Running into a facebook tracking issue. When a user creates an account, I want to fire off the FB tracking pixel.
When the landing page went live, only 1/2 of the new users are tracked. Any ideas on where the leaking issue is?
pp.onNewUser = function(v,u) {
// Set Facebook Tracking
var fb_param = {};
fb_param.pixel_id = '43211230943123';
fb_param.value = '0.00';
fb_param.currency = 'USD';
var fpw = document.createElement('script');
fpw.async = true;
fpw.src = '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/fp.js';
var ref = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
ref.parentNode.insertBefore(fpw, ref);
try {
console.log('Account Created...');
} catch(ex) {}
pp.aCN('step1a', 'hidden');
pp.rCN('step2b', 'hidden');
};
First I'd recommend upgrading to the new version of the code. There's a guide here:
Facebook: Migrate to the New Conversion Pixel
Or you can use the dropdown in adsmanager to generate it. There is also information on firing multiple events, for example: website custom audience and a conversion event.
Related
I'm working on a web app in Google Apps Script, and I'm having some trouble understanding how the authorization is handled. When accessing the web app as the user using the app, it prompts for authorization, and everything appears okay. However, I'm call userProfiles.get and looking for student email addresses, and it returns the profile without the email.
function classRosters() {
var teacher = Classroom.UserProfiles.get(Session.getActiveUser().getEmail());
var classList = Classroom.Courses.list({teacherId: teacher.id}).courses;
var classes = [];
for (i in classList) {
if (classList[i].courseState != 'ACTIVE') {
continue;
}
var class = classList[i];
var classId = classList[i].id;
var className = classList[i].name;
classes.push([className]);
var teacherId = Classroom.Courses.Teachers.get(classId, classList[i].ownerId).userId;
var teacherEmail = Classroom.UserProfiles.get(teacherId);
var title = Classroom.Courses.get(classId).name;
var students = Classroom.Courses.Students.list(classId).students;
var studentArray = [];
if (students) {
for (j in students) {
var currStudent = students[j];
var email = Classroom.UserProfiles.get(currStudent.userId).emailAddress;
var email = Classroom.Courses.Students.get(classId, currStudent.userId).profile.emailAddress;
studentArray.push(email);
Logger.log(email);
}
}
for (j in classes) {
if (className.indexOf(classes[j]) > -1) {
var classIndex = +j;
classes[classIndex].push(studentArray);
}
}
}
return classes;
}
I've played with the API explorer, and it shows that classroom.profile.email is required, but that's not included in the scopes. When I use the API explorer, I can authorize, and it works, and my web app will work as well until the authorization from the explorer expires.
Is there any method to prompt for authorization in the GAS library for the Classroom advanced service? I can't find anything much that's specific to GAS and not part of the overall API.
Thanks,
James
Unfortunately Apps Script doesn't allow you to request additional scopes for your advanced services. The email and photos scopes aren't required to execute the method, but are required to return email and photo data in the response. You can follow issue 3070 for progress on this problem.
Update 2015-08-17:
We just implemented a workaround, which is that the Classroom advanced service now always prompts for the following fixed set of scopes:
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/classroom.courses
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/classroom.rosters
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/classroom.profile.emails
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/classroom.profile.photos
This provides access to emails, but does mean that the scopes requested for a given script may be more than it actually needs. We hope this unblocks admins that are trying to use Apps Script to manage their Classroom data, while we work on a longer-term solution for dealing with optional scopes in Apps Script.
I'm trying to post directly to facebook/twitter without prompting the user with a UIViewController using the following code:
// 1. Create the service
var facebook = new FacebookService {
ClientId = "<App ID from developers.facebook.com/apps>",
RedirectUrl = new System.Uri ("<Redirect URL from developers.facebook.com/apps>")
};
// 2. Create an item to share
var item = new Item { Text = "Xamarin.Social is the bomb.com." };
item.Links.Add (new Uri ("http://github.com/xamarin/xamarin.social"));
// 3. Present the UI on iOS
var shareController = facebook.GetShareUI (item, result => {
// result lets you know if the user shared the item or canceled
DismissViewController (true, null);
});
PresentViewController (shareController, true, null);
BUT the Xamarin.Social instructions say:
As an alternative to presenting the share UI, you can share items directly using the **ShareItemAsync** method of the service.
https://github.com/xamarin/Xamarin.Social
I can't find any examples or explicit tutorials on how to use this. Can anyone help me on this please?
If you look at the source of Xamarin.Social, internally ShareItemAsync is used anyways to carry out the requests. GetShareUI is just a wrapper around ShareItemAsync.
From the source of ShareViewController (which gets the UI), you can see how they are using ShareItemAsync to carry out the requests. Here's the snippet for you.
try {
service.ShareItemAsync (item, account).ContinueWith (shareTask => {
StopSharing ();
.
.
.
.
.
}, TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext ());
}
So all you need to do is create the item, get hold of the account and call the method on the service, something like this
var item = new Item { Text = "Xamarin.Social is the bomb.com." };
item.Links.Add (new Uri ("http://github.com/xamarin/xamarin.social"));
var account = facebook.GetAccountsAsync().FirstOrDefault();
facebook.ShareItemAsync(item, account);
I am trying to write an activity in Google+ using the dotnet-client. The issue is that I can't seem to get the configuration of my client app correctly. According to the Google+ Sign-In configuration and this SO question we need to add the requestvisibleactions parameter. I did that but it did not work. I am using the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login and I even added the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write but the insert still did not work.
This is what my request url looks like:
https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?service=lso&passive=1209600&continue=https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope%3Dhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login%2Bhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write%26response_type%3Dcode%26redirect_uri%3Dhttp://localhost/%26state%3D%26requestvisibleactions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26client_id%3D000.apps.googleusercontent.com%26request_visible_actions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26hl%3Den%26from_login%3D1%26as%3D-1fbe06f1c6120f4d<mpl=popup&shdf=Cm4LEhF0aGlyZFBhcnR5TG9nb1VybBoADAsSFXRoaXJkUGFydHlEaXNwbGF5TmFtZRoHQ2hpa3V0bwwLEgZkb21haW4aB0NoaWt1dG8MCxIVdGhpcmRQYXJ0eURpc3BsYXlUeXBlGgdERUZBVUxUDBIDbHNvIhTeWybcoJ9pXSeN2t-k8A4SUbfhsygBMhQivAmfNSs_LkjXXZ7bPxilXgjMsQ&scc=1
As you can see from there that there is a request_visible_actions and I even added one that has no underscore in case I got the parameter wrong (requestvisibleactions).
Let me say that my app is being authenticated successfully by the API. I can get the user's profile after being authenticated and it is on the "insert moment" part that my app fails. My insert code:
var body = new Moment();
var target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = referenceId;
target.Image = image;
target.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
target.Description = description;
target.Name = caption;
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
var insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
// this is a valid service instance as I am using this to query the user's profile
_plusService,
body,
id,
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment result = null;
try
{
result = insert.Fetch();
}
catch (ThreadAbortException)
{
// User was not yet authenticated and is being forwarded to the authorization page.
throw;
}
catch (Google.GoogleApiRequestException requestEx)
{
// here I get a 401 Unauthorized error
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
} `
For the OAuth flow, there are two issues with your request:
request_visible_actions is what is passed to the OAuth v2 server (don't pass requestvisibleactions)
plus.moments.write is a deprecated scope, you only need to pass in plus.login
Make sure your project references the latest version of the Google+ .NET client library from here:
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/download/stable/plus/v1/csharp
I have created a project on GitHub showing a full server-side flow here:
https://github.com/gguuss/gplus_csharp_ssflow
As Brettj said, you should be using the Google+ Sign-in Button as demonstrated in the latest Google+ samples from here:
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-quickstart-csharp
First, ensure you are requesting all of the activity types you're writing. You will know this is working because the authorization dialog will show "Make your app activity available via Google, visible to you and: [...]" below the text that starts with "This app would like to". I know you checked this but I'm 90% sure this is why you are getting the 401 error code. The following markup shows how to render the Google+ Sign-In button requesting access to Add activities.
<div id="gConnect">
<button class="g-signin"
data-scope="https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login"
data-requestvisibleactions="http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity"
data-clientId="YOUR_CLIENT_ID"
data-accesstype="offline"
data-callback="onSignInCallback"
data-theme="dark"
data-cookiepolicy="single_host_origin">
</button>
Assuming you have a PlusService object with the correct activity type set in data-requestvisibleactions, the following code, which you should be able to copy/paste to see it work, concisely demonstrates writing moments using the .NET client and has been tested to work:
Moment body = new Moment();
ItemScope target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = "replacewithuniqueforaddtarget";
target.Image = "http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/GoogleyEyes.png";
target.Type = "";
target.Description = "The description for the activity";
target.Name = "An example of add activity";
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
MomentsResource.InsertRequest insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
_plusService,
body,
"me",
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment wrote = insert.Fetch();
Note, I'm including Google.Apis.Plus.v1.Data for convenience.
Ah it's that simple! Maybe not? I am answering my own question and consequently accept it as the answer (after a few days of course) so others having the same issue may be guided. But I will definitely up-vote Gus' answer for it led me to the fix for my code.
So according to #class answer written above and as explained on his blog the key to successfully creating a moment is adding the request_visible_actions parameter. I did that but my request still failed and it is because I was missing an important thing. You need to add one more parameter and that is the access_type and it should be set to offline. The OAuth request, at a minimum, should look like: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http://localhost/&request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity&access_type=offline.
For the complete and correct client code you can get Gus' example here or download the entire dotnet client library including the source and sample and add what I added below. The most important thing that you should remember is modifying your AuthorizationServerDescription for the Google API. Here's my version of the authenticator:
public static OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient> CreateAuthenticator(
string clientId, string clientSecret)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientId))
throw new ArgumentException("clientId cannot be empty");
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientSecret))
throw new ArgumentException("clientSecret cannot be empty");
var description = GoogleAuthenticationServer.Description;
var uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
// This is the one that has been documented on Gus' blog site
// and over at Google's (https://developers.google.com/+/web/signin/)
// This is not in the dotnetclient sample by the way
// and you need to understand how OAuth and DNOA works.
// I had this already, see my original post,
// I thought it will make my day.
if (uri.IndexOf("request_visible_actions") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint = new Uri(
uri + param +
"request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity");
}
// This is what I have been missing!
// They forgot to tell us about this or did I just miss this somewhere?
uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
if (uri.IndexOf("offline") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint =
new Uri(uri + param + "access_type=offline");
}
// Register the authenticator.
var provider = new WebServerClient(description)
{
ClientIdentifier = clientId,
ClientSecret = clientSecret,
};
var authenticator =
new OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient>(provider, GetAuthorization)
{ NoCaching = true };
return authenticator;
}
Without the access_type=offline my code never worked and it will never work. Now I wonder why? It would be good to have some explanation.
I am getting images from Bing to display in my app. I followed Bing's instructions, I successfully retrieve the image's URLs, but for some reason, the emulator won't display them! Here's what I have
var bingContainer = new Bing.BingSearchContainer(new Uri("https://api.datamarket.azure.com/Bing/Search/"));
var accountKey = "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
bingContainer.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(accountKey, accountKey);
var imageQuery = bingContainer.Image("porsche", null, null, null, null, null, "Size:Medium");
imageQuery.BeginExecute(new AsyncCallback(this.ImageResultLoadedCallback), imageQuery);
Then, I get my images and try to set them here:
var imageQuery = (DataServiceQuery<Bing.ImageResult>)ar.AsyncState;
var enumerableImages = imageQuery.EndExecute(ar);
var imagesList = enumerableImages.ToList();
List<String> imList = new List<String>();
while (imList.Count != 3)
{
Bing.ImageResult tr = imagesList.First<Bing.ImageResult>();
if (tr.ContentType == "image/jpeg")
{
imList.Add(tr.MediaUrl);
}
imagesList.RemoveAt(0);
}
image1.Source = new BitmapImage(new Uri(#imList[0]));
image2.Source = new BitmapImage(new Uri(#imList[1]));
image3.Source = new BitmapImage(new Uri(#imList[2]));
When I debug, the process seems to just stop on those three last lines where I set the source.
Alright, after two days of frustration, I found out you cannot access the UI thread from an async callback. VS wasn't giving any errors, yet the images were not showing. An async callback runs alongside the main UI thread, so it can't access or change the elements in the UI. The easy workaround just involves wrapping the lines of code that access the UI like this:
Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() =>
{
image1.Source = new BitmapImage(new Uri(#imList[0]));
image2.Source = new BitmapImage(new Uri(#imList[1]));
image3.Source = new BitmapImage(new Uri(#imList[2]));
});
It works now!
Are you sure MediaUrl is returning proper urls to images? What if you would use some hardcoded urls to images in the imList list, would the images load properly in image1, image2 and image3? The point i am getting to is that perhaps the quality of the data is incorrect. That is, though your query executes well, MediaURL is not containing a properly formatted URL.
Also, what is the exception you get when the debugger stops?
I'm trying to create an interactive search engine (for finding event tickets) of which one of its features is a visual map that shows related venues using OpenLayers. I have a plethora of venues (3000+) in a kml file that I would like to selectively show a filtered subsection of. Below is the code I have but when I try to run it has a JavaScript error. Running firebug and chrome developer tools makes me think that it is not getting passed the parameters I give because it says that the variables are null. However, I cannot figure out why they are not getting passed. Any insight is greatly appreciated.
var map, drawControls, selectControl, selectedFeature, select;
$('#kml').load('venuesComplete.kml');
kml=$('#kml').html();
function showVenues(state, city, venue){
filterStrategy = new OpenLayers.Strategy.Filter({});
var kmllayer = new OpenLayers.Layer.Vector("KML", {
strategies: [filterStrategy,
new OpenLayers.Strategy.Fixed()],
protocol: new OpenLayers.Protocol.HTTP({
url: "venuesComplete.kml",
format: new OpenLayers.Format.KML({
extractStyles: true,
extractAttributes: true
})
})
});
select = new OpenLayers.Control.SelectFeature(kmllayer);
kmllayer.events.on({
"featureselected": onFeatureSelect,
"featureunselected": onFeatureUnselect
});
map.addControl(select);
select.activate();
filter = new OpenLayers.Filter.Comparison({
type: OpenLayers.Filter.Comparison.LIKE,
property: "",
value: ""
});
function clearFilter(){
filterStrategy.setFilter(null);
}
function setFilter(property, value){
filter.value = value;
filter.property = property;
filterStrategy.setFilter(filter);
}
var vector_style = new OpenLayers.Style();
if(venue!=""){
setFilter('name', venue);
}else if(city!=""){
setFilter('description', city);
}else if(state!=""){
setFilter('description', state);
}
map.addLayer(kmllayer);
function onPopupClose(evt) {
select.unselectAll();
}
function onFeatureSelect(event) {
var feature = event.feature;
var selectedFeature = feature;
var popup = new OpenLayers.Popup.FramedCloud("chicken",
feature.geometry.getBounds().getCenterLonLat(),
new OpenLayers.Size(100,100),
"<h2>"+feature.attributes.name + "</h2>" + feature.attributes.description +'<br>'+feature.attributes,
null,
true,
onPopupClose
);
document.getElementById('venueName').value=feature.attributes.name;
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML=event.feature.id;
feature.popup = popup;
map.addPopup(popup);
}
function onFeatureUnselect(event) {
var feature = event.feature;
if(feature.popup) {
map.removePopup(feature.popup);
feature.popup.destroy();
delete feature.popup;
}
}
}
function init() {
map = new OpenLayers.Map('map');
var google_map_layer = new OpenLayers.Layer.Google(
'Google Map Layer',
{type: google.maps.MapTypeId.HYBRID}
);
map.addLayer(google_map_layer);
state="";
state+=document.getElementById('stateProvDesc').value;
city="";
city+=document.getElementById('cityZip').value;
venue="";
venue+=document.getElementById('venueName').value;
showVenues(state,city,'Michie Stadium');
map.addControl(new OpenLayers.Control.LayerSwitcher({}));
map.zoomToMaxExtent();
}
IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY, your kml does not load properly. if this is not the case, please disconsider my answer.
it is very important to check if your kml layer was properly loaded. i have a map that loads multiple dynamic (from php) kml layers and it is not uncommon to have a large layer simply not load. when that happens, the operation is aborted, but, as far as openlayers is concerned, the layer was properly loaded.
so i do 2 things: i check if the amount of loaded data meets the expected number of features in my orginal php kml parser (i use a jquery or ajax call for that) and then, in case there is a discrepancy, i try reloading (since this is a loop, i limit it to 5 attempts, so as not to loop infinitely).
check out some of my code here