I'm not sure whether this is a correct place for me to ask, it's about Computer Architecture. But I'm desperate so please pardon me.
Does anyone understand this parallel program? I can't proceed to answer my assignment because of this.
This means that each instruction between PARBEGIN and PAREND should be executed in parallel and the whole block will terminate when every single proc_k has terminated.
So in other words, the program will continue after PAREND as soon as proc_1 to proc_k (executed concurrently) terminated.
It means that Proc_1 to Proc_k execute concurrently. For example, if each needs 2 seconds to be done, the total time to execute Proc_1 to Proc_k is 2 seconds, not 2*k seconds.
Related
I would like to ask you how to specify waiting for closing of specific program which was started before. I am showing here an example with command waitfor but unfortunately I don't know how to write it correctly, therefore I am asking you for help.
system('"C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" &');
waitfor "closing of chrome.exe"
You should follow the advice in this other Q&A to find the PID of the new program right after you start it. Then, in a loop, check to see if that PID is still running (using again the same process as before), and pause(1) to avoid checking too frequently.
I guess you can do something like:
time_in_seconds=60
while ~isfile("output_folder/file.db")
pause(time_in_seconds)
end
Note that this program, as is, requires that file to exist at some point, otherwise infinite loop. Make sure you put safeguards to end it in case the file does not get created (like a time limit).
But I am not sure it makes sense to have MATLAB waiting for 40 minutes for a script to finish...
When I put a "pause" command into my program, I can precede it with a disp("Just finished averaging") or something of the kind, so I can read on the console which "pause" I am at.
But when I lose my patience with a program that's taking forever to complete, and hit Ctrl-C to see what is going on, I cannot see a way of finding out which code line I interrupted it at. The "whereami" command tells me I am in pause, which is obviously true but hardly helpful; it's like a GPS device telling me I'm in the driver seat. Oh yeah, I figured that myself, thank you Captain.
I am tempted to create a dedicated variable, say MyApproximateCurrentCodeLine, and updating it every few lines of code with hard-wired substitution commands. This would work but would take a lot of time to write, a similar amount of time to remove when I'm done, and would have to be repeated with every program I need to debug. Not to mention it's just plain ugly.
Is there a better way of finding the current execution point?
Once you have interrupted the program
[linenum, callername] = where()
will give you the full calling tree.
S.
I have Pari/GP 32-bit and would like to implement any type of code which runs for a limited amount of time, then automatically stops if nothing is produced by that time. Here is a pseudocode example:
command
...
run command
if run time over 3 minutes
automatically interrupt the program and stop running
I know there is a basic way to do this, I just never found it in the PARI/GP guide. Any help? Thanks.
alarm(5);for(i=1,10^10,continue)
I have a shell script which runs very large simulation binaries. This becomes problematic when I want to request some output of variables in the script. For instance, when I run 10 large simulations, I want to be able to print which iteration I am on without having to wait a minute or two for the current simulation to terminate.
Currently, I am using the trap command. However, the script does not react immediately to signals but will only execute the binded function when the current iteration terminates. I will post the code if anyone needs it.
You should start threads for each large thing you're going to run. Have those threads dump results somewhere, then you have your main method free waiting to interrogate the results on the fly.
I want to limit the subprocesses count to 3. Once it hits 3 i wait until one of the processes stops and then execute a new one. I'm using Kernel.fork to start the process.
How do i get the number of running subprocesses? or is there a better way to do this?
A good question, but I don't think there's such a method in Ruby, at least not in the standard library. There's lots of gems out there....
This problem though sounds like a job for the Mutex class. Look up the section Condition Variables here on how to use Ruby's mutexes.
I usually have a Queue of tasks to be done, and then have a couple of threads consuming tasks until they receive an item indicating the end of work. There's an example in "Programming Ruby" under the Thread library. (I'm not sure if I should copy and paste the example to Stack Overflow - sorry)
My solution was to use trap("CLD"), to trap SIGCLD whenever a child process ended and decrease the counter (a global variable) of processes running.