Given a group of developers, each one has the following requirements on the respective (local)Windows machines:
Through IDEs like Eclipse, STS etc., run Spring, Hibernate etc. projects
Quickly build, deploy , run, change if required, rebuild and redeploy(everything, preferably via IDEs) the projects available on Github
There are following constraints/objectives :
The individual developer machines have restricted or no Internet access
The developers must take the required jars from a single location which will store jars required across the team
Whenever required, a developer must be able to pull updated jars from the central location onto his local environment and continue to run the projects seamlessly
Within the IDE, build a Github project and run it (locally)
Attached is the image to give a clear idea of the work environment which I'm envisaging!
I have started reading Maven but quite overwhelmed - how should I proceed?
You should use an internal Maven repository. There is such applications as Nexus and Artifactory (those are probably the close numbers 1 and 2 in the business, just my opinion). You can set it up to use your proxy server.
It will be able to serve as a proxy for your Maven clients, and keep a copy of the artifacts that are downloaded. They will even allow you control over what kind of artifacts your developers pull in (although they may not always appreciate that).
It will also be able to store and serve your own artifacts that your developers can deploy (release) to it.
Maven is great at dependency management, and that is what most organizations start using it for. But as your process matures, there is also the opportunity for version/release management using Maven. Developers will build SNAPSHOT versions for themselves, or share these with the team through the repository. When they release their artifacts, they make a final version of the artifact available in the repository.
Maven has great support for your IDEs, myself I use Eclipse a lot, which has m2e to work with Maven.
Apache itself on 'Why do I need a Repository Manager?'
New tools require adaptation, sometimes culture shifts. And in the case of Maven, where many organizations come from scripted builds, it may require a paradigm shift. It sounds a bit as if you're at risk of being overwhelmed some more in the future. I think it will be worth your effort, but you may want to get some experienced help to get you on track.
More of a personal note: done with those proxy servers, alright!
As suggested by Sander Verhagen in another answer, what you should do is to use a repository proxy. Nexus and Artifactory is the most famous one. Here I will describe briefly steps you need to do for what you are looking for:
Set up Nexus in machine M
In Nexus, setup a proxy repository to Central (this should be available out of box), and other repositories that you want your developer to access. You may need to add http proxy setting when you are configuring the Repo Proxy.
(Optional, but recommended) setup a repository group which includes all the public repository proxies. Assuming URL of this proxy group is http://M/nexus/groups/public
In developer's machine, update ~/.m2/settings.xml, set http://M/nexus/groups/public as the mirror of central. If you created other internal hosted repositories in Nexus, you may add them in settings.xml as well.
That's all. You can use Maven as normal. Dependencies will now be fetched from Nexus in M.
Related
I've been using maven since a year for managing my projects' dependencies, but I recently came to know that there is a concept of Maven Repository Manager.
I would like to ask What is a Maven Repository Manager and what is the purpose of using maven repository manager.
A "Maven Repository Manager" is basically a server that stores copies of all of your libraries so that they can be downloaded when a project is built. When you use Maven, you are using a repository manager already called "Maven Central." See here: https://maven.apache.org/repository-management.html
When you are working with a large project or corporation, they may host an alternative to Maven Central, like Sonatype Nexus. There are two reasons why they do.
First, a big corporation might have libraries that are intended only for internal use that are used across a large number of projects. For example, if you worked at Amazon, you might have libraries for completing credit card transactions. That shouldn't necessarily be shared with the rest of the world, so you don't want to put it in Central; you need to put it someplace private.
Second, it reduces bandwidth. If every developer at Amazon only used Maven Central, then that would be lots of network traffic. A repository acts as a "proxy" to Central. It searches internally for a library, and then if it doesn't find it, it downloads it from Central and then saves it for the next time someone asks for it.
To solve problems like:
how do you get your binary to your server in the first place?
which version do you want?
when you deploy a new version how do you revert to an old version?
which employees can access which binaries?
And so forth.
New maven and relatively new to java...
I would like to collaborate on a project in java with fellow classmates. I would like to manage the build with maven and software configuration with github. After reading a bit about it I have the following impression:
Using the two together is simply a matter of pointing a github repository at my local maven project folder. All builds and dependencies will be handled locally with source changes being committed per the strictures of github. The situation becomes more complicated if I wish for github to do something other than configuration, such as hosting the project as a maven repository.
Is my understanding of the situation correct?
You are best advised to only use github for managing source code. Consider installing a dedicated repository manager like one of the following for sharing binaries:
Nexus
Aritfactory
Archiva
A repository manager is also useful for caching artifacts downloaded from 3rd party repositories like Maven Central. I find it an essential component of my ALM infrastructure.
Update
There was a recent Sonatype blog posting called "Wait... You don't have a repository manager?" which gives some explanation as to why people won't use a repository manager.
Wherever you read about continuous delivery or continuous integration it's recommended to use an artifact repository to store the artifacts even though Jenkins already stores them for each build.
So why is it recommended to use an artifact repository? Is there a smooth solution to work with the artifacts of the Jenkins builds, ex. to use these artifacts for deployment?
An artifact repository and continuous integration tools serve two different purposes and one cannot be substituted with the other. Check this video from Artifactory, one of the providers of artifact repositories, about why one should use an artifact repository.
Jenkins stores the artifacts as plain files without versioning while artifacts in an artifact repository can be version controlled. So you have a lot more flexibility in retrieving artifacts and governing them. Read this very good article on why we need them. Surely not all of those things are supported by continuous integration tools like Jenkins.
Moreover, you can also look at the Artifactory plugin for Jenkins which integrates the two.
An artifact repository is needed but the artifact repo is a conceptual piece an not always a distinct tool. With Jenkins you should have MD5 signatures and (I think) a way of downloading the files you want (web service call, right?) from your remote server. Certainly, if you're doing something simple like using the Jenkins build pipeline plugin, it should be able to access the right versions of the files smoothly.
Alternatively, if you are using a separate deployment tool, the better ones bundle an artifact repository.
Regardless, you want what the ITIL folks call a Definitive Media/Software Library. Definitive in that the bits are secure, trusted, and official. And a library in that they can be easily looked up and accessed. When working with an artifact repository, you need to make sure its adequately secure. It is backed up. It is accessible for your deployments (including to production). If you look at Jenkins and it meets your criteria in those categories, consider yourself done. If it's lacking, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was, then you need either a dedicated tool like the Maven repos, or something bundled with the deploy tooling.
For more of my rambling on the subject, there's a recorded webcast. The slides for that are up on Slideshare.
I haven't kept up to date with Jenkins, we still use a version of the CI when it was orginally called Hudson.
In your projects your poms you should normally point to your own artifact repository were you can fetch and deploy your own (company) projects.
Using an artifact repository with your CI server, it can then deploy successfully built snapshot and releases which can be available to other developers.
I am new to Maven and trying to use it for Android build. I have this doubt in my mind which was also triggered by Jason Van Zyl's interview here.
My Question
How to ensure that the dependency we have downloaded from Maven Central is free from Malware or is not corrupted?
You can never be sure it is free from malware, i.e. it is always possible.
Maven Central host open source projects so the source code is always available from somewhere, so if you need to be sure of malware free and also sure of compatible licensing terms you should download the source and build it yourself and not use Maven Central.
I am sure if an artifact did have malware in it the people running Maven Central have a policy to be contacted to investigate such things and deal with it.
...
Re corruption free. Maven makes use of hash digests for many things to ensure corruption free data, your Maven client and Maven Repository can be configured to always validate. Files on the server also usually have a *.md5 or *.sha1 URL of the data checksum.
Also JARs themselves have intrinsic checksums. They are based on ZIP files and these do have a checksum scheme that should detect most corruption. The ZIP directory is always at the end of the file so short/truncated files will also be detected.
Obviously these mechanisms are not 100% reliable but maybe considered 99.99% reliable.
...
As a software producer putting things up on Maven central. I would urge you to always SIGN your JARs. This is a mechanism that allows each independent software producer to sign the original JAR they produce and then distribute it via any mechanism across the internet. Any user can (theoretically) download it from any source and be able to verify that it has not been tampered with.
Unfortunately Maven Central does not have a policy to ensure source code is available alongside binaries, or have a policy enforcing JAR signing. So from a security stand point Maven Central is useful to get things going with your local development but if you do care about security do not use it.
You nee to implement your own security policy (or pay someone else) to implement it on your behalf.
To manage your secured environment you might wish to take a look at one of the Maven repositories you can run on your local network such as Sonatype Nexus (this comes in open-source and free edition with most features enabled).
...
NB I did not read the link you provided yet will do now.
Suggesting to build software yourself instead of downloading it from the Central repository is an amazingly bad idea. Uploads to central are very closely guarded and you can enable strict checksum checks for every download Maven does in your settings.xml.
If the checksum matches you will have the exact copy of artifacts in central and they are very closely monitored during uploads and do not change once uploaded.
In addition you would only use Central indirectly via a company controlled repository manager like Nexus and if you need more security, license and audit tooling and reporting you would look at tools like Sonatype Nexus Professional and Sonatype Insight or similar products.
I have a following problem. We have a central maven repository hosted on our company server. Our team is working on a project. Everyone here uses that repository to get the required artifacts. If something is missing at the moment and is required for the task that the developer is currently dealing with, he installs this artifact manually to the central repository, so that his commits don't break the automated builds.
Now, each developer also has Glassfish v2 installed on his machine. That is for testing and debugging purposes. Before committing the changes, developer makes the .ear for the project with Maven help. However, after the developer deploys the ear to it's local glassfish, frequent errors arise, because the set of glassfish libraries may not contain all the latest dependencies of the central company repository.
Right now in case of the error the developer simply reads the log and looks what exactly is missing. After that he manually copies the required jar inside his local $GLASSFISH_HOME$/lib dir. But that seems a little bit frustrating. How can this be done automatically?
Right now we are trying to implement the following solution. The developer has to synchronize his local maven repository gathering all the artifacts from the central one that are required by the project. This local repository has to be placed on the java classpath, so that glassfish would also see it. Is that a correct approach? Maybe there is a way to install directly all the required artifacts from the central repository inside $GLASSFISH_HOME$/dir and this can be done automatically during deploy?
About having to install dependencies. If the developers need to install dependencies missing from public maven repositories, take into account that usually maven proxies have the ability to cache public repos. For instance, archiva has a proxying cache. If the dependencies are your own project deliverables you should consider releasing and deploying with maven to your company repo.
About latest versions. You need to specify maven what version of dependencies should use. I would prefer editing my poms manually, anyway there's a variety of ways to achieve that.
The libraries should be part of the project, I think. If not standard libraries of glassfish, they should be included, for instance, in your war file as part of your project. If not standard but not part of your project (not the regular approach) consider managing this glassfish as a project on its own (own git/svn repo, own pom, own versions, own everything).
Good luck.