I have a controller named CommentsController and 2 views, the first named searchProducts and the second named searchCategories
in the controller i used:
public function getSearchproducts() {
...
}
public function getSearchcategories() {
...
}
.... so the url generated is /comments/searchproducts and /comments/searchcategories...
i want to use urls like '/comments/serach-products' or '/comments/serach_products' is it possible using controllers ??
If your controller action contains multiple words, you may access the
action using "dash" syntax in the URI.
This is mentioned in RESTful Controllers section. So, comments/searchproducts could be used as
comments/search-products
And method would be
public function getSearchProducts() {}
Same for getSearchcategories, url could be comments/search-categories and method
public function getSearchCategories() {}
If you need to change the way your routes are built, you'll have to do them manually:
Route::get('search-products',
array(
'as' => 'search.products',
'uses' => 'CommentsController#getSearchproducts'
)
);
And then, when you do
URL::route('search-products')
It will generate a URI
yoursite/search-products
I'm not really fan of resourceful controllers, I always create them manually, and nor is Phil Sturgeon as you can see in this post.
Related
I have question about syntax which I can not find an answer for.
I have code in routes file:
Route::get(
'/something/{seoString}/{someMore}',
['as' => 'my_name', 'uses' => '\my\namespace\MyController#index', 'my_route_action' => 20]
);
And I would like to rewrite it using the new syntax for calling controller
Route::get(
'/something/{seoString}/{someMore}',
[MyController#::class, 'index'] // would like to use this new syntax
);
And it works fine, but how can I add the custom route action 'my_route_action'?
I know it's possible to wrap the routes with a group and add it this way:
Route::group(['my_route_action' => 20], static function () {
Route::get(
'/something/{seoString}/{someMore}',
[MyController#::class, 'index'] // would like to use this new syntax
);
);
But that's not what I'm looking for. I don't want to be adding one group for each route just to add the route action.
So I wanted to ask if it does exist something like ->addCustomAction() or how is this supposed to be done?
Unfortunately the route action is not a thing, and probably shouldn't be. Unsure what you're actually trying to achieve with that too.
If you're passing in GET data like a bit of data, you can do it through: {variable} so the URL would become the following:
Route::get('my-route-url/{model}/get', [MyController::class, 'methodName')->name('something')->middleware(['something'])
And in your controller, you dependency inject request if you're wanting to use that too, as well as the model:
public function methodName(Request $request, Model $model)
{
dd($request->all(), $model);
}
The "as" is the the name method. Middleware is still middleware.
If you're trying to do a Key/Pair bit of data, you need to use POST request and pass it in the data, which you can access via the $request->input('keyName') method in the controller.
Since 2 weeks I work in a projet of devlopment of a application. I must creat many CRUD and it may take many times. Now I want to know if I can use a free crud generator laravel.If yes, which generator?
Need your Help please.
Command:
php artisan make:model User -mrc
RESTful Resource controller
A RESTful resource controller sets up some default routes for you and even names them.
Route::resource('users', 'UsersController');
Gives you these named routes:
Verb Path Action Route Name
GET /users index users.index
GET /users/create create users.create
POST /users store users.store
GET /users/{user} show users.show
GET /users/{user}/edit edit users.edit
PUT|PATCH /users/{user} update users.update
DELETE /users/{user} destroy users.destroy
And you would set up your controller something like this (actions = methods)
class UsersController extends BaseController {
public function index() {}
public function show($id) {}
public function store() {}
}
You can also choose what actions are included or excluded like this:
Route::resource('users', 'UsersController', [
'only' => ['index', 'show']
]);
Route::resource('monkeys', 'MonkeysController', [
'except' => ['edit', 'create']
]);
RESTful Resource Controller documentation
Implicit controller
An Implicit controller is more flexible. You get routed to your controller methods based on the HTTP request type and name. However, you don't have route names defined for you and it will catch all subfolders for the same route.
Route::controller('users', 'UserController');
Would lead you to set up the controller with a sort of RESTful naming scheme:
class UserController extends BaseController {
public function getIndex()
{
// GET request to index
}
public function getShow($id)
{
// get request to 'users/show/{id}'
}
public function postStore()
{
// POST request to 'users/store'
}
}
Implicit Controller documentation
It is good practice to use what you need, as per your preference. I personally don't like the Implicit controllers, because they can be messy, don't provide names and can be confusing when using php artisan routes. I typically use RESTful Resource controllers in combination with explicit routes.
Laravel already provides CRUD operation see: laravel.com/docs/5.8/controllers#resource-controllers
Laravel resource routing assigns the typical "CRUD" routes to a controller with a single line of code. For example, you may wish to create a controller that handles all HTTP requests for "photos" stored by your application. Using the make:controller Artisan command, we can quickly create such a controller:
php artisan make:controller PhotoController --resource
[EDIT 1]
Or you can choose for example: Laravel-Backpack/CRUD which comes with an Admin panel and others things like that.
[EDIT 2]
Also you can refer this Laravel blog to choose a generator:
https://laravel-news.com/13-laravel-admin-panel-generators
[EDIT 3]
Again on Laravel Blog you can see that Laravel is constantly evolving a new Artisan command have been added see:
laravel-news.com/laravel-resources-artisan-command
I am trying to add a new route to my application and can't seem to get it to work. I keep getting a 404 error. It looks like the physical path is looking at the wrong directory. Currently looking at D:\Web\FormMapper\blog\public\forms but should be looking at D:\Web\FormMapper\blog\resources\view\layout\pages\forms.blade.php
My request URL:
http://localhost/FormMapper/ /works fine
http://localhost/FormMapper/forms /doesn't work
http://localhost/FormMapper/forms.php /No input file specified.
my FormsController:
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
class FormsController extends Controller
{
public function index()
{
return view('layouts.pages.forms');
}
}
My web.php:
Route::get('/', function () {
return view('layouts/pages/login');
});
Route::get('/forms', 'FormsController#index');
My folder structure looks like this:
My config/view.php
return [
'paths' => [
resource_path('views'),
],
'compiled' => env(
'VIEW_COMPILED_PATH',
realpath(storage_path('framework/views'))
),
];
you must use dot for this. In your controller change to this:
return view('layouts.pages.forms');
If your route only needs to return a view, you may use the Route::view method. Like the redirect method, this method provides a simple shortcut so that you do not have to define a full route or controller. The view method accepts a URI as its first argument and a view name as its second argument. In addition, you may provide an array of data to pass to the view as an optional third argument:
Route::view('/', 'layouts.pages.login');
Route::view('/forms', 'layouts.pages.forms', ['foo' => 'bar']);
Check docs
After tracking digging deeper I determined that the issue was that IIS requires URL rewrite rules in place for Laravel to work properly. The index.php and '/' route would work b/c it was the default page but any other pages wouldn't. To test this I used the
php artisan serve
approach to it. and everything worked properly. Unfortunately I am unable to do this in production so I needed to get it to work with IIS.
I am attempting to create a route in Laravel for a dynamic URL to load a particular controller action. I am able to get it to route to a controller using the following code:
Route::get('/something.html', array('uses' => 'MyController#getView'));
What I am having trouble figuring out is how I can pass a variable from this route to the controller. In this case I would like to pass along an id value to the controller action.
Is this possible in Laravel? Is there another way to do this?
You are not giving us enough information, so you need to ask yourself two basic questions: where this information coming from? Can you have access to this information inside your controller without passing it via the routes.php file?
If you are about to produce this information somehow in your ´routes.php´ file:
$information = WhateverService::getInformation();
You cannot pass it here to your controller, because your controller is not really being fired in this file, this is just a list of available routes, wich may or may not be hit at some point. When a route is hit, Laravel will fire the route via another internal service.
But you probably will be able to use the very same line of code in your controller:
class MyController extends BaseController {
function getView()
{
$information = WhateverService::getInformation();
return View::make('myview')->with(compact('information'));
}
}
In MVC, Controllers are meant to receive HTTP requests and produce information via Models (or services or repositores) to pass to your Views, which can produce new web pages.
If this information is something you have in your page and you want to sneak it to your something.html route, use a POST method instead of GET:
Route::post('/something.html', array('uses' => 'MyController#getView'));
And inside your controller receive that information via:
class MyController extends BaseController {
function getView()
{
$information = Input::get('information');
return View::make('myview')->with(compact('information'));
}
}
I read the docs on the Laravel website, Stack Overflow, and Google but still don't understand the difference between Route::resource and Route::controller.
One of the answers said Route::resource was for crud. However, with Route::controller we can accomplish the same thing as with Route::resource and we can specify only the needed actions.
They appear to be like siblings:
Route::controller('post','PostController');
Route::resource('post','PostController');
How we can choose what to use? What is good practice?
RESTful Resource controller
A RESTful resource controller sets up some default routes for you and even names them.
Route::resource('users', 'UsersController');
Gives you these named routes:
Verb Path Action Route Name
GET /users index users.index
GET /users/create create users.create
POST /users store users.store
GET /users/{user} show users.show
GET /users/{user}/edit edit users.edit
PUT|PATCH /users/{user} update users.update
DELETE /users/{user} destroy users.destroy
And you would set up your controller something like this (actions = methods)
class UsersController extends BaseController {
public function index() {}
public function show($id) {}
public function store() {}
}
You can also choose what actions are included or excluded like this:
Route::resource('users', 'UsersController', [
'only' => ['index', 'show']
]);
Route::resource('monkeys', 'MonkeysController', [
'except' => ['edit', 'create']
]);
API Resource controller
Laravel 5.5 added another method for dealing with routes for resource controllers. API Resource Controller acts exactly like shown above, but does not register create and edit routes. It is meant to be used for ease of mapping routes used in RESTful APIs - where you typically do not have any kind of data located in create nor edit methods.
Route::apiResource('users', 'UsersController');
RESTful Resource Controller documentation
Implicit controller
An Implicit controller is more flexible. You get routed to your controller methods based on the HTTP request type and name. However, you don't have route names defined for you and it will catch all subfolders for the same route.
Route::controller('users', 'UserController');
Would lead you to set up the controller with a sort of RESTful naming scheme:
class UserController extends BaseController {
public function getIndex()
{
// GET request to index
}
public function getShow($id)
{
// get request to 'users/show/{id}'
}
public function postStore()
{
// POST request to 'users/store'
}
}
Implicit Controller documentation
It is good practice to use what you need, as per your preference. I personally don't like the Implicit controllers, because they can be messy, don't provide names and can be confusing when using php artisan routes. I typically use RESTful Resource controllers in combination with explicit routes.
For route controller method we have to define only one route. In get or post method we have to define the route separately.
And the resources method is used to creates multiple routes to handle a variety of Restful actions.
Here the Laravel documentation about this.
i'm using Laravel 8 in my project
and in my route file web.php
i add this route
Route::controller(SitesController::class)->group(function() {
Route::get('index', 'index')->name('index');
}
in the Route::controller group we pass controller name we will use
inside the group we define the route we'll use as below syntax
Route::method-used('prefix in the URL', 'function used in the specified controller ')->name(); if the name not used in your code just delete it