Spring 3.2 with MVC, ContentNegotation, REST and PDF Generator - spring

Let's say, I have a REST styled controller mapping
#RequestMapping(value="users", produces = {MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE})
public List<User> listUsers(#ReqestParams Integer offset, #ReqestParams Integer limit, #ReqestParams String query) {
return service.loadUsers(query, offset, limit);
}
Serving JSON (or even XML) is not an issue, this is easy using ContentNegotation and MessageConverters
<bean id="contentNegotiationManager" class="org.springframework.web.accept.ContentNegotiationManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="favorPathExtension" value="true" />
<property name="favorParameter" value="false" />
<property name="ignoreAcceptHeader" value="false" />
<property name="mediaTypes" >
<value>
html=text/html
json=application/json
xml=application/xml
</value>
</property>
</bean>
Now, I need to add support for PDF. Naturally, I want to use (Spring) MVC + REST as much as possible. Most examples I have found implement this with an explicit definition not using REST style, e.g.
#RequestMapping(value="users", produces = {"application/pdf"})
public ModelAndView listUsersAsPdf(#ReqestParams Integer offset, #ReqestParams Integer limit, #ReqestParams String query) {
List<User> users = listUsers(offset, limit, query); // delegated
return new ModelAndView("pdfView", users);
}
That works, but is not very comfortable because for every alternate output (PDF, Excel, ...) I would add a request mapping.
I have already added application/pdf to the content negotation resolver; unfortunately any request with a suffix .pdf or the Accept-Header application/pdf were be responded with 406.
What is the ideal setup for a REST/MVC style pattern to integrate alternate output like PDF?

You can create a WEB-INF/spring/pdf-beans.xml like below.
<bean id="listofusers" class="YourPDFBasedView"/>
And your controller method will return view name as listofusers.
#RequestMapping(value="users")
public ModelAndView listUsersAsPdf(#ReqestParams Integer offset, #ReqestParams Integer limit, #ReqestParams String query) {
List<User> users = listUsers(offset, limit, query); // delegated
return new ModelAndView("listofusers", users);
}
And you can use contentNegotiationViewResolver in this way:
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.XmlViewResolver">
<property name="order" value="1"/>
<property name="location" value="WEB-INF/spring/pdf-views.xml"/>
</bean>
<!--
View resolver that delegates to other view resolvers based on the content type
-->
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.ContentNegotiatingViewResolver">
<!-- All configuration is now done by the manager - since Spring V3.2 -->
<property name="contentNegotiationManager" ref="cnManager"/>
</bean>
<!--
Setup a simple strategy:
1. Only path extension is taken into account, Accept headers are ignored.
2. Return HTML by default when not sure.
-->
<bean id="cnManager" class="org.springframework.web.accept.ContentNegotiationManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="ignoreAcceptHeader" value="true"/>
<property name="defaultContentType" value="text/html" />
</bean>
For JSON: Create a generic JSON view resolver like below and register it as bean in context file.
public class JsonViewResolver implements ViewResolver {
/**
* Get the view to use.
*
* #return Always returns an instance of {#link MappingJacksonJsonView}.
*/
#Override
public View resolveViewName(String viewName, Locale locale) throws Exception {
MappingJacksonJsonView view = new MappingJacksonJsonView();
view.setPrettyPrint(true); // Lay the JSON out to be nicely readable
return view;
}
}
Same for XML:
public class MarshallingXmlViewResolver implements ViewResolver {
private Marshaller marshaller;
#Autowired
public MarshallingXmlViewResolver(Marshaller marshaller) {
this.marshaller = marshaller;
}
/**
* Get the view to use.
*
* #return Always returns an instance of {#link MappingJacksonJsonView}.
*/
#Override
public View resolveViewName(String viewName, Locale locale)
throws Exception {
MarshallingView view = new MarshallingView();
view.setMarshaller(marshaller);
return view;
}
}
and register above xml view resolver in context file like this:
<oxm:jaxb2-marshaller id="marshaller" >
<oxm:class-to-be-bound name="some.package.Account"/>
<oxm:class-to-be-bound name="some.package.Customer"/>
<oxm:class-to-be-bound name="some.package.Transaction"/>
</oxm:jaxb2-marshaller>
<!-- View resolver that returns an XML Marshalling view. -->
<bean class="some.package.MarshallingXmlViewResolver" >
<constructor-arg ref="marshaller"/>
</bean>
You can find more information at this link:
http://spring.io/blog/2013/06/03/content-negotiation-using-views/
Using all view resolver techniques, you can avoid writing duplicate methods in controller, such as one for xml/json, other for excel, other for pdf, another for doc, rss and all.

Knalli, if you replace #ResponseBody with ModelAndView(), you can achieve both the features.
Is there any reason you want to keep #ResponseBody ? I just want to know if I am missing anything, just want to learn.
Other option is to write HttpMessageConverters then:
Some samples are here.
Custom HttpMessageConverter with #ResponseBody to do Json things
http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2013/07/spring-mvc-requestbody-and-responsebody-demystified.html

This is working sample. I have configured contentnegotiationviewresolver for this, and give highest order. After that I have ResourceBundleViewResolver for JSTL and Tiles View, then XmlViewResolver for excelResolver, pdfResolver, rtfResolver. excelResolver, pdfResolver, rtfResolver. XmlViewResolver and ResourceBundleViewResolver works only with MAV only, but MappingJacksonJsonView and MarshallingView takes care for both MAV and #ResponseBody return value.
<bean id="contentNegotiatingResolver" class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.ContentNegotiatingViewResolver">
<property name="order"
value="#{T(org.springframework.core.Ordered).HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE}" />
<property name="mediaTypes">
<map>
<entry key="json" value="application/json" />
<entry key="xml" value="application/xml" />
<entry key="pdf" value="application/pdf" />
<entry key="xlsx" value="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" />
<entry key="doc" value="application/msword" />
</map>
</property>
<property name="defaultViews">
<list>
<!-- JSON View -->
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.json.MappingJacksonJsonView" />
<!-- XML View -->
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.xml.MarshallingView">
<constructor-arg>
<bean id="jaxbMarshaller" class="org.springframework.oxm.jaxb.Jaxb2Marshaller">
<property name="classesToBeBound">
<list>
<value>Employee</value>
<value>EmployeeList</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
</constructor-arg>
</bean>
</list>
</property>
<property name="ignoreAcceptHeader" value="true" />
</bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.ResourceBundleViewResolver"
id="resourceBundleResolver">
<property name="order" value="#{contentNegotiatingResolver.order+1}" />
</bean>
<bean id="excelResolver" class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.XmlViewResolver">
<property name="location">
<value>/WEB-INF/tiles/spring-excel-views.xml</value>
</property>
<property name="order" value="#{resourceBundleResolver.order+1}" />
</bean>
<bean id="pdfResolver" class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.XmlViewResolver">
<property name="location">
<value>/WEB-INF/tiles/spring-pdf-views.xml</value>
</property>
<property name="order" value="#{excelResolver.order+1}" />
</bean>
<bean id="rtfResolver" class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.XmlViewResolver">
<property name="location">
<value>/WEB-INF/tiles/spring-rtf-views.xml</value>
</property>
<property name="order" value="#{excelResolver.order+1}" />
</bean>
And our XMLViewResolver spring-pdf-views.xml looks like this.
<bean id="employees"
class="EmployeePDFView"/>
And EmployeePDFView will have code for generating pdf and writing pdf byte stream on Response object. This will resolve to rest url that will end with .pdf extension, and when you return MAV with "employees" id.

Related

Data is not getting inserted in JPA Spring weblogic

I have following configuration in application context
<jee:jndi-lookup id="dataSource" jndi-name="MY_DS" />
<context:load-time-weaver/>
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.transaction.jta.WebLogicJtaTransactionManager" />
<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager"/>
<bean
class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="emf"
class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="jtaDataSource" ref="dataSource" />
<property name="jpaVendorAdapter" ref="jpaVendorAdapter" />
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="pu_TEST" />
</bean>
<bean id="jpaVendorAdapter"
class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.EclipseLinkJpaVendorAdapter">
<property name="database" value="ORACLE" />
<property name="showSql" value="true" />
</bean>
Now my DAO Class
#Repository
public class EmployeeDAO{
#PersistenceContext
private EntityManager em;
#Transactional
public void create(Employee entity) {
LOG.error("Enitity Manager:create" + em);
em.persist(entity);
// em.flush(); if i use flush it saves
}
}
Now when I save the entity it does not say give any error but no data is updated into db.
I do not wish to use flush as entitymanager is injected by spring and should perform flush at the end automatically which is not happening. correct my understanding.
Adding facade class may be issue is there, Does Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW has anything to do here?
#Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void process(){
Employee e = factory.getEmployee();
employeeDao.create(e);
}
On Debug after create method call it shows employee got primary key populated that mean db call has made but at the end it is not persisted.
Please try either of the 3 :
1.Solution 1
Please call below code
em.joinTransaction();
just before
em.persistEntity(entity);
2.Solution 2
make attribute readOnly=false in #Transactional
3.Solution 3
Try manually adding bean EmployeeDAO in spring xml file
or else you can try below:
#Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRED)

Spring Controller #ResponseBody text/xml response UTF-8 encoding issue

I have annotation based Spring Rest Service running on jetty web server(also tomcat).The controller code is :
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.POST, value = { "/ssrfeed/exec/",
"/query/exec" }, consumes = { "application/xml", "text/xml",
"application/x-www-form-urlencoded" }, produces = {
"application/xml;charset=UTF-8", "text/xml;charset=UTF-8",
"application/x-www-form-urlencoded;charset=UTF-8" })
#ResponseBody
protected String getXmlFeed(HttpServletRequest request,
#PathVariable String serviceName, #RequestBody String xmlReq) {
//code....
return appXMLResponse;
}
The problem is that the response xml returned by Controller contains some characters like ä ö ü (Umlaute). The response when rendered on browser gives the parsing error :
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: //localhost:8083/MySerice/ssrfeed/exec/
Line Number 18111, Column 17:
<FIRST_NAME>Tzee rfista</FIRST_NAME>
----------------^
(a small triangle appear in place of ü)
The expected is : <FIRST_NAME>Tzeeürfista</FIRST_NAME>
I have tried a below solutions but issue is still there.
Tried using filters referring to solution given on technowobble
passed the charset to StringHttpMessageConverter property
<bean id="restTemplate" class="org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate">
<property name="messageConverters">
<list>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter">
<property name="supportedMediaTypes" value="application/json" />
</bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.StringHttpMessageConverter">
<property name="supportedMediaTypes" value="text/xml;charset=UTF-8" />
</bean>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
ref link
Enabled the SetCharacterEncodingFilter in tomcat -web.xml
Changed the code to return ResponseEntity instead of String and removed #ResponseBody.
protected ResponseEntity<String> getXmlFeed(HttpServletRequest
request, #PathVariable String serviceName, #RequestBody String xmlReq) {
//line of code
HttpHeaders responseHeaders = new HttpHeaders();
responseHeaders.add("Content-Type", "application/xml; charset=utf-8");
return new ResponseEntity<String>(appXMLResponse, responseHeaders, HttpStatus.CREATED);
}
The 4th solution works But this being existing code I can't change method signature as it might impact existing clients of this service. Any ideas/pointers to solve this ?
in your dispatcher servlet context xml, you have to add a propertie. e.g.
<bean class = "org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.annotation.AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter">
<property name="messageConverters">
<array>
<bean class = "org.springframework.http.converter.StringHttpMessageConverter">
<property name="supportedMediaTypes" value = "text/plain;charset=UTF-8" />
</bean>
</array>
</property>
</bean>
Finally the issue is resolved. Here is what I did.
1. Used StringHttpMessageConverter's constructer for setting charset as :
<bean id="stringHttpMessageConverter"
class="org.springframework.http.converter.StringHttpMessageConverter">
<constructor-arg index="0" name="defaultCharset" value="UTF-8"/>
<property name="supportedMediaTypes">
<list>
<value>application/xml</value>
<value>text/xml</value>
<value>application/x-www-form-urlencoded</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
Also I removed the unnecessary spring3.0 and 3.1 jars from my project. These were not required but were lying there. (should have done earlier).
This solved the problem for me.
There is no such answer with what I've solved my encoding problem so I'll post it.
I've got Spring RestService running on Jetty. At response body part of data that was received from database had correct UTF-8 encoding, but data from .property file (with error and success messages) had incorrect encoding and was like äöü...
At first I checked encoding of .property file itself with File->Settings->Editor->Code Style-> File Encodings (in such way you could not only check but set encoding you need) - it was UTF-8.
Then I set response encoding #RequestMapping in my RestController:
#RequestMapping(value = "/category/{categoryId}", method = RequestMethod.DELETE, produces = { "application/json;**charset=UTF-8**" })
and set defaultCharset property for Jackson2:
<bean id="jsonConverter" class="org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter">
<property name="supportedMediaTypes" value="application/json;" />
<property name="prettyPrint" value="true" />
<property name="defaultCharset" value="UTF-8"/>
</bean>
No result.
But then I found that the problem could be solved by adding UTF-8 encoding to
PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer who grabs data from my .property file:
<bean class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
<property name="locations">
<list>
<value>classpath:app.properties</value>
<value>classpath:database.properties</value>
<value>classpath:ru.error.messages.properties</value>
<value>classpath:ru.success.messages.properties</value>
</list>
</property>
<property name="fileEncoding" value="UTF-8"/>
</bean>
... and the problem has gone )))

Spring MVC REST produces XML on default

I have a problem with Spring MVC and REST. The problem is that when i post a url without extension or whatever extension other then json or html or htm i am always getting an xml response. But i want it to default to text/html response. I was searching in many topics and cant find the answear to this.
Here is my Controller class :
#RequestMapping(value="/user/{username}", method=RequestMethod.GET)
public String showUserDetails(#PathVariable String username, Model model){
model.addAttribute(userManager.getUser(username));
return "userDetails";
}
#RequestMapping(value = "/user/{username}", method = RequestMethod.GET,
produces={"application/xml", "application/json"})
#ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.OK)
public #ResponseBody
User getUser(#PathVariable String username) {
return userManager.getUser(username);
}
Here is my mvc context config:
<mvc:resources mapping="/resources/**"
location="/resources/"/>
<context:component-scan
base-package="com.chodak.controller" />
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.ContentNegotiatingViewResolver">
<property name="defaultContentType" value="text/html" />
<property name="mediaTypes">
<map>
<entry key="json" value="application/json"/>
<entry key="xml" value="application/xml"/>
</map>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="viewResolver"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.UrlBasedViewResolver">
<property name="viewClass">
<value>
org.springframework.web.servlet.view.tiles3.TilesView
</value>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="tilesConfigurer"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.tiles3.TilesConfigurer">
<property name="definitions">
<list>
<value>/WEB-INF/tiles.xml</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
Actually when I tried the built in Eclipse browser it works fine, but when I use firefox or chrome it shows xml response on a request with no extension. I tried using ignoreAcceptHeader, but no change.
Also works on IE :/
If anyone has an idea please help, Thank you.
I actually found out how to do it, i dont really understand why but it is working now, I added default views to the contentresolver like :
<property name="defaultViews">
<list>
<!-- JSON View -->
<bean
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.json.MappingJacksonJsonView">
</bean>
<!-- JAXB XML View -->
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.view.xml.MarshallingView">
<constructor-arg>
<bean class="org.springframework.oxm.jaxb.Jaxb2Marshaller">
<property name="classesToBeBound">
<list>
<value>com.chodak.tx.model.User</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
</constructor-arg>
</bean>
</list>
</property>
and removed the getUser method, the one annoted to produce xml and json. If I leave it with the added default views its still not working. If anyone can explain why it would be awesome :)
You can do
import org.springframework.http.MediaType;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.ContentNegotiationConfigurer;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.WebMvcConfigurer;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.WebMvcConfigurerAdapter;
#Configuration
// #EnableWebMvc already autoconfigured by Spring Boot
public class MvcConfiguration {
#Bean
public WebMvcConfigurer contentNegotiationConfigurer() {
return new WebMvcConfigurerAdapter() {
#Override
public void configureContentNegotiation(ContentNegotiationConfigurer configurer) {
configurer.favorPathExtension(false)
.favorParameter(true)
.parameterName("mediaType")
.ignoreAcceptHeader(true)
.useJaf(false)
.defaultContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
.mediaType("xml", MediaType.APPLICATION_XML)
.mediaType("json", MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON);
// this line alone gave me xhtml for some reason
// configurer.defaultContentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_UTF8);
}
};
}
(tried with Spring Boot 1.5.x)
see https://spring.io/blog/2013/05/11/content-negotiation-using-spring-mvc
"What we did, in both cases:
Disabled path extension. Note that favor does not mean use one approach in preference to another, it just enables or disables it. The order of checking is always path extension, parameter, Accept header.
Enable the use of the URL parameter but instead of using the default parameter, format, we will use mediaType instead.
Ignore the Accept header completely. This is often the best approach if most of your clients are actually web-browsers (typically making REST calls via AJAX).
Don't use the JAF, instead specify the media type mappings manually - we only wish to support JSON and XML."

Datasource initialization at server start up

We have an application where we have used spring for IOC. We have the dataSource bean configured in applicationContext.xml and that is referenced in other bean definations.
The dataSource bean defination looks like:
<bean id="dbDataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource"
destroy-method="close">
<property name="driverClassName" value="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver" />
<property name="url"
value="jdbc:oracle:oci:#TESTDB" />
<property name="username" value="TESTUSER" />
<property name="password" value="TESTPWD" />
<property name="initialSize" value="50" />
<property name="maxActive" value="40" />
<property name="maxIdle" value="10" />
<property name="minIdle" value="10" />
<property name="maxWait" value="-1" />
</bean>
<bean id="serviceDAO" class="com.test.impl.ServiceDAOImpl">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dbDataSource" />
</bean>
ServiceDAOImpl looks as follows:
public class ServiceDAOImpl implements ServiceDAO {
private JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
public void setDataSource(DataSource dataSource) {
this.jdbcTemplate = new JdbcTemplate(dataSource);
}
#SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
public ValueObj readValue(String key) {
String query = "SELECT * FROM SERVICE_LOOKUP WHERE KEY=?";
/**
* Implement the RowMapper callback interface
*/
return (ValueObj) jdbcTemplate.queryForObject(query,
new Object[] { key }, new RowMapper() {
public Object mapRow(ResultSet resultSet, int rowNum)
throws SQLException {
return new ValueObj(resultSet.getString("KEY"),
resultSet.getString("VALUE"));
}
});
}
public ServiceDAOImpl() {
}
}
Now, at the server start up injection is happening fine and when we use the dataSource in serviceDAOImpl the connection is happening fine. But the very first time the database call is made it takes around 3 mins to get the response back. I think this is because the pool creation is done during the first call and we have set the parameter "initialSize" = 50 in applicationConext.xml.
So, to avoid this we need a way in which the pool can be created during the application startup itself and can be used directly.
Please suggest. Let me know if any clarification required.
Regards
Saroj
There's a work-around for this .You could force jdbcTemplate to use the
DB connection at startup. See the link here for detailed explanation .
<bean id="jdbcTemplate" class="org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate">
<constructor-arg index="0" ref="dataSource"/>
<constructor-arg index="1" value="false"/>
</bean>
The second constructor-arg is the lazy Init flag.
Aravind A's solution is the preffered one, but just in case you don't want to define an extra bean you can point spring to your DAO's init method:
<bean id="serviceDAO" class="com.test.impl.ServiceDAOImpl" init-method="init">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dbDataSource" />
</bean>
and then define ServiceDAOImpl.init() which calls some sql like SELECT 1 FROM SERVICE_LOOKUP LIMIT 1 or even better some noop like SELECT 1:
public class ServiceDAOImpl implements ServiceDAO {
public void init() {
String query = "SELECT 1 FROM SERVICE_LOOKUP LIMIT 1";
int i = jdbcTemplate.queryForInt(query);
}
}

Does order matter while injecting properties in ProxyFactoryBean

I am trying to inject the aspects in a service. For this service I am creating a proxied object using classic way.
I have written a bean- baseProxy of type (ProxyFactoryBean) which contains a list of all the required advices.
<bean id="baseProxy" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
<property name="interceptorNames">
<list>
<value>methodInvocationAdvice</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
I am creating a proxy for the service like this :
<bean id="singproxy" parent="baseProxy">
<property name="target" ref="singtarget" />
<property name="targetClass" value="com.spring.learning.SingingService"></property>
</bean>
Which doesn't work but when I revert these two properties and write like this :
<bean id="singproxy" parent="baseProxy">
<property name="targetClass" value="com.spring.learning.SingingService"></property>
<property name="target" ref="singtarget" />
</bean>
To my surprise it works fine. In spring does it matter on the order for bean ? Or its a special case with ProxyFactoryBean?
I tried with Spring 3.0 I am not sure same behavior exists with previous versions.
Concerning target and targetClass, It's one or the other, but not both. Here's the relevant source (from org.springframework.aop.framework.AdvisedSupport), a parent class of ProxyFactoryBean:
public void setTarget(Object target) {
setTargetSource(new SingletonTargetSource(target));
}
public void setTargetSource(TargetSource targetSource) {
this.targetSource = (targetSource != null ? targetSource : EMPTY_TARGET_SOURCE);
}
public void setTargetClass(Class targetClass) {
this.targetSource = EmptyTargetSource.forClass(targetClass);
}
As you can see, both setTarget() and setTargetClass() write to the same field, so the last assignment wins.

Resources