Sorry for my English.
Is table Category:
ID
PID
name
And hierarchy:
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
Category 4
Category 5
Category 3
Category 7
Category 8
Name of category may be repeated. How do I can to find all children on request: "Category 2 and Category 3" for oracle?
The result should be:
Category 2
Category 3
Category 4
Category 5
== Updated ==
I need to find by name "Category 2 AND Category 3", because name of category may be repeated!
A couple of assumptions. PID is the parent id of the current record and you know the ID of category 2.
I will use 245 as the id of category 2 in this example. If you don't have a way to get a unique id for the starting category, that is a different problem all together that has to be solved in your data.
(I gave a similar answer to another question yesterday doing a bottom up query. The difference between bottom up and top down is the order of the col1 = col2 in the connect by prior statement.)
Use a hierarchical query.
select Lpad(Name,Length(Name) + LEVEL * 10 - 10,'-') Name
from Category
start with id = 245
connect by prior id = pid;
Here is an sqlFiddle.
============Edit==============
Added this now that I'm more clear on what you need.
select Lpad(Name,Length(c1.Name) + LEVEL * 10 - 10,'-') Name
from Category c1
start with c1.name = 'Category 2'
and c1.id in (select c2.pid from category c2 where c2.name = 'Category 3')
connect by prior c1.id = c1.pid;
This will give you all branches starting with a Category 2 that have a Category 3 as the next child.
I've added another sqlFiddle with an additional branch having a 2 / 5 relation so you can see it only returns the two 2 /3 branches.
Related
image
image2
Now I have like this
image3
but I want have more categories
like this
How to select many category?
Let’s say in your case, we need to define the category for every features. So feature can have many categories and inverse category can have many features. Thus, it will be a Many To Many relationships.
To accomplish this we need to create 3 tables features, categories, and intermediate table feature_category. The feature_category table will have the feature_id and category_id column which connects both feature and category table and this intermediate table called the pivot table.
Here are the table structures:
features
id - integer
name - string
categories
id - integer
name - string
feature_category
feature_id - integer
category_id - integer
=> category
id name
-- -------
1 Category 1
2 Category 2
3 Category 3
4 Category 4
=> features
id name
-- -------
1 Feature 1
2 Feature 2
3 Feature 3
4 Feature 4
=> feature_category
id feature_id category_id
-- ------- -------
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 2
4 3 3
4 3 4
===============================
Our feature_category table before sync() operation:
id feature_id category_id
-- ------- -------
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 2 3
4 2 4
5 3 2
6 4 3
Laravel Sync() example:
<?php
use App\Models\Feature;
$user = Feature::find(2);
// Want to keep only "Category 2" (Id 2) category
$user->category()->sync([2]);
After performing the above operation, our feature_category table will look like below:
id feature_id category_id
-- ------- -------
1 1 1
2 2 2
5 3 2
6 4 3
Checkboxes or dropdowns can be used from the frontend to select multiple categories for features and sync() method can be used to update feature cards accordingly.
First you need to create new table feature_category with two fields :
(same type of features.id) feature_id
(same type of categories.id) category_id
Second create belongsToMany relationship directly in Voyager.
Example :
I have 8 tables with data of sold products. Each table is about a unique product. In Power BI, I want to create a matrix, containing the sold quantities (values) per product (rows), per month (columns), and the number of unique customers who bought the products.
Each of the 8 tables with the sales data has the following structure. So the App ID is different for each table, but is constantly the same within a table. Example for a Cars table:
Customer ID Month App ID
29273 2020-3 1
90283 2018-5 1
55824 2016-12 1
55824 2018-10 1
55824 2021-1 1
So, a bicycle table would have the same structure, but then the App ID's would be, for example 2, in the entire table.
I have two tables that are connected with the 8 product tables in a one-to-many relationship. The Calendar table based on the Month column, and the App table based on the App ID column.
The table Calendar:
Month
2015-1
2015-2
2015-3
2015-4
2015-5
...
...
The table Apps:
ID Name
1 Cars
2 Bicycle
3 Scooter
4 ...
So, the structure is:
I created the Calendar en Apps tables so that I could use them for the matrix, but it doesn't work like I want so far. At the end, I want to create a matrix like this (where P = the number of products sold, and C = the number of customers in that month for that product):
Product 2015-1 2015-2 2015-3 2015-4 2015-5 ...
P C P C P C P C P C
Cars 3 2 5 5 7 6 2 1 4 2
Bicycle 11 9 17 14 5 5 4 4 8 6
Scooter ...
Skateboard ...
As mentioned, I made that Calendar and App table so that I can use the columns from it to fill the labels in the rows and columns. What I am unable to do is create such a 'general variable' of the number of products sold per product, and the number of customers associated with it.
Can someone explain to me how I can fill the matrix with the numbers of products (and customers) sold, so that the matrix looks like the one described above?
I think this is pretty straight forward. You actually don't need the 'Calendar' table as it only contains the same info as is already in the 'Sales' table.
You should configure the matrix like this:
Rows: 'Name' (from the 'Apps' table)
Columns: 'Month' (from the
'Sales' table)
Values:
C = Count distinct of CustomerId (from 'Sales' table) [this counts the unique customers per month and app)
P = Count of CustomerId (from 'Sales' table) [this counts the rows of the 'Sales' table which is your number of products if every row represents 1 sale)
The different aggregations (count distinct, count) can be found under the Values' options:
I have a table which contains values in a hierarchy structure.
I was wondering if anyone knew of a query where I could loop through each row finding it's ID and then search for rows with a PARENTID of the same value. So for example:
With a table
ID PARENTID LEVEL VALUE
-------------------------------
1 0 COUNTRY USA
2 1 CITY NYC
3 1 CITY LA
4 2 TEAM GIANTS
5 2 TEAM JETS
6 3 TEAM RAMS
7 3 TEAM CHARGERS
I could start by searching for ID:2 (NYC) and from there find all teams in that city. Something like (but I do not know the total loops I'll need to do)
SELECT ID2,VALUE FROM TABLE1 WHERE PARENTID = ID1;
Gives me:
3,LA
6,RAMS
7,CHARGERS
connect by is a common way to loop through a hierarchy like that. If you add start with, you can pick a starting point in the hierarchy.
SELECT table1.*, level
FROM table1
START WITH id = 3
CONNECT BY parentid = PRIOR id;
Please note that level is an Oracle keyword which will tell you how many loops you have stepped through so far. I wouldn't recommend using it as a column name. There's some other pseudocolumns and functions you might find helpful too.
Let's say i have a table structure like this :
ID | Name | SCHOOLNAME | CODESCHOOL
1 DARK Kindergarten 123 1
2 DARK Kindergarten 111 1
3 Knight NY University 3
4 Knight LA Senior HS 2
5 JOHN HARVARD 3
so, how to diplay all of the data above into like this :
ID | Name | SCHOOLNAME | CODESCHOOL
1 DARK Kindergarten 123 1
3 Knight NY University 3
5 JOHN HARVARD 3
my purpose is want to display data with the max of codeschool, but when i tried with my query below :
SELECT NAME, SCHOOLNAME, MAX(CODESCHOOL) FROM TABLE GROUP BY NAME, SCHOOLNAME
but the result is just like this :
ID | Name | SCHOOLNAME | CODESCHOOL
1 DARK Kindergarten 123 1
2 DARK Kindergarten 111 1
3 Knight NY University 3
4 Knight LA Senior HS 2
5 JOHN HARVARD 3
maybe it caused by the GROUP BY SCHOOLNAME, when i tried to not select SCHOOLNAME, the data displayed just like what i expected, but i need the SCHOOLNAME field for search condition in my query
hope you guys can help me out of this problem
any help will be appreciated
thanks
Using some wacky joins you can get a functional get max rows per category query.
What you essentially need to do is to join the table to itself and make sure that the joined values only contain the top values for the CODESCHOOL column.
I've also added a :schoolname parameter because you wanted to search by schoolname
Example:
SELECT
A.*
FROM
TABLE1 A
LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE1 B ON B.NAME = A.NAME
AND B.CODESCHOOL < A.CODESCHOOL
WHERE
B.CODESCHOOL IS NULL AND
(
(A.SCHOOLNAME = :SCHOOLNAME AND :SCHOOLNAME IS NOT NULL) OR
(:SCHOOLNAME IS NULL)
);
this should create this output, note that dark has 2 outputs because it has 2 rows with the same code school which is the max in the dark "category"/name.
ID|NAME |SCHOOLNAME |CODESCHOOL
--| -----|----------------|----------
4|Knight|LA Senior HS | 2
5|JOHN |HARVARD | 3
2|DARK |Kindergarten 111| 1
1|DARK |Kindergarten 123| 1
It's not the most effective query but it should be more than good enough as a starting point.
Sidenote: I've been blatantly stealing this logic for a while from https://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/03/14/how-to-find-the-max-row-per-group-in-sql-without-subqueries/
I am using an analytical window function ROW_NUMBER().
This will group (or partition) by NAME then select the top 1 CODESCHOOL in DESC order.
Select NAME,
SCHOOLNAME,
CODESCHOOL
From (
Select NAME,
SCHOOLNAME,
CODESCHOOL,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY NAME ORDER BY CODESCHOOL DESC) as rn
from myTable)
Where rn = 1;
My Database Table Contain Records Like this:
ID ProductId Occurences
1 1 1
2 2 5
3 3 3
4 4 3
5 5 5
6 6 8
7 7 9
Now i want to get top 4 ProductId with the highest Occurences.
This is my Query:
var data = (from temp in context.Product
orderby temp.Occurences descending
select temp).Take(4).ToList();
Now here as because ProductId 2 and 5 have same occurences and ProductId 3 and 4 also have same occurences then here I am not getting that how to resolve this means which product id should i take as because they are having same occurences.
Basically i am selecting this productid to display this products on my website.i will display those products which are return by this query.
So can anyone please give me some idea like how to resolve this ???
Expected Output:
ID ProductId Occurences
1 7 9
2 6 8
so Now for 3rd position Which ProductId i should select as because both ProductId 2 and 5 have same Occurences and for 4th position which ProductId i should select among 3 and 4 as because they both too have same occurences.
can I suggest you to use group by technique and pick the first one
context.Product.GroupBy(p => p.Occurance)
.Select(grp => grp.FirstOrDefault())
.Take(4)ToList();
Sorry, I have not tested this but it should do the job. You just need to add OrderBy along with it.