I want to have multiple filters in an APEX report but it seems it's not possible? I'm new to apex so it's quite possible too I just don't know how to do it.
I've searched around the net and looked at the various settings in the APEX page but I can't find what I'm looking for.
Like in this screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/3j3wOIG.png
I can only have 1 filter available. I want to filter on other fields too including fields which are not in the report columns.
Is this possible? If yes, can you please teach me? thanks
Columns that aren't displayed in your report are not rendered on your page, therefore you can not filter on them. If you want do so anyway, you need to create a filter based on page items, which you can append to your report query in the where clause.
e.g. create a page item P1_FILTER1 and reference it in your query as: "...where my_column = nvl(:P1_FILTER1,my_column)".
To ensure data consistency you can best create your page item as a select list.
Related
I have many end users for my reports. Some of them want to look at all website data, some just section A, some section B, etc. For my own sanity and not having to create the same report over and over with different filters, I'm wondering if there's either:
A way to provide a link to a report where the link tells data studio what filter to apply to the report
A way to filter the report based on the user who's logging in.
I have the impression that neither of these is possible, and it seems like people are reluctant to have one dashboard that they have to proactively filter for their section (I'm still going to try that). But I'm hoping that there's perhaps something I didn't know about.
This is possible using Custom bookmark links (doc). The Drill down table example (doc) shows how you can create a table with records linking to a second page of the dashboard with different filters. You could use this to create filter pre-sets for different users groups.
This is currently not possible.
I am required to make a form which will contain important keywords and their description, with the possibility to search between the words. It is loaded from the Help menu and it is designed to give the users detailed help informations about other components. (Just like every application's Help menu)
I only used forms to query tables, and I was wondering, what is the correct way to achieve this? Does Oracle support any feature that would auto-generate a help-form based on my 'Help' inputs from Property Palettes? or do I have to manually write data into a canvas? if so, how can I search through it?
I considered creating a table and writing help informations in it, but I don't think that is the correct way.
Oracle Forms, unfortunately, does not give you programmatic access to values stored in property palettes, so your solution will need to be custom made.
Create a table, e.g. HELP_TOPICS (keyword, help_text), add a list item that contains all the keywords; when a user selects a keyword, query the table to find the help text, and set the value on a display-only text area item on the page.
I am trying to implement the DOJO data gird in my application. On load of the xPages I am getting the current user id in a session scope variable and filtering the REST services that supplies the data grid the data from a view, based on the user id. I have used the "keys" property to filter the values so that the current user should be able to see the values only relevant to him in the grid. This is working fine, but when I try to sort the results once the page is loaded it starts displaying blank values and sort does not work. I have made sure that the columns I require to sort are also made sorted for the back-end view by checking the "Click on column header to sort" option in the view. Still I am unable to get the sorting working for columns. Please let me know if there is a work-around for this problem or am I doing or not doing something for the default sort not to work as expected.
Nash, I have had similar issues with the blank rows as you describe. I think the blanks lines are rows that don't match the keys. Here are my tips for fixing this. The issue I think is not with your grid but your Rest service.
Use a viewJsonService type of rest service
Use a category filter instead of keys
Make your category filter code similar to mine below. This will ensure that you don't show documents to someone who shouldn't see them. When the category is null, the Rest service will show all documents. This isn't causing the blank lines, but is a best practice IMO.
var category:String = lineItemBean.getThisUNID();
//wherever your category comes from, maybe session.getUserName() in your case
if(category == null){
return "show nothing"
} else {
return lineItemBean.getThisUNID();
}
I hope this helps. My guess is that this will fix your sorting issues as well.
I want to know if I can select data from multi-company in Morphex reports, for example: user wants to get report's data from CEU & CEE companies. I don't mean get the whole data from all companies, I mean to get data from specific multi-companies.
I can achieve this in SSRS reports by passing a multi-value parameter to DATAAREAID table's field.
It's seems I can achieve this by set Report's Cross-Company property and QueryRun to yes.
this.query.allowCrossCompany(true);
this.query.addCompanyRang("CEU");
this.query.addCompanyRang("CEE");
Here are some links for more details:
Cross-Company Reports in the AOT
Cross-Company X++ Code Basics
I'm trying to build a FileMaker Pro 11 layout that excludes records containing a certain value. The relevant data is in table Invoice. I want to filter so that Invoice records whose "Invoice Check Grouping" field is blank are not displayed on the layout.
I've added a global field to the invoice table called "Blank Invoice Check Grouping" to use as my filter criteria. I've created a self-join relationship to the Invoice table, joining "Invoice ID" to "Invoice ID" and joining "Invoice Check Grouping" to "Blank Invoice Check Grouping". The resulting table is named "Invoice Check Groupings".
The layout which I build based on table "Invoice Check Groupings" shows all records in Invoice--it does not filter out those with blank values. What am I doing incorrectly?
Thanks,
Ben
Layouts show records in a table (or more accurately, a table occurrence) and don't directly deal with related data. As mentioned by #pft221, you can use relationships for filtering, but only when viewing data through a portal.
If you always want a particular layout to show data based on a particular find, you can do so with a script and a script trigger. First set up a script to do the following:
Enter Find Mode[]
Set Field["Invoice Check Grouping"; "*" // Find all records with any data in this field
Perform Find[]
Note that you can also embed the find request within the Perform Find script step, but I tend to script finds in the above manner as it's easier to see what the find request is in the script and variables can be used in the find request.
Now you need to set your layout to execute this script whenever it's loaded. Go to the layout and enter Layout Mode. Select Layouts>Layout Setup from the menu bar. Click the Script Triggers tab and check the box for OnLayoutEnter and select the script you wrote above. Now whenever the layout is entered, that script will run and exclude the records that have that particular field being empty.
There are many ways to filter records, depending on what you are trying to do and what you are trying to display for your users.
The most common and simple way you can filter records is through a simple Find in a list view. I'm unclear from your question, but my best guess is that you're already using a list view and misunderstanding how FileMaker's relationships and Table Occurrences (TO's) work.
To Filter with the "Find Records" method:
Create a new List View layout of any Table Occurrence of your Invoice Table -- most likely you will want to use the default Table Occurrence that FileMaker created for you when you created the table.
Place the fields that you would like to display on that layout, including the "Invoice Check Grouping" field.
Switch into Find Mode
Put a '*' character into the "Invoice Check Grouping" field
Perform the Find
You should now see a list of all Invoices where the "Invoice Check Grouping" field is not blank. (You can find additional interesting search criteria in the "Insert: Operators" drop down of the title bar.)
Now you may actually be looking to filter related records through a portal but, given that you've set up a self-join on the Invoice index on the Invoice table my guess is that, at best, this would show either 0 or 1 record for each Invoice record you display in your main layout.
To Filter Records with the "Portal Filter" method:
Let's assume, though, that you have a Client table where you'd like to see only the records with a non-blank "Invoice Check Grouping" value. The table set-up would be as follows:
Client
Client ID
[... other client info ...]
Invoice
Invoice ID
Client ID
Invoice Check Grouping
[... other invoice info ...]
With a relationship in the relationships graph:
Client::Client ID ------< Invoice::Client ID
From there you would set up a Form layout on the Client TO and create a portal showing records from the Invoice TO. From the options for the portal you would select "Filter Portal Records" and use a formula similar to:
not IsEmpty(Invoice::Invoice Check Grouping)
Finally, it's worth noting that a portal filter isn't appropriate for all display situations or calculations. You can set up a similar filter completely through your relationships graph (as I believe you have already tried to do.) This will work, once again, for viewing records through a portal but not for the records displayed by a layout itself.
The answers above don't actually help Ben with his question. They are workarounds.
I have the same problem as Ben, and I don't think there is a solution, even now in Filemaker 12. There is I think no way to define a relationship that will omit the related records where the match fields are empty.
Two options come to mind:
On a specific layout, you have more fine-grained control in the portal definition itself, and can use this to exclude the records
You can now use SQL queries to achieve this result within Filemkaer.