I'm developing my first Visual Studio (2015 Community) Command Menu and I'm trying to get access to IEditorOperations to delete text, send backspace etc. but I'm not sure how to. I can do:
var Service = Provider.GetService(typeof(IEditorOperationsFactoryService)) as IEditorOperationsFactoryService;
Service.GetEditorOperations(???);
I'm not sure what to pass in the ??? since I don't have access to an ITextView instead what I have is a IVsTExtView via:
IVsTextView View;
IVsTextManager Manager = (IVsTextManager)ServiceProvider.GetService(typeof(SVsTextManager));
int MustHaveFocus = 1;
Manager.GetActiveView(MustHaveFocus, null, out View);
When creating the Command Menu, VS generates a template for me with a private ctor creating the command service, binding it to the command set id etc. An overridden Initialize method, and a bunch of properties.
Any ideas?
EDIT: After help from Sergey, I managed to get a bit further. But now I get a null when I try to get the IEditorOperationsFactoryService, all the other values are valid.
static IEditorOperations GetEditorService(IServiceProvider Provider, IVsTextView VsView)
{
IEditorOperations Result;
try
{
var Model = (IComponentModel)Provider.GetService(typeof(SComponentModel));
var Editor = (IEditorOperationsFactoryService)Provider.GetService(typeof(IEditorOperationsFactoryService)); // returns null
var Adaptor = Model.GetService<IVsEditorAdaptersFactoryService>();
IWpfTextView TextView = Adaptor.GetWpfTextView(VsView);
Result = Editor.GetEditorOperations(TextView);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show(e.ToString());
Result = null;
}
return (Result);
}
You can get IEditorOperationsFactoryService instance from variable named Model, like this:
var Model = (IComponentModel)this.ServiceProvider.GetService(typeof(SComponentModel));
var Editor = (IEditorOperationsFactoryService)Model.GetService<IEditorOperationsFactoryService>();
You can get IWpfTextView (that implements ITextView) from IVsTextView using:
IVsTextView textView = ...;
IWpfTextView v = GetEditorAdaptersFactoryService().GetWpfTextView(textView);
private Microsoft.VisualStudio.Editor.IVsEditorAdaptersFactoryService GetEditorAdaptersFactoryService()
{
Microsoft.VisualStudio.ComponentModelHost.IComponentModel componentModel =
(Microsoft.VisualStudio.ComponentModelHost.IComponentModel)serviceProvider.GetService(
typeof(Microsoft.VisualStudio.ComponentModelHost.SComponentModel));
return componentModel.GetService<Microsoft.VisualStudio.Editor.IVsEditorAdaptersFactoryService>();
}
I am trying to develop a pivot application for Windows Phone 7 using Visual Studio 2010. I got the data from the calendar with the following code.
void Appointments_SearchCompleted(object sender, AppointmentsSearchEventArgs e)
{
try
{
AppointmentResultsDataLINQ.DataContext =
from Appointment appt in e.Results
where appt.IsAllDayEvent == false
select appt;
}
catch (System.Exception)
{
//No results
}
}
The problem comes when I tried to connect to the next button.
private void button2_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (AppointmentResultsDataLINQ.DataContext.ToString() == "Meeting")
{
mediaElement1.Source = new Uri("http://www.opendrive.com/files/NV8zNTMwNDYwX2hxRXZR/Crystallize.mp3", UriKind.Absolute);
}
else
{
mediaElement1.Source = new Uri("https://www.opendrive.com/files/NV8zMjAxODY0X0VBNDJY/Hetken%20tie%20on%20kevyt%20(piano%20cover)%20-%20YouTube.mp3", UriKind.Absolute);
}
mediaElement1.Play();
How can I convert the data to string so that it can play the two songs correctly? Because right now, even though I set the event to "Meeting" on the calendar, it still plays the second song.
You have binded the ListBox using the Appointment object, so the DataContext needs to be typecasted into the same. And by setting the event as Meeting if it means setting the Subject field of Appointment class as "Meeting" then this code should work fine.
if ((((Appointment)(AppointmentResultsDataLINQ.DataContext)).Subject).Equals("Meeting")))
{
mediaElement1.Source = new Uri("http://www.opendrive.com/files/NV8zNTMwNDYwX2hxRXZR/Crystallize.mp3", UriKind.Absolute);
}
When you are doing AppointmentResultsDataLINQ.DataContext.ToString() you are converting the DataContext object's address value to string and not getting the required string value. Also "==" doesn't work for string comparisons.
In my windows phone app, I need to track some events to get a good flow. But I'm not sure how to handle them in good sequence.
What needs to be done at startup of the app:
Main view is loaded and corresponding view model instantiated
In the constructor of the view model I initiate a login sequence that signals when completed with an eventhandler
Now when the login sequence has finished AND the view is completely loaded I need to startup another sequence.
But here is the problem, the order of these 2 events 'completing' is not always the same...
I've use the EventToCommand from MVVMLight to signal the view model that the view has 'loaded'.
Any thoughts on how to synchronize this.
As you should not use wait handles or something similar on the UI thread. You will have to sync the two method using flags in your view model and check them before progressing.
So, implement two boolean properties in your view model. Now when the login dialog is finished set one of the properties (lets call it IsLoggedIn) to true, and when the initialization sequence is finished you set the other property (how about IsInitialized) to true. The trick now lies in the implementation of the setter of these two properties:
#region [IsInitialized]
public const string IsInitializedPropertyName = "IsInitialized";
private bool _isInitialized = false;
public bool IsInitialized {
get {
return _isInitialized;
}
set {
if (_isInitialized == value)
return;
var oldValue = _isInitialized;
_isInitialized = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(IsInitializedPropertyName);
InitializationComplete();
}
}
#endregion
#region [IsLoggedIn]
public const string IsLoggedInPropertyName = "IsLoggedIn";
private bool _isLoggedIn = false;
public bool IsLoggedIn {
get {
return _isLoggedIn;
}
set {
if (_isLoggedIn == value)
return;
var oldValue = _isLoggedIn;
_isLoggedIn = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(IsLoggedInPropertyName);
InitializationComplete();
}
}
#endregion
public void InitializationComplete() {
if (!(this.IsInitialized && this.IsLoggedIn))
return;
// put your code here
}
Alternatively you can remove the InitializationComplete from the setters and change InitializationComplete to:
public void InitializationComplete() {
// put your code here
}
Then subscribe to the 'PropertyChanged' event use the following implementation:
private void Class1_PropertyChanged(object sender, System.ComponentModel.PropertyChangedEventArgs e) {
if (e.PropertyName == IsInitializedPropertyName || e.PropertyName == IsLoggedInPropertyName) {
if (this.IsInitialized && this.IsLoggedIn)
InitializationComplete();
}
}
I'm playing around with Surface and I'm trying to use a scatterview as a module region.
<s:ScatterView cal:RegionManager.RegionName="{x:Static common:RegionNames.MainRegion}"></s:ScatterView>
What happens is that when I run the app, a exception is thrown. With a litle reflection I got to the place where the exception occours:
The DelayedRegionCreationBehavior tries to create the region:
protected virtual IRegion CreateRegion(DependencyObject targetElement, string regionName)
{
try
{
// Build the region
IRegionAdapter regionAdapter = this.regionAdapterMappings.GetMapping(targetElement.GetType());
IRegion region = regionAdapter.Initialize(targetElement, regionName);
return region;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new RegionCreationException(string.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture, Resources.RegionCreationException, regionName, ex), ex);
}
}
Then the ItemsControlRegionAdapter attemps to the set region target ItemsSource:
protected override void Adapt(IRegion region, ItemsControl regionTarget)
{
bool itemsSourceIsSet = regionTarget.ItemsSource != null;
#if !SILVERLIGHT
itemsSourceIsSet = itemsSourceIsSet || (BindingOperations.GetBinding(regionTarget, ItemsControl.ItemsSourceProperty) != null);
#endif
if (itemsSourceIsSet)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(Resources.ItemsControlHasItemsSourceException);
}
// If control has child items, move them to the region and then bind control to region. Can't set ItemsSource if child items exist.
if (regionTarget.Items.Count > 0)
{
foreach (object childItem in regionTarget.Items)
{
region.Add(childItem);
}
// Control must be empty before setting ItemsSource
regionTarget.Items.Clear();
}
regionTarget.ItemsSource = region.Views;
}
The scatterview fires a notification of the ItemsSource change and class the ItemsControlHelper is called :
internal static bool IsItemsReadOnly(ItemsControl itemsControl)
{
IList itemsControlItems = GetItemsControlItems(itemsControl);
if (!itemsControlItems.IsReadOnly)
{
return itemsControlItems.IsFixedSize;
}
return true;
}
I think that the GetItemsControlItems returns null, causing the exception.
Any thoughts on how to overcome this situation?
I think this is a known issue with ScatterView. We are aware of the issue, and will fix it for the future. If it is the same issue we have seen, it has to do with the ItemsSource of the ScatterView being an IList<foo> or some other "generic" list. If you could change your ItemSource to be a simple IList (not an IList<foo>), I think that would resolve your issue.
I hope this helps,
-Luis Cabrera
Software Design Engineer, Microsoft Surface
I am getting some errors thrown in my code when I open a Windows Forms form in Visual Studio's designer. I would like to branch in my code and perform a different initialization if the form is being opened by designer than if it is being run for real.
How can I determine at run-time if the code is being executed as part of designer opening the form?
if (System.ComponentModel.LicenseManager.UsageMode == System.ComponentModel.LicenseUsageMode.Designtime)
{
// Design time logic
}
To find out if you're in "design mode":
Windows Forms components (and controls) have a DesignMode property.
Windows Presentation Foundation controls should use the IsInDesignMode attached property.
The Control.DesignMode property is probably what you're looking for. It tells you if the control's parent is open in the designer.
In most cases it works great, but there are instances where it doesn't work as expected. First, it doesn't work in the controls constructor. Second, DesignMode is false for "grandchild" controls. For example, DesignMode on controls hosted in a UserControl will return false when the UserControl is hosted in a parent.
There is a pretty easy workaround. It goes something like this:
public bool HostedDesignMode
{
get
{
Control parent = Parent;
while (parent!=null)
{
if(parent.DesignMode) return true;
parent = parent.Parent;
}
return DesignMode;
}
}
I haven't tested that code, but it should work.
The most reliable approach is:
public bool isInDesignMode
{
get
{
System.Diagnostics.Process process = System.Diagnostics.Process.GetCurrentProcess();
bool res = process.ProcessName == "devenv";
process.Dispose();
return res;
}
}
The most reliable way to do this is to ignore the DesignMode property and use your own flag that gets set on application startup.
Class:
public static class Foo
{
public static bool IsApplicationRunning { get; set; }
}
Program.cs:
[STAThread]
static void Main()
{
Foo.IsApplicationRunning = true;
// ... code goes here ...
}
Then just check the flag whever you need it.
if(Foo.IsApplicationRunning)
{
// Do runtime stuff
}
else
{
// Do design time stuff
}
I had the same problem in Visual Studio Express 2013. I tried many of the solutions suggested here but the one that worked for me was an answer to a different thread, which I will repeat here in case the link is ever broken:
protected static bool IsInDesigner
{
get { return (Assembly.GetEntryAssembly() == null); }
}
The devenv approach stopped working in VS2012 as the designer now has its own process. Here is the solution I am currently using (the 'devenv' part is left there for legacy, but without VS2010 I am not able to test that though).
private static readonly string[] _designerProcessNames = new[] { "xdesproc", "devenv" };
private static bool? _runningFromVisualStudioDesigner = null;
public static bool RunningFromVisualStudioDesigner
{
get
{
if (!_runningFromVisualStudioDesigner.HasValue)
{
using (System.Diagnostics.Process currentProcess = System.Diagnostics.Process.GetCurrentProcess())
{
_runningFromVisualStudioDesigner = _designerProcessNames.Contains(currentProcess.ProcessName.ToLower().Trim());
}
}
return _runningFromVisualStudioDesigner.Value;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Are we in design mode?
/// </summary>
/// <returns>True if in design mode</returns>
private bool IsDesignMode() {
// Ugly hack, but it works in every version
return 0 == String.CompareOrdinal(
"devenv.exe", 0,
Application.ExecutablePath, Application.ExecutablePath.Length - 10, 10);
}
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.IsAttached
It's hack-ish, but if you're using VB.NET and when you're running from within Visual Studio My.Application.Deployment.CurrentDeployment will be Nothing, because you haven't deployed it yet. I'm not sure how to check the equivalent value in C#.
using (System.Diagnostics.Process process = System.Diagnostics.Process.GetCurrentProcess())
{
bool inDesigner = process.ProcessName.ToLower().Trim() == "devenv";
return inDesigner;
}
I tried the above code (added a using statement) and this would fail on some occasions for me. Testing in the constructor of a usercontrol placed directly in a form with the designer loading at startup. But would work in other places.
What worked for me, in all locations is:
private bool isDesignMode()
{
bool bProcCheck = false;
using (System.Diagnostics.Process process = System.Diagnostics.Process.GetCurrentProcess())
{
bProcCheck = process.ProcessName.ToLower().Trim() == "devenv";
}
bool bModeCheck = (System.ComponentModel.LicenseManager.UsageMode == System.ComponentModel.LicenseUsageMode.Designtime);
return bProcCheck || DesignMode || bModeCheck;
}
Maybe a bit overkill, but it works, so is good enough for me.
The success in the example noted above is the bModeCheck, so probably the DesignMode is surplus.
You check the DesignMode property of your control:
if (!DesignMode)
{
//Do production runtime stuff
}
Note that this won't work in your constructor because the components haven't been initialized yet.
When running a project, its name is appended with ".vshost".
So, I use this:
public bool IsInDesignMode
{
get
{
Process p = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
bool result = false;
if (p.ProcessName.ToLower().Trim().IndexOf("vshost") != -1)
result = true;
p.Dispose();
return result;
}
}
It works for me.
I'm not sure if running in debug mode counts as real, but an easy way is to include an if statement in your code that checkes for System.Diagnostics.Debugger.IsAttached.
If you created a property that you don't need at all at design time, you can use the DesignerSerializationVisibility attribute and set it to Hidden. For example:
protected virtual DataGridView GetGrid()
{
throw new NotImplementedException("frmBase.GetGrid()");
}
[DesignerSerializationVisibility(DesignerSerializationVisibility.Hidden)]
public int ColumnCount { get { return GetGrid().Columns.Count; } set { /*Some code*/ } }
It stopped my Visual Studio crashing every time I made a change to the form with NotImplementedException() and tried to save. Instead, Visual Studio knows that I don't want to serialize this property, so it can skip it. It only displays some weird string in the properties box of the form, but it seems to be safe to ignore.
Please note that this change does not take effect until you rebuild.
We use the following code in UserControls and it does the work. Using only DesignMode will not work in your app that uses your custom user controls as pointed out by other members.
public bool IsDesignerHosted
{
get { return IsControlDesignerHosted(this); }
}
public bool IsControlDesignerHosted(System.Windows.Forms.Control ctrl)
{
if (ctrl != null)
{
if (ctrl.Site != null)
{
if (ctrl.Site.DesignMode == true)
return true;
else
{
if (IsControlDesignerHosted(ctrl.Parent))
return true;
else
return false;
}
}
else
{
if (IsControlDesignerHosted(ctrl.Parent))
return true;
else
return false;
}
}
else
return false;
}
Basically the logic above boils down to:
public bool IsControlDesignerHosted(System.Windows.Forms.Control ctrl)
{
if (ctrl == null) return false;
if (ctrl.Site != null && ctrl.Site.DesignMode) return true;
return IsControlDesignerHosted(ctrl.Parent);
}
If you are in a form or control you can use the DesignMode property:
if (DesignMode)
{
DesignMode Only stuff
}
I found the DesignMode property to be buggy, at least in previous versions of Visual Studio. Hence, I made my own using the following logic:
Process.GetCurrentProcess().ProcessName.ToLower().Trim() == "devenv";
Kind of a hack, I know, but it works well.
System.ComponentModel.Component.DesignMode == true
To solve the problem, you can also code as below:
private bool IsUnderDevelopment
{
get
{
System.Diagnostics.Process process = System.Diagnostics.Process.GetCurrentProcess();
if (process.ProcessName.EndsWith(".vshost")) return true;
else return false;
}
}
Here's another one:
//Caters only to thing done while only in design mode
if (App.Current.MainWindow == null){ // in design mode }
//Avoids design mode problems
if (App.Current.MainWindow != null) { //applicaiton is running }
After testing most of the answers here, unfortunately nothing worked for me (VS2015).
So I added a little twist to JohnV's answer, which didn't work out of the box, since DesignMode is a protected Property in the Control class.
First I made an extension method which returns the DesignMode's Property value via Reflection:
public static Boolean GetDesignMode(this Control control)
{
BindingFlags bindFlags = BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Static;
PropertyInfo prop = control.GetType().GetProperty("DesignMode", bindFlags);
return (Boolean)prop.GetValue(control, null);
}
and then I made a function like JohnV:
public bool HostedDesignMode
{
get
{
Control parent = Parent;
while (parent != null)
{
if (parent.GetDesignMode()) return true;
parent = parent.Parent;
}
return DesignMode;
}
}
This is the only method that worked for me, avoiding all the ProcessName mess, and while reflection should not be used lightly, in this case it did all the difference! ;)
EDIT:
You can also make the second function an extension method like this:
public static Boolean IsInDesignMode(this Control control)
{
Control parent = control.Parent;
while (parent != null)
{
if (parent.GetDesignMode())
{
return true;
}
parent = parent.Parent;
}
return control.GetDesignMode();
}
For WPF (hopefully this is useful for those WPF people stumbling upon this question):
if (System.ComponentModel.DesignerProperties.GetIsInDesignMode(new DependencyObject()))
{
}
GetIsInDesignMode requires a DependencyObject. If you don't have one, just create one.
/// <summary>
/// Whether or not we are being run from the Visual Studio IDE
/// </summary>
public bool InIDE
{
get
{
return Process.GetCurrentProcess().ProcessName.ToLower().Trim().EndsWith("vshost");
}
}
Here's a flexible way that is adaptable to where you compile from as well as whether or not you care which mode you're in.
string testString1 = "\\bin\\";
//string testString = "\\bin\\Debug\\";
//string testString = "\\bin\\Release\\";
if (AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory.Contains(testString))
{
//Your code here
}