I'm using multimonitor workstation and need emacs running as daemon to assure correct working with multiple frames, for example to avoid ending emacs session after closing a frame.
When I run emacs as daemon I face problem with visuals that usually displays in GUI. Icons and connectors for the dirtree mode and same things for the sr-speedbar mode are replaced with ascii pseudo-graphics as I run emacs under console.
How can I enable GUI visuals even for daemonized emacs?
running emacs as daemon:
emacs --daemon=foo
spawning emacs frames:
emacsclient -c -s foo
emacsclient -c -s foo
emacsclient -c -s foo
All commands are run from GUI where DISPLAY variable is set
Related
I have a application that launches xterm and dumps uart logs. I am able to see it launch and dump the logs in the GUI. However, Using a remote session I want the xterm output to be running as a background process somewhere so that I can switch back and forth within a single terminal.
Using GUI
Using remote terminal (SSH)
$ xterm
xterm: Xt error: Can't open display: :0
I tried to do something like, but failed to work -
alias xterm="/bin/bash -c"
I don't want to have X forwarding and launch a window on my local machine as well.
If you just need the logs, you most likely don't need an X server or xterm.
You can simply run the target command itself. From your screenshot it looks like the command might be telnet 127.0.0.1 <port_number>. You can find it from the script that your application launches, or with ps -ef when it's running. If it's an UART, then you can also use minicom or socat to connect directly to serial port without any extra programs. This way, you don't even need telnet.
You can combine this command with either screen or tmux so that it's running in the background and you can switch to it from any terminal or console. Just run screen with no arguments, then run the command on virtual screen. Detach with CTRL-a d, and your command will continue to run in the background ready for you to reconnect to it at any time with screen -r.
Moreover, screen can also connect to serial port directly so you get two for the price of one.
The thing with xterm is that it will not write the logs anywhere except in the graphics buffer, and even there it will be only as flashing pixels which is not suitable for any processing. If you insist on going that way, you have several options:
Change the script that application runs (might not be possible depending on your situation)
Replace /usr/bin/xterm with your dummy script that just runs bash instead of xterm, and redirects the output to a file (ugly, but you could probably avoid breaking other applications by changing PATH and putting it somewhere else). In your script, you can use bash's redirection features such as >, or pipe output to tee.
Start a VNC server in the background and set the DISPLAY environment variable when you run your application to the number of virtual screen. In this case, any windows from application will open on VNC virtual screen and you can connect to it as you please.
Use xvfb as a dummy X server and combine it with xterm logging, etc.
Solution 1: Fake xterm on X11-less systems
You can also create a wrapper script that replaces xterm with another function. Test this out on a laptop with X11:
$ function xterm {
echo "hello $#"
}
$ xterm world 1
hello world 1
$ export -f xterm
$ /bin/xterm # opens a new xterm session
$ xterm world 2 # commands executed in second terminal
hello world 2
This means that you've replaced the command xterm for a function in all of the child processes.
Now, if you already know that your script will work in a terminal without xterm, you could create a function that accepts all of the parameters and executes it. No need for complicated screen stuff or replacing /usr/bin/xterm.
Solution 2: Dump UART data for the winz
If you want to save all of the uart data into a file, this is easily fixed by creating a screen session and a log file. Below the command will create a session named myscreensessionname that listens on the serial connection /dev/ttyUSB0 and writes its data to /home/$USER/myscreensessionname.log.
$ screen -dmS myscreensessionname -L -Logfile /home/$USER \
/myscreensessionname.log /dev/ttyUSB0 115200
Note that if you're going to use multiple screen sessions, you might want to use serial ids instead of /dev/ttyUSB0. You can identify the connections with udevadmin as follows.
$ udevadm info --name=/dev/ttyUSB0 | grep 'by-id'
S: serial/by-id/usb-FTDI_TTL232R-3V3_FTBDBIQ7-if00-port0
E: DEVLINKS=/dev/serial/by-id/usb-FTDI_TTL232R-3V3_FTBDBIQ7-if00-port0 /dev/serial/by-path/pci-0000:00:14.0-usb-0:4.4.4.1:1.0-port0
Here, instead of /dev/ttyUSB0, I would make use of /dev/serial/by-id/usb-FTDI_TTL232R-3V3_FTBDBIQ7-if00-port0.
EDIT:
You can attach the screen session with the following command. Once in the screen session, press crtl+a, and press d to detach.
$ screen -Dr myscreensessionname
To view all of your screen sessions:
$ screen -list
There is a screen on:
2382.myscreensessionname (04/02/2021 10:32:07 PM) (Attached)
1 Socket in /run/screen/S-user.
I am trying to open multiple tabs and execute a series of commands in each tab. Lets say I open 3 tabs tab1, tab2, tab3. Then in each tab I would like to execute following:
ssh user#address (PublicKey Authentication is setup and
hence no need to enter password)
Launch python scripts (python some.py)
Hold the tab open after executing the commands to see the outputs.
I went through some threads and have a rough outline for Bash script.
#!/bin/bash
echo "Script running"
gnome-terminal -e "bash -c \"ssh user#address; uname -a; exec bash\""
When I run the above script, a new terminal opens and I can see that I have ssh-ed into the target address but the other command uname -a didnot execute.
I would like to build upon this to implement the following:
Open multiple tabs and run commands. Ex : gnome-terminal --tab -e
"bash -c \"ssh user#address; python file1.py; exec bash\"" -tab -e
"bash -c \"ssh user#address; python file2.py; exec bash\""
Wait for one of the python file to start executing before opening
another tab and repeating the process for another python file.
Also is there a better way to implement the same task ?
The above code snippet was from this thread.
You should consider using screen or tmux or a similar terminal multiplexer for this.
Example usage:
screen -d -m bash -c 'ls; bash'
to initiate a screen session in which ls was executed and then a shell started, and then
screen -X screen bash -c 'date; bash'
to create a new window in the existing screen session, run date therein and then start a shell in that window.
Mind that the programs are run without you seeing their output right away on your controlling terminal. You can then attach to the screen session using
screen -x
Which attach you to the running session and will show you one of the screen windows (the virtual terminals of your two running programs). Typing Ctrl-A n will switch through the windows, Ctrl-A d will detach you again, leaving the programs running, so you can attach later with screen -x.
You can attach from several locations (e. g. from two different Gnome-terminals) to the same running windows. Both will then show the same contents.
Another advantage of using screen is that you can log out and the programs keep running. If you later login again, you can still attach to the running sessions.
Only a direct attack like a reboot, a kill-signal or an interaction (like pressing Ctrl-C while being attached) will terminate your programs then.
I have a game server running in an xterm window.
Once daily I'd like to send a warning message to any players followed after a delay by the stop command to the program inside the xterm window from a script running on a schedule. This causes the cleanup and save functions to run automatically.
Once the program shuts down I can bring it back up easily but I don't know how to send the warning and stop commands first.
Typed directly into xterm the commands are:
broadcast Reboot in 2 minutes
(followed by a 2 minute wait and then simply):
stop
no / or other characters required.
Any help?
Do you also need to type something from the xterm itself (from time to time) or do you want your server to be fully driven from external commands?
Is your program line-oriented? You may first try something like:
mkfifo /tmp/f
tail -f /tmp/f | myprogram
and then try to send commands to your program (from another xterm) with
echo "mycommand" > /tmp/f
You may also consider using netcat for turning your program to a server:
Turn simple C program into server using netcat
http://lifehacker.com/202271/roll-your-own-servers-with-netcat
http://nc110.sourceforge.net/
Then you could write a shell script for sending the required commands to your "server".
If you know a little about C programming; I remember having once hacked the script program (which was very easy to do: code is short) in order to launch another program but to read commands from a FIFO file (then again a shell script would be easy to write for driving your program).
Something you might try is running your program inside a screen session.
You can then send commands to the session from cron that will be just
as if you typed them.
In your xterm, before launching the program do:
screen -S myscreen bash
(or you can even replace bash by your program). Then from your cron
screen -S myscreen -X stuff 'broadcast Reboot in 2 minutes\n'
sleep 120
screen -S myscreen -X stuff 'stop\n'
will enter that text. You can exit the session using screen -S myscreen -X quit
or by typing ctrl-a \.
screen is intended to be transparent. To easily see you are inside screen, you can
configure a permanent status bar at the bottom of your xterm:
echo 'hardstatus alwayslastline' >~/.screenrc
Now when you run screen you should see a reverse video bottom line. Depending
on your OS it may be empty.
I'm using gdb to debug a parallel mpi-code 'prog'. For that I use a small number of processes, say 'M' and do something like
mpiexec -n M xterm -e gdb ./prog
This pops up M xterms with each of them running one gdb process on one of the files prog.
The resulting cluttering of the screen by individual windows can be rather cumbersome.
Is there any way, using any known split-window terminal emulator (say, terminator), such as to have the M gdb processes starting up in only one window, however split into M parts from start?
I faced a similar problem and have found tmpi which does exactly what you want: launch mpi debugging processes in M tmux terminal windows.
Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/Azrael3000/tmpi.git
then install with:
sudo ./tmpi/install.sh
which places the tmpi executable in /usr/local/bin
The tmpi executable and tmux must be in the path on all your servers.
Run a job with:
tmpi M gdb my_executable
where M is the number of processes that you want.
What you want is called a 'terminal multiplexer'; look into screen or tmux
EDIT: this is probably what you want; issue the following commands in your shell
tmux new-session -d bash # start a bash shell
tmux split-window -v python # start a python shell below it
tmux attach-session -d # enter the tmux session
I have two xterms and several gnome-terminal windows active on my X display.
However, xlsclients only shows one gnome-terminal client.
$ xlsclients
luban.local /usr/X11/bin/xterm
ohm gnome-terminal
luban.local xterm
How can I get a list of the gnome-terminal sessions attached to my display?
This option will run the new terminal window in its own process and as a distinct X client.
--disable-factory
These options
--instance=foo --class=bar
provide a convenient hook to distinguish between sessions:
$ xlsclients -l
...
Window 0x3000001:
Machine: ohm
Name: Terminal
Icon Name: foo
Command: foo
Instance/Class: foo/bar
This is correct; gnome-terminal (like konsole) starts just a single process. If you ask for a second console, the process opens a new window but doesn't start another process just for that window (unlike xterm). This saves a lot of memory and resources.