visuals in Power BI:
I want to show Store Name, Orders (by Salesman selected in slicer) and Total Orders in that Store (ignoring Salesman selected in slicer). I have created two very simple measure (can be seen in above visual) and used in matrix visuals. Visual is showing All stores while I want to show only those stores where Salesman X (selected salesman in slicer) have orders i.e. I don't want Store B row.
while solving, I suspected that it is due to fact that visual is not cross filtering. I used crossfilter but it made no difference. data can be seen in below image:
Please guide. Thanks in advance.
Try to change [Total Orders] to this measure, but keep [Total Orders].
IF( ISBLANK([Orders Count]), BLANK(), [Total Orders])
By Adding VALUES('Order'[Store ID]) in measure solved the problem. complete measure definition is as follows:
Total Orders = CALCULATE(
count('Order'[Order ID]),
REMOVEFILTERS(Salesman[Salesman Name]),
VALUES('Order'[Store ID]))
This issues the problem but I could not understand how? Because VALUES bring only those stores where salesman has Order. But when salesman removed from the filter context by REMOVEFILTERS, then how come VALUES bring only stores where salesman have orders?
a) You intend to utilize Store.salesmanName from Store in a slicer, meaning whatever is selected from there, you intend that selection to be applied on Order to give you the Order.StoreName. So when X is selected only A and C are returned.
b) Once that selection happens, you intend DAX to return the total count of each Order.StoreName whether it has a corresponding Store.salesmanID in Order.salesmanID or not. In other words, in this layer of the analysis, you want the previous selection to remain applied in the outer loop but to be ignored in the inner loop.
To be able to do that, you can do this,
totalCount =
VAR _store =
MAX ( 'Order'[storeID] ) //what is the max store ID
VAR _count =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'Order'[SalesmanId] ),
FILTER ( ALL ( 'Order' ), 'Order'[storeID] = _store ) //remove any filters and apply the value from above explicitly in the filter
)
RETURN
_count
I want to count the occurrences of values in a column. In my case the value I want to count is TRUE().
Lets say my table is called Table and has two columns:
boolean value
TRUE() A
FALSE() B
TRUE() A
TRUE() B
All solutions I found so far are like this:
count_true = COUNTROWS(FILTER(Table, Table[boolean] = TRUE()))
The problem is that I still want the visual (card), that displays the measure, to consider the filters (coming from the slicers) to reduce the table. So if I have a slicer that is set to value = A, the card with the count_true measure should show 2 and not 3.
As far as I understand the FILTER function always overwrites the visuals filter context.
To further explain my intent: At an earlier point the TRUE/FALSE column had the values 1/0 and I could achieve my goal by just using the SUM function that does not specify a filter context and just acts within the visuals filter context.
I think the DAX you gave should work as long as it's a measure, not a calculated column. (Calculated columns cannot read filter context from the report.)
When evaluating the measure,
count_true = COUNTROWS ( FILTER ( Table, Table[boolean] = TRUE() ) )
the first argument inside FILTER is not necessarily the full table but that table already filtered by the local filter context (including report/page/visual filters along with slicer selections and local context from e.g. rows/column a matrix visual).
So if you select Value = "A" via slicer, then the table in FILTER is already filtered to only include "A" values.
I do not know for sure if this will fix your problem but it is more efficient dax in my opinion:
count_true = CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(Table), Table[boolean])
If you still have the issue after changing your measure to use this format, you may have an underlying issue with the model. There is also the function KEEPFILTERS that may apply here but I think using KEEPFILTERS is overcomplicating your case.
I am trying to use power pivot to analyze a stock portfolio at any point in time.
The data model is:
transactions table with buy and sell transactions
historical_prices table with the closing price of each stock
security_lookup table with the symbol and other information about the stock (whether it’s a mutual fund, industry, large cap, etc.).
One to many relationships link the symbol column in security_lookup to the transactions and historical_prices tables.
I am able to get the cost basis to work correctly by doing sumx(transactions, quantity*price). However, I’m not able to get the current value of my holdings. I have a measure called “Current Price” which finds the most recent closing price by
Current Price :=
CALCULATE (
LASTNONBLANK ( Historical_prices[close], min[close] ),
FILTER (
Historical_Prices,
Historical_prices[date] = LASTDATE ( historical_prices[date] )
)
)
However, when I try to find the current value of a security by using
Current Value = sumx(transactions,transactions[quantity]*[Current Price])
the total is not accurate. I'd appreciate suggestions on a way to find the current value of a position. Preferably using sumx or an iterator function so that the subtotals are accurate.
The problem with your Current Value measure is that you are evaluating [Current Price] within the row context of the transactions table (since SUMX is an iterator), so it's only seeing the date associated with that row instead of the last date. Or more precisely, that row's date is the last date in the measure's filter context.
The simplest solution is probably to calculate the Current Price outside of the iterator using a variable and then pass that constant in so you don't have to worry about row and filter contexts.
Current Value =
VAR CurrentPrice = [Current Price]
RETURN SUMX(transactions, transactions[quantity] * CurrentPrice)
I have a table with 5 categories and units displayed into 2 types, Actual and budget.
I want to filter this table. Only when 2 or more values are selected in the slicer. Something like this.
I though of adding a measure, but dont know how to work the if statement exactly.
Measure = IF(COUNTROWS(ALLSELECTED(Report[Shipment Group])) = 1, "Something which would not filter the units", SELECTEDVALUE(Report[Units], SUM(Report[Units])))
Not sure if this is correct approach.Would like to know if any other approach is possible. Any help would be helpful. Thank you in advance.
This is a bit of an odd request, but I think I have something that works.
First, you need to create a separate table for your slicer values (or else you can't control filtering how you want). You can hit the new table button and define it as follows:
Groups = VALUES(Report[Shipment Group])
Set your slicer to use Groups[Shipment Group] instead of Report[Shipment Group].
Define your new measure as follows:
Measure = IF(COUNTROWS(ALLSELECTED(Groups[Shipment Group])) = 1,
SUM(Report[Units]),
SUMX(FILTER(Report,
Report[Shipment Group] IN VALUES(Groups[Shipment Group])),
Report[Units]))
or equivalently
Measure = IF(COUNTROWS(ALLSELECTED(Groups[Shipment Group])) = 1,
SUM(Report[Units]),
CALCULATE(SUM(Report[Units]),
FILTER(Report,
Report[Shipment Group] IN VALUES(Groups[Shipment Group]))))
Note: Double check that Power BI has not automatically created a relationship between the Groups and Report tables. You don't want that.
How do I go about writing the relational algebra for this SQL query?
Select patient.name,
patient.ward,
medicine.name,
prescription.quantity,
prescription.frequency
From patient, medicine, prescription
Where prescription.frequency = "3perday"
AND prescription.end-date="08-06-2010"
AND canceled = "Y"
Relations...
prescription
prescription-ref
patient-ref
medicine-ref
quantity
frequency
end-date
cancelled (Y/N))
medicine
medicine-ref
name
patient
Patient-ref
name
ward
I will just point you out the operators you should use
Projection (π)
π(a1,...,an): The result is defined as the set that is obtained when all tuples in R are restricted to the set {a1,...,an}.
For example π(name) on your patient table would be the same as SELECT name FROM patient
Selection (σ)
σ(condition): Selects all those tuples in R for which condition holds.
For example σ(frequency = "1perweek") on your prescription table would be the same as SELECT * FROM prescription WHERE frequency = "1perweek"
Cross product(X)
R X S: The result is the cross product between R and S.
For example patient X prescription would be SELECT * FROM patient,prescription
You can combine these operands to solve your exercise. Try posting your attempt if you have any issues.
Note: I did not include the natural join as there are no joins. The cross product should be enough for this exercise.
An example would be something like the following. This is only if you accidentally left out the joins between patient, medicine, and prescription. If not, you will be looking for cross product (which seems like a bad idea in this case...) as mentioned by Lombo. I gave example joins that may fit your tables marked as "???". If you could include the layout of your tables that would be helpful.
I also assume that canceled comes from prescription since it is not prefixed.
Edit: If you need it in standard RA form, it's pretty easy to get from a diagram.
alt text http://img532.imageshack.us/img532/8589/diagram1b.jpg