search in folder that has a space in its name - bash

I have tried the examples below, but it does not return anything, but if I drop the name with the space in it, it works. How to handle foldernames with a space in it?
MainDir="/Users/redres/Dropbox/Computer\ Ebooks/Skimmed"
# FS=$'\n'
while IFS= read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done < <(find "$MainDir" -iname '*' -print0)
i=1
for i in $(find $MainDir -type f); do echo "$i"; done;
thanks

MainDir="/Users/redres/Dropbox/Computer\ Ebooks/Skimmed"
Either quote the space or \-escape it, not both. Use
MainDir="/Users/redres/Dropbox/Computer Ebooks/Skimmed"

The formatting of the code is enough to make one weep!
However, this should work, assuming there isn't actually a backslash in the directory name before the space:
MainDir="/Users/redres/Dropbox/Computer Ebooks/Skimmed"
while IFS= read -d '' -r file
do
printf "File found: '%s'\n" "$file"
done < <(find "$MainDir" -print0)
For example:
$ mkdir -p 'Double Spaced Directory/Holograms/Object Lesson'
$ cp /dev/null 'Double Spaced Directory/Holograms/Object Lesson/Obstacle Course'
$ MainDir=$PWD/"Double Spaced Directory"
$ while IFS= read -d '' -r file
> do
> printf "File found: '%s'\n" "$file"
> done < <(find "$MainDir" -iname '*' -print0)
File found: '/Users/jleffler/soq/Double Spaced Directory'
File found: '/Users/jleffler/soq/Double Spaced Directory/Holograms'
File found: '/Users/jleffler/soq/Double Spaced Directory/Holograms/Object Lesson'
File found: '/Users/jleffler/soq/Double Spaced Directory/Holograms/Object Lesson/Obstacle Course'
$

Related

How to include escape characters in grep results [duplicate]

I want to iterate over a list of files. This list is the result of a find command, so I came up with:
getlist() {
for f in $(find . -iname "foo*")
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
It's fine except if a file has spaces in its name:
$ ls
foo_bar_baz.txt
foo bar baz.txt
$ getlist
File found: foo_bar_baz.txt
File found: foo
File found: bar
File found: baz.txt
What can I do to avoid the split on spaces?
You could replace the word-based iteration with a line-based one:
find . -iname "foo*" | while read f
do
# ... loop body
done
There are several workable ways to accomplish this.
If you wanted to stick closely to your original version it could be done this way:
getlist() {
IFS=$'\n'
for file in $(find . -iname 'foo*') ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done
}
This will still fail if file names have literal newlines in them, but spaces will not break it.
However, messing with IFS isn't necessary. Here's my preferred way to do this:
getlist() {
while IFS= read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
If you find the < <(command) syntax unfamiliar you should read about process substitution. The advantage of this over for file in $(find ...) is that files with spaces, newlines and other characters are correctly handled. This works because find with -print0 will use a null (aka \0) as the terminator for each file name and, unlike newline, null is not a legal character in a file name.
The advantage to this over the nearly-equivalent version
getlist() {
find . -iname 'foo*' -print0 | while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done
}
Is that any variable assignment in the body of the while loop is preserved. That is, if you pipe to while as above then the body of the while is in a subshell which may not be what you want.
The advantage of the process substitution version over find ... -print0 | xargs -0 is minimal: The xargs version is fine if all you need is to print a line or perform a single operation on the file, but if you need to perform multiple steps the loop version is easier.
EDIT: Here's a nice test script so you can get an idea of the difference between different attempts at solving this problem
#!/usr/bin/env bash
dir=/tmp/getlist.test/
mkdir -p "$dir"
cd "$dir"
touch 'file not starting foo' foo foobar barfoo 'foo with spaces'\
'foo with'$'\n'newline 'foo with trailing whitespace '
# while with process substitution, null terminated, empty IFS
getlist0() {
while IFS= read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
# while with process substitution, null terminated, default IFS
getlist1() {
while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
# pipe to while, newline terminated
getlist2() {
find . -iname 'foo*' | while read -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# pipe to while, null terminated
getlist3() {
find . -iname 'foo*' -print0 | while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# for loop over subshell results, newline terminated, default IFS
getlist4() {
for file in "$(find . -iname 'foo*')" ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# for loop over subshell results, newline terminated, newline IFS
getlist5() {
IFS=$'\n'
for file in $(find . -iname 'foo*') ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# see how they run
for n in {0..5} ; do
printf '\n\ngetlist%d:\n' $n
eval getlist$n
done
rm -rf "$dir"
There is also a very simple solution: rely on bash globbing
$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ touch "stupid file1"
$ touch "stupid file2"
$ touch "stupid file 3"
$ ls
stupid file 3 stupid file1 stupid file2
$ for file in *; do echo "file: '${file}'"; done
file: 'stupid file 3'
file: 'stupid file1'
file: 'stupid file2'
Note that I am not sure this behavior is the default one but I don't see any special setting in my shopt so I would go and say that it should be "safe" (tested on osx and ubuntu).
find . -iname "foo*" -print0 | xargs -L1 -0 echo "File found:"
find . -name "fo*" -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l
See man xargs.
Since you aren't doing any other type of filtering with find, you can use the following as of bash 4.0:
shopt -s globstar
getlist() {
for f in **/foo*
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
The **/ will match zero or more directories, so the full pattern will match foo* in the current directory or any subdirectories.
I really like for loops and array iteration, so I figure I will add this answer to the mix...
I also liked marchelbling's stupid file example. :)
$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ touch "stupid file1"
$ touch "stupid file2"
$ touch "stupid file 3"
Inside the test directory:
readarray -t arr <<< "`ls -A1`"
This adds each file listing line into a bash array named arr with any trailing newline removed.
Let's say we want to give these files better names...
for i in ${!arr[#]}
do
newname=`echo "${arr[$i]}" | sed 's/stupid/smarter/; s/ */_/g'`;
mv "${arr[$i]}" "$newname"
done
${!arr[#]} expands to 0 1 2 so "${arr[$i]}" is the ith element of the array. The quotes around the variables are important to preserve the spaces.
The result is three renamed files:
$ ls -1
smarter_file1
smarter_file2
smarter_file_3
find has an -exec argument that loops over the find results and executes an arbitrary command. For example:
find . -iname "foo*" -exec echo "File found: {}" \;
Here {} represents the found files, and wrapping it in "" allows for the resultant shell command to deal with spaces in the file name.
In many cases you can replace that last \; (which starts a new command) with a \+, which will put multiple files in the one command (not necessarily all of them at once though, see man find for more details).
I recently had to deal with a similar case, and I built a FILES array to iterate over the filenames:
eval FILES=($(find . -iname "foo*" -printf '"%p" '))
The idea here is to surround each filename with double quotes, separate them with spaces and use the result to initialize the FILES array.
The use of eval is necessary to evaluate the double quotes in the find output correctly for the array initialization.
To iterate over the files, just do:
for f in "${FILES[#]}"; do
# Do something with $f
done
In some cases, here if you just need to copy or move a list of files, you could pipe that list to awk as well.
Important the \"" "\" around the field $0 (in short your files, one line-list = one file).
find . -iname "foo*" | awk '{print "mv \""$0"\" ./MyDir2" | "sh" }'
Ok - my first post on Stack Overflow!
Though my problems with this have always been in csh not bash the solution I present will, I'm sure, work in both. The issue is with the shell's interpretation of the "ls" returns. We can remove "ls" from the problem by simply using the shell expansion of the * wildcard - but this gives a "no match" error if there are no files in the current (or specified folder) - to get around this we simply extend the expansion to include dot-files thus: * .* - this will always yield results since the files . and .. will always be present. So in csh we can use this construct ...
foreach file (* .*)
echo $file
end
if you want to filter out the standard dot-files then that is easy enough ...
foreach file (* .*)
if ("$file" == .) continue
if ("file" == ..) continue
echo $file
end
The code in the first post on this thread would be written thus:-
getlist() {
for f in $(* .*)
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
Hope this helps!
Another solution for job...
Goal was :
select/filter filenames recursively in directories
handle each names (whatever space in path...)
#!/bin/bash -e
## #Trick in order handle File with space in their path...
OLD_IFS=${IFS}
IFS=$'\n'
files=($(find ${INPUT_DIR} -type f -name "*.md"))
for filename in ${files[*]}
do
# do your stuff
# ....
done
IFS=${OLD_IFS}

Cannot reference a file name that has spaces in a unix shell script [duplicate]

I want to iterate over a list of files. This list is the result of a find command, so I came up with:
getlist() {
for f in $(find . -iname "foo*")
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
It's fine except if a file has spaces in its name:
$ ls
foo_bar_baz.txt
foo bar baz.txt
$ getlist
File found: foo_bar_baz.txt
File found: foo
File found: bar
File found: baz.txt
What can I do to avoid the split on spaces?
You could replace the word-based iteration with a line-based one:
find . -iname "foo*" | while read f
do
# ... loop body
done
There are several workable ways to accomplish this.
If you wanted to stick closely to your original version it could be done this way:
getlist() {
IFS=$'\n'
for file in $(find . -iname 'foo*') ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done
}
This will still fail if file names have literal newlines in them, but spaces will not break it.
However, messing with IFS isn't necessary. Here's my preferred way to do this:
getlist() {
while IFS= read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
If you find the < <(command) syntax unfamiliar you should read about process substitution. The advantage of this over for file in $(find ...) is that files with spaces, newlines and other characters are correctly handled. This works because find with -print0 will use a null (aka \0) as the terminator for each file name and, unlike newline, null is not a legal character in a file name.
The advantage to this over the nearly-equivalent version
getlist() {
find . -iname 'foo*' -print0 | while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done
}
Is that any variable assignment in the body of the while loop is preserved. That is, if you pipe to while as above then the body of the while is in a subshell which may not be what you want.
The advantage of the process substitution version over find ... -print0 | xargs -0 is minimal: The xargs version is fine if all you need is to print a line or perform a single operation on the file, but if you need to perform multiple steps the loop version is easier.
EDIT: Here's a nice test script so you can get an idea of the difference between different attempts at solving this problem
#!/usr/bin/env bash
dir=/tmp/getlist.test/
mkdir -p "$dir"
cd "$dir"
touch 'file not starting foo' foo foobar barfoo 'foo with spaces'\
'foo with'$'\n'newline 'foo with trailing whitespace '
# while with process substitution, null terminated, empty IFS
getlist0() {
while IFS= read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
# while with process substitution, null terminated, default IFS
getlist1() {
while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
# pipe to while, newline terminated
getlist2() {
find . -iname 'foo*' | while read -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# pipe to while, null terminated
getlist3() {
find . -iname 'foo*' -print0 | while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# for loop over subshell results, newline terminated, default IFS
getlist4() {
for file in "$(find . -iname 'foo*')" ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# for loop over subshell results, newline terminated, newline IFS
getlist5() {
IFS=$'\n'
for file in $(find . -iname 'foo*') ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# see how they run
for n in {0..5} ; do
printf '\n\ngetlist%d:\n' $n
eval getlist$n
done
rm -rf "$dir"
There is also a very simple solution: rely on bash globbing
$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ touch "stupid file1"
$ touch "stupid file2"
$ touch "stupid file 3"
$ ls
stupid file 3 stupid file1 stupid file2
$ for file in *; do echo "file: '${file}'"; done
file: 'stupid file 3'
file: 'stupid file1'
file: 'stupid file2'
Note that I am not sure this behavior is the default one but I don't see any special setting in my shopt so I would go and say that it should be "safe" (tested on osx and ubuntu).
find . -iname "foo*" -print0 | xargs -L1 -0 echo "File found:"
find . -name "fo*" -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l
See man xargs.
Since you aren't doing any other type of filtering with find, you can use the following as of bash 4.0:
shopt -s globstar
getlist() {
for f in **/foo*
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
The **/ will match zero or more directories, so the full pattern will match foo* in the current directory or any subdirectories.
I really like for loops and array iteration, so I figure I will add this answer to the mix...
I also liked marchelbling's stupid file example. :)
$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ touch "stupid file1"
$ touch "stupid file2"
$ touch "stupid file 3"
Inside the test directory:
readarray -t arr <<< "`ls -A1`"
This adds each file listing line into a bash array named arr with any trailing newline removed.
Let's say we want to give these files better names...
for i in ${!arr[#]}
do
newname=`echo "${arr[$i]}" | sed 's/stupid/smarter/; s/ */_/g'`;
mv "${arr[$i]}" "$newname"
done
${!arr[#]} expands to 0 1 2 so "${arr[$i]}" is the ith element of the array. The quotes around the variables are important to preserve the spaces.
The result is three renamed files:
$ ls -1
smarter_file1
smarter_file2
smarter_file_3
find has an -exec argument that loops over the find results and executes an arbitrary command. For example:
find . -iname "foo*" -exec echo "File found: {}" \;
Here {} represents the found files, and wrapping it in "" allows for the resultant shell command to deal with spaces in the file name.
In many cases you can replace that last \; (which starts a new command) with a \+, which will put multiple files in the one command (not necessarily all of them at once though, see man find for more details).
I recently had to deal with a similar case, and I built a FILES array to iterate over the filenames:
eval FILES=($(find . -iname "foo*" -printf '"%p" '))
The idea here is to surround each filename with double quotes, separate them with spaces and use the result to initialize the FILES array.
The use of eval is necessary to evaluate the double quotes in the find output correctly for the array initialization.
To iterate over the files, just do:
for f in "${FILES[#]}"; do
# Do something with $f
done
In some cases, here if you just need to copy or move a list of files, you could pipe that list to awk as well.
Important the \"" "\" around the field $0 (in short your files, one line-list = one file).
find . -iname "foo*" | awk '{print "mv \""$0"\" ./MyDir2" | "sh" }'
Ok - my first post on Stack Overflow!
Though my problems with this have always been in csh not bash the solution I present will, I'm sure, work in both. The issue is with the shell's interpretation of the "ls" returns. We can remove "ls" from the problem by simply using the shell expansion of the * wildcard - but this gives a "no match" error if there are no files in the current (or specified folder) - to get around this we simply extend the expansion to include dot-files thus: * .* - this will always yield results since the files . and .. will always be present. So in csh we can use this construct ...
foreach file (* .*)
echo $file
end
if you want to filter out the standard dot-files then that is easy enough ...
foreach file (* .*)
if ("$file" == .) continue
if ("file" == ..) continue
echo $file
end
The code in the first post on this thread would be written thus:-
getlist() {
for f in $(* .*)
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
Hope this helps!
Another solution for job...
Goal was :
select/filter filenames recursively in directories
handle each names (whatever space in path...)
#!/bin/bash -e
## #Trick in order handle File with space in their path...
OLD_IFS=${IFS}
IFS=$'\n'
files=($(find ${INPUT_DIR} -type f -name "*.md"))
for filename in ${files[*]}
do
# do your stuff
# ....
done
IFS=${OLD_IFS}

bash iterate over a directory sorted by file size

As a webmaster, I generate a lot of junk files of code. Periodically I have to purge the unneeded files filtered by extention. Example: "cleaner txt" Easy enough. But I want to sort the files by size and process them for the "for" loop. How can I do that?
cleaner:
#/bin/bash
if [ -z "$1" ]; then
echo "Please supply the filename suffixes to delete.";
exit;
fi;
filter=$1;
for FILE in *.$filter; do clear;
cat $FILE; printf '\n\n'; rm -i $FILE; done
You can use a mix of find (to print file sizes and names), sort (to sort the output of find) and cut (to remove the sizes). In case you have very unusual file names containing any possible character including newlines, it is safer to separate the files by a character that cannot be part of a name: NUL.
#/bin/bash
if [ -z "$1" ]; then
echo "Please supply the filename suffixes to delete.";
exit;
fi;
filter=$1;
while IFS= read -r -d '' -u 3 FILE; do
clear
cat "$FILE"
printf '\n\n'
rm -i "$FILE"
done 3< <(find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type f -name "*.$filter" \
-printf '%s\t%p\0' | sort -zn | cut -zf 2-)
Note that we must use a different file descriptor than stdin (3 in this example) to pass the file names to the loop. Else, if we use stdin, it will also be used to provide the answers to rm -i.
Inspired from this answer, you could use the find command as follows:
find ./ -type f -name "*.yaml" -printf "%s %p\n" | sort -n
find command prints the the size of the files and the path so that the sort command prints the results from the smaller one to the larger.
In case you want to iterate through (let's say) the 5 bigger files you can do something like this using the tail command like this:
for f in $(find ./ -type f -name "*.yaml" -printf "%s %p\n" |
sort -n |
cut -d ' ' -f 2)
do
echo "### $f"
done
If the file names don't contain newlines and spaces
while read filesize filename; do
printf "%-25s has size %10d\n" "$filename" "$filesize"
done < <(du -bs *."$filter"|sort -n)
while read filename; do
echo "$filename"
done < <(du -bs *."$filter"|sort -n|awk '{$0=$2}1')

How to concatenate a list of folder paths within a variable that have spaces in them in shell script [duplicate]

I want to iterate over a list of files. This list is the result of a find command, so I came up with:
getlist() {
for f in $(find . -iname "foo*")
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
It's fine except if a file has spaces in its name:
$ ls
foo_bar_baz.txt
foo bar baz.txt
$ getlist
File found: foo_bar_baz.txt
File found: foo
File found: bar
File found: baz.txt
What can I do to avoid the split on spaces?
You could replace the word-based iteration with a line-based one:
find . -iname "foo*" | while read f
do
# ... loop body
done
There are several workable ways to accomplish this.
If you wanted to stick closely to your original version it could be done this way:
getlist() {
IFS=$'\n'
for file in $(find . -iname 'foo*') ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done
}
This will still fail if file names have literal newlines in them, but spaces will not break it.
However, messing with IFS isn't necessary. Here's my preferred way to do this:
getlist() {
while IFS= read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
If you find the < <(command) syntax unfamiliar you should read about process substitution. The advantage of this over for file in $(find ...) is that files with spaces, newlines and other characters are correctly handled. This works because find with -print0 will use a null (aka \0) as the terminator for each file name and, unlike newline, null is not a legal character in a file name.
The advantage to this over the nearly-equivalent version
getlist() {
find . -iname 'foo*' -print0 | while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: %s\n' "$file"
done
}
Is that any variable assignment in the body of the while loop is preserved. That is, if you pipe to while as above then the body of the while is in a subshell which may not be what you want.
The advantage of the process substitution version over find ... -print0 | xargs -0 is minimal: The xargs version is fine if all you need is to print a line or perform a single operation on the file, but if you need to perform multiple steps the loop version is easier.
EDIT: Here's a nice test script so you can get an idea of the difference between different attempts at solving this problem
#!/usr/bin/env bash
dir=/tmp/getlist.test/
mkdir -p "$dir"
cd "$dir"
touch 'file not starting foo' foo foobar barfoo 'foo with spaces'\
'foo with'$'\n'newline 'foo with trailing whitespace '
# while with process substitution, null terminated, empty IFS
getlist0() {
while IFS= read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
# while with process substitution, null terminated, default IFS
getlist1() {
while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done < <(find . -iname 'foo*' -print0)
}
# pipe to while, newline terminated
getlist2() {
find . -iname 'foo*' | while read -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# pipe to while, null terminated
getlist3() {
find . -iname 'foo*' -print0 | while read -d $'\0' -r file ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# for loop over subshell results, newline terminated, default IFS
getlist4() {
for file in "$(find . -iname 'foo*')" ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# for loop over subshell results, newline terminated, newline IFS
getlist5() {
IFS=$'\n'
for file in $(find . -iname 'foo*') ; do
printf 'File found: '"'%s'"'\n' "$file"
done
}
# see how they run
for n in {0..5} ; do
printf '\n\ngetlist%d:\n' $n
eval getlist$n
done
rm -rf "$dir"
There is also a very simple solution: rely on bash globbing
$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ touch "stupid file1"
$ touch "stupid file2"
$ touch "stupid file 3"
$ ls
stupid file 3 stupid file1 stupid file2
$ for file in *; do echo "file: '${file}'"; done
file: 'stupid file 3'
file: 'stupid file1'
file: 'stupid file2'
Note that I am not sure this behavior is the default one but I don't see any special setting in my shopt so I would go and say that it should be "safe" (tested on osx and ubuntu).
find . -iname "foo*" -print0 | xargs -L1 -0 echo "File found:"
find . -name "fo*" -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l
See man xargs.
Since you aren't doing any other type of filtering with find, you can use the following as of bash 4.0:
shopt -s globstar
getlist() {
for f in **/foo*
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
The **/ will match zero or more directories, so the full pattern will match foo* in the current directory or any subdirectories.
I really like for loops and array iteration, so I figure I will add this answer to the mix...
I also liked marchelbling's stupid file example. :)
$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ touch "stupid file1"
$ touch "stupid file2"
$ touch "stupid file 3"
Inside the test directory:
readarray -t arr <<< "`ls -A1`"
This adds each file listing line into a bash array named arr with any trailing newline removed.
Let's say we want to give these files better names...
for i in ${!arr[#]}
do
newname=`echo "${arr[$i]}" | sed 's/stupid/smarter/; s/ */_/g'`;
mv "${arr[$i]}" "$newname"
done
${!arr[#]} expands to 0 1 2 so "${arr[$i]}" is the ith element of the array. The quotes around the variables are important to preserve the spaces.
The result is three renamed files:
$ ls -1
smarter_file1
smarter_file2
smarter_file_3
find has an -exec argument that loops over the find results and executes an arbitrary command. For example:
find . -iname "foo*" -exec echo "File found: {}" \;
Here {} represents the found files, and wrapping it in "" allows for the resultant shell command to deal with spaces in the file name.
In many cases you can replace that last \; (which starts a new command) with a \+, which will put multiple files in the one command (not necessarily all of them at once though, see man find for more details).
I recently had to deal with a similar case, and I built a FILES array to iterate over the filenames:
eval FILES=($(find . -iname "foo*" -printf '"%p" '))
The idea here is to surround each filename with double quotes, separate them with spaces and use the result to initialize the FILES array.
The use of eval is necessary to evaluate the double quotes in the find output correctly for the array initialization.
To iterate over the files, just do:
for f in "${FILES[#]}"; do
# Do something with $f
done
In some cases, here if you just need to copy or move a list of files, you could pipe that list to awk as well.
Important the \"" "\" around the field $0 (in short your files, one line-list = one file).
find . -iname "foo*" | awk '{print "mv \""$0"\" ./MyDir2" | "sh" }'
Ok - my first post on Stack Overflow!
Though my problems with this have always been in csh not bash the solution I present will, I'm sure, work in both. The issue is with the shell's interpretation of the "ls" returns. We can remove "ls" from the problem by simply using the shell expansion of the * wildcard - but this gives a "no match" error if there are no files in the current (or specified folder) - to get around this we simply extend the expansion to include dot-files thus: * .* - this will always yield results since the files . and .. will always be present. So in csh we can use this construct ...
foreach file (* .*)
echo $file
end
if you want to filter out the standard dot-files then that is easy enough ...
foreach file (* .*)
if ("$file" == .) continue
if ("file" == ..) continue
echo $file
end
The code in the first post on this thread would be written thus:-
getlist() {
for f in $(* .*)
do
echo "File found: $f"
# do something useful
done
}
Hope this helps!
Another solution for job...
Goal was :
select/filter filenames recursively in directories
handle each names (whatever space in path...)
#!/bin/bash -e
## #Trick in order handle File with space in their path...
OLD_IFS=${IFS}
IFS=$'\n'
files=($(find ${INPUT_DIR} -type f -name "*.md"))
for filename in ${files[*]}
do
# do your stuff
# ....
done
IFS=${OLD_IFS}

Why is bash echo adding new line in find results?

When I echo the results of a find, bash is replacing the filenames' spaces with newlines. The second version shows the error. Why is that?
First version:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Bash ${BASH_VERSION}"
for f in *.txt
do
echo " $f"
done
output, no errors:
Bash 5.0.3(1)-release
File 1.txt
File 2.txt
Second version:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Bash ${BASH_VERSION}"
for f in $(find . -maxdepth 1 -type f)
do
echo " $f"
done
output with errors:
Bash 5.0.3(1)-release
./File
1.txt
./File
2.txt
Thanks to Gordon Davisson and his reference, I've understood it's not as trivial as it seems:
while IFS= read -r -d $'\0' f; do
printf " %s\n" "$f"
done < <(find . -maxdepth 1 -type f -print0)
This uses NULL byte (\0) as line delimiter, splitting the array returned by find at the end of each filename (instead of each space, which was the source of the error I was getting).
I would recommend you to use printf instead of echo because it gives more consistent behavior than echo.
#!/bin/bash
echo "Bash ${BASH_VERSION}"
for f in *.txt
do
printf "%s " $f
done
The above program shows filenames on the same line separated by a tab and below program for newline.
#!/bin/bash
echo "Bash ${BASH_VERSION}"
for f in *.txt
do
printf "%s\n" $f
done

Resources