I have a PNG image that I would like to turn into a layered PSD image. The image itself is mostly white space with several areas of text.
I tried to convert this PNG to a PSD but I ended up with a flat image.
I am not too versed in image processing. Is there any service that can recognize areas of white space and turn the various components of an image into layers?
Sorry png or jpeg files cannot be converted into layers . For this, you need to break the image into layers and then convert the file as .psd
Yes .PNG can be layered (from Macromedia Fireworks back in the day)
I still have about 100,000 layered files in .PNG
If I remember right Corel Draw can convert these files.
Yes, but in Adobe Fireworks CS6 .PNG format.
Save your document with the Photoshop layers in .PSD format in a folder
Open saved .PSD with Adobe Fireworks CS6
In Fireworks CS6, click 'File' then 'Save As' and select the first 'Fireworks .PNG' format option. You will notice that the name of your file will have the following extensions: [name.fw.png].
Save
PS. Never Save to "PNG level.PNG" because the layers will be unified. Just like it should not be exported to any .PNG. That is, just save the .PSD document to .FW.PNG.
Related
I'm trying to create a small PDF file, embedding one optimized PNG image displayed as a header and footer on a 3 page PDF (same image must appear 6x in the PDF)
My optimized PNG image is only 2.3KB. It looks very sharp.
Failed with libreoffice
When I insert just one instance of the 2.3KB PNG image into a Libreoffice Writer doc containing only text, then export as PDF I can see that the image gets re-compressed to JPG and the resulting PDF file grows by about 40KB after adding the image. It also loses quality, the PNG also gets JPG fuzzy edges.
If I right click the image and select compression, there is no way to disable recompressing the image (it's already optimized better than libreoffice could do it) I've tried setting a compression level of 0,1,9 etc. Choosing JPG, no resize, lossless, etc but there was no improvement.
Failed with wkhtmltopdf
I also tried making a test page and used wkhtml2pdf but it did the same thing. Adding the low quality flag made no difference.
PDF Spec suggests PNG is supported?
From skimming the PDF spec, it looks like PNG images are supported.
Even plain text PDF files are surprisingly large
The disappointing thing is also when I take a 7KB HTML file which is basically just <html><body><p>foo...</p><p>bar...</p> (only about 15 paragraphs) with no CSS. The resulting 2 page PDF file is 30KB. Why should a 7kb (almost plain text) file become 30kb as a PDF?
Suggestions?
Can someone please suggest how to make a small PDF file in Linux?
I need to include 7KB of text and repeat one PNG image 6 times.
Manually or programatically. I'll take whatever I can get at this point.
PDF Spec suggests PNG is supported?
PNG isn't supported per se; PDF allows embedding JPEG images as-is, but not PNG images. PDF does borrow a set of features of the PNG format, however.
rinohtype (full disclosure: I'm the author) tries to embed as much as possible from PNG images as-is into the PDF. This does involve some bit-juggling to separate the alpha channel from the color data for example, but no reencoding of the image is performed. It does not (yet) support interlaced PNGs.
rinohtype should be able to do what you want to achieve. But please note that it currently is in a beta stage, so you might encounter some bugs.
Even plain text PDF files are surprisingly large
To keep the PDF size as small as possible, make sure not to embed/subset any of the fonts. Use only the fonts from the base 14 PDF fonts which are provided by PDF readers.
What you want is certainly achievable. Regarding the image quality, I would recommend making your image twice the size that you want it to actually display at in the PDF to keep it looking sharp.
As to the size, I've just modified a test in my PDF writer module (WIP..) to include a 7.2K png, 200px x 70px, in a PDF twice and the PDF came out at 6.8K 8). There's not much text included, but more text will only add what it's worth + a small percentage.
You can see the module and original test here.. https://github.com/DoccaPDF/docca-pdf-writer/blob/master/src/tests/writer.js#L40
That test adds ~112K of images to the PDF and results in a 103K PDF.
Of course not all images are created equal so you milage may vary..
*the images are only actually added to the PDF once, but are displayed multiple time.
I have a weird problem in matlab. I have code that takes in a directory of jp2 files and converts all of them to either tiff, png, or a jpg file. Then it puts these files in a new directory. The user can specify how big they want the file to be in terms of how many pixels are used (EX: 1:3:end is every three pixels). This code works perfectly for the png and tiff conversions.
With the jpg conversion there is no error whatsoever but when I go to click on the jpeg file in the new folder (which it does go to at least) It says "Windows Photo Viewer can't open this picture because the file appears to be damaged, corrupted, or is too large" I tried opening the pictures in other viewers but it said the same thing. All of the png and tiff pictures opened fine.
Some help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
Edit: I noticed when I call imshow on the location of the jpeg file it actually does show up in matlab. It still does not show up in any image viewers though
I opened one PNG file in Inkscape and exported it as SVG. When I opened that file with notepad I came to know that the PNG file is embedded within it. If the conversion happened then the resulting file should have only SVG related tags. It shouldn't embed the image within it. Or Am I doing anything wrong.
Note: Save as option also producing the same kind of file. I am using Inkscape version 0.48 in Windows 7 - 64 bit.
This is a bit of an old thread, but it comes up early in Google so I thought I'd contribute something.
In Inkscape, you must do a trace to change the image into SVG. Look at the Path | Trace bitmap menu item and play with the options on that screen.
After creating the trace, you can remove your source image and have a pure svg in your saved file.
I've found it helpful to create layers in Inkscape and move the source image to one layer and put the trace on another layer to let me make quick comparisons using the 'hide layer' buttons.
BTW, your source image can be anything - bmp, jpg, png, etc.
A .png file is a raster image file. In order to convert it to a vector graphic based format like .svg and have it be "native" svg rather than an included image you are going to either have to use a program that can rasterize it or in Inkscape trace the bitmap and turn it into paths. Inkscape provides information on tracing: http://inkscape.org/doc/tracing/tutorial-tracing.html
Is there a way to ungroup objects of a saved powerpoint jpg file ?
like a rectangular shape over a text made using powerpoint and saved image as jpg , is there a way to separate rectangular shape and review the text ?
A jpg file is flat. It doesn't care if it was a face photo or a converted powerpoint; the information you want is not present in the file any more.
I'm working on a Sidebar Gadget and cannot get my JPEGs to show up (PNGs work). When I try to open the file by itself in IE8 it doesn't work. Firefox, of course, can open it fine.
JPEG Details:
Dimensions: 1080X900
180 dpi
Bit depth 24
Color representation: uncalibrated
I've found some things talking about the images being compressed incorrectly (?) but I haven't been able to get it working...
Any clues?
IE8 drops support for CMYK JPEG and renders them as the infamous red X without so much as a warning.
If you have ImageMagick:
identify -verbose image.jpg
will show you the image colorspace. If it's CMYK, you can convert to RGB with:
convert broken.jpg -colorspace RGB fixed.jpg
If you need to do CMYK to RGB conversion on a whole batch of JPEG-images, this command may be helpful to you:
for i in *.jpg; do convert "$i" -colorspace RGB "$i"; done
PS: If you'd like to see what is going on, just add -verbose:
for i in *.jpg; do convert "$i" -colorspace RGB -verbose "$i"; done
I had a similar issue with IE8 not displaying two JPEG images. FF, Safari, Chrome all displayed them without complaint but IE acted as if the files were not there. I have no idea what was going on, but a quick image conversion to gif or png fixed the problem. Just another in a long line of confirmations that IE sucks.
Had similar problems with existing images, which will not show up in IE8.
Problem is, as converter42 says: CMYK-Images
Convert them to RGB colorspace and all is good
The Solution with the PNG is not the best, because PNG files can be MUUUCH larger than JPGS.
If you are using photoshop for creating the jpgs. Try the below.
Open the file and go to 'Image' menu
Go to Mode
Select RGB
Save and upload to server.
This should work.
Why are you dealing with the image at 180 dpi and not the 72dpi screen resolution? At screen resolution the image will be roughly double that size. Still, the size is manageable for any browser.
When creating a gadget, you should be using PNGs for all the elements of the gadgets. Are you having issues displaying JPEG photos?
Have you looked for the yellow bar at the top of IE that blocks certain suspicious content from being loaded (popups, activex, javascript, etc.)? If it appears, try telling it to "allow".
Lastly, what are you using to compress your images to JPEG?
EDIT: If you want to do batch conversion use the batch converter in photoshop or use the Actions panel to record the conversion process for a single image, then replay the action on an entire folder. Additionally, you can save this action to a "droplet" which is a small application containing the action that you can drop an image or folder on top to.
Alternatively, if you don't fell like learning Actions, XNView is an excellent image viewer and converter that supports something like 160 different image formats and can batch convert and batch rename huge lists of files.
I fixed this issue by opening the CMYK JPEG file in Windows Paint and then saving as a JPEG, which Paint encodes as RGB by default. Not a great solution because I'm sure that Paint's converter is not as robust as Photoshop's, but this can be a quick fix if the job needs to be done now and there's no access to the tools above.