Here is the scenario, I have a dataset with fields Category, Country and NUM_SCHOOLS.
i created a column to populate the country names as columns. I created a row group to calculate the row column. In my current report Column headers(Country) Country1, Country2....so on are displayed and row headers(Category) A, B, C and D are displayed. Values is [Sum(Fields!NUM_SCHOOLS.Value)]. Everything is correctly displayed
I used pipe(|) symbol as the separator between the cells, i am not allowed to post images, i tried my best to explain. Please let me know if you need any information to help me.
Current Report:
Country1 Country2
A 10 | 12
B 5 | 6
C 5 | 7
D 11 | 15
Required report:
Country1 Country2
A 10 | 12
B 5 | 6
C 5 | 7
D 26
Only for D column, i want to add the numbers and display the value as a single value. (11+15=26), for other categories it should display in different country buckets.
Please help me out. Thanks in Advance!
Sum of more than One Columns Quantity of More than one dataset in rdlc.=Sum(Fields!QUANTITY.Value, "Tone")
+Sum(Fields!QUANTITY.Value, "Buffalo")
+Sum(Fields!QUANTITY.Value, "Cow")
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I don't think that you can merge columns across column groups.
I think that the best option is to remove your column grouping and manually add in 7 columns for your receipt frequencies. You'd have to use a Sum with an Iif to get your values correctly, for instance in the far left column, something like:
=Sum(iif(fields!RECIEPT_FREQUENCY.Value="ANNUAL" ,Fields!val.Value,0))
then you could add a merged cell underneath and add the following expression
=Sum(iif(Fields!PART_COUNT.Value="D", Fields!val.Value,0),"DataSetName")
Alternatively, you could leave it as it is and enter the following expression in a total row at the bottom of your matrix. But you would have to do something expression based for the cell borders to give the illusion of it being merged..
=Sum(iif(Fields!PART_COUNT.Value="D"
And fields!RECIEPT_FREQUENCY.Value="BI-WEEKLY"
,Fields!val.Value,0),"DataSetName")
Related
I've been trying to find an answer for this, but haven't succeeded - I need to sum a column for a specified date range, as long as my rowname matches the reference sheet's column name.
i.e
Reference_Sheet
Date John Matt
07/01/19 1 2
07/02/19 1 2
07/03/19 2 1
07/04/19 1 1
07/05/19 3 3
07/06/19 1 2
07/07/19 1 1
07/08/19 5 9
07/09/19 9 2
Sheet1
A B
1 07/01
2 07/07
3 Week1
4 John 10
5 Matt 12
Have to work in google sheets, and I tried using SUMPRODUCT which told me I can't multiply texts and I tried SUMIFS which let me know I can't have different array arguments - failed efforts were similar to below,
=SUMIFS('Reference_Sheet'!B2:AO1000,'Reference_Sheet'!A1:AO1,"=A4",'Reference_Sheet'!A2:A1000,">=B1",'Reference_Sheet'!A2:A1000,"<=B2")
=SUMPRODUCT(('Reference_Sheet'!$A$2:$AO$1000)*('Reference_Sheet'!$A$2:$A$1000>=B$1)*('Reference_Sheet'!$A$2:$A$1000<=B$2)*('Reference_Sheet'!$A$1:$AO$1=$A4))
This might work:
=sumifs(indirect("Reference_Sheet!"&address(2,match(A4,Reference_Sheet!A$1:AO$1,0))&":"&address(100,match(A4,Reference_Sheet!A$1:AO$1,0))),Reference_Sheet!A$2:A$100,">="&B$1,Reference_Sheet!A$2:A$100,"<="&B$2)
But you'll need to specify how many rows down you need it to go. In my formula, it looks down till 100 rows.
To change the number of rows, you need to change the number in three places:
&address(100
Reference_Sheet!A$2:A$100," ... in two places
To briefly explain what is going on:
look for the person's name in row 1 using match
Use address and indirect to build the address of cells to add
and then sumIfs() based on dates.
alternative:
=SUMPRODUCT(QUERY(TRANSPOSE(QUERY($A:$D,
"where A >= date '"&TEXT(F$1, "yyyy-mm-dd")&"'
and A <= date '"&TEXT(F$2, "yyyy-mm-dd")&"'", 1)),
"where Col1 = '"&$E4&"'", 0))
I used "Union" to combine two different subject area in an analysis in OBIEE 11 :
"A" is a column in the first subject area with formula that needs
"A_Dim" to be calculated using "A_Dim" and Case-When (So I Should Use "A_Dim" in first subject area then exclude it in result)
"A" equals to zero in second subject area
"B" is a column in the second subject area
"B" equals to zero in first subject area
"C" is a column in Result (Using Add Result Column) that has this formula :
SUM("A" BY sth ) / SUM("B" BY sth)
("A","B",... replaced with saw_i in result column formula as you know)
the problem is, I can not get top 10 rows ordering by "C" ??
(I tried using RANK, TOPN , TOPN(RANK()),... with no luck)
(and one more thing, there are two problem with using "Narrative view" instead of other views , first they want a bar chart, besides in narrative there is no Exclude option and I should use javaScript to get top 10 from thousands of repeated "C" values)
The original question is old, but I figured I would add my solution in case anyone ends up here like I did.
I was able to create a "Result Column" with my TOPN formula. I did not have to create equivalent columns in the two queries that are being unioned (aka there are 4 columns in each union query but 5 columns in the "Result Columns" overall). It seems to work as expected.
I've searched quite a bit for this and can't find a good solution anywhere to what seems to me like a normal problem for this product.
I've got a data table (in memory) that is from a rollup table(call it 'Ranges'). Basically like so:
id | name | f1 | f2 | totals
0 | Channel1 | 450 | 680 | 51
1 | Channel2 | 890 | 990 | 220
...and so on
Which creates a bar chart with Name on the X and Totals on the Y.
I have another table that is an external link to a large (500M+ rows) table. That table (call it 'Actuals') has a column ('Fc') that can fit inside the F1 and F2 values of Ranges.
I need a way for Spotfire Analyst (v7.x) to use the selection of the the bar chart for Ranges to trigger this select statement:
SELECT * FROM Actuals WHERE Actuals.Fc between [Ranges].[F1] AND [Ranges].[F2]
But there aren't any relationships (Foreign keys) between the two data sources, one is in memory (Ranges) and the other is dynamic loaded.
TLDR: How do I use the selected rows from one visualization as a filter expression for another visualization's data?
My choice for the workaround:
Add a button which says 'Load Selected Data'
This will run the following code, which will store the values of F1 and F2 in a Document Property, which you can then use to filter your Dynamically Loaded table and trigger a refresh (either with the refresh code or by setting it to load automatically).
rowIndexSet=Document.ActiveMarkingSelectionReference.GetSelection(Document.Data.Tables["IL_Ranges"]).AsIndexSet()
if rowIndexSet.IsEmpty != True:
Document.Properties["udF1"] = Document.Data.Tables["IL_Ranges"].Columns["F1"].RowValues.GetFormattedValue(rowIndexSet.First)
Document.Properties["udF2"] = Document.Data.Tables["IL_Ranges"].Columns["F2"].RowValues.GetFormattedValue(rowIndexSet.First)
if Document.Data.Tables.Contains("IL_Actuals")==True:
myTable=Document.Data.Tables["IL_Actuals"]
if myTable.IsRefreshable and myTable.NeedsRefresh:
myTable.Refresh()
This is currently operating on the assumption that you will not allow your user to view multiple ranges at a time, and simply shows the first one selected.
If you DO want to allow them to view multiple ranges, you can run a cursor through your IL_Ranges table to either get the Min and Max for each value, and limit the Actuals between the min and max, or you can create a string that will essentially say 'Fc between 450 and 680 or Fc between 890 and 990', pass that through to a stored procedure as a string, which will execute the quasi-dynamic statement, and grab the resulting dataset.
I am working with Ruby (not Rails) and PostgeSQL and have been banging my head for hours trying to figure out how to assign the value of a field when you know the column and the row you are trying to cross reference.
I have tried the following:
A database containing cities and linked distances similar to:
Cities city1 city2 city3 city4
city1 0 17 13 6
city2 17 0 7 15
city3 . . .
city4 . . .
and I have tried playing around with the following code:
array.each { |city| #array being the array containing the sorted cities
from_city = city
query { |row|
#row is a hash containing each city as key and distance as val
#first row: {"Cities"=>"city1", "city1"=>"0", "city2"=>"17",...
#I have tried doing a row.each and grabbing the value of the specified city key,
but that doesn't work..
}
}
Is there a better way to go about doing this? Basically all I need to know is how I can pull the distance value when I know what two cities I want to use and will assign it to the variable distance.
I'd change your database schema (SQL databases aren't really designed to work by column access, and adding a new column everytime you add a city is really painful to do):
origin | destination | distance
city1 | city2 | 17
... More rows ...
That way looking up the distance between 2 cities is just:
conn.exec_params('SELECT distance from cities where origin = $1 and destination = $2', [city1, city2])
which will return 1 row with 1 column which is the distance between the two.
Alternatively if your data set is small and doesn't change much there's nothing wrong with storing the data as a file and loading it into memory once at startup. Depends on your use case.
Also, if you're going to do lots of geometry computations, PostGIS might be what you want.
I have a view with 2 columns. Both number types. I want to add a button to the page, which will calculate the ration between total of column 1 and total of column 2.
For example:
Column 1 | Column 2
5 | 5
10 | 10
4 | 3
3 | 4
It should be (5+10+4+3)/(5+10+3+4) = 1..
Thank you,
Florin
I would probably go into the view properties and turn on the totals for both those columns. Then in SSJS I'd get a NotesNavigator for that view and then create a NotesViewEntry object. Then I'd set that ViewEntry to the NotesNavigator.getLastEntry()... something like that. That entry should then have a columnValues() property. I THINK it would be something like:
var column1 = entry.getColumnValues()[1];
var column2 = entry.getColumnValues()[2];
Note: getColumnValues() is zero based and depending on the view design some columns might not be available to retrieve from getColumnValues().
Once you have you're 2 var's then you can do the math and do whatever with the result.
That's how I would approach it at least.
(I don't have an editor handy so sorry if some of the syntax is off)