What is the opposite of Regexp.escape ?
> Regexp.escape('A & B')
=> "A\\ &\\ B"
> # do something, to get the next result: (something like Regexp.unescape(A\\ &\\ B))
=> "A & B"
How can I get the original value?
replaces = Hash.new { |hash,key| key } # simple trick to return key if there is no value in hash
replaces['t'] = "\t"
replaces['n'] = "\n"
replaces['r'] = "\r"
replaces['f'] = "\f"
replaces['v'] = "\v"
rx = Regexp.escape('A & B')
str = rx.gsub(/\\(.)/){ replaces[$1] }
Also make sure to #puts output in irb, because #inspect escapes characters by default.
Basically escaping/quoting looks for meta-characters, and prepends \ character (which has to be escaped for string interpretation in source code). But if we find any control character from list: \t, \n, \r, \f, \v, then quoting outputs \ character followed by this special character translated to ascii.
UPDATE:
My solution had problems with special characters (\n, \t ans so on), I updated it after investigating source code for rb_reg_quote method.
UPDATE 2:
replaces is hash, which converts escaped characters (thats why it is used in block attached to gsub) to unescaped ones. It is indexed by character without escape character (second character in sequence) and searches for unescaped value. The only defined values are control-characters, but there is also default_proc attached (block attached to Hash.new), which returns key if there is no value found in hash. So it works like this:
for "n" it returns "\n", the same for all other escaped control characters, because it is value associated with key
for "(" it returns "(", because there is no value associated with "(" key, hash calls #default_proc, which returns key itself
The only characters escaped by Regexp.escape are meta characters and control characters, so we don't have to worry about alphanumerics.
Take a look at http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.0.0/Hash.html#method-i-default_proc for documentation on #defoult_proc
You can perhaps use something like this?
def unescape(s)
eval %Q{"#{s}"}
end
puts unescape('A\\ &\\ B')
Credits to this question.
codepad demo
If you are okay with a regex solution, you can use this:
res = s.gsub(/\\(?!\\)|(\\)\\/, "\\1")
codepad demo
Try this
>> r = Regexp.escape("A & B (and * c [ e] + )")
# => "A\\ &\\ B\\ \\(and\\ \\*\\ c\\ \\[\\ e\\]\\ \\+\\ \\)"
>> r.gsub("\\(","(").gsub("\\)",")").gsub("\\[","[").gsub("\\]","]").gsub("\\{","{").gsub("\\}","}").gsub("\\.",".").gsub("\\?","?").gsub("\\+","+").gsub("\\*","*").gsub("\\ "," ")
# => "A & B (and * c [ e] + )"
Basically, these (, ), [, ], {, }, ., ?, +, * are the meta characters in regex. And also \ which is used as an escape character.
The chain of gsub() calls replace the escaped patterns with corresponding actual value.
I am sure there is a way to DRY this up.
Update: DRY version as suggested by user2503775
>> r.gsub("\\","")
Update:
following are the special characters in regex
[,],{,},(,),|,-,*,.,\\,?,+,^,$,<space>,#,\t,\f,\v,\n,\r
using a regex replace using \\(?=([\\\*\+\?\|\{\[\(\)\^\$\.\#\ ]))\
should give you the string unescaped, you would only have to replace \r\n sequences with there CrLf counterparts.
"There\ is\ a\ \?\ after\ the\ \(white\)\ car\.\ \r\n\ it\ should\ be\ http://car\.com\?\r\n"
is unescaped to :
"There is a ? after the (white) car. \r\n it should be http://car.com?\r\n"
and removing the \r\n gives you :
There is a ? after the (white) car.
it should be http://car.com?
Related
I have the following string -
abcdefgh;
lmnopqrst;
On doing a string = string.split(";"), I get -
["abcdefgh", "\nlmnopqrst"]
Now when I do -
string[1].start_with?("\\")
The function returns false. Whereas if I do
string[0].start_with?("a")
The function return true.
I am new to ruby and just can't understand this behavior. Can anyone tell me what am I doing wrong.
I dont know, butString[1][0] (first character from string) returns "\n" so maybe use this
string[1].start_with?("\n")
This is because "\n" actually does not start with a backslash . It is the line feed character and is considered to be a single character and for that reason it is only presented having the escape character \ in front of it.
So:
string[1].start_with?("\n")
Will return true.
You already tried to search with string[1].start_with?("\\") so you seem to realize you need to escape the backslash character by using \\.
If your input string would look like this:
\abcdefgh;
lmnopqrst;
Then after .split(';') your resulting array would look like this:
["\\abcdefgh;", "\nlmnopqrst"]
Now string[0].start_with?("\\") would return true because the first string actually starts with a single backslash, which was presented with the escape character in the console.
you can try
'\nhello world'.start_with?("\\") # return true
"\nhello world".start_with?("\\") # return false
because '\n' is two chars( \ and n), but "\n" is one char(new line char).
The first character there is not "\" - it's "\n" in the first example, and "\\" in the second. "\n" and "\\" are effectively single characters in this context, even though they look like two characters.
"\n" != "\\", and so start_with? responds false.
I want to write a regex in Ruby that will add a backslash prior to any open square brackets.
str = "my.name[0].hello.line[2]"
out = str.gsub(/\[/,"\\[")
# desired out = "my.name\[0].hello.line\[2]"
I've tried multiple combinations of backslashes in the substitution string and can't get it to leave a single backslash.
You don't need a regular expression here.
str = "my.name[0].hello.line[2]"
puts str.gsub('[', '\[')
# my.name\[0].hello.line\[2]
I tried your code and it worked correct:
str = "my.name[0].hello.line[2]"
out = str.gsub(/\[/,"\\[")
puts out #my.name\[0].hello.line\[2]
If you replace putswith p you get the inspect-version of the string:
p out #"my.name\\[0].hello.line\\[2]"
Please see the " and the masked \. Maybe you saw this result.
As Daniel already answered: You can also define the string with ' and don't need to mask the values.
There is a file that has control B and control C commands separating fields of text. It looks like:
"TEST\003KEY\002TEST\003KEY"
I tried to create a regex that will match this and remove it. I am not sure why this regex is not working:
"TEST\003KEY\002TEST\003KEY".gsub(/\00[23]/, ',')
Try the following:
"TEST\003KEY\002TEST\003KEY".gsub(/\002|\003/, ',')
Here it is demonstrated in irb on my machine:
$ irb
1.9.3p448 :007 > "TEST\003KEY\002TEST\003KEY".gsub(/\002|\003/, ',')
=> "TEST,KEY,TEST,KEY"
The syntax \002|\003 means "match the character literal \002 or the character literal \003". The expression given in the original question \00[23] is not valid: this is the character literal \00 (a null character) followed by the character class [23]: i.e. it matches two-character sequences.
You can also use the [[:cntrl:]] character class to match all control characters:
$ irb
1.9.3p448 :007 > "TEST\003KEY\002TEST\003KEY\005TEST".gsub(/[[:cntrl:]]/, ',')
=> "TEST,KEY,TEST,KEY,TEST"
Here's the deal. First and foremost, computers cannot store characters--they can only store numbers. So when a computer stores a string it converts every character to a number. The numbers for all the basic characters are given by an ascii chart(you can search google for one).
When you tell a computer to print a string, it retrieves the numbers saved for the string and outputs them as characters (using an ascii chart to convert the numbers to characters).
Double quoted strings can contain what are called escape sequences. The most common escape sequence is "\n":
puts "hello\nworld"
--output:--
hello
world
A double quoted string converts the escape sequence "\n" to the ascii code 10:
puts "\n".ord #=>10 (ord() will show you the ascii code for a character)
A double quoted string can also contain escape sequences of the form \ddd, e.g. \002. Escape sequences like that are called octal escape sequences, which means 002 is the octal representation of an ascii code.
In an octal number, the right most digit is the 1's column, and the next digit to the left is the 8's column and the next digit to the left is the 64's column. For instance, this octal number:
\123
is equivalent to 3*1 + 2*8 + 1*64 = 83. It so happens that an "S" has the ascii code 83:
puts "\123" #=>S
Because you also can use octal escape sequences in a double quoted string, that means that instead of using the escape sequence "\n" you could use the octal escape "\012" (2*1 + 1*8 + 0*64 = 10). A double quoted string converts the octal escape sequence "\012" to the ascii code 10, which is the same thing that a double quoted string does to "\n". Here is an example:
puts "hello" + "\012" + "world"
--output:--
hello
world
The final thing to note about octal escape sequences is that you can optionally leave off any leading 0's:
puts "hello" + "\12" + "world"
--output:--
hello
world
Okay, now examine your string:
"TEST\003KEY\002TEST\003KEY"
You can see that it contains three octal escape sequences. A double quoted string converts the octal escape sequence \003 to the ascii code: 3*1 + 0*8 + 0*64 = 3. If you check an ascii chart, the ascii code 3 represents a character called "end of text". A double quoted string converts the octal escape sequence \002 to the ascii code: 2*1 + 0*8 + 0*64 = 2, which represents a character called 'start of text'. I'm not sure where you are getting the "control B" and "control C" names from (maybe those are the key strokes on your keyboard that are mapped to those characters?).
Next, a regex acts like a double quoted string, so
/<in here>/
you can use the same escape sequences as in a double quoted string, and the regex will convert the escape sequences to ascii codes.
Now, in light of all the above, examine your regex:
/\00[23]/
As Richard Cook pointed out, your regex gets interpreted as the octal escape sequence \00 followed by the character class [23]. The octal escape sequence \00 gets converted to the ascii code: 0*1 + 0*8 = 0. And if you look at an ascii chart, the number 0 represents a character called 'null'. So your regex is looking for a null character, followed by either a "2" or a "3", which means your regex is looking for a two character string. But a two character string will never match the octal escape sequence "\003" (or "\002"), which represents only one character.
The main thing to take away from all this is that when you see a string that contains an octal escape sequence:
"hello\012world"
...that string does not contain the characters \, 0, 1, and 2. A double quoted string converts that sequence of characters into one ascii code, which represents ONE character. You can prove that very easily:
puts "hello".length #=>5
puts "hello\012".length #=>6
There are also many other types of escape sequences that can appear in double quoted strings. You would think they would be listed in the String class docs, but they are not.
s = "TEST\003KEY\002TEST\003KEY"
s.split(/[[:cntrl:]]/) * ","
# => "TEST,KEY,TEST,KEY"
Need parse a lot of text files and replace any quoted strings containing cyrillic symbols. They are may contains new lines, non-alphabetic characters and special symbols (for example '$' or escaped quote).
Can anyone help with regex?
From comments:
for example php code
function hello($word) {
$word2 = "ха-ха!";
echo "Привет, $word $word2\n";
}
hello('Мир');
I need match "ха-ха!", "Привет, $word $word2\n" and 'Мир'
This should work:
str = 'The cat is under the "таблица"'
regex = /"\p{Cyrillic}+.*?\.?"/ui
str.match(regex){|s| do_stuff_with_each_matching s}
# or...
str.gsub!(regex){|s| method_that_translates_russian s}
Check it out on live at http://rubular.com/r/0Mwbfinjvp.
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Regexp.html
".*[^a-zA-Z\d]+.*" matches any quoted character sequence containing at least one non-alphanumeric character.
i.e. it matches "aa$bb" and "a1$b1"
It doesn't match "aabb" or a$b.
Hope that this is what you want (Add required escaping).
I'm trying to remove non-letters from a string. Would this do it:
c = o.replace(o.gsub!(/\W+/, ''))
Just gsub! is sufficient:
o.gsub!(/\W+/, '')
Note that gsub! modifies the original o object. Also, if the o does not contain any non-word characters, the result will be nil, so using the return value as the modified string is unreliable.
You probably want this instead:
c = o.gsub(/\W+/, '')
Remove anything that is not a letter:
> " sd 190i.2912390123.aaabbcd".gsub(/[^a-zA-Z]/, '')
"sdiaaabbcd"
EDIT: as ikegami points out, this doesn't take into account accented characters, umlauts, and other similar characters. The solution to this problem will depend on what exactly you are referring to as "not a letter". Also, what your input will be.
Keep in mind that ruby considers the underscore _ to be a word character. So if you want to keep underscores as well, this should do it
string.gsub!(/\W+/, '')
Otherwise, you need to do this:
string.gsub!(/[^a-zA-Z]/, '')
That will work most of the cases, except when o initially does not contain any non-letter, in which case gsub! will return nil.
If you just want a replaced string, it can be simpler:
c = o.gsub(/\W+/, '')
Using \W or \w to select or delete only characters won't work. \w means A-Z, a-z, 0-9, and "_":
irb(main):002:0> characters = (' ' .. "\x7e").to_a.join('')
=> " !\"\#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?#ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~"
irb(main):003:0> characters.gsub(/\W+/, '')
=> "0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
So, stripping using \W preserves digits and underscores.
If you want to match characters use /[A-Za-z]+/, or the POSIX character class [:alpha:], i.e. /[[:alpha:]]+/, or /\p{ALPHA}/.
The final format is the Unicode property for 'A'..'Z' + 'a'..'z' in ASCII, and gets extended when dealing with Unicode, so if you have multibyte characters you should probably use that.
use Regexp#union to create a big matching object
allowed = Regexp.union(/[a-zA-Z0-9]/, " ", "-", ":", ")", "(", ".")
cleanstring = dirty_string.chars.select {|c| c =~ allowed}.join("")
I don't see what that o.replace is in there for if you have a string:
string = 't = 4 6 ^'
And you do:
string.gsub!(/\W+/, '')
You get:
t46
If you want to get rid of the number characters too, you can do:
string.gsub!(/\W+|\d+/, '')
And you get:
t