I am using spring-security 3.0.2.RELEASE with spring-security-kerberos-core 1.0.0.M2 to implement SPNEGO based authentication.
The server has more than one valid DNS name. One refers to the machine itself (machine.domain), the other refers to the application (app.domain). Currently there is no reverse proxy set up.
I need to ensure that SPNEGO works for both valid DNS names. As it is, I have the machine name set up as the SPN. If I use IE7 to connect to the application, it works to connect to the machine name, but not the application name (HTTP 401).
I am using the SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator to validate tickets, but it only allows for one SPN to be configured at a time.
How do I configure my application to work with multiple SPNs? Do the SPNs just have to be added to the list with setspn? Or do I need to set up multiple ticket validators?
My question is very similar to this one (which was unanswered):
http://forum.spring.io/forum/spring-projects/security/122250-spring-security-3-kerberos-spn
Thanks so much,
James
Just a quick thought:
You can define two SunJaasKerberosTicketValidator instances, each for its domain and then implement your own KerberosTicketValidator which will delegate to the underlying JAAS validator based on the HTTP request.
You can get to the request from the validator if you use RequestContextListener:
HttpServletRequest request = (HttpServletRequest) ((ServletWebRequest)
RequestContextHolder.currentRequestAttributes()).getNativeRequest();
Pavel is right, just in case of ClassCastException try:
RequestAttributes requestAttributes = RequestContextHolder.currentRequestAttributes();
HttpServletRequest request = ((ServletRequestAttributes) requestAttributes).getRequest()
Related
I'd like to know if and how it is possible to set and update Keycloak (OpenID-Connect) AccessToken or IdToken attributes (so called Claims) by a client web application, after successful authentication.
The use case is to add specific user-attributes (e.g. number of pets, hair color, favorite car, etc.) to the Access- or Id-Token, while the user is logged in to our web application based on a Vue.js Frontend and a SpringBoot Backend, mainly exposing REST Services to the Frontend.
A second web-application, also using the Keycloak Token for user authentication/authorization (Single-Sign-On feature) should be able to read the user-attributes added by the first web-application to the Token.
Even I'm afraid that adding and changing of Token payload is not allowed by architectural design of OpenId-Connect, I nevertheless hope it will be possible anyhow.
Token-attributes are implemented as 'Claims' in OpenId-Connect. And Keycloak supports 'Claim' mappings during the authentication process (set by static mappings on Keycloak server as well as by code that runs on the Keycloak server).
The appropriate methods to set and get Claim key-value pairs are mentioned by the following articles:
How to create a Script Mapper in Keycloak?:
token.getOtherClaims().put("myClaimName", "claim value");
Include user locale to the Keycloak ID token:
Map<String, Object> otherClaims = token.getOtherClaims();
if (otherClaims.containsKey("myClaimName")) {
String claimValue = String.valueOf(otherClaims.get("myClaimName"));
}
For the case changing of Token payload by Keycloak clients is not allowed by architectural design, I appreciate any suggestion on best practices to hand over dynamically added user-attributes from one webapp to another webapp, having the same Keycloak Access- and/or Id-Token in common.
Yes, changing of token payload by user application is not allowed/possible by architectural design. App doesn't own private key, which is required to create proper token signature, when you change payload.
I have a multi-tenant application (springboot keycloak adapter + spring security) secured by Keycloak. Given the multi-tenant nature of the project, I wrote a multi-client connector which works fine.
On the official Keycloak doc, it is recommended (for multi-tenant applications) to model each tenant as a new realm, but for me it works better to have multiple clients within the same same realm. This is due to following advantages:
Client scopes, groups and other configs can be shared
Users don't need to be duplicated on N different realms
SSO login works perfectly within same realm clients (by using bearer
services +CORS)
So, everything works fine except for 1 thing, my initial SSO access_token (which is then shared across all bearer-only services by means of CORS) is kind of big (it shows all the resources - tenants - and its roles within each resource/tenant).
I'd like to limit the size of the access_token, by means of using "scopes" to restrict the roles in the token to only those meaningful to the tenant where I'm logged in at that time. For this, I'm manually firing a Request to the auth server (outside of the standard functionality provided by springboot/spring security) with the goal of manually overwriting whatever access-token exists within my app, with the new one generated by my extra request.
My "new" token request looks similar to this:
SimpleKeycloakAccount currentUserAccount = (SimpleKeycloakAccount) auth.getDetails();
String authServerUrl = currentUserAccount.getKeycloakSecurityContext().getDeployment().getAuthServerBaseUrl();
String realm = currentUserAccount.getKeycloakSecurityContext().getDeployment().getRealm();
String resource = currentUserAccount.getKeycloakSecurityContext().getDeployment().getResourceName();
String refreshToken = currentUserAccount.getKeycloakSecurityContext().getRefreshToken();
String token = currentUserAccount.getKeycloakSecurityContext().getTokenString();
Http http = new Http( new Configuration(authServerUrl, realm, resource,
currentUserAccount.getKeycloakSecurityContext().getDeployment().getResourceCredentials()
, null),
(params, headers) -> {});
String url = authServerUrl + "/realms/" + realm + "/protocol/openid-connect/token";
AccessTokenResponse response = http.<AccessTokenResponse>post(url)
.authentication()
.client()
.form()
.param("grant_type", "refresh_token")
.param("refresh_token", refreshToken)
.param("client_id", resource)
.param("client_secret", "SOME_SECRET")
.param("scope", "SOME_SCOPE_TO_RESTRICT_ROLES")
.response()
.json(AccessTokenResponse.class)
.execute();
// :) - response.getToken() and response.getRefreshToken(), contain new successfully generated tokens
My question is, how can I force my-app to change/reset the standard access-token & refresh_token obtained by the usual means, with these "custom created" tokens? or is that possible at all?
Thx for any feedback!
Further Information
To clarify more, lets analyze the behavior of a typical springboot/spring security project integrated with Keycloak:
You protect your endpoints with "roles" via configurations (either on the application.properties, or on the SecurityContext)
You know that this Spring application talks in the back channel with the Keycloak authorization server, that's how you become the access_token (But all this is a black box for the developer, you only know a Principal was created, a Security Context, Credentials; etc - everything happens behind the curtains)
Considering those 2 points above, imagine that you use an Http library to basically request a new token towards the auth server token endpoint like in the code above (yes filtered by scopes and everything). So the situation now is that though you have created a valid access_token (and refresh_token); since they were created "manually" by firing a request towards the token endpoint, this new token hasn't been "incorporated" to the application because No new Principal has been created, no new security context has been generated, etc. In other words, to the springboot application this new token is non-existent.
What I'm trying to accomplish is to tell sprinboot/spring security: "Hey pal, I know you didn't generate this token yourself, but please accept it and behave as if you'd have created it".
I hope this clarifies the intent of my question.
You can revoke a token using org.springframework.security.oauth2.provider.token.ConsumerTokenServices#revokeToken method.
On the Autorization Server:
#Resource(name="tokenServices")
ConsumerTokenServices tokenServices;
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.POST, value = "/tokens/revoke/{tokenId:.*}")
#ResponseBody
public String revokeToken(#PathVariable String tokenId) {
tokenServices.revokeToken(tokenId);
return tokenId;
}
Of course, you'll have to secure this method since is a very sensitive one.
In the case that each tenant is a separate client you can just use keycloak's "Scope" mapping at each client. Just turn off Full Scope Allowed and your tokens will only contain the user's roles for that specific client (tenant).
"Scope Mappings" is a a non intuitive way of saying "Define what roles should go into the access token" :-)
When turned off the UI changes and you even can configure what other roles of other clients should additionally go into the access token.
Just to give some closure to this question:
No, there doesn't seem to be any elegant or intended way to force a manual token renewal by means of using springboot/spring security keycloak connector.
The Javascript connector can do this trivially like this:
// for creating your keycloak connector
var keycloak = Keycloak({
url: 'http://localhost:8080/auth',
realm: '[YOUR_REALM]',
clientId: '[YOUR_CLIENT]'
});
// for login in (change scopes list to change access capabilities)
var options = {
scope: [EMPTY_STRING_SEPARATED_LIST_OF_SCOPES] // <-- here specify valid scopes
};
keycloak.login(options); // <-- receive a new token with correctly processed scopes
Given how easy it is to do this with the Keycloak client JS adapter, and how obscure it is to do this with the springboot/spring security adapter, it follows following:
Security design seems intended to have 2 (Keycloak security) layers; the first is a front-facing public client (usually password protected), and the 2nd layer is composed of several bearer-only services which would ussually only accept acces-tokens. If for those bearer-only services you want to implement finner grained control via scopes, you achieve that trivially by using a javascript based Keycloak client (other connectors as explained won't deal nicely with the header modification necessary to deal with OAuth2 scopes).
I 'm trying to create a secure spring rest api using pre-authentication security for siteminder.
I 've tried a solution where I 'm getting SM_USER and when I tested it in postman by adding new header SM_USER with random value it seems to work fine.
If you don't provide header I'm getting an error org.springframework.security.web.authentication.preauth.PreAuthenticatedCredentialsNotFoundException: SM_USER header not found in request which is valid.
But how can I be sure that this is secure? if someone knows the URL of my rest api could call this without problem. Should I check something else in spring or only siteminder offers user authentication?
The front-end SiteMinder web agent is the guaranty that the session is valid - you must make sure via server/network configuration that your application cannot be accessed directly without first passing through the SiteMinder web agent.
Also, SiteMinder asserts multiple headers. SM_USER should not be used alone because it can be asserted by the web agent in some circumstances when the user does not actually have a valid session. Instead, you should first look for the existence (non-blank) of SM_SERVERSESSIONID, which only exists if the session is valid.
Lastly, I generally try to avoid SM_USER at all - because SM_USER is actually not a user attribute at all, but rather is "the login identifier used for authentication". If SiteMinder authenticates users via federation (e.g. SAML) or x509 authentication, SM_USER will be rather different than if a login form was used. Instead, its better in SiteMinder to set a "universal id" that is a user attribute, and appears in the headers as SM_UNIVERSALID. Your SiteMinder administrators will know how to do this (and may already have - look to see if you have a SM_UNIVERSALID header available already).
One other caution, in some SiteMinder configurations, the underscore will not be in the header name (use of the underscore is called "legacy" header mode in SiteMinder), so you might want to make your app configurable with respect to the header names, e.g. SMSERVERSESSIONID, SMUSER, SMUNIVERSALID etc.
If you want to programmatically re-validate a session, you can use the SiteMinder Agent API or REST API, or look at my company's product "SSO/Rest" which provides a comprehensive set of uniform REST interfaces to SiteMinder and also other SSO providers (http://www.idfconnect.com).
HTH!
-Richard
Here is my problem:
Context :
-Windows Server 2012 with ActiveDirectory
-Tomcat
-Rest API (Spring)
I'm currently trying to restrict REST request. I want that only specific groups of the AD could access to specific resources. I'm restricted to Kerberos authentication.
System configuration
Create a user in domain "Tomcat"
setspn -a HTTP/apirest.domain#DOMAIN
Generate a tomcat.keytab using ktpass
API rest configuration
I'm using the spring security sample on github that you can find here :
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security-kerberos/tree/master/spring-security-kerberos-samples/sec-server-win-auth
I know that there is an EntryPoint and this is not needed in my context (API Rest). I've chosen this sample because it seems to use the windows authentication context and use it to automatically authenticate me in the spring security context. Right after, an ldap request is send to extract all information about the user logged. In my case, I need to extract the group.
I'm also using :
https://github.com/GyllingSW/kerberos-demo
To extract the role of the user with the class "RoleStrippingLdapUserDetailsMapper.java" instead of the "ActiveDirectoryLdapAuthoritiesPopulator". This implementation also offers localhost authentication but the issue with the NTLM token seems to be fixed in last commit of spring security.
I'm not really sure if this is the right way to do what I want.
My authentication seems to fail and I only have one things going wrong in my logs..
"Property 'userDn' not set - anonymous context will be used for read-write operations"
Questions
Do I have to run my tomcat service using the tomcat account ? (Seems to be, yes)
Am I doing the right things with Kerberos security ?
How can I get rid of the anonymous context?
The anonymous context seems to be set just right after Tomcat start. I want to get a context just after that my user (For instance, user1) requests the rest API (EntryPoint or whatever)
If there is something unclear let me know, I will try to reformulate!
Thanks,
You do not need to query LDAP to get information about which groups does user belong to. Active Directory already adds this information to the Kerberos ticket which is sent from browser to Tomcat.
You just need to extract this information from the token for example using Kerb4J library. It comes with Spring integration inspired by spring-security-kerberos project so it should be pretty easy to switch to it.
If you still want to query LDAP you need to authenticate in LDAP before you can make any queries. Again there's no need to use end-user accounts for it - you can use the keytab file for Kerberos authentication in LDAP and query groups using "Tomcat" account
I found a way to fix my issue.
In a REST API context, you have no entry point. I tried to set my entry point to an unmapped URL, just to do the negociation. By doing this, you will receive an HTTP response with the error code 404 (Not found) but with the right header was added by spring security (WWW-Authenticate).
The web browser will not send the ticket service if the error code is not 401.
To solve this problem, you have to create a CustomEntryPoint class (implements AuthenticationEntryPoint) and you need to override the "commence" method to return a 401 HTTP code with the right header.
I hope that could help. If there is a better way, let me know !
I used Spring and Apache CXF to create a REST webservices application. I'm using x.509 certificates to authenticate the users, and then a custom authorization service to get all of the user groups and details. I've implemented a custom UserDetailsService that extracts the user information and populates a UserDetails object. Part of the process of populating this object involves a request to the corporate authorization service. The authorization service is unfortunately a proprietary system, but at least they provide a Java API. The authorization service, among other things, returns a list of groups that the user belongs to.
I'm still in the development stage, but my observations so far seem to indicate that the UserDetailsService is called once upon initial connection. Then each request uses a cached authorization object.
So my question and potential problem are this... Corporate policy states that applications are only allowed to cache the users authorization details for a set period of time. So, how long does Spring keep these UserDetails objects cached before refreshing them? And, how can I control this cache time to make sure I comply with policy?
There was a ticket submitted for something similar to this request:
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SEC-898
The advice in the ticket is to create your own filter than periodically sets the Authentication.setAuthenticated property to false, forcing a look up of the user. You might be able to achieve the same by setting a smaller session timeout